Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 153
Filtrar
2.
Br J Dermatol ; 185(5): 978-987, 2021 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33991338

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: New technologies have enabled the potential for stratified medicine in psoriasis. It is important to understand patients' preferences to enable the informed introduction of stratified medicine, which is likely to involve a number of individual tests that could be collated into a prescribing algorithm for biological drug selection to be used in clinical practice. OBJECTIVES: To quantify patient preferences for an algorithm-based approach to prescribing biologics ('biologic calculator') in psoriasis. METHODS: An online survey comprising a discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted to elicit the preferences of two purposive samples of adults living with psoriasis in the UK, identified from a psoriasis patient organization (Psoriasis Association) and an online panel provider (Dynata). Respondents chose between two biologic calculators and conventional prescribing described using five attributes: treatment delay; positive predictive value; negative predictive value; risk of infection; and cost saving to the National Health Service. Each participant selected their preferred alternative from six hypothetical choice sets. Additional data, including sociodemographic characteristics, were collected. Choice data were analysed using conditional logit and fully correlated random parameters logit models. RESULTS: Data from 212 respondents (67 from the Psoriasis Association and 145 from Dynata) were analysed. The signs of all estimated coefficients were consistent with a priori expectations. Respondents had a strong preference for a high predictive accuracy and avoiding serious infection, but there was evidence of systematic differences in preferences between the samples. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that individuals with psoriasis would value a biologic calculator and suggested that such a biologic calculator should have sufficient accuracy to predict future response and risk of serious infection from the biologic.


Assuntos
Preferência do Paciente , Psoríase , Adulto , Comportamento de Escolha , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Medicina Estatal , Inquéritos e Questionários
3.
Res Dev Disabil ; 104: 103681, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32474231

RESUMO

Cyber-dependent offending, i.e. criminal behaviour reliant on computing and the online domain, has been reportedly associated with particular characteristics and motivations such as being young, male, autistic and motivated by challenge. These associations are anecdotal however and empirical evidence is limited. The present study investigated reasons for engaging or declining to commit cyber-dependent offending in cyber-skilled non-offenders (n = 175) and offenders (n = 7) via an online survey measuring cyber-dependent criminality. The potential role of autism and autistic traits was also considered. Qualitative interviews about motivations for offending were carried out with the offenders. The cyber-dependent offenders reported seven main reasons for engaging in cyber-dependent offending: (1) lack of understanding; (2) entertainment; (3) peer influence; (4) experience and career; (5) anonymity and risk perception; (6) life events; and (7) morals. Twenty-nine (approximately 17 %) of the non-offenders had been asked to engage in cyber-dependent offending but had declined. Their reasons and motivations for declining to commit cyber-dependent offences were compared with the cyber-dependent offenders reasons and motivations for engaging in cybercrime. Seven main reasons for declining to offend were identified: (1) moral principles; (2) perception of risk; (3) fear of consequences; (4) not wanting to; (5) wanting to adhere to the law; (6) behaviour being too complicated; and (7) price being too low. Implications for practise are discussed.


Assuntos
Transtorno Autístico , Criminosos , Humanos , Masculino , Motivação , Autorrelato , Inquéritos e Questionários
4.
Osteoarthritis Cartilage ; 28(6): 819-823, 2020 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32173628

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Shared decision-making supported by patient decisions aids may improve care and reduce healthcare costs for persons considering total joint replacement. Observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have evaluated the short-term impact of decision aids on uptake of surgery and costs, however the long-term effects are unclear. This analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of patient decision aids on 1) use of joint replacement up to 7-years of follow-up, and 2) osteoarthritis-related health system costs. METHODS: 324 participants in a Canadian RCT with 2-years follow-up who were randomized to either a decision aid (n = 161) or usual care (n = 163) had their trial and health administrative data linked. The proportion undergoing surgery up to 7-years were compared using cumulative incidence plots and competing risk regression. Mean per-patient costs were compared using two sample t-tests. RESULTS: At 2-years, 119 of 161 (73.9%) patients in the decision aid arm and 129 of 163 (79.1%) patients in the usual care arm had surgery. Between two and 7-years, 17 additional patients in both the decision aid (of 42, 40.4%) and usual care (of 34, 50.0%) arms underwent surgery. At 7-years, patients exposed to decision aids had a similar likelihood of undergoing surgery (HR = 0.92, 95% CI:0.73 to 1.17, p = 0.49) and mean per-patient costs ($21,965 vs $23,681, incremental cost: -$1,717, 95% CI:-$5,631 to $2,198) compared to those in usual care. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to assess the long-term impact of decision aids on use of joint replacement and healthcare costs. These results are not conclusive but can inform future trial design. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The full trial protocol is available at ClinicalTrials.Gov (NCT00911638).


