Real-World Effectiveness of Natalizumab Extended Interval Dosing in a French Cohort.

INTRODUCTION: Natalizumab, a therapy for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), is associated with a risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). Over the last several years, practitioners have used off-label extended interval dosing (EID) of natalizumab to reduce PML risk, despite the absence of a large-scale efficacy evaluation. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, multicenter cohort study among adults with RRMS receiving stable standard interval dosing (SID), defined as a ≥ 12-month consecutive period of ≥ 11 natalizumab infusions/year in France. We compared the 12-month risk difference of remaining relapse-free (primary endpoint) between patients who switched to EID (≤ 9 natalizumab infusions) and those who remained on SID, with a noninferiority margin of - 11%. We used propensity score methods such as inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) and 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). Secondary endpoints were annualized relapse rate, disease progression, and safety. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between patients receiving EID (n = 147) and SID (n = 156). The proportion of relapse-free patients 12 months postbaseline was 142/147 in the EID (96.6%) and 144/156 in the SID group (92.3%); risk difference (95% CI) 4.3% (- 1.3 to 9.8%); p < 0.001 for non-inferiority. There were no significant differences between relapse rates (0.043 vs. 0.083 per year, respectively; p = 0.14) or Expanded Disability Status Scale mean scores (2.43 vs. 2.72, respectively; p = 0.18); anti-JC virus index values were similar (p = 0.23); and no instances of PML were reported. The comparisons using IPTW (n = 306) and PSM (n = 204) were consistent. CONCLUSION: These results support the pertinence of using an EID strategy for RRMS patients treated with natalizumab. CLINICAL TRIALS: gov identifier (NCT04580381).

Comparison of Clinical Profiles and Mortality Outcomes Between Influenza and COVID-19 Patients Invasively Ventilated in the ICU: A Retrospective Study From All Paris Public Hospitals From 2016 to 2021.

Studies comparing outcomes of ICU patients admitted for either COVID-19 or seasonal influenza are limited. Our objective was to describe baseline clinical profiles, care procedures, and mortality outcomes by infection status (influenza vs COVID-19) of patients who received invasive mechanical ventilation in the ICU. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: Data were extracted from the Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris database from September 1, 2016, to April 20, 2021. It includes data from the 39 university hospitals. PATIENTS: A total of 752 influenza adult patients and 3,465 COVID-19 adult patients received invasive mechanical ventilation in one of the ICUs of the Paris area university hospitals, France. INTERVENTION: The characteristics and outcome by infection status were compared. Factors associated with mortality were assessed using Cox proportional hazard models after controlling for potential confounders, including infection status. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The median age at admission to the ICU was 67 (interquartile range [IQR], 57-77) and 63 yr (IQR, 54-71 yr) for influenza and COVID-19 patients, respectively. At ICU admission, COVID-19 patients were more frequently obese, more frequently had diabetes mellitus or high blood pressure, and were less likely to have chronic heart failure, chronic respiratory disease, chronic kidney failure, or active cancer than influenza patients. The overall survival at 90 days was 57% for COVID-19 patients and 66% for influenza patients (p < 0.001). In a multivariable Cox model, higher age, organ transplant, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection, and chronic kidney failure were associated with shorter survival, whereas obesity and high blood pressure were associated with longer survival after invasive ventilation. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 and influenza patients requiring mechanical ventilation in the ICU differed by many characteristics. COVID-19 patients showed lower survival independently of potential confounders.

Metabolomics in the understanding and management of hepatic encephalopathy.

Metabolomics refers to the study of biological components below 1000 Daltons (Da) involved in metabolic pathways as substrates, products or effectors. According to the interconnected metabolic disturbances that have been described in the pathophysiology of hepatic encephalopathy (HE), this technique appears to be well adapted to study and better delineate the disease. This review will focus on recent advances in metabolomics in the field of HE. Thus, after a brief overview of the general principles of metabolomics, we will discuss metabolomics as a potentially efficient tool for unraveling new HE pathophysiological insights, biomarkers identification, or as a predicting tool for treatment response or outcome prognosis. Finally, we will give our vision on the prospects offered by metabolomics for improving care of HE patients.