Ascites: aetiology, mortality and the prevalence of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the aetiology, prognosis and prevalence of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) in patients hospitalized for ascites. The validity of an elevated (>11 g/l) serum-ascites albumin gradient (SAAG) in the diagnostic work-up was evaluated. Mortality trends were observed over two periods of time. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 231 consecutive patients who underwent diagnostic paracentesis between February 1994 and December 1998 and January 2005 and March 2007 were included in the study. The definition of SBP comprised polymorphonuclear cell count >250/mm(3) without evidence of other intra-abdominal source of infection. SAAG was obtained and the Child-Pugh classification applied. Survival rates were obtained from medical records. RESULTS: The most common causes of ascites were alcohol liver cirrhosis (n=143; 62%), malignancy (n=30; 13%), non-alcoholic cirrhosis (n=11; 5%) and malignancy with cirrhosis (n=11; 5%). The prevalence of SBP in cirrhosis was 6.7% (95% CI 2.8-10.5%). Overall mortality rates at 1 month, 6 months and 1 year were 22%, 40% and 48%, respectively, and remained unchanged between the intervals. Patients with grade C liver disease had higher 1-month (26% versus 6%), and 6-month (44% versus 27%) mortality rates than grade B patients, but commensurate 1-year mortality (49% versus 47%). SAAG was >or=11 g/l in 85% of patients with obvious portal hypertension and in 30% with malignancy, ascites albumin level

Should we screen reflux oesophagitis patients for coeliac disease?

OBJECTIVES: Oesophagitis and gastro-oesophageal reflux have been implicated recently in the manifestations of coeliac disease. The aim was to investigate this association in a primary-care setting. METHODS: First, the prevalence of coeliac disease was calculated in 1198 adults with oesophagitis, in 2541 adults with reflux symptoms and in 200 adults suffering from dysphagia; 5459 patients with a history consistent with dyspepsia and 709 patients with a suspicion of coeliac disease served as controls. Second, the prevalence of oesophagitis was estimated in 382 untreated and 232 treated coeliac patients; controls here comprised 5404 patients with dyspeptic symptoms and 2525 patients with reflux symptoms. Third, oesophagitis and oesophageal reflux symptoms were investigated before and after a gluten-free diet was followed in 67 adults with coeliac disease. The diagnosis of coeliac disease was based on small-bowel histology; histological exclusion of the disease was unambiguous in all controls. Oesophagitis was identified by endoscopic inspection. RESULTS: Altogether, 0.9% of patients with oesophagitis and 0.6% of those with oesophageal reflux symptoms had coeliac disease. The corresponding percentages were 1.0% in patients with dyspepsia and 12% with suspicion of coeliac disease. The prevalence of oesophagitis was 5.2% in untreated coeliac disease, 5.6% in treated coeliac disease, 7.0% in patients with dyspepsia, and 27% in symptomatic reflux disease. In coeliac patients, the reflux symptoms were mild but nevertheless were alleviated on a gluten-free diet. CONCLUSIONS: This study does not support the conception that patients with reflux oesophagitis should be screened vigorously for coeliac disease. The association between these two conditions is, at most, weak, but a gluten-free diet may still bring symptomatic relief for reflux symptoms in coeliac disease.