Impact of timing of urgent coronary artery bypass grafting following coronary angiography on acute kidney injury.

OBJECTIVES: Prior studies have examined the association between timing of cardiac surgery after coronary angiography with risk of acute kidney injury, but this remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between interval from coronary angiography to urgent coronary artery bypass grafting with acute kidney injury, and to examine this possible effect in patients with preexisting kidney disease. METHODS: Patients from a single institution undergoing urgent, isolated coronary artery bypass grafting within 7 days of coronary angiography were included. Patients were subdivided by chronic kidney disease stage and angiography-to-surgery interval. Locally estimated scatterplot smoothing was used to evaluate the functional relationship of the probability of acute kidney injury and time interval. Adjusted odds ratios were calculated for each time interval group compared against the Day 0 to 1 interval group, controlling for multiple covariates. Analyses were repeated for each chronic kidney disease subgroup. RESULTS: A total of 2249 patients were included in this study. There were 271 (12.0%) patients with postoperative acute kidney injury. Plots demonstrated a decreasing risk of kidney injury from Day 0 to 1 to Day 3 following coronary angiography. Adjusted odds ratios also showed a significant decrease in risk of kidney injury on Day 3 compared with Day 0 to 1. Analyses repeated for each chronic kidney disease stage showed similar trends. CONCLUSIONS: For patients undergoing urgent coronary artery bypass grafting, there is a decreased risk of kidney injury in those having surgery on day 3 after coronary angiography compared with those having surgery on Day 0 to 1, regardless of preexisting kidney disease.

A Statewide Analysis of Predictors of Trauma Center Transfer: The Burden of Non-Clinical Factors.

OBJECTIVES: There is a perception, with mixed literary support, that patients are transferred from community hospitals to tertiary medical centers for non-clinical reasons (ie, payor, race, and admission time). Over-triage risks unequally burdening the tertiary medical centers within a trauma system. This study aims to identify potential non-clinical factors associated with the transfer of injured patients. METHODS: Using the 2018 North Carolina State Inpatient Database, patients with a primary diagnosis of spine, rib or extremity fractures, or TBI were identified using ICD-10-CM code and admission type of "Urgent," "Emergency," or "Trauma." Patients were divided into cohorts of "retained" (at community hospital) or "transferred" (Level-1 or 2 trauma centers). RESULTS: 11,095 patients met inclusion criteria; 2432 (21.9%) patients made up the transfer cohort. The mean ISS for all retained patients was 2.2 (±.9) and 2.9 (±1.4) for all transferred patients. The transfer cohort was younger (mean age 66 v 75.8), underinsured, and more likely to be admitted after 1700 (P < .001). Similar differences were seen regardless of injury pattern. CONCLUSIONS: Patients transferred to trauma centers were more likely to be underinsured and be admitted outside of normal business hours. These transferred patients had longer lengths of stay and higher mortality rates. Across all cohorts, similar ISS suggests that a portion of the transfers could be managed at a community hospital. After hours transfers suggest a need for more robust community hospital coverage. Intentional triage of the injured patient encourages appropriate utilization of resources and is crucial to maintaining high-functioning trauma centers and systems.

Neuropsychologic changes in primary hyperparathyroidism after parathyroidectomy from a dual-institution prospective study.

BACKGROUND: The impact of parathyroidectomy on neuropsychiatric symptoms in primary hyperparathyroidism remains poorly defined. The validated scales Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 can be used to assess depression and anxiety, respectively. Our aim was to prospectively characterize the changes in neuropsychiatric symptoms after parathyroidectomy. METHODS: Patients undergoing parathyroidectomy and thyroidectomy (control) from two institutions between 2014 and 2019 were prospectively administered a questionnaire assessing neuropsychiatric symptoms before and after surgery. Paired t tests compared preoperative with postoperative neuropsychiatric symptoms and t tests compared differences in neuropsychiatric symptoms between parathyroidectomy and thyroidectomy. RESULTS: A total of 244 patients underwent parathyroidectomy and 161 underwent thyroidectomy. We observed improvement in neuropsychiatric symptoms after parathyroidectomy (6.2 [5.0-7.4], P < .01). Preoperatively, neuropsychiatric symptoms were more prevalent in patients undergoing parathyroidectomy when compared with thyroidectomy (11.2 ± 11.5 vs 7.5 ± 8.2, P < .01); however, after surgery there was no difference between the two groups (5.1 ± 7.1 vs 5.4 ± 7.2, P = .59). Preoperatively, 27.5% and 18.0% of patients endorsed moderate to severe depression and anxiety, which fell to 8.2% and 5.3%, respectively, (P < .01) after surgery. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing parathyroidectomy showed significant improvement in neuropsychiatric symptoms after surgery. Neuropsychiatric symptoms are more prevalent in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Neuropsychiatric symptoms should be assessed in all patients with primary hyperparathyroidism and should be considered a relative indication for parathyroidectomy.

Bilateral respiratory epithelial adenomatoid hamartomas originating from the anterior olfactory clefts.

A respiratory epithelial adenomatoid hamartoma (REAH) is an uncommon benign lesion often found in the sinonasal tract. We present a case of bilateral REAH originating from the anterior olfactory cleft treated with endoscopic surgical resection without recurrence. We highlight the characteristics of REAH and necessary steps to ensure proper diagnosis and treatment.