Evaluation of the Reproducibility of the Dejour Classification for Femoropatellar Instability.

Objective To evaluate the classification proposed by David Dejour to describe trochlear dysplasia of the knee through inter- and intraobserver reproducibility measurements. Methods Ten patients with trochlear dysplasia were studied. Three physicians, members of the Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia do Joelho (Brazilian Society of Knee Surgery), were invited to evaluate the images. Intra- and interobserver analyses were performed at one-week intervals. Reproducibility was evaluated in four scenarios: using only radiography; using radiography and tomography; using radiography and consulting the classification; and using radiography and tomography, consulting the classification. Results The intraobserver evaluation presented discordant results. In the interobserver analysis, the degree of agreement was low for the analyses that used only radiography and excellent for those in which both radiography and tomography were used. Conclusion The Dejour classification presented a low intra- and interobserver reproducibility when only the profile radiography was used. It was demonstrated that the use of the radiography alone for classification may generate lack of uniformity even among experienced observers. However, when radiography and tomography were combined, reproducibility improved.

Evaluation of the Reproducibility of the Dejour Classification for Femoropatellar Instability / Avaliação da reprodutibilidade da classificação de Dejour para instabilidade femoropatelar

Abstract Objective To evaluate the classification proposed by David Dejour to describe trochlear dysplasia of the knee through inter- and intraobserver reproducibility measurements. Methods Ten patients with trochlear dysplasia were studied. Three physicians, members of the Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia do Joelho (Brazilian Society of Knee Surgery), were invited to evaluate the images. Intra- and interobserver analyses were performed at one-week intervals. Reproducibility was evaluated in four scenarios: using only radiography; using radiography and tomography; using radiography and consulting the classification; and using radiography and tomography, consulting the classification. Results The intraobserver evaluation presented discordant results. In the interobserver analysis, the degree of agreement was low for the analyses that used only radiography and excellent for those in which both radiography and tomography were used. Conclusion The Dejour classification presented a low intra- and interobserver reproducibilitywhenonly the profile radiography was used. It was demonstrated that the use of the radiography alone for classificationmay generate lack of uniformity even among experienced observers. However, when radiography and tomography were combined, reproducibility improved.

Resumo Objetivo Avaliar, pela reprodutibilidade interobservador e intraobservador, a classificação proposta por David Dejour para descrever a displasia troclear do joelho. Métodos Foram estudados dez pacientes com diagnóstico de displasia troclear. Três médicos membros da Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia do Joelho foram convidados para avaliar as imagens. Análises intra- e interobservador foram feitas com intervalo de uma semana. A reprodutibilidade foi avaliada em quatro cenários: uso de radiografia; uso de radiografia e tomografia; uso de radiografia, consultando-se a classificação no momento; e uso de radiografia e tomografia, consultando-se a classificação no momento. Resultados A avaliação intraobservador apresentou resultados discordantes. Na análise interobservador, o grau de concordância foi baixo para as análises que usavam apenas a radiografia e excelente para aquelas que associavamradiografia e tomografia. Conclusão A classificação de Dejour apresentou uma baixa reprodutibilidade intra e interobservador quando usada somente a radiografia em perfil. Demonstrou-se que o uso apenas da radiografia para classificar pode gerar falta de uniformidade até mesmo entre observadores experientes. Contudo, quando radiografia e tomografia foram associadas, a reprodutibilidade melhorou.

Successful anesthesia and hip surgery in a 107-year-old patient.

PATIENT: Female, 107. FINAL DIAGNOSIS: Hip fracture. SYMPTOMS: -. MEDICATION: -. CLINICAL PROCEDURE: Hip surgery. SPECIALTY: Orthopedics and Traumatology. OBJECTIVE: Rare disease. BACKGROUND: In modern societies, elderly populations have increased over the last four decades and have become the main clients of medical services. A hip fracture is a significant injury for anyone, but for older people it can be catastrophic. CASE REPORT: A 107-year-old female was admitted with fracture of the right hip. The patient took a single 200 mL carbohydrate drink orally two hours before surgery. Before induction of spinal anesthesia, routine monitoring was started and an intravenous line was placed. Crystalloids and hydroxyethyl starch in 0.9% sodium chloride solution were administered intravenously during the operation. After sedation with i.v. ketamine and midazolam, spinal puncture was performed with the patient in the sitting position and isobaric bupivacaine were administered. The level of sensory block was observed in T12 and motor blockade (grade 3) of the lower limbs. The surgical procedure lasted 60 minutes without hypotension, bradycardia or decreased oxygen saturation. For safety reason, the patient was transferred to the ICU for monitoring; intravenous hydration was withdrawn and released oral feeding six hours after the end of surgery. The patient was sent to his residence on the morning of the second day. CONCLUSIONS: This case showed that with suitable techniques and conduits can perform surgery in a patient with 107 years.