Reassessment of low- and intermediate-risk endometrial cancer reports by gynecological pathologists increases risk classification without impacting outcome.

OBJECTIVES: A lack of agreement is often observed in pathological reviews performed by specialized and general pathologists. Four histopathological variables influence the risk classification of endometrial cancer: histological type; histological grade; myometrial invasion; lymph-vascular space invasion (LVSI). This study aimed to evaluate if changes in the risk classification after a specialized pathological review of low- and intermediate-risk endometrial cancer (LIREC) samples may impact disease-free survival (DFS). METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 195 patients diagnosed with LIREC at Barretos Cancer Hospital was obtained. Two gynecologic pathologists re-evaluated the pathological reports. Through the histology report reviewed, we could determine their new risk classification. The Kappa concordance score was used to verify the concordance between the general's and specialized pathologists' reports, and the new risk classification was correlated with the patients' DFS. RESULTS: The final reports led to changes in the histological type, histological grade, myometrial invasion, and lymphovascular space invasion in 13.3 %, 62,8%, 18.3 %, and 11.1 % of cases, respectively. The Kappa concordance score for all variables was less than 0.7. In 54 patients (30 %), the risk classification was modified (κ = 0.396), of which 30 (55.5 %) cases upstaged. There was no difference in DFS for patients who had an upstaging in their European Society of Medical Oncology modified classification compared to those who maintained their initial risk classification (86.7 % vs 88.0 %, p = 0.77). CONCLUSION: Despite the differences in the reports reassessed by expert gynecological pathologists and the change (30%) in patients' risk classification, there was no difference in their DFS.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with six cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel in advanced ovarian cancer patients unsuitable for primary surgery: Safety and effectiveness.

OBJECTIVE: Three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by interval debulking (ID) surgery is an alternative for patients with advanced ovarian cancer unresectable disease. This study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of six cycles of NACT followed by cytoreduction. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer, tubal carcinoma, or primary peritoneal carcinoma treated with platinum based NACT between January 2008 and February 2012. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients underwent NACT; 78% and 18.2% had extensive stage IIIC or IV disease at diagnosis, respectively. Their median age was 60 years (41-82). On histology, serous adenocarcinoma was found in 90.2%. Patients did not receive chemotherapy after debulking surgery. 35.4% suffered grade 3/4 toxicity; the most commonly observed toxicities were hematologic and nausea. After NACT, 23.1% experienced clinical complete response, 57.4% partial response, and 12.1% disease progression. Complete resection of all macroscopic and microscopic disease (R0) was performed in 63.7%. Surgical complications were uncommon; however, four (6.2%) patients needed a second procedure due to operative complications and 18 (27.3%) needed blood transfusion after debulking. Over a median follow-up period of 19.2 months, median overall survival and chemotherapy-free interval were 37.5 months (confidence interval not reached) and 16 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: Six cycles of neoadjuvant carboplatin and paclitaxel was safe and effective and did not increase perioperative or postoperative complications in patients with stage IIIC/IV disease who were unsuitable for optimal PDS. The overall survival of this cohort was higher than that of those treated with ID surgery.