Case Report: Treatment of Renal Artery Aneurysms by Ex Vivo Renal Artery Aneurysm Repair and Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Renal artery aneurysms are increasingly being detected incidentally during diagnostic imaging using magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, or angiography performed for evaluation of other diseases. Our understanding of their natural history and surgical management has evolved significantly during the past two decades. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three patients with incidentally identified renal artery aneurysms have been referred to our renal transplantation program in the last 3 years. All three had aneurysms located at renal artery branches making endovascular repair challenging and thus underwent hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy with ex vivo aneurysmectomy, with heterotopic autotransplantation in two cases and allotransplantation in the third case. RESULTS: All three cases resulted in successful renal artery aneurysm repair and reimplantation and good renal function of the implanted kidney. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic nephrectomy with ex vivo aneurysm repair and reimplantation can be a successful approach to surgical management, especially in cases where the aneurysm involves multiple artery branches and endovascular repair is challenging. Given the excellent results with this surgical approach, living and deceased donor kidneys with aneurysms should be strongly encouraged if deemed reparable.

The Incremental Cost of Incompatible Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: A National Cohort Analysis.

Incompatible living donor kidney transplantation (ILDKT) has been established as an effective option for end-stage renal disease patients with willing but HLA-incompatible living donors, reducing mortality and improving quality of life. Depending on antibody titer, ILDKT can require highly resource-intensive procedures, including intravenous immunoglobulin, plasma exchange, and/or cell-depleting antibody treatment, as well as protocol biopsies and donor-specific antibody testing. This study sought to compare the cost and Medicare reimbursement, exclusive of organ acquisition payment, for ILDKT (n = 926) with varying antibody titers to matched compatible transplants (n = 2762) performed between 2002 and 2011. Data were assembled from a national cohort study of ILDKT and a unique data set linking hospital cost accounting data and Medicare claims. ILDKT was more expensive than matched compatible transplantation, ranging from 20% higher adjusted costs for positive on Luminex assay but negative flow cytometric crossmatch, 26% higher for positive flow cytometric crossmatch but negative cytotoxic crossmatch, and 39% higher for positive cytotoxic crossmatch (p < 0.0001 for all). ILDKT was associated with longer median length of stay (12.9 vs. 7.8 days), higher Medicare payments ($91 330 vs. $63 782 p < 0.0001), and greater outlier payments. In conclusion, ILDKT increases the cost of and payments for kidney transplantation.

Quantifying the risk of incompatible kidney transplantation: a multicenter study.

Incompatible live donor kidney transplantation (ILDKT) offers a survival advantage over dialysis to patients with anti-HLA donor-specific antibody (DSA). Program-specific reports (PSRs) fail to account for ILDKT, placing this practice at regulatory risk. We collected DSA data, categorized as positive Luminex, negative flow crossmatch (PLNF) (n = 185), positive flow, negative cytotoxic crossmatch (PFNC) (n = 536) or positive cytotoxic crossmatch (PCC) (n = 304), from 22 centers. We tested associations between DSA, graft loss and mortality after adjusting for PSR model factors, using 9669 compatible patients as a comparison. PLNF patients had similar graft loss; however, PFNC (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.64, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15-2.23, p = 0.007) and PCC (aHR = 5.01, 95% CI: 3.71-6.77, p < 0.001) were associated with increased graft loss in the first year. PLNF patients had similar mortality; however, PFNC (aHR = 2.04; 95% CI: 1.28-3.26; p = 0.003) and PCC (aHR = 4.59; 95% CI: 2.98-7.07; p < 0.001) were associated with increased mortality. We simulated Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services flagging to examine ILDKT's effect on the risk of being flagged. Compared to equal-quality centers performing no ILDKT, centers performing 5%, 10% or 20% PFNC had a 1.19-, 1.33- and 1.73-fold higher odds of being flagged. Centers performing 5%, 10% or 20% PCC had a 2.22-, 4.09- and 10.72-fold higher odds. Failure to account for ILDKT's increased risk places centers providing this life-saving treatment in jeopardy of regulatory intervention.

Key role for CD4 T cells during mixed antibody-mediated rejection of renal allografts.

