Ex-vivo and in-vivo validation of a novel measuring protocol for guided endodontics.

OBJECTIVES: To (1) validate the use of a post-operative intraoral scan (IOS) versus Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT), gold standard, on its ability to measure the accuracy of guided endodontics, and (2) present clinical data on the accuracy of guided endodontics. METHODS: Four models, including 10 extracted teeth each, were created. Forty guided access cavities were planned on dentin to simulate pulp canal obliteration (PCO). Two operators performed guided access cavities. A post-operative CBCT and IOS were acquired. The coronal, apical, and angular deviations were measured with CBCT and IOS. Clinical accuracy was measured using an IOS acquired immediately after drilling the access cavity with the aid of a guide. Data analysis was performed using multiway Anova and corrected for simultaneous hypothesis testing according to Tukey. P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Descriptive statistics on the clinical accuracy of guided endodontics were performed. RESULTS: Thirty-eight cavities were assessed with a mean length of 13.8 mm. No statistical difference between operators and methods was found for all parameters (P > 0.05). Thirty-three patients were treated with guided endodontics and measured using an IOS. Results show an average coronal, apical, and angular deviation of 0.2 mm, 0.45 mm, and 1.91° respectively. The average length of the access cavities was 12.5 mm. CONCLUSIONS: An IOS can be used to measure the accuracy of guided endodontics. Clinical data showed high accuracy of guided endodontics with a mean apical deviation smaller than 0.5 mm and a mean angular deviation of less than 2°. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The use of an IOS does not involve additional radiation exposure. A safety margin of at least 1 mm around the planned trajectory should be respected when planning the case to minimize the possibility of root perforation.

In vitro study on the accuracy of sleeveless guided endodontics and treatment of a complex upper lateral incisor.

PURPOSE: The present study aims to assess the accuracy of sleeveless guided endodontics for root canal treatment of severe pulp canal obliteration (PCO) in 3D printed jaws. Additionally, the treatment of a complex lateral incisor is presented to illustrate the use of sleeveless guides in a clinical situation. METHODS: Two cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) volumes of an upper and lower jaw were selected to design 3D printed models with PCO. Virtual planning of the access cavities was performed from right to left second premolar. Then, the models were mounted into a phantom head to simulate an actual patient. Two operators with different levels of experience in endodontics performed guided access cavities. The handpiece was guided by guiding rails placed against each other on the sides of the tooth. A post-operative CBCT scan was taken for analysis. RESULTS: Eighty-eight guided access cavities (44 per operator) were drilled on eight 3D printed models. The mean length of the access cavities was 15.3 mm, with a mean coronal and apical deviation of 0.5 mm and 0.7 mm respectively. The mean angular deviation was 1.5°. No statistically significant difference was found between operators for the three measured parameters. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates, within its limitations, that sleveless guides represent an accurate method for guided endodontic treatment. No statistically significant difference between operators was found when using the guide. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This method offers a valuable alternative to conventional endodontic guides with similar accuracy results.