Evaluating Combinations of Biological and Clinicopathologic Factors Linked to Poor Outcomes in Resected Colorectal Liver Metastasis: An External Validation Study.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have suggested that certain combinations of KRAS or BRAF biomarkers with clinical factors are associated with poor outcomes and may indicate that surgery could be "biologically" futile in otherwise technically resectable colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). However, these combinations have yet to be validated through external studies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic search to identify these studies. The overall survival (OS) of patients with these combinations was evaluated in a cohort of patients treated at 11 tertiary centers. Additionally, the study investigated whether using high-risk KRAS point mutations in these combinations could be associated with particularly poor outcomes. RESULTS: The recommendations of four studies were validated in 1661 patients. The first three studies utilized KRAS, and their validation showed the following median and 5-year OS: (1) 30 months and 16.9%, (2) 24.3 months and 21.6%, and (3) 46.8 months and 44.4%, respectively. When analyzing only patients with high-risk KRAS mutations, median and 5-year OS decreased to: (1) 26.2 months and 0%, (2) 22.3 months and 15.1%, and (3) not reached and 44.9%, respectively. The fourth study utilized BRAF, and its validation showed a median OS of 10.4 months, with no survivors beyond 21 months. CONCLUSION: The combinations of biomarkers and clinical factors proposed to render surgery for CRLM futile, as presented in studies 1 (KRAS high-risk mutations) and 4, appear justified. In these studies, there were no long-term survivors, and survival was similar to that of historic cohorts with similar mutational profiles that received systemic therapies alone for unresectable disease.

Current Evidence on the Diagnosis and Management of Spilled Gallstones Post-laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Despite improvements in intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), spilled gallstones after LC remains a significant yet often overlooked complication, occurring around 1-40% of cases. This review discusses the most recent updates in risk factors, presentations, complications, diagnosis, management, and prognosis for spilled gallstones post-LC. METHODS: A comprehensive systematic review was performed using Medline/PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science databases, with the range of search date being between Jan 2015 and July 2024, regarding spilled gallstone incidence, management, and complications. RESULTS: Risk factors for spilled gallstones (SG) post-LC are intraoperative gallbladder perforation due to poor operational environment, quantity, size, type of stones (pigment, cholesterol-rich, or mixed), presence of adhesions or anatomic variations, and insufficient surgical training. 60% of SG complications are abscesses from bacterial infections, which can progress to peritonitis, fistulas, lung/liver abscesses, and choledocholithiasis. SGs are associated with delayed presentation of unexpected clinical problems, with even diagnosis. Although treatment depends on the severity of the complication, when SGs are identified through imaging, often through ultrasound (US) and computed tomography, minimally invasive approaches and antibiotic courses are viable first-line approaches. CONCLUSION: Although LC-associated spillage of gallstones are rare, the complications can be a serious cause of morbidity. Therefore, having proper notification of operative complications, a high index of suspicion for patients with prior history of LC, and awareness of proper diagnostic modalities is key to early diagnosis and prevention of SG-related complications.

Clinical Outcomes, Costs, and Value of Surgery Among Older Patients with Colon Cancer at US News and World Report Ranked Versus Unranked Hospitals.

BACKGROUND: US News and World Report (USNWR) hospital rankings influence patient choice of hospital, but their association with surgical outcomes remains ill-defined. We sought to characterize clinical outcomes and costs of surgery for colon cancer among USNWR top ranked and unranked hospitals. METHODS: Using Medicare Standard Analytic Files, patients aged ≥65 years undergoing surgery for colon cancer were identified. Hospitals were categorized as 'ranked' or 'unranked' based on USNWR cancer hospital rankings. One-to-one matching was performed between patients treated at ranked and unranked hospitals, and clinical outcomes and costs of surgery were compared. RESULTS: Among 50 ranked and 2522 unranked hospitals, 13,650 patient pairs were compared. Overall, 30-day mortality was 2.13% in ranked hospitals versus 3.68% in unranked hospitals (p < 0.0001), and the overall paired cost difference was $8159 (p < 0.0001). As patient risk increased, 30-day mortality differences became larger, with the ranked hospitals having 30-day mortality of 7.59% versus 11.84% for unranked hospitals among the highest-risk patients (p < 0.0001). Overall paired cost differences also increased with increasing patient risk, with cost of care being $72,229 for ranked hospitals versus $56,512 for unranked hospitals among the highest-risk patients (difference = $14,394; p = 0.02). The difference in cost per 1% reduction in 30-day mortality was $9009 (95% confidence interval [CI] $6422-$11,597) for lowest-risk patients, which dropped to $3387 (95% CI $2656-$4119) for highest-risk patients (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Treatment at USNWR-ranked hospitals, particularly for higher-risk patients, was associated with better outcomes but higher-cost care. The benefit of being treated at highly ranked USNWR hospitals was most pronounced among high-risk patients.

