Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 16 de 16
Filtrar
2.
J Cataract Refract Surg ; 49(3): 259-265, 2023 03 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36378266

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To characterize intraoperative complications, case complexity, and changes in complication rates with surgical experience for cataract surgeries involving residents at the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). SETTING: All VHA facilities where cataract surgery was performed. DESIGN: Multicenter, retrospective cohort study. METHODS: A retrospective review of all cataract surgeries within the VHA between July 2010 and June 2021 was conducted. Several parameters, including resident involvement, intraoperative complications, and case complexity as determined by Current Procedural Terminology codes, and use of pupil expansion or capsular support devices, were collected. Complication rates were compared between residents and attendings. RESULTS: Of 392 428 cataract surgeries completed across 108 VHA facilities, 90 504 were performed by attendings alone, while 301 924 involved a resident. Of these, 10 244 (11.3%) of attending cases were complex compared with 32 446 (10.7%) of resident cases. Pupil expansion devices were required in 8191 of attending cases (9.05%) and 31 659 (10.5%) of cases involving residents ( P < .001). Similarly, cases involving residents were more likely than attending-only cases to require a capsular support device (0.835% vs 0.586%, P < .001). Cases involving residents were more likely to have posterior capsular rupture (4.75% vs 2.58%, P < .001) and dropped nucleus (0.338% vs 0.198%, P < .001). Higher resident case volumes were associated with significantly lower complication rates for posterior capsular rupture, dropped nucleus, zonular loss, and suprachoroidal hemorrhage. CONCLUSIONS: Although residents had higher intraoperative complication rates than attendings, these rates were reduced with surgical experience. Residents were involved in a similar number of complex surgical cases as attendings.


Assuntos
Catarata , Internato e Residência , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Saúde dos Veteranos , Complicações Intraoperatórias , Competência Clínica
3.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 79(8): 683-688, 2022 04 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34864858

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To describe the development of a pilot specialty medication clinical dashboard targeting tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitor therapy. SUMMARY: This was a quality improvement project conducted between August 2019 and April 2020. The dashboard was designed with collaboration between clinical pharmacists and specialty providers in rheumatology, gastroenterology, and dermatology. Data was queried from the Veterans Affairs Corporate Data Warehouse. Patients with an active prescription or intravenous order for a TNF-α inhibitor were included. Dashboard flag criteria focused on TNF-α inhibitor safety and adherence monitoring. Flag results from the dashboard were characterized from data captured at a single time point. For 431 patients on TNF-α inhibitor treatment at the institution, 304 flags corresponding to 223 unique patients (51.7%) were identified on the dashboard: 3% of patients had a new infection, 9% had overdue monitoring laboratory tests, 5% had a critical laboratory result, 2% were on 2 biologic agents, 27% were overdue for a refill, 6% had an emergency department visit, and 2% had an inpatient admission. No patients were flagged for heart failure exacerbation or new malignancy. Seventeen percent of patients were prescribed high-dose etanercept or adalimumab, representing a potential annual cost savings of $302,497 if 50% of these patients had their dose successfully reduced to labeled dosing. Opportunities for pharmacist intervention utilizing the dashboard were identified and characterized through chart review of flagged patients. CONCLUSION: Pharmacists have the opportunity to improve safety and adherence for TNF-α inhibitor therapy through use of a specialty medication clinical dashboard. The dashboard should be used in conjunction with collaborative practice protocols.


Assuntos
Conduta do Tratamento Medicamentoso , Farmacêuticos , Inibidores do Fator de Necrose Tumoral , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa , Apresentação de Dados , Humanos , Fatores Imunológicos , Adesão à Medicação , Programas de Monitoramento de Prescrição de Medicamentos , Melhoria de Qualidade , Inibidores do Fator de Necrose Tumoral/administração & dosagem , Inibidores do Fator de Necrose Tumoral/efeitos adversos , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inibidores
5.
Headache ; 61(8): 1207-1213, 2021 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34352118

