The growing use of echocardiography--a double-edged sword?

I believe that the growing volume of echocardiographic services is indeed a double-edge sword. On the one hand, it provides eloquent testimony to the versatility and perceived value of echocardiography to patient care. On the other hand, it underlines the significant resources consumed by providing these services. In these times of "do more with less," doing more can have some negative consequences. I believe that we must each act in a responsible manner, doing our part to be sure that the services we provide are truly needed. We must ask ourselves, and discuss with our referring physicians, "How will the results of this study alter patient care?" On occasion, we may find that a requested study really does not need to be performed. At the very least, this dialogue should allow us to refine the focus of the study and provide the most useful information to the treating physician. We must collect good outcomes data documenting those circumstances in which echocardiography improves outcomes and those clinical settings in which echocardiography is not helpful. We must continue to improve our skills to provide the best services to our patients. And we must also continue to adapt to changes in the health care environment. At the same time, I do not think that we can or should sacrifice quality in an effort to control costs. Clearly, incorrect or misleading information cannot be either cost-effective or good for patient care. We must therefore continue to uphold high professional standards and to work with regulatory agencies ensure that the resources allocated to echocardiographic services are adequate to do them well. ASE's mission statement, which emphasizes that we are "...dedicated to excellence in the development and application of cardiovascular ultrasound to patient care," demands no less.

Transesophageal echocardiographic assessment of embolic sources: intracardiac and extracardiac masses and aortic degenerative disease.

The increased sensitivity of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) makes it complementary and, in many cases, superior to transthoracic echocardiography in the detection of various sources of embolism. These sources include intracardiac thrombus, tumors, spontaneous echocardiographic contrast, and others. TEE is also helpful as an adjunctive test for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolisms.

Flow dependence of measures of aortic stenosis severity during exercise.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to investigate the effect of altering transvalvular volume flow rate on indexes of aortic stenosis severity (valve area, valve resistance, percent left ventricular stroke work loss) derived by using Doppler echocardiography. BACKGROUND: Assessment of hemodynamic severity in aortic stenosis has been limited by the absence of an index that is independent of transvalvular flow rate. The traditional measurement of valve area by the Gorlin equation has been shown to vary with alterations in transvalvular flow. Recently, valve resistance and percent stroke work loss have been proposed as indexes that are relatively independent of flow. Although typically derived with invasive measurements, valve resistance and percent stroke work loss (in addition to continuity equation valve area) can be determined noninvasively with Doppler echocardiography. METHODS: We performed 110 symptom-limited exercise studies in 66 asymptomatic patients with valvular aortic stenosis. Continuity equation valve area, valve resistance (the ratio between mean transvalvular pressure gradient and mean flow rate) and the steady component of percent stroke work loss (the ratio between mean transvalvular pressure gradient and left ventricular systolic pressure) were assessed by Doppler echocardiography at rest and immediately after exercise. RESULTS: Mean transvalvular volume flow rate increased 24% (from [mean +/- SD] 319 +/- 80 to 400 +/- 140 ml/s, p < 0.0001); mean pressure gradient increased 36% (from 30 +/- 14 to 41 +/- 18 mm Hg, p < 0.0001); continuity equation aortic valve area increased 14% (from 1.38 +/- 0.50 to 1.58 +/- 0.69 cm2, p < 0.0001); valve resistance increased 13% (from 137 +/- 81 to 155 +/- 97 dynes.s.cm-5, p < 0.0001); and percent stroke work loss increased 17% (from 17.4 +/- 6.9% to 20.3 +/- 8.5%, p < 0.0001). The effects of flow on valve area, valve resistance and percent stroke work loss were independent of the presence of an aortic valve area < or = or > 1.0 cm2 or reduced transvalvular flow rate (rest cardiac output < 4.5 liters/min). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis, Doppler echocardiographic measures of valve area, valve resistance and percent stroke work loss are flow dependent. Flow dependence is observed with valve area < or = or > 1.0 cm2 and in the presence of both normal and low transvalvular flow states. The potential effects of transvalvular flow should be considered when interpreting Doppler measures of aortic stenosis severity.