We utilized mouse models to elucidate the immunologic mechanisms of functional graft loss during mixed antibody-mediated rejection of renal allografts (mixed AMR), in which humoral and cellular responses to the graft occur concomitantly. Although the majority of T cells in the graft at the time of rejection were CD8 T cells with only a minor population of CD4 T cells, depletion of CD4 but not CD8 cells prevented acute graft loss during mixed AMR. CD4 depletion eliminated antidonor alloantibodies and conferred protection from destruction of renal allografts. ELISPOT revealed that CD4 T effectors responded to donor alloantigens by both the direct and indirect pathways of allorecognition. In transfer studies, CD4 T effectors primed to donor alloantigens were highly effective at promoting acute graft dysfunction, and exhibited the attributes of effector T cells. Laser capture microdissection and confirmatory immunostaining studies revealed that CD4 T cells infiltrating the graft produced effector molecules with graft destructive potential. Bioluminescent imaging confirmed that CD4 T effectors traffic to the graft site in immune replete hosts. These data document that host CD4 T cells can promote acute dysfunction of renal allografts by directly mediating graft injury in addition to facilitating antidonor alloantibody responses.

The pathogenesis of acute allograft dysfunction in desensitized renal transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Acute allograft rejection after HLA desensitization is common early post-transplant but the sequence of histopathologic changes leading to graft dysfunction has not been well defined. METHODS: We evaluated the early pathogenesis and sequence of antibody-mediated graft damage of 35 desensitized living donor kidney recipients by studying the course of biopsies taken in the very early post-transplant period (<1 month). RESULTS: A total of 14 of the 35 patients met criteria for acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). In these patients, the chronologic sequence of pathologic changes was C4d peritubular capillary deposition, acute tubular injury, and peritubular capillaritis, followed by glomerulitis and interstitial inflammation. Classic AMR lesions occurred early, followed by mononuclear cellular infiltration, which comprised CD4 and CD8 T cells and monocytes. Development of graft dysfunction in most patients occurred concurrently with the emergence of graft cellular infiltration, rather than at the earlier time of antibody deposition as detected via C4d deposition. CONCLUSION: These data provide novel insight into the sequence of pathologic changes in patients with AMR post-transplant after HLA desensitization.

Clinical outcomes of renal transplant recipients treated with enteric-coated mycophenolic acid vs. mycophenolate mofetil as a switch agent using a primary steroid-free rapamune and microemulsion cyclosporine protocol.

Since 2002 our transplant program has utilized a steroid free, cyclosporine (CSA)- and rapamycin (RAPA)-based maintenance immunosuppression regimen. In cases where it has been desirable to avoid the potential nephrotoxicity with this regimen we have used mycophenolic acid (MPA) as our "switch" drug of choice. Both mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (Roche Inc., Nutley, NJ, USA) and enteric-coated MPA (ECM) (Novartis, East Hanover, NJ, USA) have been used. In this study, we retrospectively compared the tolerability of the two formulations of MPA. Thus we compared 103 recipients switched to RAPA/MMF (RMM group) to 114 switched to RAPA/ECM (REC group). There was a significantly higher incidence of patients requiring dose changes and drug discontinuation in the RMM group, as well as an increased frequency of dose changes. There were significantly more acute rejection episodes and kidney losses in the dose adjustment vs. no dose adjustment patients. However, when comparing the incidence of acute rejection and kidney loss between the RMM and REC groups, there was no significant difference. We conclude that in this cohort of recipients, the ECM formulation of MPA was better tolerated than the MMF formulation, resulting in fewer patients requiring dose adjustments or drug discontinuation.

A randomized prospective trial of OKT3 induction in the current immunosuppression era.

Recent improvements in immunosuppression and subsequent decreases in the incidence of acute rejection have brought into question the benefit of the use peri-transplant antibody therapy (i.e. induction therapy). In the current era of immunosuppression that includes mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and cyclosporine emulsion (Neoral, Novartis, Basle, Switzerland), we designed and have completed a prospective, randomized trial to address this question. Cadaveric and living donor renal allograft recipients were randomized to receive either OKT3/MMF/delayed Neoral/prednisone or MMF/immediate Neoral/prednisone without OKT3. The incidence of rejection episodes was the primary end point. Patients with delayed graft function were excluded. All rejection episodes were biopsy proven and all patients have been followed for a minimum of 2 yr. Fifty-four patients received OKT3 induction, of which 6 patients suffered a rejection episode (11%), while 13 patients (27%) not receiving OKT3 (p=0.04) had a rejection episode. Four patients in the no OKT3 group suffered multiple rejections, while there were only 2 with more than one episode in the OKT3 group. There was no increased incidence of infectious complications in the group receiving OKT3. Hospital costs tended to be higher in the OKT3-treated group, but were not significantly different. The low incidence of rejection in the OKT3-treated group was intriguing and validates the use of antibody therapy in the early post-operative periods even in the era of improved baseline immunosuppression.