Surveillance-Associated Anxiety After Curative-Intent Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Regular surveillance imaging is commonly used after curative-intent resection of most solid-organ cancers to enable prompt diagnosis and management of recurrent disease. Given the fear of cancer recurrence, surveillance may lead to distress and anxiety ("scanxiety") but its frequency, severity, and management among cancer survivors are poorly understood. METHODS: A systematic review of the PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases was conducted to evaluate existing literature on anxiety and emotional experiences associated with surveillance after curative-intent cancer surgery as well as interventions aimed at reducing scanxiety. RESULTS: Across the 22 included studies encompassing 8693 patients, reported rates of scanxiety varied significantly, but tended to decrease as time elapsed after surgery. Qualitative studies showed that scanxiety arises from various factors innate to the surveillance experience and is most prevalent in the scan-to-results waiting period. Common risk factors for scanxiety included sociodemographic and cancer-related characteristics, low coping self-efficacy, pre-existing anxiety, and low patient well-being. Conversely, reassurance was a positive aspect of surveillance reported in several studies. Trials evaluating the impact of interventions all focused on modifying the surveillance regimen compared with usual care, but none led to reduced rates of scanxiety. CONCLUSIONS: Although scanxiety is nearly universal across multiple cancer types and patient populations, it is transient and generally limited in severity. Because existing trials evaluating interventions to reduce scanxiety have not identified effective strategies to date, future research is needed to identify interventions aimed at reducing their impact on high-risk individuals.

Demographic Trends, Coalterations, and Imatinib Resistance across Genomic Variants in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: An AACR Project GENIE Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are the most common mesenchymal neoplasm of the gastrointestinal tract, the treatment of which represents a significant breakthrough in targeted cancer therapy. Given its overall rare nature, analysis of genomic differences and clinical implications between demographic groups has not been previously completed, but American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Project GENIE makes such an analysis possible. METHODS: Anonymized demographic, clinical, and genomic data from 1,559 GIST patients was analyzed using cBioPortal and custom Python scripts, with no exclusions from the cohort. Data included patient demographics, genomic alterations, and co-occurrence information, and was classified according to clinical implications using the OncoKB database. Analysis involved Chi-squared tests for differences in genomic alterations across various demographic factors and mutual exclusivity analysis to identify co-mutation patterns. RESULTS: Male patients exhibited higher mutation rates at PDGFRA (14.56% vs 8.05%; p<0.001), while female patients had higher rates at NF1 (7.46% vs 3.23%; p=0.001). Asian patients showed higher alteration rates at KIT (85.59%; p=0.002). Co-occurrence analysis revealed KIT alterations frequently co-occurred with CDKN2A (q<0.001), MTAP (q=0.045), and PTEN (q=0.056), while showing mutual exclusivity with PDGFRA (q<0.001), NF1 (q<0.001), and BRAF (q=.015). CDKN2A alterations co-occurred with MTAP (q<0.001) and PIK3CA (q=.015), while being mutually exclusive with TP53 (q=.002) and NF1 (q=.007). Trends were similar among patients who had received no prior medical treatment. Imatinib-resistant mutations were more common in male patients (25.6% vs 18.9%; p=.0056) and those under 55 (27.3% vs 20.9%; p=.0228). Among patients with imatinib-resistant mutations, 77.78% had sunitinib resistance, while 70.25% maintained sensitivity to ripretinib. CONCLUSION: Sex and race/ethnic differences in genomic alterations, as well as co-mutations, were prevalent among patients with GIST. Variations in mutational profiles highlight the importance of distinct genetic drivers that may be targeted to treat different patient populations.

