The clinical utility of TRACP-5b to monitor anti-resorptive treatments of osteoporosis.

TRACP-5b can be used to monitor the response of treatments in osteoporosis. We investigated the effect of feeding on levels of TRACP-5b and how these markers perform in a clinical setting. After feeding, there was no effect on levels TRACP-5b. It has similar diagnostic accuracy to CTX and PINP. INTRODUCTION: Bone turnover markers (BTMs) can be used to monitor response to osteoporosis treatment. However, some are affected by food intake and are not suitable to measure in a clinical setting. An assay is available which is capable of detecting the active isoform 5b of tartrate resistance acid phosphatase (TRACP-5b) and it may have minimal biological variation. Our aims were to investigate the effect of feeding on levels of TRACP-5b and compare this to CTX and PINP and then to compare the diagnostic accuracy of TRACP-5b to CTX and PINP in patients with osteoporosis given commonly used treatments. METHODS: Eighteen patients were recruited to investigate the effect of feeding on BTMs. Ninety-seven patients (74 females and 23 males) receiving 5 mg annual intra-venous zoledronate (mean age 70) and 97 patients receiving no treatment were recruited as group-matched controls. Sixteen patients receiving 60 mg subcutaneous denosumab every 6 months, (mean age 76) and 16 matched controls were recruited. Seventy-six patients were receiving oral bisphosphonates: 70 mg alendronate weekly, 35 mg risedronate and 150 mg monthly ibandronate (4%). Thirty of these patients had BMD measured at the total hip and lumbar spine. An estimate of compliance was not determined. Eighty patients receiving no treatment were recruited as group-matched controls. TRACP-5b (ELISA, Nittobo) and CTX and PINP were measured in serum in the non-fasting state between 0800 and 1700. RESULTS: After feeding, there was no effect on levels TRACP-5b and significant reductions in CTX and PINP, 29% and 10%, respectively (p < 0.001). In the zoledronate and denosumab groups, there were no differences in the areas under the curves (AUCs) between TRACP-5b, PINP and CTX. In the oral bisphosphonates group, the AUCs between TRACP-5b and PINP and TRACP-5b and CTX were significantly different, p < 0.01 and p = 0.001, respectively. TRACP-5b was negatively correlated with BMD. CONCLUSION: TRACP-5b is not affected by food intake, unlike CTX and PINP. All three BTMs correlate with change in BMD at the lumbar spine and total hip. TRACP-5b has similar diagnostic accuracy to CTX and PINP with commonly used treatments for osteoporosis with the exception of oral bisphosphonate therapy.

Quantitative computed tomography discriminates between postmenopausal women with low spine bone mineral density with vertebral fractures and those with low spine bone mineral density only: the SHATTER study.

Lumbar spine volumetric bone mineral density (BMD) measured using quantitative computed tomography (QCT) can discriminate between postmenopausal women with low areal BMD with and without vertebral fractures. QCT provides a 3D measure of BMD, excludes the vertebral posterior elements and accounts for bone size. This knowledge could contribute to effective treatment targeting of patients with low BMD. INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the ability of lumbar spine bone mineral apparent density (BMAD), trabecular bone score (TBS) and volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) to discriminate between postmenopausal women with low areal bone mineral density (aBMD) by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) with and without vertebral fractures. The discriminatory ability of lumbar spine aBMD was compared with that of BMAD, TBS and vBMD. METHODS: We studied three groups of postmenopausal women, i.e. group 1, aBMD T-score < - 1.0 and ≥ 1 vertebral fracture (n = 39); group 2, aBMD T-score < - 1.0 and no vertebral fracture, age- and aBMD-matched to group 1 (n = 34); group 3, aBMD score > - 1 and no vertebral fracture, age-matched to group 1 (n = 37). Lumbar spine aBMD was measured by DXA. BMAD was calculated using the DXA scan results. TBS was derived following DXA scan image reanalysis. Lumbar spine vBMD was assessed by quantitative computed tomography and Mindways Pro software. Differences in variables between groups 1, 2 and 3 were examined using general linear univariate modelling approaches. Area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was calculated for BMAD, TBS and vBMD to determine the ability of lumbar spine measurement variables to discriminate between group 1 and group 2. A comparison of ROCs was performed. RESULTS: Lumbar spine BMAD and TBS measurement variables were similar for groups 1 and 2. However, vBMD was significantly lower in group 1 and could discriminate between those women with low aBMD with (group 1) and without vertebral fractures (group 2). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that lumbar spine vBMD may discriminate well between postmenopausal women with low aBMD with and without vertebral fractures as it provides a 3D measure of bone mineral density, excludes the posterior elements of the vertebrae and takes into account bone size. A unique feature of the SHATTER study is that groups 1 and 2 were matched for aBMD, thus our study findings are independent of aBMD. Furthermore, we observed that neither BMAD nor TBS could distinguish between women with low aBMD with and without vertebral fractures. The knowledge gained from the SHATTER study will influence clinical and therapeutic decision-making, thereby optimising the care of patients with and without vertebral and other fragility fractures.