Dependence of Gorlin formula and continuity equation valve areas on transvalvular volume flow rate in valvular aortic stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Valve areas derived by the Gorlin formula have been observed to vary with transvalvular volume flow rate. Continuity equation valve areas calculated from Doppler-echo data have become a widely used alternate index of stenosis severity, but it is unclear whether continuity equation valve areas also vary with volume flow rate. This study was designed to investigate the effects of changing transvalvular volume flow rate on aortic valve areas calculated using both the Gorlin formula and the continuity equation in a model of chronic valvular aortic stenosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using a canine model of chronic valvular aortic stenosis in which anatomy and hemodynamics are similar to those of degenerative aortic stenosis, each subject (n = 8) underwent three studies at 2-week intervals. In each study, transvalvular volume flow rates were altered with saline or dobutamine infusion (mean, 10.3 +/- 5.1 flow rates per study). Simultaneous measurements were made of hemodynamics using micromanometer-tipped catheters, of ascending aortic instantaneous volume flow rate using a transit-time flowmeter, and of left ventricular outflow and aortic jet velocity curves using Doppler echocardiography. Valve areas were calculated from the invasive data by the Gorlin equation and from the Doppler-echo data by the continuity equation. In the 24 studies, mean transit-time transvalvular volume flow rate ranged from 80 +/- 33 to 153 +/- 49 mL/min (P < .0001). Comparing minimum to maximum mean volume flow rates, the Gorlin valve area changed from 0.54 +/- 0.22 cm2 to 0.68 +/- 0.21 cm2 (P < .0001), and the continuity equation valve area changed from 0.57 +/- 0.18 cm2 to 0.70 +/- 0.20 cm2 (P < .0001). A strong linear relation was observed between Gorlin valve area and mean transit-time volume flow rate for each study (median, r = .88), but the slope of this relation varied between studies. The Doppler-echo continuity equation valve area had a weaker linear relation with transit-time volume flow rate for each study (median, r = .51). CONCLUSIONS: In this model of chronic valvular aortic stenosis, both Gorlin and continuity equation valve areas were flow-dependent indices of stenosis severity and demonstrated linear relations with transvalvular volume flow rate. The changes in calculated valve area that occur with changes in transvalvular volume flow should be considered when measures of valve area are used to assess the hemodynamic severity of valvular aortic stenosis.

Echocardiographic volume flow and stenosis severity measures with changing flow rate in aortic stenosis.

The anatomy of degenerative valvular aortic stenosis has been poorly represented in animal models, limiting the evaluation of noninvasive echo-Doppler measures of transvalvular volume flow rate and stenosis severity during progressive disease evolution or under conditions of changing volume flow rates. To study these issues, chronic valvular aortic stenosis, characterized by stiff leaflets without commissural fusion, was created in nine adult mongrel dogs by suturing pericardial covered Teflon-felt pads into the sinuses of Valsalva below the coronary ostia during hypothermic cardiac arrest. In the eight surviving dogs, echo-Doppler examinations were performed weekly for up to 8 wk postoperatively. Simultaneous invasive micromanometer pressure data were collected at 2-wk intervals in all subjects, with simultaneous ascending aortic transit time-volume flow measurement in four subjects. Volume flow rates were altered with saline and dobutamine infusions during invasive studies for comparison of echo-Doppler and invasive pressure gradients, volume flow, and valve areas. Serial echo-Doppler follow-up (39 +/- 11 days) demonstrated that, from baseline to final study, mean transvalvular pressure gradient increased (4 +/- 1 to 38 +/- 7 mmHg, P = 0.001), continuity equation aortic valve area decreased (2.06 +/- 0.18 to 0.54 +/- 0.04 cm2, P < 0.0001), and progressive left ventricular hypertrophy developed (62 +/- 6 to 114 +/- 9 g, P = 0.0003). Echo-Doppler and invasive data correlated well for measures of transvalvular pressure gradients (n = 98, maximum instantaneous gradient r = 0.95, mean gradient r = 0.91), volume flow (n = 75, stroke volume r = 0.86, cardiac output r = 0.86), and valve area (n = 73, r = 0.73) despite acute alterations in volume flow and progressive disease evolution. This chronic canine model, with anatomy and hemodynamics similar to clinical degenerative valvular aortic stenosis, should provide a valuable tool for investigating clinically relevant new measures of stenosis severity with use of invasive or noninvasive techniques.

Development of an aortic valve mass after radiofrequency catheter ablation.

A 49-year-old woman underwent a successful radiofrequency catheter ablation of a left-sided accessory pathway using a retrograde approach across the aortic valve. Routine echocardiography performed 20 hours after the procedure revealed a new aortic valve mass. Five blood cultures were negative. An echocardiogram after 2 days of heparin therapy showed complete resolution of the mass. There was no clinical evidence of embolization. Echocardiography may need to be performed routinely after catheter ablations performed retrograde across the aortic valve so that this potentially devastating complication can be diagnosed and treated early in its course.

Subacute ventricular free wall rupture complicating myocardial infarction.

Myocardial free wall rupture accounts for between 8% and 17% of mortality after myocardial infarction. In up to 40% of cases death occurs subacutely over a matter of hours, not minutes. Illustrative clinical cases and data suggest that a high degree of clinical suspicion, along with the early use of echocardiography, could significantly reduce mortality resulting from myocardial free wall rupture complicating myocardial infarction. Myocardial free wall rupture should be suspected in patients with recent myocardial infarction who have recurrent or persistent chest pain, hemodynamic instability, syncope, pericardial tamponade, or transient electromechanical dissociation. In this clinical situation, emergent echocardiography showing a pericardial effusion or pericardial thrombus is highly suggestive of free wall rupture. Surgical exploration and rupture repair is the definitive diagnostic and therapeutic procedure.