Upfront surgery for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Prediction of futility using artificial intelligence.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify patients at risk of "futile" surgery for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma using an artificial intelligence (AI)-based model based on preoperative variables. METHODS: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients who underwent resection between 1990 and 2020 were identified from a multi-institutional database. Futility was defined either as mortality or recurrence within 12 months of surgery. Various machine learning and deep learning techniques were used to develop prediction models for futile surgery. RESULTS: Overall, 827 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients were included. Among 378 patients (45.7%) who had futile surgery, 297 patients (78.6%) developed intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma recurrence and 81 patients (21.4%) died within 12 months of surgical resection. An ensemble model consisting of multilayer perceptron and gradient boosting classifiers that used 10 preoperative factors demonstrated the highest accuracy, with areas under receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.830 (95% confidence interval 0.798-0.861) and 0.781 (95% confidence interval 0.707-0.853) in the training and testing cohorts, respectively. The model displayed sensitivity and specificity of 64.5% and 80.0%, respectively, with positive and negative predictive values of 73.1% and 72.7%, respectively. Radiologic tumor burden score, serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9, and direct bilirubin levels were the factors most strongly predictive of futile surgery. The artificial intelligence-based model was made available online for ease of use and clinical applicability (https://altaf-pawlik-icc-futilityofsurgery-calculator.streamlit.app/). CONCLUSION: The artificial intelligence ensemble model demonstrated high accuracy to identify patients preoperatively at high risk of undergoing futile surgery for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Artificial intelligence-based prediction models can provide clinicians with reliable preoperative guidance and aid in avoiding futile surgical procedures that are unlikely to provide patients long-term benefits.

Outcomes of liver transplant for colorectal liver metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation (LT) for nonresectable colorectal liver metastasis (NRCRLM) has become accepted for select patients meeting strict inclusion criteria. Advancements in patient selection and understanding of cancer biology may expand benefits to patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). In this meta-analysis, we sought to assess survival outcomes, recurrence patterns, and quality of life (QoL) after LT for CRLM. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched. A random-effect meta-analysis was conducted to obtain pooled overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates and to compare QoL from baseline. Continuous data were analyzed, and standardized mean differences were reported. RESULTS: Overall, 16 studies (403 patients, 58.8% male sex) were included. The pooled 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS after LT for NRCRLM was 96% (95% CI: 92%-99%), 77% (95% CI: 62%-89%), and 53% (95% CI: 45%-61%), respectively. Moreover, the pooled 1-, 3-, and 5-year DFS was 58% (95% CI: 43%-72%), 33% (95% CI: 9%-61%), and 13% (95% CI: 4%-27%), respectively. Overall, 201 patients (49.8%) experienced recurrence during the follow-up period with the lungs being the most common site (45.8%). There was no significant differences in physical and emotional functioning, fatigue, and pain components of QoL at 6 months after LT compared with baseline (all P > .05). CONCLUSION: LT for NRCRLM demonstrated good OS outcomes with no differences in the QoL at 6 months after transplantation. Transplantation may represent a viable treatment option for NRCRLM.

Rare primary liver cancers: An EASL position paper.

In recent years, owing to advances in our understanding of hepatocarcinogenesis, rare primary liver cancers (PLCs), including combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma, fibrolamellar carcinoma, and hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma have garnered increased attention. In this position paper, an international panel of experts representing oncology, hepatology, pathology, radiology, surgery, and molecular biology has summarised the available information and evidence on the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of rare PLCs. While clinical trials of systemic treatments are underway for some rare PLCs, it is evident that more research, involving national and international collaboration, is required.

Upper gastrointestinal cancers: Trends and determinants of location of death.