Clinical utility of bone turnover markers in monitoring the withdrawal of treatment with oral bisphosphonates in postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Bone markers may be useful to monitor response to treatment withdrawal in osteoporosis. We used two criteria for investigating the change in BTMs after withdrawal of bisphosphonate treatment. A larger increase in BTMs was associated with greater bone loss. Bone markers may be useful in monitoring of patients taking a pause from treatment. INTRODUCTION: Measurement of bone turnover markers (BTMs) may be useful to monitor offset of treatment with bisphosphonates (BP) in osteoporosis. We assessed the effect of withdrawal of BP treatment by comparing the changes in BTMs and total hip (TH) bone density (BMD). METHODS: We studied postmenopausal osteoporotic women who had completed a randomised study of three oral BPs. After 2 years of treatment, participants with BMD T-score > - 2.5 and in whom it was considered clinically appropriate to discontinue treatment, were invited to participate in a further 2-year observational study. Biochemical response was assessed using BTMs (CTX and PINP) with offset being defined by two criteria: (1) an increase greater than the least significant change (LSC) and (2) an increase above the reference mean value. RESULTS: Fifty women completed the study. At 48 weeks after stopping BPs, CTX was greater than the LSC for 66% of women and PINP 72%; CTX was above the reference mean for 64% of women and PINP 42%. The decrease in THBMD was greater for women with the largest increase in BTM compared to those with continued suppression (mean difference for CTX was - 2.98%, 95%CI - 4.75 to - 1.22, P < 0.001, PINP - 2.25%, 95% CI - 4.46 to - 0.032, P = 0.046). CONCLUSION: The measurement of BTM after withdrawal of BPs is potentially useful to evaluate patients that are taking a pause from treatment. An increase in BTMs more than the LSC and/or reference mean reflects loss of treatment effect and identifies patients that are likely to have a decrease in BMD. Such changes could provide an indication for reintroduction of treatment.

Effects of discontinuing oral bisphosphonate treatments for postmenopausal osteoporosis on bone turnover markers and bone density.

The antiresorptive potency varies between different bisphosphonates. We investigated the effect of stopping oral bisphosphonate treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis (ibandronate, alendronate, risedronate) on BTMs and BMD. After stopping treatment, all three groups showed an increase in BTMs and a decrease in hip BMD; however, none returned to pre-treatment baseline values. INTRODUCTION: Bisphosphonates (BPs) continue to suppress bone turnover markers (BTMs) after treatment has stopped, leading to the suggestion that a pause in treatment could be considered for low-risk patients. Indirect comparisons suggest that after cessation of treatment, the effects on bone may differ between drugs. We investigated the effects of stopping oral BP treatments for postmenopausal osteoporosis on BTMs and bone mineral density (BMD). METHODS: We studied postmenopausal osteoporotic women who had previously taken part in a 2-year randomised study of three oral BPs (ibandronate, alendronate, or risedronate). At the end of the study, women with hip BMD T-score > - 2.5 and considered clinically appropriate to discontinue treatment were invited to participate in a further 2-year observational study. Biochemical response was assessed using BTMs, and BMD was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. RESULTS: All BTMs increased after treatment withdrawal but remained below the pre-treatment baseline with less suppression of BTMs for the risedronate group compared to alendronate and ibandronate up to 48 weeks. There was no difference between the BP groups 96 weeks after stopping treatment. The change in BMD during the 96 weeks after stopping treatment was - 1.6% (95% CI - 1.9 to - 1.2, P < 0.001) for the total hip and - 0.6% (95% CI - 1.1 to - 0.2, P = 0.17) at the lumbar spine with no difference between the three BP groups (P = 0.85 and P = 0.48, respectively). CONCLUSION: For all treatment groups, there was an increase in BTMs and a decrease in hip BMD after stopping BPs for 2 years; however, none returned to pre-treatment baseline values.