Murine renal allografts: spontaneous acceptance is associated with regulated T cell-mediated immunity.

It was shown >20 yr ago that mice will spontaneously accept renal allografts in the absence of immunosuppression, but the mechanism responsible for this is not understood. We transplanted DBA/2 (H-2(d)) kidneys into nephrectomized C57BL/6 (H-2(b)) mice, and the allografts were spontaneously accepted for >60 days without immunosuppression. In contrast, nonimmunosuppressed cardiac and skin allografts in the same strain combination are rejected within approximately 10 days. The accepted renal allografts have a prominent leukocytic infiltrate, suggesting an ongoing, local immune response. At 60 days post-transplant, the recipients of accepted renal allografts display DBA/2-reactive alloantibodies. They also display DBA/2-reactive delayed-type hypersensitivity responses that are actively counter-regulated by DBA/2-induced TGF-beta production, but not by IL-10 production. These data suggest that a donor-reactive, cell-mediated immune mechanism involving TGF-beta is associated with the spontaneous acceptance of renal allografts in mice.

Elevated blood pressure predicts the risk of acute rejection in renal allograft recipients.

BACKGROUND: Acute rejection (AR) is a strong predictor of renal allograft survival. Recent advances in immunosuppression have reduced considerably the incidence of AR. Still, approximately 25% of patients have AR early post-transplant, and the factors that predispose to AR have not been fully clarified. METHODS: The study includes 1641 adults, recipients of first cadaveric (CAD, N = 1195) or living related renal grafts (LRD, N = 446), transplanted in one institution. The variables associated with the occurrence of AR during the first year post-transplant were identified. RESULTS: By univariate analyses, AR was associated with the following variables: younger (P < 0.001); heavier (P = 0.003); and African American recipients (P = 0.002); CAD transplants (P = 0.001); higher number of HLA mismatches (P = 0.001); delayed graft function (DGF, P = 0.001); higher levels of serum creatinine post-transplant (P = 0.003); and higher levels of systolic and/or diastolic blood pressure (BP) post-transplant (P < 0.001). Higher BP levels were also associated with earlier AR episodes (P < 0.0001). By multivariable analysis AR was significantly associated with recipient age, number of HLA mismatches, DGF, pre-PRA and systolic BP. Analysis of BP measured weekly post-transplant indicated that elevated BP levels, even three weeks prior to the AR episode, were significantly associated with AR. For every level of BP, the use of BP medications was associated with a lower incidence of AR (P < 0.0001). Furthermore, the use of calcium channel blockers was also associated with lower incidence of AR (P = 0.001). Of note, 81% of recipients whose BP increased after the transplant had AR. In contrast, 22% of patients whose BP declined post-transplant had AR. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated BP levels post-transplant identify patients at high risk of AR independently of graft function. Treatment of BP and reduction of BP levels appears to be associated with a decreased risk of AR. We hypothesize that high BP may be an indicator of a particular type of allograft damage, perhaps ischemic, that may predispose to AR.

Human allograft acceptance is associated with immune regulation.

The ultimate goal of transplantation is drug-free allograft acceptance, which is rarely encountered in transplant recipients. Using a novel human-to-mouse "trans vivo" delayed-type hypersensitivity assay, we assessed donor-reactive cell-mediated immune responses in kidney and liver transplant patients, four of whom discontinued all immunosuppression. One of these subjects (J.B.) rejected his graft after 7 years of stable function, while the others (D.S., R.D., M.L.) continue to have excellent graft function 5, 28, and 4 years after the cessation of immunosuppression. PBMCs from J.B. exhibited strong responses to both donor and recall antigens whereas PBMCs from patients D.S., R.D., and M.L. responded strongly to recall, but not donor, antigens. Furthermore, when donor and recall antigens were colocalized, the recall response in these three patients was inhibited. This donor antigen-linked nonresponsiveness was observed in four other patients who are still maintained on immunosuppression. The weakness of donor-reactive DTH responses in these patients is due to donor alloantigen-triggered regulation that relies on either TGF-beta or IL-10. In D.S., regulation is triggered by a single donor HLA Class I antigen, either in membrane-bound or soluble form. This demonstrates that allograft acceptance in humans is associated with an immune regulation pattern, which may be useful in the diagnosis and/or monitoring of transplant patients for allograft acceptance.

Mechanisms of graft acceptance: evidence that plasminogen activator controls donor-reactive delayed-type hypersensitivity responses in cardiac allograft acceptor mice.

We have used delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) responses to probe the mechanisms of drug-induced cardiac allograft acceptance in mice. DBA/2-->C57BL/6 cardiac allograft recipients treated transiently with gallium nitrate accept their grafts for >90 days and fail to display DBA/2-reactive DTH responses. These DTH responses are restored when anti-TGF-beta Abs are included at the challenge site, and cell depletion studies showed that this DTH inhibition is mediated by CD4+ cells. Real-time PCR analysis revealed that allograft acceptor mice produce no more than background levels of TGF-beta mRNA at DTH challenge sites. This suggests that DTH regulation in allograft acceptor mice may involve TGF-beta activation, rather than TGF-beta production. The protease, plasmin, can activate TGF-beta, and activated T cells can express a receptor for the plasmin-producing enzyme urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), and can also produce both uPA and tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA). We observed that Abs to tPA or uPA can replace anti-TGF-beta mAb for the restoration of donor-reactive DTH responses in allograft acceptor mice. Histologic analysis revealed that accepted cardiac allografts express uPA, tPA, and active TGF-beta, whereas accepted cardiac isografts express only tPA, but not uPA or activated TGF-beta. These data demonstrate that local tPA and uPA contribute to DTH regulation in allograft acceptor mice and suggest that these elements of the fibrinolytic pathway are used to control donor-reactive cell-mediated immunity in allograft acceptor mice.

Pulmonary Rhizopus infection in a diabetic renal transplant recipient.

Infectious complications after renal transplantation remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Mucormycosis is a rare infection in renal transplant recipients; however, mortality is exceedingly high. Risk factors predisposing to this disease include prolonged neutropenia, diabetes, and patients who are immunosuppressed (Singh N, Gayowski T, Singh J, Yu LV. Invasive gastrointestinal zygomycosis in a liver transplant recipient: case report and review of zygomycosis in solid-organ transplant recipients, Clin Infect Dis 1995: 20: 617). Life-threatening infections can occur, as this fungus has the propensity to invade blood vessel endothelium, resulting in hematological dissemination. We report a case of cavitary Rhizopus lung infection, 2 months after renal transplantation, where the patient was treated successfully with Amphotericin B and surgical resection of the lesions with preservation of his allograft function. In this era of intensified immunosuppression, we may see an increased incidence of mucormycosis in transplant population. Invasive diagnostic work-up is mandatory in case of suspicion; Amphotericin B and, in selected cases, surgical resection are the mainstays of therapy.

Obese living kidney donors: short-term results and possible implications.

BACKGROUND: Living kidney donation has increased recently as the shortage of cadaveric organs continues. This increase has occurred in part, due to expanded donor criteria, including obese patients. This is a potential concern because obesity is associated with surgical complications, possibly death, and chronic medical problems. To address this concern, we examined the outcome of a large group of obese (ObD) and nonobese living kidney donors (NObD). METHODS: A total of 107 obese (body mass index> or =27 kg/m2) and 116 nonobese (body mass index<27 kg/m2) living kidney donors donating at a single institution between 1990 and 1996 were studied. Surgical complications, operative duration, and hospital length of stay were assessed. Preoperative blood pressure, serum creatinine, creatinine clearance, protein excretion, fasting glucose, and hemoglobin A1C were measured and first degree relatives with diabetes were identified. RESULTS: Overall complications were significantly more common in ObD, 16.8 vs. 3.4% (P=0.0012). The majority of complications in the entire cohort, 56%, were wound related and were significantly more common in ObD (P=0.016). There was no significant increase in nonwound-related infections, bleeding, or cardiopulmonary events. There were no deaths or major complications. Operative time was significantly longer in ObD 151+/-30 vs. 141+/-29 min (P<0.05) but hospital duration was no different. Predonation, blood pressure in ObD was significantly higher, (P<0.05) and they more often had a family history of diabetes, 46 vs. 30% (P<0.05) than nonobese donors. Renal function, proteinuria, fasting glucose, or hemoglobin A1C were no different. CONCLUSION: With prudent selection, the use of obese living kidney donors appears safe in the short term. They experience more minor complications, usually wound related, and slightly longer operations. Given a higher baseline blood pressure and family history of diabetes, the long-term effect on the remaining solitary kidney in ObD needs to be examined.

Renal allograft survival following acute rejection correlates with blood pressure levels and histopathology.

