Telehealth in oncofertility and breast cancer patients during COVID-19: preliminary results of insenoallasalute.it project.

OBJECTIVE: Breast cancer (BC) is the leading diagnosis in premenopausal patients. Lockdown measures during COVID-19 pandemic reduced facilities for premenopausal patients, impairing oncological and reproductive health. To reduce its effect, a telehealth program called insenoallasalute.it was designed in Italy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A national-based multicentric observational study was undertaken by insenoallasalute.it study group (Italian Ministry of Health, Modena Hospital and Tor Vergata University Hospital) to raise awareness among women on a) BC and its negative role on reproductive health; b) increase adherence to screening programs and self-examination; c) present oncofertility strategies. A web-based platform with two sections was designed: an informative section and a telehealth application activated with a mobile one-time password. After a self-evaluation test to select premenopausal women with maternal desire and family or personal history for BC or ovarian cancer, and premenopausal women with maternity desires with prior medically assisted procreation, a dedicated agenda for telehealth evaluation was displayed and planned. In case the patients fulfilled the criteria for further evaluation, they were invited to perform an outpatient evaluation in one of the pilot centers. RESULTS: From July 2021 to December 2021, 2,830 single accounts were activated, and 2,450 (86.57%) completed the tests. 53 patients were selected to undergo telehealth consultation and 40 (80.0%) scheduled the telehealth visit. 6 patients underwent surgery in the study centers. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience insenoallasalute.it embodied an innovative solution to spread BC awareness, BC screening program, and oncofertility opportunities in the oncological population.

Influence of COVID-19 Pandemic on Colorectal Cancer Presentation, Management and Outcome during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

The aim of the study was to investigate whether the COVID-19 pandemic and related measures had an influence on colorectal cancer (CRC) presentation, management, and outcomes; it was a retrospective monocentric study. CRC patients undergoing surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic (1 March 2020-28 February 2022) (group B) were compared with patients operated on in the previous two years (1 March 2018-29 February 2020) in the same unit (group A). The primary outcome was to investigate whether there were differences in concern regarding the stage at presentation, as a whole and after dividing groups based on cancer location (right colon cancer, left colon cancer, rectal cancer). Secondary outcomes included differences in the number of patients admitted from emergency departments and emergency surgeries between periods, and differences in the postoperative outcomes. A subanalysis within the pandemic group was conducted on the same outcomes, dividing the aforementioned group based on pandemic trends. Two hundred and eighty (280) were operated on during the study period: 147 in group A and 133 in group B. Stage at presentation was similar between groups; however, the subgroups analysis showed that in the pandemic group, the number of early-stage left colon cancer occurrences almost halves, yet not significantly. Emergency department referral was more common in group B (p-value: 0.003); in group B, they also had longer operations and there was a more frequent use of ostomy. No differences in the number of postoperative complications nor in the postoperative outcomes were found. Patients with CRC were more frequently referred through the emergency department during the COVID-19 pandemic and left-sided cancers appear to be generally diagnosed at a more advanced stage. Postoperative outcomes showed that high specialized colorectal units can deliver standard high-level treatment under high-pressure external conditions.

Primary Prophylaxis for Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Children With Biliary Atresia and Portal Hypertension Candidates for Liver Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Cirrhosis for biliary atresia (BA) is associated with risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (GB) from gastroesophageal varices due to portal hypertension. Primary prophylaxis of GB is controversial in children who are candidates for liver transplantation (LT). The aim of the study was to define the management of gastroesophageal varices and to identify the benefit of primary prophylaxis for GB in BA children waiting for LT. METHODS: A retrospective single-center study including all BA children listed for LT in 2008-2016. Clinical, endoscopical, and biochemical data were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 82 children, 50 (61%) did not receive primary prophylaxis and did not present any episode of bleeding, 16 (19.5%) underwent primary prophylaxis, and 16 (19.5%) presented spontaneous GB and received secondary prophylaxis. Children without primary prophylaxis and GB were younger than patients with primary prophylaxis and those with GB (7.7 years [range, 4.1-37.9 years] vs 11.2 years [range, 5.1-43 years]; P = .03 vs 10.7 years [range, 6.9-39.9 years], respectively; P = .004). Seventy-five percent of GB occurred in children older than 8 months. Fifteen (93.8%) children with GB presented esophageal varices (grade III = 10 [62.5%]) and 10 (62.5%) required endoscopic treatments, consisting mainly of sclerotherapy. Median time to LT was similar for children with or without bleeding (2 months [range, 0-17.7 months] vs 2.2 months [0-17.9 months], respectively; P = .89). After 45.5 months (range, 13.7-105.5 months) of follow-up, the overall patient survival was 97.6%. At the intention-to-treat analysis, the survival rate was 100% for patients without bleeding episode and 87.5% for children with GB (P = .16). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the risk of GB being not clinically predictable in children with BA waiting for LT, our experience suggests that primary prophylaxis of GB might be unnecessary in children younger than 6 months, while it should be considered in older children. Thus, the occurrence of GB does not delay the timing of transplantation.

Transanal repair of rectocele with high frequency radio scalpel.

AIM: This is a prospective randomized study to analyze results obtained in two groups of patients, affected by stage 2 rectocele and treated with rectum anterior wall repair and strength, performed with standard or modified Khubchandani technique, using High Frequency (HF) Radio Scalpel. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort of 24 patients with stage 2 rectocele (Mellgren's classification) have been included. Twelve (group A) underwent surgery with standard technique and twelve (group B) underwent surgery using the HF Radio Scalpel, which cuts and coagulates tissues without damage thanks to its low working temperature (45-70°C). Each patient underwent proctolo-gical examination and anoscopy in 7th, 15th, 45th POD and after 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: During post-operative follow-up 5 patients from group A and 1 from group B didn't show up so that they drop out the study. As a result, group A is composed by 7 patients and group B by 11 patients. Mean operating time was significantly favourable in group B (51 vs 33 minutes, p< 0.01). The differences between other parameters weren't statistically significant, even if post-operative course was less difficult in HF Radio Scalpel group. CONCLUSIONS: The surgical technique to repair and reinforce anterior rectal wall is easier and faster if performed with HF Radio Scalpel respect to the standard procedure described by Khubchandani. Post-operative course was less painful and, even more importantly considering the patient age, surgical time was shorter. Therefore, the results obtained cast positive light on using this technique to treat uncomplicated grade 2 rectocele.

The greater omentum as a site for pancreatic islet transplantation.

The greater omentum is a highly vascularized anatomical structure in the peritoneal cavity. Its main components are connective, adipose and vascular cells, along with specialized immune cells. The omentum functions as a site for fat accumulation, it has adhesive properties to control traumatized and inflamed tissues, and a function in local hemostasis, immune responses, and revascularization. Other functions include the absorption of fluids, the phagocytosis of particulate matter, and foreign body reaction. The omentum is catalyzing significant interest for its potential as a site for pancreatic islet and cell transplantation. Our knowledge about this structure, its functions, and its potential as a site for transplantation is poised to grow in the coming years.