Response of bone turnover markers to raloxifene treatment in postmenopausal women with osteopenia.

UNLABELLED: We used two methods of identifying women who reached the target for raloxifene treatment with bone turnover markers. Both approaches identified women that responded to treatment but did not fully agree and may be complementary. INTRODUCTION: The change in bone turnover markers (BTMs) in response to osteoporosis therapy can be assessed by a decrease beyond the least significant change (LSC) or below the mean of the reference interval (RI). We compared the performance of these two approaches in women treated with raloxifene. METHODS: Fifty postmenopausal osteopenic women (age 51-72 years) were randomised to raloxifene or no treatment for 2 years. Blood samples were collected for the measurement of BTM. The LSC for each marker was calculated from the untreated women and the RI obtained from healthy premenopausal women (age 35-40 years). Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured at the spine and hip. RESULTS: There was a decrease in BTM in response to raloxifene treatment, percentage change at 12 weeks: C terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX) -39 % (95 % CI -48 to -28) and N terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PINP) -32 % (95 % CI -40 to -23) P < 0.001. The proportion of women classified as responding to treatment using LSC at 12 weeks was as follows: CTX 38 % and PINP 52 % and at 48 weeks CTX 60 % and PINP 65 %. For the RI approach, the proportion of women classified as responding to treatment at 12 weeks was CTX and PINP 38 % and at 48 weeks CTX 40 % and PINP 45 %. There was a significant difference in the change in spine BMD in the raloxifene-treated group compared to the no-treatment group at week 48: difference 0.031 g/cm(2) (95 % CI 0.016 to 0.046, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The two approaches identified women that reached the target for treatment using BTM. Both LSC and RI criteria appear useful in identifying treatment response, but the two approaches do not fully overlap and may be complementary.

Response of bone turnover markers to three oral bisphosphonate therapies in postmenopausal osteoporosis: the TRIO study.

UNLABELLED: We used bone turnover markers to identify women who responded to bisphosphonate treatment for osteoporosis. Response was more likely with alendronate and ibandronate than risedronate. There was a greater decrease in bone markers if baseline bone turnover markers were higher and if the patient took more than 80 % of her medication. INTRODUCTION: Biochemical response to bisphosphonate therapy can be assessed using either a decrease in bone turnover marker beyond the least significant change (LSC) or a reduction to within a reference interval (RI). We compared the performance of these target responses and determined whether response was related to the type of bisphosphonate, compliance and baseline bone turnover markers. METHODS: Biochemical responses to three oral bisphosphonates were assessed in an open, controlled trial comprising 172 postmenopausal osteoporotic women (age 53-84 years), randomised to alendronate, ibandronate or risedronate, plus calcium and vitamin D supplementation for 2 years. The LSC for each marker was derived within the study population, whereas RIs were obtained from a control group of healthy premenopausal women (age 35-40 years). RESULTS: Over 70 % of women achieved a target response for serum CTX and PINP, irrespective of the approach used. The percentage decrease at 12 weeks was greater for women with baseline PINP above the RI -63 % (difference 13 %, 95 % CI 0 to 27.1, P = 0.049) and good compliance -67 % (difference 15.9 %, 95 % CI 6.3 to 25.5, P = 0.001). Responders had a greater increase in spine bone density compared to nonresponders; for example 6.2 vs. 2.3 % (difference 3.9 %, 95 % CI 1.6 to 6.3, P = 0.0011) for PINP LSC. The magnitude of change in bone markers was greater with ibandronate and alendronate than risedronate. CONCLUSIONS: Both approaches to response identified similar proportions of women as responders. Nonresponders had smaller increases in BMD, and we suggest that biochemical assessment of response is a useful tool for the management of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

The impact of glucocorticoid therapy on trabecular bone score in older women.