Physiologic changes with maximal exercise in asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis assessed by Doppler echocardiography.

OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that the physiologic response to exercise in valvular aortic stenosis could be measured by Doppler echocardiography. BACKGROUND: Data on exercise hemodynamics in patients with aortic stenosis are limited, yet Doppler echocardiography provides accurate, noninvasive measures of stenosis severity. METHODS: In 28 asymptomatic subjects with aortic stenosis maximal treadmill exercise testing was performed with Doppler recordings of left ventricular outflow tract and aortic jet velocities immediately before and after exercise. Maximal and mean volume flow rate (Qmax and Qmean), stroke volume, cardiac output, maximal and mean aortic jet velocity (Vmax, Vmean), mean pressure gradient (delta P) and continuity equation aortic valve area were calculated at rest and after exercise. The actual change from rest to exercise in Qmax and Vmax was compared with the predicted relation between these variables for a given orifice area. Subjects were classified into two groups: Group I (rest-exercise Vmax/Qmax slope > 0, n = 19) and Group II (slope < or = 0, n = 9). RESULTS: Mean exercise duration was 6.7 +/- 4.3 min. With exercise, Vmax increased from 3.99 +/- 0.93 to 4.61 +/- 1.12 m/s (p < 0.0001) and mean delta P increased from 39 +/- 20 to 52 +/- 26 mm Hg (p < 0.0001). Qmax rose with exercise (422 +/- 117 to 523 +/- 209 ml/s, p < 0.0001), but the systolic ejection period decreased (0.33 +/- 0.04 to 0.24 +/- 0.04, p < 0.0001), so that stroke volume decreased slightly (98 +/- 29 to 89 +/- 32 ml, p = 0.01). The increase in cardiac output with exercise (6.5 +/- 1.7 to 10.2 +/- 4.4 liters/min, p < 0.0001) was mediated by increased heart rate (71 +/- 17 to 147 +/- 28 beats/min, p < 0.0001). There was no significant change in the mean aortic valve area with exercise (1.17 +/- 0.45 to 1.28 +/- 0.65, p = 0.06). Compared with Group I patients, patients with a rest-exercise slope < or = 0 (Group II) tended to be older (69 +/- 12 vs. 58 +/- 19 years, p = 0.07) and had a trend toward a shorter exercise duration (5.3 +/- 2.9 vs. 7.3 +/- 4.9 min, p = 0.20). There was no difference between groups for heart rate at rest, blood pressure, stroke volume, cardiac output, Vmax, mean delta P or aortic valve area. With exercise, Group II subjects had a lower cardiac output (7.4 +/- 2.4 vs. 11.5 +/- 4.6 liters/min, p = 0.005) and a smaller percent increase in Vmax (3 +/- 9% vs. 22 +/- 14%, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Doppler echocardiography allows assessment of physiologic changes with exercise in adults with asymptomatic aortic stenosis. A majority of subjects show a rest-exercise response that closely parallels the predicted relation between Vmax and Qmax for a given orifice area. The potential utility of this approach for elucidating the relation between hemodynamic severity and clinical symptoms deserves further study.

Value of transesophageal color Doppler echocardiography for detection of different types of atrial septal defect in adults.

In 121 adults, the value of transthoracic and transesophageal color Doppler echocardiography for detection of different types of atrial septal defect (ASD) or of partial anomalous pulmonary venous return was analyzed. The 121 patients had a total of 129 defects with left-to-right atrial shunting (including eight patients with two types of defects). All of six cases with primum-type ASD were diagnosed correctly by both echocardiographic methods. Ninety-seven patients showed a secundum-type ASD during transesophageal echocardiography: by transthoracic echocardiography, only eight (20%) of the 40 small defects (diameter < 5 mm) were detected as compared with 15 (83%) of the 18 defects with a diameter of 5 to 10 mm and all 39 defects with a diameter > 10 mm. A sinus venosus--type ASD was evident by transesophageal echocardiography in 11 patients, of which only one (9%) was demonstrated by the transthoracic approach. Partial anomalous pulmonary venous return was seen by transesophageal echocardiography in 13 patients but missed in two other patients in whom anomalous pulmonary venous return was subsequently identified by surgery (both with anomalous return of the upper right pulmonary vein into the superior vena cava). By use of the transthoracic technique, partial anomalous venous return was detected in only two cases, both of which had "scimitar syndrome." Compared with transthoracic echocardiography, the transesophageal approach is clearly superior in the detection of small secundum-type ASD, sinus venosus--type ASD, and partial anomalous pulmonary venous return.