BACKGROUND: Acute rejection (AR) is a strong predictor of renal graft survival, but the negative impact of AR on survival is variable, suggesting that other factors modulate this relationship. In this study, we examined the variables that correlate with graft survival after AR, particularly the impact of blood pressure (BP), graft function, and histopathology. METHODS: The study population included patients with no AR (N = 942) and patients with one (N = 407) or two (N = 156) AR during the first year post-transplant. Patients were adults who were recipients of living related (LRD, N = 410) or cadaveric grafts (CAD, N = 1095) and who were transplanted in a single institution and followed for 5.8 +/- 4 years. RESULTS: Compared with patients without AR, those with AR were significantly younger, had more human lymphocyte antigen mismatches, and included more CAD recipients. Graft survival was analyzed beyond six-months post-transplant. In patients with AR, reduced survival correlated (multivariate) with (a) younger recipients (P = 0.01), (b) AR occurring later during the first-year post-transplant (P = 0.0006), (c) elevated serum creatinine (Cr) before (P = 0.05), at the time (P = 0.0001) of, or after AR (P = 0.0004), and (d) average BP levels after AR [systolic BP (P = 0.003 logistic, P < 0.0001 by Cox), diastolic BP (P = 0.007), mean arterial pressure (P < 0.0001)]. This latter correlation was independent of graft function and recipient race. Thus, post-AR BP levels correlated with graft survival in patients with post-AR creatinine

Comparison of crossmatch results obtained by ELISA, flow cytometry, and conventional methodologies.

The complement-dependent lymphocytotoxicity crossmatch (CXM) is the presently accepted standard for detection of donor-reactive alloantibodies in transplant patients. However, the newer flow cytometric (FXM) and ELISA (EXM) crossmatch technologies are increasingly used as substitutes for the CXM. We have compared the sensitivity and reproducibility of FXM vs. EXM and, in general, find them to be quite similar. However, when we compared the agreement of FXM vs. EXM in 112 donor/recipient combinations, we found that they identified different subsets of donor-specific alloantibodies in about 35% of the tests. When compared to the standard CXM method, the EXM correlated much better than did the FXM, yielding a much lower rate of false positive (2.5% vs. 8%) and false negative (7% vs. 18.5%) results. The reduction in time required to obtain a result (3 h) and the cost of materials ($25/test) was identical for the EXM and FXM. We conclude that the ELISA method for crossmatching has advantages over the flow cytometric method as a substitute for the present standard complement-dependent lymphocytotoxicity method.

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in renal allografts with chronic nephropathy: implications for graft survival.

De novo focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) in renal allografts most often is diagnosed in association with chronic allograft nephropathy (CN). In this study, we assessed the clinical and pathological variables that correlate with the presence of de novo FSGS and the implications of FSGS for the survival of grafts with CN. The study population included 293 renal allograft recipients (52 living related donor, 241 cadaveric donor) diagnosed with CN by biopsy more than 6 months after transplantation. Patients with recurrent FSGS or FSGS associated with other glomerulopathies were excluded. FSGS was present in 87 patients with CN (30%). FSGS was diagnosed more commonly in the following groups of patients: young (P = 0.04), black (P = 0.02), and those with elevated serum cholesterol levels (P = 0.002) and/or high-grade proteinuria (P < 0. 0001, all univariate analysis). FSGS was diagnosed later after transplantation than CN without FSGS (P < 0.0001), and FSGS correlated with the presence of arteriolar hyalinosis in the biopsy specimen (P = 0.04). Compared with CN without FSGS, FSGS was associated with significantly worse death-censored graft survival (P = 0.008, univariate Cox). In addition, when we analyzed all patients with CN, graft survival correlated by multivariate analysis with the following parameters: serum creatinine level (P < 0.0001) and proteinuria (P = 0.004) at the time of diagnosis, presence of FSGS (P = 0.03), and degree of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (CN score; P < 0.0001, Cox). Of interest, the use of lipid-reducing agents was also associated with improved graft survival in patients with CN (P = 0.0002, univariate Cox), although total lipid levels were not significantly less in patients receiving these drugs. In conclusion, de novo FSGS presents late after transplantation and in association with arteriolar hyalinosis, suggesting these lesions may be related to chronic cyclosporine toxicity. In CN, the presence of FSGS and the severity of interstitial fibrosis are negative independent predictors of graft survival. The possible relationship between lipid-reducing agents and graft survival clearly needs to be examined carefully in future studies.