UNLABELLED: We propose that trabecular bone score could be a useful tool for the study of glucocorticoid-associated bone effects. Trabecular bone score alone and lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) used in combination with trabecular bone score, but not lumbar spine BMD alone was able to discriminate between glucocorticoid-treated and glucocorticoid-naïve women. INTRODUCTION: Glucocorticoids result in rapid bone loss and an increase in fracture risk that cannot be fully explained by changes in BMD. Trabecular bone score (TBS) correlates with three-dimensional bone micro-architectural parameters and can be derived from grey-level variations within dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans. We propose that TBS could be a useful tool for the study of glucocorticoid-associated bone effects. METHODS: We assessed the ability of lumbar spine BMD (LS-BMD), TBS, and LS-BMD with TBS (LS-BMD + TBS) to discriminate between healthy women and (i) glucocorticoid-treated women, and (ii) glucocorticoid-naïve women with recent fractures. Older women (n = 484, ages 55-79 years) who had (i) taken prednisolone ≥5 mg/day for >3 months (n = 64), (ii) sustained a recent fracture of the distal forearm (n = 46), proximal humerus (n = 37), vertebra (n = 30) or proximal femur (n = 28), or (iii) were healthy population-based women (n = 279) were recruited. LS-BMD was measured by DXA and TBS values were derived. RESULTS: Compared to healthy, population-based women, women with recent fractures had lower LS-BMD (-0.34 to -1.38) and TBS (-0.38 to -1.04) Z-scores. Glucocorticoid-treated women had lower TBS Z-scores than glucocorticoid-naïve women (-0.80 versus 0) but their LS-BMD Z-scores did not differ (-0.13 versus 0). TBS alone (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) = 0.721) and LS-BMD + TBS (AUC = 0.721), but not LS-BMD alone (AUC = 0.572) was able to discriminate between glucocorticoid-treated and glucocorticoid-naïve women. CONCLUSIONS: TBS provides additional information regarding glucocorticoid-associated alterations in bone quality. We conclude that TBS may be a useful tool for the further study of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.

Adherence to raloxifene therapy: assessment methods and relationship with efficacy.

UNLABELLED: Response to therapy depends on patient compliance but accurate assessment is difficult and adequate levels of adherence are uncertain. Adherence to raloxifene treatment may be assessed more accurately by electronic monitoring than by counting returned tablets. The level of adherence is positively associated with the degree of bone response. INTRODUCTION: Adherence to study medication is usually estimated by counting returned tablets. This method relies on subjects' honesty and may be inaccurate. We aimed to assess adherence more accurately, and examine its effect on measures of bone response, by using electronic monitoring. METHODS: Osteopenic women, ages 50 to 80, were prescribed daily raloxifene for 2 years. Electronic bottle caps (Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS), Aardex) recorded the date and time on opening. Returned tablets were also counted. We measured bone mineral density (BMD) in duplicate at the spine and hip at baseline and 2 years. We also measured urinary N-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen (NTX) at baseline, 1 and 2 years. We calculated the percentage changes in BMD and NTX from mean baseline to mean follow up measurements. Percentage adherence was assessed by both methods for 71 subjects that completed the study. RESULTS: The two methods correlated significantly (p <0.001, Spearman's rho = 0.73) but the tablet count showed a higher median adherence than the MEMS caps (95.7 vs. 85.0%, p <0.001), with greater divergence at lower adherence levels. MEMS adherence in 65 subjects with complete data correlated with NTX response (p <0.01, rho = -0.33) but with BMD response only at the femoral neck. However, adherence in the lowest quartile was associated with poorer BMD response at all sites (p <0.05). CONCLUSION: Tablet counts may give similar results overall but conceal substantial individual non-adherence. Monitoring caps may assess adherence more accurately than tablet counts and would be the preferred method in clinical trials. The degree of adherence is associated with both bone turnover and BMD responses to anti-resorptive therapy.

Vertebral fracture assessment scans enhance targeting of investigations and treatment within a fracture risk assessment pathway.