Assuntos
Artroplastia de Substituição/economia , Artroplastia de Substituição/estatística & dados numéricos , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Osteoartrite/economia , Osteoartrite/cirurgia , Participação do Paciente , Utilização de Procedimentos e Técnicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Método Simples-Cego , Fatores de Tempo
5.
Lupus ; 28(11): 1337-1343, 2019 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31423896

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the effects of the B-cell activating factor (BAFF)-targeting antibody Belimumab on human nonmemory B-cell pools. Human B-cell pools were identified using surface markers adapted from mouse studies that specifically assessed reductions in immature B cells due to BAFF depletion. Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have high levels of both BAFF and immature B cells. Mechanistic mouse studies provide a framework for understanding human responses to therapies that target B cells. METHODS: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated from healthy donors and SLE patients on Belimumab or standard-of-care therapy (SCT). Cells were stained for flow cytometry to identify B-cell subsets based on CD21/CD24. Differences in subset proportions were determined by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test. RESULTS: Patients treated with Belimumab show alterations in the nonmemory B-cell pool characterized by a decrease in the Transitional 2 (T2) subset (p = 0.002), and an increase in the proportion of Transitional 1 (T1) cells (p = 0.005) as compared with healthy donors and SCT patients. The naïve B-cell compartment showed no significant differences between the groups (p = 0.293). CONCLUSION: Using a translational approach, we show that Belimumab-mediated BAFF depletion reduces the T2 subset in patients, similar to observations in mouse models with BAFF depletion.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/farmacologia , Fator Ativador de Células B/imunologia , Imunossupressores/farmacologia , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Animais , Subpopulações de Linfócitos B/imunologia , Feminino , Humanos , Leucócitos Mononucleares/imunologia , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/imunologia , Masculino , Camundongos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Células Precursoras de Linfócitos B/imunologia , Especificidade da Espécie , Adulto Jovem
8.
Clin Genet ; 93(4): 752-761, 2018 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28881385

RESUMO

Diagnostic exome sequencing (DES) has aided delineation of the phenotypic spectrum of rare genetic etiologies of intellectual disability (ID). A SET domain containing 5 gene (SETD5) phenotype of ID and dysmorphic features has been previously described in relation to patients with 3p25.3 deletions and in a few individuals with de novo sequence alterations. Herein, we present additional patients with pathogenic SETD5 sequence alterations. The majority of patients in this cohort and previously reported have developmental delay, behavioral/psychiatric issues, and variable hand and skeletal abnormalities. We also present an apparently unaffected carrier mother of an affected individual and a carrier mother with normal intelligence and affected twin sons. We suggest that the phenotype of SETD5 is more complex and variable than previously presented. Therefore, many features and presentations need to be considered when evaluating a patient for SETD5 alterations through DES.


Assuntos
Transtornos Dismórficos Corporais/genética , Deficiências do Desenvolvimento/genética , Deficiência Intelectual/genética , Metiltransferases/genética , Adolescente , Adulto , Transtornos Dismórficos Corporais/diagnóstico , Transtornos Dismórficos Corporais/fisiopatologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Deleção Cromossômica , Cromossomos Humanos Par 3/genética , Deficiências do Desenvolvimento/diagnóstico , Deficiências do Desenvolvimento/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Deficiência Intelectual/diagnóstico , Deficiência Intelectual/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mutação/genética , Penetrância , Fenótipo , Sequenciamento do Exoma , Adulto Jovem
10.
Br J Dermatol ; 177(3): 828-836, 2017 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28386916