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review is to assess the efficacy and safety of memantine for the prophylactic treatment of episodic migraine. BACKGROUND: Migraine is a prevalent chronic disease with significant costs to the health care system. Although various prophylactic treatment options are available, these medications have limitations based on efficacy, potential side effects, and patient preference. Memantine is an N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonist used in dementia treatment that may have potential benefit for migraine prophylaxis. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL databases was conducted to identify relevant published studies through December 2020 using the search terms: migraine disorders, migraine, headache disorders, or headache and memantine. Studies selected for the systematic review included prospective, interventional designs and evaluated memantine for prophylaxis of migraine. Animal studies, case reports, abstracts, review articles, protocols without results, and studies not written in English were excluded. Data were extracted using a standardized systematic process and included author, publication date, study design, sample size, patient characteristics, treatment regimen, clinical efficacy outcomes, and adverse drug effects. RESULTS: Four articles were identified for inclusion representing two prospective open-label studies and two randomized, double-blind trials, evaluating 183 patients on memantine overall. A reduction in number of migraine days and headache severity were shown in all four studies in the participants treated with memantine. The most common adverse effects included somnolence, sedation, and nausea, none of which were severe. CONCLUSION: The studies in this review establish that memantine has the potential for use as a treatment option for episodic migraine. Additional long-term studies using an active comparator would be useful to further elucidate its role.


Assuntos
Antagonistas de Aminoácidos Excitatórios/farmacologia , Memantina/farmacologia , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/tratamento farmacológico , Receptores de N-Metil-D-Aspartato/antagonistas & inibidores , Antagonistas de Aminoácidos Excitatórios/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Memantina/efeitos adversos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde
6.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 69(11): 3212-3224, 2021 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34291817

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Unintentional falls are a leading cause of injury for older adults, and evidence is needed to understand modifiable risk factors. We evaluated 1-year fall-related fracture risk and whether dispensing of medications with anticholinergic/sedating properties is temporally associated with an increased odds of these fractures. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study with nested self-controlled analyses conducted between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2016. SETTING: Twenty percent nationwide, random sample of US Medicare beneficiaries. PARTICIPANTS: New users of medications with anticholinergic/sedating properties who were 66+ years old and had Medicare Parts A, B, and D coverage but no claims for medications with anticholinergic/sedating properties in the year before initiation were eligible. MEASUREMENTS: We followed new users of medications with anticholinergic/sedating properties until first non-vertebral, fall-related fracture (primary outcome), Medicare disenrollment, death, or end of study data. We estimated the 1-year risk with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of first fracture after new use. We applied the self-controlled case-crossover and case-time-control designs to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs by comparing anticholinergic and/or sedating medication exposure (any vs. none) during a 14-day hazard period preceding the fracture to exposure to these medications during an earlier 14-day control period. RESULTS: A total of 1,097,989 Medicare beneficiaries initiated medications with anticholinergic/sedating properties in the study period. The 1-year cumulative incidence of fall-related fracture, accounting for death as a competing risk, was 5.0% (95% CI: 5.0%-5.0%). Using the case-crossover design (n = 41,889), the adjusted OR for the association between anticholinergic/sedating medications and fractures was 1.03 (95% CI: 0.99, 1.08). Accounting for the noted temporal trend using the case-time-control design (n = 209,395), the adjusted OR was 1.60 (95% CI: 1.52, 1.69). CONCLUSION: Use of anticholinergic/sedating medication was temporally associated with an increased odds of fall-related fractures. Patients and their healthcare providers should consider pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic treatments for the target condition that are safer.


Assuntos
Acidentes por Quedas/estatística & dados numéricos , Antagonistas Colinérgicos/efeitos adversos , Fraturas Ósseas/epidemiologia , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
7.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 30(2): 144-156, 2021 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33000867

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Medications with anticholinergic and sedative properties are widely used among older adults despite strong evidence of harm. The drug burden index (DBI), a pharmacological screening tool, measures these properties across drug classes, and higher DBI drug exposure (DBI > 1) has been associated with certain physical function-related adverse events. Our aim was to quantify mean daily DBI drug exposure among older adults in the United States (US). METHODS: We screened medications for DBI properties and operationalized the DBI for US Medicare claims. We then conducted a retrospective cohort study of a 20% random, nationwide sample of 4 137 384 fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries aged 66+ years (134 757 039 person-months) from January 2013 to December 2016. We measured the monthly distribution based on mean daily DBI, categorized as (a) >0 vs 0 (any use) and (b) 0, 0 < DBI ≤ 1, 1 < DBI ≤ 2, and DBI > 2, and examined temporal trends. We described patient-level factors (eg, demographics, healthcare use) associated with high (>2) vs low (0 < DBI≤1) DBI drug exposure. RESULTS: The distribution of the mean daily DBI, aggregated at the month-level, was: 58.1% DBI = 0, 29.0% 0 < DBI≤1, 9.3% 1 < DBI≤2, and 3.7% DBI > 2. Predictors of high monthly DBI drug exposure (DBI > 2) included certain indicators of increased healthcare use (eg, high number of drug claims), white race, younger age, frailty, and a psychosis diagnosis code. CONCLUSIONS: The predictors of high DBI drug exposure can inform discussions between patients and providers about medication appropriateness and potential de-prescribing. Future Medicare-based studies should assess the association between the DBI and adverse events.