UNLABELLED: Vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) scanning is a useful tool to aid vertebral fracture identification. In this evaluation, we show that introduction of a comprehensive fracture risk assessment pathway incorporating VFA has enhanced diagnosis of vertebral fractures and improved targeting of investigations and treatment. INTRODUCTION: Vertebral fractures are a common manifestation of osteoporosis and are associated with an increased risk of future vertebral and non-vertebral fractures. VFA is a method of imaging the thoraco-lumbar spine and a useful tool to aid vertebral fracture identification. In August 2008, a new one-stop pathway was introduced incorporating VFA and laboratory investigations at the time of bone mineral density assessment. The aims of this evaluation were to evaluate the clinical utility of VFA in identifying vertebral fractures which had not presented clinically and to evaluate the impact of this on management. METHODS: We performed a retrospective 6-month review of the new pathway focussing on those patients undergoing VFA who were suspected to have a vertebral fracture. The outcomes of VFA, spinal X-rays and investigations were evaluated. RESULTS: Three thousand five hundred twenty-six individuals underwent fracture risk assessment over a 6-month period, of which 1,833 underwent VFA. Previously undiagnosed vertebral fractures were found in 202 individuals (36 were in retrospect apparent on prior imaging, and 29 were new vertebral fractures in patients with pre-existing vertebral fractures). Diagnosis of a vertebral fracture led to further investigation in all individuals and altered management in 59 (29 %) individuals. A potentially modifiable underlying cause was found in 42 (21 %). CONCLUSIONS: Introduction of a fracture risk assessment service incorporating VFA and a one-stop pathway has enhanced vertebral fracture identification and targeting of treatment and management.

The effect of cessation of raloxifene treatment on bone turnover in postmenopausal women.

There is evidence to suggest accelerated bone loss following estrogen cessation. The effect of cessation of raloxifene therapy on bone turnover is unknown. Our aim was to determine the effect of cessation of raloxifene treatment on bone turnover and bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal, osteopenic women. Women aged 50 to 80 years received raloxifene for 96 weeks and were then randomized to continue raloxifene (group 1, n=20) or placebo (group 2, n=20) for a further 96 weeks. A third group (group 3, n=14) received no treatment. Bone turnover markers and bone density (BMD) were measured throughout the study. Raloxifene treatment for 96 weeks resulted in a decrease in bone turnover (PINP by 31%) and an increase in spine BMD (by 2%) but no change in hip BMD for groups 1 and 2. Continuation of raloxifene (group 1) maintained these changes. Following cessation of raloxifene (group 2), bone markers returned to baseline levels (by 120 weeks). Hip BMD was decreased by 2% at 192 weeks compared to baseline. Bone markers in the controls (group 3) remained at the upper limit of the reference range throughout, with decreases in BMD of 2.3% (spine) and 2.8% (hip). Bone loss following cessation of raloxifene therapy at 96 weeks was greater than in the control group, suggesting accelerated bone loss. The beneficial effect on bone turnover of 96 weeks of raloxifene was lost 6 months after cessation of treatment.

Device-specific thresholds to diagnose osteoporosis at the proximal femur: an approach to interpreting peripheral bone measurements in clinical practice.

INTRODUCTION: A single T score criterion cannot be universally applied to different peripheral bone measurement devices, since measurements in an identical population result in a tenfold difference in the prevalence of osteoporosis. The use of peripheral devices is increasing in clinical practice, despite the difficulties in interpreting results. We propose the use of two thresholds, which have either 95% sensitivity or 95% specificity, to identify (1) individuals who require treatment or (2) individuals who require no treatment, both based on a peripheral measurement alone, or (3) individuals who require additional central densitometry measurements. METHODS: We recruited 500 postmenopausal women, 100 premenopausal women and 279 women with proximal femoral, vertebral, distal forearm or proximal humeral fractures. All subjects underwent dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements of the lumbar spine, total hip and distal forearm, quantitative computed tomography (QCT) of the distal forearm and quantitative ultrasound (QUS) of the heel (four devices), finger (two devices), radius and metatarsal. We identified the threshold for each device that identified women without osteoporosis with the same sensitivity (upper threshold set at 95%) as total hip DXA and women with osteoporosis with the same specificity (lower threshold set at 95%) as total hip DXA. Individuals between the two thresholds required additional examination by central densitometry. RESULTS: The correlation between devices varied from 0.173 (QUS finger) to 0.686 (DXA forearm) compared with total hip DXA (P<0.0001). The area under the curve (AUC) between devices varied from 0.604 (QUS finger) to 0.896 (DXA forearm) compared with total hip DXA (P<0.0001). In a population-based cohort (prevalence of osteoporosis 9.8%) the threshold approach appropriately identified between 26% (QUS heel) and 68% (DXA forearm) of subjects in whom a treatment decision could be made without additional central DXA with 95% certainty. In a fracture cohort (prevalence of osteoporosis 36%) between 16% (QUS finger) and 37% (QCT forearm) of subjects were appropriately identified. CONCLUSION: The threshold approach to interpreting peripheral bone measurements enables a substantial number of individuals with either normal bone mineral density (BMD) or osteoporosis to be selected and treated appropriately.