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Psoriasis Stratification to Optimise Relevant Therapy (PSORT) consortium has a collective aim to develop a prescribing algorithm to help stratify eligible patients with psoriasis to the most appropriate biological treatment. To facilitate the adoption of a stratified approach, it is necessary to first understand the factors driving the choice of first-line biological therapy. OBJECTIVES: To identify and quantify factors that influence the selection of the first-line biological therapy for people with psoriasis. METHODS: Multinomial logistic regression was used to determine the factors that influenced the probability of treatment selection, using data from the British Association of Dermatologists Biologic Interventions Register from January 2012 to December 2015. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the findings to key assumptions. RESULTS: The main analysis was based on a dataset comprising 3040 people with psoriasis. The identified factors affecting first-line biological selection within the available therapies were: presence of psoriatic arthritis; patient weight; employment status; country of registration; and baseline disease severity. Importantly, the analysis showed a general shift in prescribing behaviour over time. These results were robust to sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS: This study offers important insights into the factors influencing current prescribing practice for first-line biological therapies for people with psoriasis. It provides baseline data to inform the evaluation of future potential changes that may affect prescribing behaviour, such as stratified medicine.


Assuntos
Fatores Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Terapia Biológica/métodos , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Algoritmos , Feminino , Humanos , Interleucinas/antagonistas & inibidores , Masculino , Padrões de Prática Médica , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/uso terapêutico , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inibidores
12.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 55(4): 371-377, 2017 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27914724

RESUMO

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (OMFS) remains an enigmatic specialty in Irish medicine and many students are unaware of its scope and the unique career pathway involved. We completed a multicentre cross-sectional study to identify their ability to identify the requirements for entry to specialty training year 3 (ST3) in OMFS, to assess their awareness of OMFS surgeons, and their general awareness of, and exposure to, the specialty. Data were collected through an electronic questionnaire. Participants were asked to select the most suitable surgical specialty to treat a number of common conditions in the head and neck, and to choose the requirements they deemed essential for specialist training. Knowledge was measured by the number of correct responses. A total of 443 medical students participated (University College Cork (UCC) n=328, 74%; Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI) n=113, 26%). A total of 318/374 (85%) had had no previous experience of OMFS, 38/374 (10%) had had theoretical teaching only, and 18/374 (5%) had had clinical experience. A total of 212/329 (64%) wished for greater exposure as a student, but only 34/329 (9%) would consider a career in the specialty. The median (IQR) number of correct responses for OMFS procedures was 3.0/10 (2.0), with women, direct entrants, and RCSI students scoring highest. Only 11/367 (3%) could identify the minimum entry requirements for a post of specialist registrar. This study has identified a potential gap in the undergraduate curriculum. Although medical students are rarely taught about OMFS, they show an interest in learning more.


Assuntos
Estudantes de Medicina/psicologia , Cirurgia Bucal/educação , Escolha da Profissão , Estudos Transversais , Currículo , Educação de Graduação em Medicina , Feminino , Humanos , Irlanda , Masculino , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
16.
Eye (Lond) ; 30(7): 966-71, 2016 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27080487

RESUMO

PurposeAdvances in genomic technologies are prompting a realignment of diagnostic and management pathways for rare inherited disease. New models of care are being developed as genomic-based diagnostic testing becomes increasingly relevant within more and more aspects of medicine. This study describes current care models for the provision of a genomic-based diagnosis for patients with inherited retinal dystrophy (IRD) in UK clinical practice.MethodsA structured telephone survey, conducted (in 2014) with all 23 UK Regional Genetics Centres and a sample of specialist ophthalmology centres (n=4), was used to describe models of service delivery and current levels of genomic-based diagnostic testing. Quantitative data were summarised using descriptive statistics. Responses to open-ended questions were summarised using thematic analysis.ResultsOf the 27 centres 10 of them saw IRD patients in 'generic' clinics and 17 centres offered ophthalmic-specific clinics. Extensive regional variation was observed in numbers of patients seen and in how care for the diagnosis and management of IRD was provided.ConclusionsUnderstanding current practice is a necessary first step in the development and evaluation of complex interventions, such as care models for the genomic-based diagnosis of inherited eye conditions. Presented findings here relating to disparities in care provision are potentially linked to previously reported evidence of perceived unmet needs and expectations of IRD service users. This work provides a foundation for the integration of new care models in mainstream medicine.


Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde , Gerenciamento Clínico , Predisposição Genética para Doença/genética , Serviços em Genética/estatística & dados numéricos , Testes Genéticos , Genômica , Distrofias Retinianas/diagnóstico , Distrofias Retinianas/genética , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Reino Unido
17.
J Environ Radioact ; 155-156: 112-121, 2016 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26945429

RESUMO

Radiocaesium and radiostrontium enter the human food chain primarily via soil-plant transfer. However, uptake of these radionuclides can differ significantly within species (between cultivars). The aim of this study was to assess inter-cultivar variation in soil-to-plant transfer of radiocaesium and radiostrontium in a leafy crop species, Brassica oleracea. This study comprised four independent experiments: two pot experiments in a controlled environment artificially contaminated with radiocaesium, and two field experiments in an area contaminated with radiocaesium and radiostrontium in the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone. Radiocaesium concentration ratios varied 35-fold among 27 cultivars grown in pots in a controlled environment. These 27 cultivars were then grown with a further 44 and 43 other cultivars in the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone in 2003 and 2004, respectively. In the field-grown cultivars radiocaesium concentration ratios varied by up to 35-fold and radiostrontium concentration ratios varied by up to 23-fold. In three of these experiments (one pot experiment, two field experiments) one out of the 27 cultivars was found to have a consistently lower radiocaesium concentration ratio than the other cultivars. The two field experiments showed that, five out of the 66 cultivars common to both experiments had consistently lower radiocaesium concentration ratios, and two cultivars had consistently lower radiostrontium concentration ratios. One cultivar had consistently lower radiocaesium and radiostrontium concentration ratios. The identification of cultivars that have consistently lower radiocaesium and/or radiostrontium concentration ratios suggests that cultivar selection or substitution may be an effective remediation strategy in radiologically contaminated areas. Future research should focus on plant species that are known to be the largest contributors to human dose.


Assuntos
Brassica/química , Radioisótopos de Césio/análise , Monitoramento de Radiação , Poluentes Radioativos do Solo/análise , Radioisótopos de Estrôncio/análise , Brassica/classificação , Acidente Nuclear de Chernobyl , Cadeia Alimentar , Cinza Radioativa/análise , Fatores de Tempo
18.
Surg Endosc ; 30(10): 4613-8, 2016 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26895915

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Prior studies have demonstrated that existing risk stratification guidelines for the evaluation of suspected choledocholithiasis lack accuracy, leading to the overutilization of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The aim of our study was to evaluate the performance characteristics of published guidelines in predicting choledocholithiasis and to determine the impact of laboratory trends on diagnostic accuracy. METHODS: We identified patients with suspected choledocholithiasis hospitalized over a 5-year period (2009-2014) at a tertiary care academic medical center. Among eligible patients, we assessed the performance characteristics of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) guidelines predicting the presence of choledocholithiasis, confirmed by endoscopic ultrasound, magnetic resonance cholangiography, ERCP, or intra-operative cholangiography. We also evaluated whether a second set of liver function tests improved the accuracy of the guidelines. RESULTS: On presentation, 71 of the 173 eligible patients (41.4 %) met ASGE high-probability criteria for choledocholithiasis. Of these, only 39 (54.9 %) were found to have a choledocholithiasis on confirmatory testing. Conversely, of the 102 patients (58.6 %) who were classified as low or intermediate probability, 32 (31.4 %) had choledocholithiasis. Overall, the accuracy of the guidelines was 63 % (sensitivity 54.9 %; specificity 68.6 %). Incorporating a second set of laboratory tests did not improve accuracy (62.7 %), and a significant decline in liver function tests did not reliably predict spontaneous stone passage. CONCLUSIONS: Existing guidelines performed suboptimally for predicting choledocholithiasis in our patient population, similar to other validation studies. These findings further underscore the importance of developing alternate risk stratification tools for choledocholithiasis, aiming to minimize unnecessary diagnostic ERCP.


Assuntos
Alanina Transaminase/sangue , Bilirrubina/sangue , Coledocolitíase/diagnóstico por imagem , Lipase/sangue , Colangiografia , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Colangiopancreatografia por Ressonância Magnética , Coledocolitíase/sangue , Coledocolitíase/cirurgia , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal , Endossonografia , Feminino , Humanos , Testes de Função Hepática , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Estudos Retrospectivos , Risco , Medição de Risco , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Ultrassonografia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA