[Eruptive disseminated superficial porokeratosis associated with acute hepatitis E]. / Porokératose éruptive superficielle disséminée associée à une hépatite virale E aiguë.

BACKGROUND: Porokeratosis (PK) is a rare form of dermatosis characterized by a keratinization disorder of unknown etiology. Herein we describe the first case associated with hepatitis E virus infection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A 69-year-old patient with colorectal cancer treated with radiation and chemotherapy followed by surgery in April 2017 presented two months later with jaundice associated with annular keratotic lesions of the skin with a raised border. Blood tests revealed elevated liver enzymes and hyperbilirubinemia. Viral hepatitis E was diagnosed based on serology and viral PCR after other aetiologies such as obstruction, auto-immune disease and other viruses (HAV, HBV, HCV, HSV, HIV, EBV and CMV) had been ruled out. A skin biopsy showed a cornoid lamella. Disseminated superficial porokeratosis associated with hepatitis E infection was then diagnosed. DISCUSSION: The mechanism of PK is unknown and probably involves a combination of different factors. PK has been described in patients with treatment-induced immunosuppression, solid cancer or AIDS, sometimes promoted by HCV viral infection, but never with concomitant HEV infection. A combination of immunosuppression induced by radio-chemotherapy and HEV infection could have prompted the development of PK in our patient. CONCLUSION: We report the first case of eruptive disseminated superficial porokeratosis associated with hepatitis E infection. The exact role of hepatitis E infection in the development of PK is still unclear.

Non-invasive evaluation of portal hypertension using shear-wave elastography: analysis of two algorithms combining liver and spleen stiffness in 191 patients with cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND: Two algorithms based on sequential measurements of liver and spleen stiffness using two-dimensional shearwave elastography (2D-SWE) have been recently proposed to estimate clinically significant portal hypertension (hepatic venous pressure gradient [HVPG] ≥10 mm Hg) in patients with cirrhosis, with excellent diagnostic accuracy. AIM: To validate externally these algorithms in a large cohort of patients with cirrhosis. METHODS: One hundred and ninety-one patients with stable cirrhosis (Child-Pugh class A 39%, B 29% and C 31%) who underwent liver and spleen stiffness measurements using 2D-SWE at the time of HVPG measurement were included. Diagnostic accuracy of the 2 algorithms was assessed by calculating sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values. RESULTS: The first algorithm, using liver stiffness <16.0 kilopascals (kPa) and then spleen stiffness <26.6 kPa, was used to rule-out HVPG ≥10 mm Hg. In our population, its sensitivity and negative predictive value were 95% and 63% respectively. The second algorithm, using liver stiffness >38.0 kPa, or liver stiffness ≤38.0 kPa but spleen stiffness >27.9 kPa, was used to rule-in HVPG ≥10 mm Hg. In our population, its specificity and positive predictive value were 52% and 83% respectively. Restricting the analyses to the 74 patients without any history of decompensation of cirrhosis or to the 65 patients with highly reliable liver stiffness measurement did not improve the results. CONCLUSION: In our population, diagnostic accuracies of non-invasive algorithms based on sequential measurements of liver and spleen stiffness using 2D-SWE were acceptable, but not good enough to replace HVPG measurement or to base clinical decisions.

Lack of clinical or haemodynamic rebound after abrupt interruption of beta-blockers in patients with cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND: Beta-blockers may have to be interrupted in patients with cirrhosis. The concept of a rebound after interruption of beta-blockers is based on an animal study and on isolated case reports of variceal bleeding. AIM: To determine if a rebound occurs in patients with cirrhosis following abrupt interruption of beta-blockers. METHODS: We prospectively included all consecutive patients with cirrhosis undergoing right heart and hepatic vein catheterisation. Four groups were defined: 'no beta-blockers' including patients not receiving beta-blockers; '≤1 day', '2-3 days' and '≥4 days' classified according to the time patients had interrupted beta-blockers before catheterisation. Results were expressed as median (interquartile range). RESULTS: A total of 150 patients were included. Among the 25 patients in the groups '2-3 days' and '≥4 days', median duration of beta-blockers interruption was 4 (3-6) days. No gastrointestinal bleeding occurred during that period, nor during the following month. Hepatic venous pressure gradient was not different among patients in usually treated with beta-blockers. After adjustment, beta-blockers interruption was not associated with hepatic venous pressure gradient. Cardiac index was higher in the '≥4 days' group [4.6 L/min/m(2) (3.5-5.1)] than in the '≤1 day' group [3.4 (2.6-4.0); P = 0.001] or in the '2-3 days' group [3.1 (2.7-3.7); P = 0.007], but not different from the 'no beta-blockers' group. CONCLUSIONS: Abrupt interruption of beta-blockers is associated neither with an apparent increase in the risk of variceal bleeding nor with a haemodynamic rebound. Thus, interruption of beta-blockers in patients with cirrhosis may not require particular dosing or surveillance.