Visual identification of vertebral fractures in osteoporosis using morphometric X-ray absorptiometry.

Visual identification of vertebral fractures from spinal radiographs (visual XR) makes use of the reader's expertise in ruling out non-fracture deformities or normal variants. Scan images of the spine acquired by DXA may be analyzed quantitatively (morphometric X-ray absorptiometry [quantitative MXA]) or visually (visual MXA). The aims of this study were to compare visual and quantitative MXA with visual XR for the identification of vertebral fractures. Spinal radiographs and MXA scans were acquired at baseline and 1 year in 70 women referred with osteoporosis. These were assessed visually by two expert readers (observer A, a radiologist; observer B, a physician with expertise in osteoporosis) for evidence of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures. Observer C (a radiographer with expertise in vertebral morphometry) performed visual and quantitative assessments of the MXA scans. Visual assessment of spinal radiographs by observer A was used as the gold standard for comparison of methods. Sensitivity for the identification of prevalent fractures by MXA was best for visual MXA by observer A (92%), whereas quantitative MXA had the lowest sensitivity (82%). Specificity was >90% for both visual and quantitative MXA. Kappa scores for agreement for identification of prevalent fractures between visual XR (observer A) and visual MXA (all three observers), and between visual XR and visual MXA performed by reader B were similar (kappa = 0.85-0.87). Agreement with visual XR performed by observer A was slightly lower for quantitative MXA (kappa = 0.77). Interobserver agreement between the two expert readers (observers A and B) was the same for both visual XR and visual MXA (kappa = 0.86). Seven incident vertebral fractures were identified in four patients at follow-up. All four patients were identified by visual MXA, and three patients were identified by quantitative MXA. Observers A and B identified all seven incident fractures by visual MXA, and observer C missed one fracture that was also missed by quantitative MXA. An incident fracture of vertebra T6 was excluded from analysis by quantitative MXA because of poor image quality. We conclude that visual identification of vertebral fractures from MXA scans is superior to quantitative assessment. Used as a screening tool for conventional radiography, this approach could help reduce the radiation dose to the patient in the diagnosis and monitoring of osteoporosis.

Measuring bone mineral density of the pelvis and proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty.

We aimed to evaluate the precision and longitudinal sensitivity of measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) in the pelvis and to determine the effect of bone cement on the measurement of BMD in femoral regions of interest (ROI) after total hip arthroplasty (THA). A series of 29 patients had duplicate dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans of the hip within 13 months of THA. Pelvic analyses using 3- and 4-ROI models gave a coefficient of variation (CV) of 2.5% to 3.6% and of 2.5% to 4.8%, respectively. Repeat scans in 17 subjects one year later showed a significant change in BMD in three regions using the 4-ROI model, compared with change in only one region with the 3-ROI model (p < 0.05). Manual exclusion of cement from femoral ROIs increased the net CV from 1.6% to 3.6% (p = 0.001), and decreased the measured BMD by 20% (t = 12.1, p < 0.001). Studies of two cement phantoms in vitro showed a small downward drift in bone cement BMD giving a measurement error of less than 0.03 g/cm2/year associated with inclusion of cement in femoral ROIs. Changes in pelvic periprosthetic BMD are best detected using a 4-ROI model. Analysis of femoral ROI is more precise without exclusion of cement although an awareness of its effect on the measurement of the BMD is needed.