BACKGROUND: Patients diagnosed with upper gastrointestinal cancers often require extensive end-of-life care. We sought to investigate social determinants of health associated with disparities in the location of death among patients who died of upper gastrointestinal cancers. METHODS: Patients who died between 2003 and 2020 from esophageal cancer, gastric cancer, hepatobiliary cancer, and pancreatic cancer were identified using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research database. Social determinants of health were assessed using the Social Vulnerability Index. Patients were categorized on the basis of location of death: inpatient hospital, home, nursing home, hospice, and outpatient medical facility/emergency department. Multivariable regression and mediation analyses defined the association of patient race as well as social determinants of health with location of death. RESULTS: Among 815,780 decedents (esophageal cancer: 15.3%; gastric cancer: 3.6%; hepatobiliary cancer: 36.6%; pancreatic cancer: 54.5%), most were male (60.8%), aged 55-74 years (52.3%), and White (89.1%). Most decedents died at home (55.7%), followed by inpatient hospital (24.8%), hospice (9.0%), nursing home (8.1%), and outpatient medical facility/emergency department (2.5%). During the study period, location of death shifted notably from inpatient hospital (36.8% to 21.3%) to home (45.8% to 56.3%). Residents of high Social Vulnerability Index areas were more likely to die at inpatient hospital compared with home (31.8% vs 24.3%) (P < .001). Black race (reference: White; odds ratio; 0.41, 95% confidence interval, 0.40-0.42) and social vulnerability (reference: low Social Vulnerability Index; odds ratio, 0.64, 95% confidence interval, 0.63-0.65) remained independently associated with lower odds of dying at home compared with an inpatient hospital. Notably, 65% of the overall race-based association with death at inpatient hospital was driven indirectly through social determinants of health. CONCLUSION: Social determinants are important drivers of end-of-life care and impact the potential ability of patients with cancer to die at home.

Long-term lorazepam use may be associated with worse long-term outcomes among patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Lorazepam recently has been reported to alter the tumor microenvironment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma in a murine model. We sought to evaluate whether the use of lorazepam was associated with worse outcomes among patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. METHODS: Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with stage I-IV pancreatic adenocarcinoma between 2013 and 2019 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare database. The association of lorazepam prescription relative to overall survival and recurrence-free survival was examined. RESULTS: Among 2,810 patients with stage I-III and 10,181 patients with stage IV pancreatic adenocarcinoma, a total of 133 (4.7%) and 444 individuals (4.4%) had a lorazepam prescription before disease diagnosis, respectively. Although the overall lorazepam group had comparable 5-year overall survival (15.0% vs 14.2%, P = .20) and recurrence-free survival (12.7% vs 10.9%, P = .42) with the no-lorazepam group after pancreatic adenocarcinoma resection, individuals with long-term lorazepam prescription (>30 days) had worse 5-year overall survival (9.0% vs 21.0%, P = .02) and recurrence-free survival (6.4% vs 17.1%, P = .009) compared with short-term lorazepam users (≤30 days). Similarly, among patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, individuals with a long-term lorazepam prescription had worse 1-year overall survival (9.7% vs 15.9%, P = .02) compared with patients who had short-term lorazepam prescriptions. On multivariable analysis, long-term lorazepam prescription was independently associated with overall survival among patients with resectable (hazard ratio, 1.82; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-2.74) and metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (hazard ratio, 1.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.51). CONCLUSION: Long-term lorazepam prescription was associated with worse long-term outcomes among patients who underwent resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma and patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. These data support the need for further large scale studies to confirm a potential harmful effect of lorazepam among patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Trans-arterial embolization versus chemoembolization for neuroendocrine liver metastases: a propensity matched analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Locoregional therapies are a mainstay of treatment for patients with neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELM), yet the optimal transarterial approach remains undefined and recent studies have raised concern over the safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). METHODS: Patients with NELM who underwent TACE or transarterial embolization (TAE) at a single institution between 2000-2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity score matching (PSM) controlling for age, sex, bilateral disease, tumor size, lobar embolization, grade, and extrahepatic disease was utilized to compare short- and long-term outcomes. RESULTS: Among 412 patients with NELM, 329 underwent TACE and 83 TAE. Mean age was 60.7 ± 11.1 years. Patients primarily presented with synchronous (69.2%), bilateral (84.2%), and G1 disease (48.8%) and underwent staged procedures (55.8%). Following PSM, TACE was associated with slightly worse post-procedure laboratory values, but no difference in complications compared to TAE (23.3%vs29.3%, p = 0.247). TACE was associated with improved mean PFS (21.8vs10.7 months, p = 0.002), but no difference in radiographic size, chromogranin level, or median overall survival (50.0 months vs not met, p = 0.833). CONCLUSION: Among patients with NELM, TACE was associated with similar short-term outcomes and improved PFS, but no difference in OS compared to TAE. These findings highlight the need for additional research on the optimal locoregional therapy for NELM.

Preoperative frailty as a key predictor of short- and long-term outcomes among octogenarians undergoing hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter comprehensive analysis.

BACKGROUND: When considering hepatectomy for elderly HCC patients, it's essential to assess surgical safety and survival benefits. This study investigated the impact of preoperative frailty, assessed with the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), on outcomes for octogenarians undergoing HCC hepatectomy. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of octogenarians who had hepatectomy for HCC between 2010 and 2022 at 16 hepatobiliary centers was conducted. Patients were categorized as frail or non-frail based on preoperative CFS, with frailty defined as CFS ≥5. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS), with perioperative outcomes as secondary endpoints. RESULTS: Among 240 octogenarians, 105 were characterized as being frail. Frail patients had a higher incidence of postoperative 30-day morbidity and postoperative 30-day and 90-day mortality versus non-frail patients. Meanwhile, 5-year OS, RFS and CSS among frail patients were lower compared with non-frail patients. Univariable and multivariable analysis revealed that preoperative frailty was an independent risk factor of postoperative 30-day morbidity (OR: 2.060), OS (HR: 2.384), RFS (HR: 2.190) and CSS (HR: 2.203). CONCLUSION: Preoperative frailty, as assessed by the CFS, was strongly associated with both short-term outcomes and long-term survival among octogenarians undergoing hepatectomy for HCC. Incorporating frailty assessment into the preoperative evaluation may help optimize patient selection and perioperative care.

Development and Validation of a Predictive Risk Score for Blood Transfusion in Patients Undergoing Curative-Intent Surgery for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Among patients undergoing liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), perioperative bleeding requiring blood transfusion is a common complication, yet preoperative identification of patients at risk for transfusion remains challenging. The objective of this study was to develop a preoperative risk score for blood transfusion requirement during surgery for ICC. METHODS: Patients undergoing curative-intent liver surgery for ICC (1990-2020) were identified from a multi-institutional database. A predictive model was developed and validated. An easy-to-use risk calculator was made available online. RESULTS: Among 1420 patients, 300 (21.1%) received an intraoperative transfusion. Independent predictors of transfusion included severe preoperative anemia (OR = 1.65, 95% CI 1.10-2.47), T2 category or higher (OR = 2.00, 95% CI 1.36-3.02), positive lymph nodes (OR = 1.75, 95% CI 1.32-2.32) and major resection (OR = 2.56, 95%CI 1.85-3.58). Receipt of blood transfusion significantly correlated with worse outcomes. The model showed good discriminative ability in both training (AUC = 0.68, 95% CI 0.66-0.72) and bootstrapping validation (C-index = 0.67, 95% CI 0.65-0.70) cohorts. An online risk calculator of blood transfusion requirement was developed (https://catalano-giovanni.shinyapps.io/TransfusionRisk). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative blood transfusion was significantly associated with poor postoperative outcomes among patients undergoing surgery for ICC. The identification of patients at high risk of transfusion could improve perioperative patient care and blood resources allocation.

