A pilot study to assess the utility of a freely downloadable mobile application simulator for undergraduate clinical skills training: a single-blinded, randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Medical simulators offer an invaluable educational resource for medical trainees. However, owing to cost and portability restrictions, they have traditionally been limited to simulation centres. With the advent of sophisticated mobile technology, simulators have become cheaper and more accessible. Touch Surgery is one such freely downloadable mobile application simulator (MAS) used by over one million healthcare professionals worldwide. Nevertheless, to date, it has never been formally validated as an adjunct in undergraduate medical education. METHODS: Medical students in the final 3 years of their programme were recruited and randomised to one of three revision interventions: 1) no formal revision resources, 2) traditional revision resources, or 3) MAS. Students completed pre-test questionnaires and were then assessed on their ability to complete an undisclosed male urinary catheterisation scenario. Following a one-hour quarantined revision period, all students repeated the scenario. Both attempts were scored by allocation-blinded examiners against an objective 46-point mark scheme. RESULTS: A total of 27 medical students were randomised (n = 9 per group). Mean scores improved between baseline and post-revision attempts by 8.7% (p = 0.003), 19.8% (p = 0.0001), and 15.9% (p = 0.001) for no resources, traditional resources, and MAS, respectively. However, when comparing mean score improvements between groups there were no significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: Mobile simulators offer an unconventional, yet potentially useful adjunct to enhance undergraduate clinical skills education. Our results indicate that MAS's perform comparably to current gold-standard revision resources; however, they may confer significant advantages in terms of cost-effectiveness and practice flexibility. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable.

Polymorphisms in the IL-18 and IL-12B genes and their association with the clinical outcome in Croatian patients with Type 1 diabetes.

Genetic variants of IL-18 and IL-12B may be important in immunoregulatory abnormalities, observed in the patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), that contribute to individual differences in response to a treatment. Therefore, we examined the significance of IL-18-137G/C, IL-18-607C/A, and IL-12B A/C polymorphisms in Croatians (187 patients, 236 controls), not only as factors that contribute to susceptibility to T1DM, but also as determinants of the clinical presentation of disease. The polymorphism screening has been performed using PCR sequence-specific primers (IL-18) or PCR-RFLP (IL-12B) approach. Results were evaluated by GraphPad Prism and Sigma Stat 3.5, Arlequin software and calculator for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. The genotype, allele and haplotype distribution were not statistically different between the patients and control subjects. The clinical parameter analysis revealed that patients with minor alleles at each locus, IL-18-137C/-607A, were significantly younger at T1DM onset than carriers of major alleles, IL-18-137G/-607C (20 vs 23.5 years). Moreover, the concomitant presence of minor alleles not only of IL-18 but also of IL-12B, is associated with the risk of disease progression even at younger age. These patients developed diabetes at 16 years of age, what is significantly earlier (p=0.044) compared to 25.5 years of age in patients with common alleles IL-18-137G/-607C/IL-12B A. Furthermore, combined genotype analysis of IL-18 and IL-12B has pointed out that patients with CC/AA/AA genotype have the worst glucose control based on HbA1c (8.7%, range 6.8-13.1%). In conclusion, susceptibility to T1DM in Croatians is not strongly associated with IL-18-137/-607 and IL-12B polymorphisms. These SNPs are associated with the higher risk of earlier disease development and might be implicated in the effectiveness of glycemic control.