Effect of pamidronate in preventing local bone loss after total hip arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.

Acute periprosthetic bone loss occurs after total hip arthroplasty. Bone loss undermines the support of the implant and may contribute to prosthetic failure. At present, there is no established prophylaxis for this process. We studied the effect of a single-dose infusion of 90 mg of pamidronate on early periprosthetic bone mineral density (BMD), biochemical markers of bone turnover, radiological, and clinical outcome in a 26-week, prospective, randomized, double-blinded study of 47 men and women undergoing total hip arthroplasty. Pamidronate therapy led to a significant reduction in bone loss compared with placebo for both the proximal femur and the pelvis (repeated measures analysis of variance [ANOVA]); p = 0.001 and p = 0.01, respectively). Pamidronate therapy was associated with suppression of all biochemical markers of bone turnover compared with placebo (repeated measures ANOVA; p < 0.05 for all comparisons), with the exception of urinary free deoxypyridinoline. Pamidronate did not interfere with the clinical improvement in symptoms after total hip arthroplasty, or radiological outcome, and was not associated with an increase in adverse events. This study provides clinical data on the efficacy and safety of bisphosphonates for the prevention of bone loss after total hip arthroplasty and supports the establishment of larger-scale clinical trials to determine the long-term clinical efficacy of this intervention using implant failure as the primary endpoint.

Prevention of bone loss with risedronate in glucocorticoid-treated rheumatoid arthritis patients.

The aim of the study was to assess risedronate's effect on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with rheumatoid arthritis receiving glucocorticoids. We carried out a two center, 2 year, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial with a third year of nontreatment follow-up. We studied 120 women requiring long-term glucocorticoid therapy at > 2.5 mg/day prednisolone randomized to treatment with daily placebo; daily 2.5 mg risedronate; or cyclical 15 mg risedronate (2 out of 12 weeks). At 97 weeks, bone mineral density was maintained at the lumbar spine (+1.4%) and trochanter (+0.4%) in the daily 2.5 mg risedronate group, while significant bone loss occurred in the placebo group (-1.6%, p = 0.03; and 4.0%, p < 0.005, respectively). At the femoral neck, there was a nonsignificant bone loss in the daily 2.5 mg risedronate group (-1.0%) while in the placebo group bone mass decreased significantly (-3.6%, p < 0.001). The difference between placebo and daily 2.5 mg risedronate groups was significant at the lumbar spine (p = 0.009) and trochanter (p = 0.02) but did not reach statistical significance at the femoral neck. Although not significantly different from placebo at the lumbar spine, the overall effect of the cyclical regimen was similar to that of the daily 2.5 mg risedronate regimen. Treatment withdrawal led to bone loss in the risedronate groups that was significant at the lumbar spine. A similar number of patients experienced adverse events (including upper gastrointestinal events) across treatment groups and risedronate was generally well tolerated. Thus risedronate preserves bone mass in postmenopausal women with rheumatoid arthritis receiving glucocorticoids while patients receiving a placebo have significant bone loss.

Paget's disease in a patient with ankylosing spondylitis--a diagnostic dilemma.

A patient is described in whom the diagnosis of Paget's disease was complicated by the presence of ankylosing spondylitis. The mechanism for the unusual distribution of pagetic bone is discussed.

Clinical utility of bone mass measurements in adults: consensus of an international panel. The Society for Clinical Densitometry.

Low bone mass predicts future fracture risk as well as high cholesterol or high blood pressure can predict the risk of heart disease or stroke. Prevention of the first fracture should be a clinical goal. In patients without fractures, osteopenia and osteoporosis can be diagnosed based on the extent of reduction in bone mass below mean peak bone mass of young healthy individuals. As bone mass decreases, fracture risk increases exponentially. Clinical situations in which an assessment of bone mass and fracture risk affects therapeutic decisions include estrogen deficiency, vertebral abnormalities, radiographic osteopenia, asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism, and long-term corticosteroid therapy. Serial measurements can also be used to monitor the effects of osteoporosis treatments. The appropriate technique and skeletal site for bone mass measurements should be chosen based on the patient's circumstances and the precision of measurement. A clinical interpretation can enhance the value of computer-generated bone mass measurement reports and improve decision making.