Racial and Sex Differences in Genomic Profiling of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Racial and sex disparities in the incidence and outcomes of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) exist, yet potential genomic variations of iCCA based on race and sex that might be contributing to disparate outcomes have not been well studied. METHODS: Data from the American Association for Cancer Research Project GENIE registry (version 15.0) were analyzed to assess genetic variations in iCCA. Adult patients (age >18 years) with histologically confirmed iCCA who underwent next-generation sequencing were included in the analytic cohort. Racial and sex variations in genomic profiling of iCCA were examined. RESULTS: The study enrolled 1068 patients from 19 centers (White, 71.9%; Black, 5.1%; Asian, 8.4%, other, 14.6%). The male-to-female ratio was 1:1. The majority of the patients had primary tumors (73.7%), whereas 23.0% had metastatic disease sequenced. While IDH1 mutations occurred more frequently in White versus Black patients (20.8% vs. 5.6%; p = 0.021), FGFR2 mutations tended to be more common among Black versus White populations (27.8% vs. 16.1%; p = 0.08). Males were more likely to have TP53 mutations than females (24.3% vs. 18.2%, p = 0.016), whereas females more frequently had IDH1 (23.3% vs 16.0 %), FGFR2 (21.0% vs. 11.3%), and BAP1 (23.4% vs. 14.5%) mutations than males (all p < 0.05). Marked variations in the prevalence of other common genomic alterations in iCCA were noted across different races and sexes. CONCLUSION: Distinct genomic variations exist in iCCA across race and sex. Differences in mutational profiles of iCCA patients highlight the importance of including a diverse patient population in iCCA clinical trials as well as the importance of recognizing different genetic drivers that may be targetable to treat distinct patient cohorts.

Impact of hospital volume and facility characteristics on postoperative outcomes after hepatectomy: A mediation analysis.

BACKGROUND: The impact of hospital procedural volume on outcomes after hepatectomy relative to other facility-related factors remains unclear. We sought to define the comparative impact of hospital volume compared with other facility-related factors on postoperative outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing hepatectomy. METHODS: Data on patients who underwent hepatectomy between 2013 and 2021 were collected from the Medicare Standard Analytic Files and linked with facility-level data from the American Hospital Association Survey databases. Hospital volume was stratified into high- (top 10%) and low-volume centers. Propensity score matching was used to account for variable imbalances in patient characteristics among high-compared with low-volume centers. Mediation analysis was employed to delineate facility-related factors responsible for the impact of hospital volume on outcomes with a specific focus on incidence of complications, in-hospital mortality, and failure to rescue. RESULTS: The analytic cohort included 22,969 patients from 340 institutions. After propensity score matching, receipt of surgery at a high-volume center was associated with a lower likelihood of postoperative complications (39.9% vs 41.7%, P = .01), in-hospital mortality (2.2% vs 2.8%, P = .02), and failure to rescue (5.4% vs 6.5%, P = .04) versus low-volume centers. Mediation analysis revealed that hospital capacity (bed capacity and nurse-to-bed ratio) contributed the most to the variations in risk of complications and in-hospital mortality, whereas liver transplant program status had the largest impact on failure to rescue. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital volume is a significant determinant of postoperative outcomes after hepatectomy, with hospital capacity and liver transplant program status being important mediators of this effect. Centralization and optimal resource distribution are important to achieve favorable outcomes following liver resection.

Impact of Spousal Mental Illness on Healthcare Utilization Among Patients With Gastrointestinal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Informal caregiving involves increased responsibilities, with financial and emotional challenges, thereby affecting the well-being of the caregiver. We aimed to investigate the effect of spousal mental illness on hospital visits and medical spending among patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer. METHODS: Patients who underwent GI cancer surgery between 2013 and 2020 were identified from the IBM Marketscan database. Multivariable regression analysis was used to examine the association between spousal mental illness and healthcare utilization. RESULTS: A total of 6,035 patients underwent GI surgery for a malignant indication. Median age was 54 years (IQR: 49-59), most patients were male (n = 3592, 59.5%), and had a CCI score of ≤ 2 (n = 5512, 91.3%). Of note, in the 1 year follow-up period, 19.4% (anxiety: n = 509, 8.4%; depression: n = 301, 5.0%; both anxiety and depression: n = 273, 4.5%; severe mental illness: n = 86, 1.4%) of spouses developed a mental illness. On multivariable analysis, after controlling for competing factors, spousal mental illness remained independently associated with increased odds of emergency department visits (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.05-1.38) and becoming a super healthcare utilizer (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.04-1.79), as well as 12.1% (95% CI 10.6-15.3) higher medical spending. CONCLUSION: Among patients with GI cancer spousal mental illness is associated with higher rates of outpatient visits, emergency department visits, and expenditures during the 1-year postoperative period. These findings underscore the importance of caregiving resources and counseling in alleviating caregiver burden, thereby reducing the overall burden on the healthcare system.