The spectrum of neutralizing and non-neutralizing anti-FVIII antibodies in a nationwide cohort of 788 persons with hemophilia A.

Objectives: Anti-factor VIII (FVIII) antibodies have been reported to exhibit both neutralizing and non-neutralizing characteristics. This is the first study investigating the full spectrum of FVIII-specific antibodies, including non-neutralizing antibodies, very-low titer inhibitors, and inhibitors, in a large nationwide population of persons with hemophilia A of all severities. Methods: All persons with hemophilia A (mild (FVIII > 5-40 IU/dL)/moderate [FVIII 1-5 IU/dL)/severe (FVIII < 1 IU/dL)] with an available plasma sample who participated in the sixth Hemophilia in the Netherlands study between 2018 and 2019 were included. The presence of anti-FVIII antibodies of the immunoglobulin A, M, and G isotypes and IgG subclasses, along with antibody titer levels, were assessed using direct-binding ELISAs. FVIII specificity was assessed using a competition-based ELISA approach. The inhibitor status was determined using the Nijmegen ultra-sensitive Bethesda assay (NusBA) and the Nijmegen Bethesda assay (NBA). Results: In total, 788 persons with hemophilia A (336 (42.6%) mild, 123 (15.6%) moderate, 329 (41.8%) severe hemophilia) were included. The median age was 45 years (IQR 24-60), and the majority (50.9%) had over 150 exposure days to FVIII concentrates. Within our population, 144 (18.3%) individuals had non-neutralizing FVIII-specific antibodies, 10 (1.3%) had very low-titer inhibitors (NusBA positive; NBA negative), and 13 (1.6%) had inhibitors (both NusBA and NBA positive). IgG1 was the most abundant FVIII-specific antibody subclass, and the highest titer levels were found for IgG4. In individuals without a reported history of inhibitor development, no clear differences were observed in antibody patterns between those who were minimally or highly exposed to FVIII concentrates. IgG4 subclass antibodies were only observed in persons with a reported history of FVIII inhibitor or in those with a currently detected (very low-titer) inhibitor. Conclusion: In this cross-sectional study, we identified non-neutralizing antibodies in a relatively large proportion of persons with hemophilia A. In contrast, in our population, consisting of persons highly exposed to FVIII concentrates, (very low-titer) inhibitors were detected only in a small proportion of persons, reflecting a well-tolerized population. Hence, our findings suggest that only a small subpopulation of non-neutralizing FVIII-specific antibodies is associated with clinically relevant inhibitors.

Prospective Hemophilia Inhibitor PUP Study reveals distinct antibody signatures during FVIII inhibitor eradication.

Factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitor formation is a major clinical concern during replacement therapy in patients with hemophilia A. Immune tolerance induction (ITI) is the only therapeutic approach to attempt inhibitor eradication and establishment of long-term immune tolerance to FVIII. Hemophilia Inhibitor Previously Untreated Patient (PUP) Study (HIPS) was a prospective clinical trial to investigate changes in the immune system of PUPs with severe hemophilia A. Five patients who developed persistent FVIII inhibitors during HIPS entered an ITI extension arm (HIPS-ITI). During HIPS-ITI, inhibitor patients received ITI with the same FVIII product (a single source of recombinant, human full-length FVIII) used in HIPS until successful tolerance, declared failure, or a maximum of 2 years after HIPS-ITI enrollment, whichever came first. Blood samples and clinical data were collected monthly. Longitudinal FVIII-binding antibody signatures, associated binding specificities, and apparent affinities were determined for each patient at each sampling time point. ITI was successful or partially successful in 2 patients and failed in 3. Both groups presented with distinct FVIII-specific antibody signatures. ITI success required the disappearance of FVIII inhibitors, which was associated with the eradication or sustained titer minimization of high-affinity FVIII-specific antibodies, particularly of the immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) and IgG4 subclasses. In contrast, ITI failure, as reflected by FVIII inhibitor persistence, was associated with persistent high-affinity FVIII-specific antibodies. Interestingly, 1 patient with partial ITI success and 1 patient with ITI failure developed apparent oligoreactive FVIII-binding antibodies during ITI. The explanation of the true nature of these antibodies requires more comprehensive follow-ups in future studies. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01652027.