Phase 1/2 AAV5-hRKp.RPGR (Botaretigene Sparoparvovec) Gene Therapy: Safety and Efficacy in RPGR-associated X-linked Retinitis Pigmentosa.

PURPOSE: To assess the safety and efficacy of AAV5-hRKp.RPGR in participants with retinitis pigmentosa GTPase regulator (RPGR)-associated X-linked retinitis pigmentosa (XLRP). DESIGN: Open-label, phase 1/2 dose escalation/expansion study (NCT03252847). METHODS: Males (≥5 years old) with XLRP-RPGR were evaluated. In the dose escalation phase, subretinal AAV5-hRKp.RPGR (low: 1.0×1011 vg/ml; intermediate: 2.0×1011 vg/ml; high: 4.0×1011 vg/ml) was administered to the poorer-seeing eye (n = 10). Dose confirmation (intermediate dose) was carried out in 3 pediatric participants. In the dose expansion phase, 36 participants were randomized 1:1:1 to immediate (low or intermediate dose) or deferred (control) treatment. The primary outcome was safety. Secondary efficacy outcomes included static perimetry, microperimetry, vision-guided mobility, best corrected visual acuity, and contrast sensitivity. Safety and efficacy outcomes were assessed for 52 weeks for immediate treatment participants and 26 weeks for control participants. RESULTS: AAV5-hRKp.RPGR was safe and well tolerated, with no reported dose-limiting events. Most adverse events (AEs) were transient and related to the surgical procedure, resolving without intervention. Two serious AEs were reported with immediate treatment (retinal detachment, uveitis). A third serious AE (increased intraocular pressure) was reported outside the reporting period. All ocular inflammation-related AEs responded to corticosteroids. Treatment with AAV5-hRKp.RPGR resulted in improvements in retinal sensitivity and functional vision compared with the deferred group at Week 26; similar trends were observed at Week 52. CONCLUSIONS: AAV5-hRKp.RPGR demonstrated an anticipated and manageable AE profile through 52 weeks. Safety and efficacy findings support investigation in a phase 3 trial.

Real-World Anticoagulant Use and Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism and Major Bleeding in Children.

PURPOSE: Children generally have a lower risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) than adults, but those with acute and chronic conditions requiring hospitalization and surgical procedures are at increased risk. Anticoagulant use in children has not been systematically studied, and limited data exist. This study aimed to provide data on the conditions associated with use of anticoagulants, the type of anticoagulant used in children, and the incidence of thromboembolism and major bleeding events reported in this population. METHODS: To increase understanding of the use of anticoagulant therapies in children with at-risk conditions, 3 health claims databases in the United States were analyzed to describe the characteristics of use of heparins, warfarin, and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Cumulative drug exposure was determined for continuous exposure, defined as >30 days. Unadjusted event rates of VTE and major bleeding after exposure to these therapies were reported. The data were presented descriptively and are not intended for comparison or to imply any causation. FINDINGS: Anticoagulants were infrequently used in the pediatric population, including at any time point after Fontan surgery for congenital heart disease. Heparins were used most frequently in the population overall and especially for patients aged <12 years. DOACs were used least often and primarily for patients ages 12 to <18 years. Among pediatric patients exposed to anticoagulants, unadjusted incidence rates of VTE per 1000 person-years of exposure ranged from 30.8 to 34.0 for all DOACs, 21.6 to 46.2 for warfarin, and 6.0 to 7.3 for heparins. Rates per 1000 person-years for major bleeding ranged from 0 to 4.9 for all DOACs, 4.3 to 6.7 for warfarin, and 3.7 to 4.6 for heparins. IMPLICATIONS: With results from clinical trials evaluating DOACs in the pediatric population expected in the next 2 years, these descriptive real-world data may provide a baseline understanding of current prescribing patterns and outcomes associated with the use of DOACs and other anticoagulants in routine pediatric clinical practice. This information represents the use of real-world evidence and may function as the benchmark for evaluating changes in prescription practices and potential outcomes in the future.

Thromboprophylaxis for Children Post-Fontan Procedure: Insights From the UNIVERSE Study.

Background Patients with single-ventricle physiology who undergo the Fontan procedure are at risk for thrombotic events associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The UNIVERSE Study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a novel liquid rivaroxaban formulation, using a body weight-adjusted dosing regimen, versus acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) in children post-Fontan. Methods and Results The UNIVERSE Study was a randomized, multicenter, 2-part, open-label study of rivaroxaban, in children who had undergone a Fontan procedure, to evaluate its dosing regimen, safety, and efficacy. Part A was the single-arm part of the study that determined the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and safety of rivaroxaban in 12 participants before proceeding to part B, whereby 100 participants were randomized 2:1 to open-label rivaroxaban versus ASA. The study period was 12 months. A total of 112 participants were enrolled across 35 sites in 10 countries. In part B, for safety outcomes, major bleeding occurred in one participant on rivaroxaban (epistaxis that required transfusion). Clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding occurred in 6% of participants on rivaroxaban versus 9% on ASA. Trivial bleeding occurred in 33% of participants on rivaroxaban versus 35% on ASA. For efficacy outcomes, 1 participant on rivaroxaban in part B had a pulmonary embolism (2% overall event rate); and for ASA, 1 participant had ischemic stroke and 2 had venous thrombosis (9% overall event rate). Conclusions In this study, participants who received rivaroxaban for thromboprophylaxis had a similar safety profile and fewer thrombotic events, albeit not statistically significant, compared with those in the ASA group. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Identifier: NCT02846532.

Modified IMPROVE VTE Risk Score and Elevated D-Dimer Identify a High Venous Thromboembolism Risk in Acutely Ill Medical Population for Extended Thromboprophylaxis.

An individualized approach to identify acutely ill medical patients at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and a low risk of bleeding to optimize the benefit and risk of extended thromboprophylaxis (ET) is needed. The International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism (IMPROVE) VTE risk score has undergone extensive external validation in medically ill patients for in-hospital use and a modified model was used in the MARINER trial of ET also incorporating an elevated D-dimer. The MAGELLAN study demonstrated efficacy with rivaroxaban but had excess bleeding. This retrospective analysis investigated whether the modified IMPROVE VTE model with an elevated D-dimer could identify a high VTE risk subgroup of patients for ET from a subpopulation of the MAGELLAN study, which was previously identified as having a lower risk of bleeding. We incorporated the modified IMPROVE VTE score using a cutoff score of 4 or more or 2 and 3 with an elevated D-dimer (>2 times the upper limit of normal) to the MAGELLAN subpopulation. In total, 56% of the patients met the high-risk criteria. In the placebo group, the total VTE event rate at Day 35 was 7.94% in the high-risk group and 2.83% for patients in the lower-risk group. A reduction in VTE was observed with rivaroxaban in the high-risk group (relative risk [RR]: 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.51-0.91, p = 0.008) and in the lower-risk group (RR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.40 -1.20, p = 0.187). The modified IMPROVE VTE score with an elevated D-dimer identified a nearly threefold higher VTE risk subpopulation of patients where a significant benefit exists for ET using rivaroxaban.