Assuntos
Antagonistas Colinérgicos , Preparações Farmacêuticas , Idoso , Antagonistas Colinérgicos/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/efeitos adversos , Medicare , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
9.
Gerontol Geriatr Med ; 6: 2333721420956751, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32995368

RESUMO

Exercise is touted as the ideal prescription to treat and prevent many chronic diseases. We examined changes in utilization and cost of medication classes commonly prescribed in the management of chronic conditions following participation in 12-months of supervised exercise within the Veterans Affairs Gerofit program. Gerofit enrolled 480 veterans between 1999 and 2017 with 12-months participation, with 453 having one or more active prescriptions on enrollment. Active prescriptions overall and for five classes of medications were examined. Changes from enrollment to 12 months were calculated, and cost associated with prescriptions filled were used to estimate net cost changes. Active prescriptions were reduced for opioids (77 of 164, 47%), mental health (93 of 221, 42%), cardiac (175 of 391, 45%), diabetes (41 of 166, 25%), and lipid lowering (56 of 253, 22%) agents. Cost estimates resulted in a net savings of $38,400. These findings support the role of supervised exercise as a favorable therapeutic intervention that has impact across chronic conditions.

10.
J Crit Care ; 59: 1-5, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32480359

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and safety of suvorexant for the prevention of delirium during acute hospitalization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pubmed (1946 to December 2019) and Embase (1947 to December 2019) were queried using the search term combination: delirium, confusion, cognitive defect, encephalopathy, critically ill patient, critical illness, or hospitalization and suvorexant or orexin receptor antagonist. Studies analyzed for relevance evaluated clinical outcomes of patients treated with suvorexant for prevention of delirium. Studies appropriate to the objective were evaluated, including two randomized controlled trials and four retrospective studies. RESULTS: In acutely hospitalized patients, treatment with suvorexant 15 to 20 mg alone or in combination with ramelteon resulted in a reduction in development of delirium, time until delirium onset, and length of hospital stay. When assessed, suvorexant was well tolerated and adverse effects were no worse than placebo. CONCLUSION: Based on the reviewed literature, suvorexant has shown positive outcomes in the prevention of delirium during an acute hospitalization. Larger trials comparing the efficacy of suvorexant to other sleep modulating options are necessary to further delineate its role for the prevention of delirium.


Assuntos
Azepinas/administração & dosagem , Azepinas/efeitos adversos , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Delírio/prevenção & controle , Tempo de Internação , Antagonistas dos Receptores de Orexina/administração & dosagem , Antagonistas dos Receptores de Orexina/efeitos adversos , Distúrbios do Início e da Manutenção do Sono/tratamento farmacológico , Triazóis/administração & dosagem , Triazóis/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estado Terminal , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Indenos/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Receptor MT1 de Melatonina/agonistas , Receptor MT2 de Melatonina/agonistas , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sono/efeitos dos fármacos , Resultado do Tratamento
11.
Pain Med ; 21(10): 2385-2393, 2020 10 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32101316

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Multimodal analgesia has gained popularity in total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but large multicenter studies evaluating specific analgesic combinations are lacking. DESIGN: A retrospective study using the Premier Healthcare Database (2009-2014). SUBJECTS: Adults who underwent elective primary THA or TKA. METHODS: We categorized day-of-surgery analgesic exposure using eight mutually exclusive categories: acetaminophen (Ac), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (Ns), gabapentinoids (Ga; gabapentin or pregabalin), Ac+Ns, Ac+Ga, Ns+Ga, Ac+Ns+Ga, and none of the three drugs. Multilevel models measured associations of the analgesic categories with a composite of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). RESULTS: Among 863,139 patients, 75.2% received at least one of the three drugs. In multilevel models, compared with none of the three drugs, Ga use was associated with increased odds of PPCs when used alone (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.27 to 1.44), combined with Ac (aOR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.08 to 1.26), or combined with Ns (aOR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.21 to 1.34). In contrast, the Ac+Ns pair was associated with decreased odds of PPCs (OR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.83 to 0.90) and lower opioid consumption. Ac+Ns+Ga was not associated with PPCs, whereas it was associated with the lowest opioid consumption on the day of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Gabapentinoids, alone and in single combination with either acetaminophen or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, were associated with higher PPCs, whereas the Ac+Ns pair was associated with fewer PPCs and an opioid-sparing effect. Ac+Ns+Ga was not associated with PPCs, whereas it was associated with the lowest opioid consumption on the day of surgery.


Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril , Artroplastia do Joelho , Acetaminofen/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Artroplastia de Quadril/efeitos adversos , Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos
12.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 102(3): 221-229, 2020 Feb 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31804238

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Gabapentinoids are commonly prescribed in perioperative multimodal analgesia protocols. Despite widespread use, the optimal dose to reduce opioid consumption while minimizing risks is unknown. We assessed dose-dependent effects of gabapentinoids on opioid consumption and postoperative pulmonary complications following total hip or knee arthroplasty (THA or TKA). We hypothesized that use of a gabapentinoid on the day of THA or TKA is associated with an increased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications in a dose-response fashion compared with the risk for patients who did not receive the drug. METHODS: Using the Premier Database, we identified adults who underwent elective primary THA or TKA from 2009 to 2014. The exposure was receipt of a gabapentinoid (gabapentin or pregabalin) on the day of surgery. Gabapentin dose was categorized into 5 groups: none, 1 to 350, 351 to 700, 701 to 1,050, and >1,050 mg per day. Pregabalin dose was categorized into 4 groups: none, 1 to 110, 111 to 250, and >250 mg per day. The primary outcome was a composite of postoperative pulmonary complications, defined as respiratory failure, pneumonia, reintubation, pulmonary edema, noninvasive ventilation, or invasive mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: Of 858,306 patients who underwent THA or TKA, 11.0% received gabapentin and 10.2% received pregabalin. The mean age (and standard deviation) of the patients was 65.6 ± 10.7 years, 39.6% were male, 78.2% were Caucasian, and 55.2% were covered by Medicare. In multilevel regression analysis, receipt of gabapentinoid at any dose on the day of surgery was associated with increased odds of postoperative pulmonary complications. Compared with no exposure to the drug being used by the particular group, all dose ranges of gabapentin and pregabalin were associated with greater odds of postoperative pulmonary complications (odds ratio, 95% confidence interval = 1.51, 1.40 to 1.63, for >1,050 mg of gabapentin and 1.81, 1.57 to 2.09, for >250 mg of pregabalin). We found no clinically meaningful associations between exposure to either gabapentin or pregabalin and perioperative opioid consumption or the length of the hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to gabapentinoids at any dose on the day of THA or TKA was associated with increased odds of postoperative pulmonary complications in a dose-response fashion, with minimal effects on perioperative opioid consumption. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Assuntos
Analgésicos/efeitos adversos , Artroplastia de Quadril/métodos , Artroplastia do Joelho/métodos , Gabapentina/efeitos adversos , Pneumopatias/induzido quimicamente , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/induzido quimicamente , Pregabalina/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Artroplastia de Quadril/estatística & dados numéricos , Artroplastia do Joelho/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise de Regressão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
14.
J Subst Abuse Treat ; 107: 38-43, 2019 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31757263

RESUMO

Memantine is commonly used for the treatment of moderate-to-severe Alzheimer's disease. Due to its antagonism of the N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor, which has been shown to block rewarding and reinforcing effects of morphine, memantine has been investigated for potential utilization in opioid use disorder (OUD). The objective of this systematic review is to assess the evidence available to determine the safety and efficacy of memantine as treatment for OUD. Pubmed (1946-August 2019) and Embase (1947-August 2019) were queried using the following search terms: opioid-related disorders, opioids, substance withdrawal syndrome, withdrawal syndrome, opiate addiction, opiate, opiate dependence, opiate substitution treatment, managed opioid withdrawal, or drug withdrawal and memantine. After assessing studies appropriate for the objective, one single-blind and five double-blind, placebo-controlled trials were included. Of the included studies, four demonstrated beneficial effects of memantine either as monotherapy or adjunct to methadone or buprenorphine on reducing opioid cravings and methadone dose, increasing retention rates, and improving cognitive performance in patients with OUD. Two studies did not show benefit on patient retention rates with memantine adjunct to naltrexone. Study durations ranged from 3 to 13 weeks, and memantine dosing ranged from 5 to 60 mg/day. Memantine was well tolerated with similar rates of adverse effects between treatment groups. Based on the reviewed literature, memantine appears most beneficial as an adjunctive treatment for OUD when combined with methadone or buprenorphine, but not naltrexone. Larger studies with longer periods of treatment and follow-up are needed to support the use of memantine in the management of OUD.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/farmacologia , Buprenorfina/farmacologia , Antagonistas de Aminoácidos Excitatórios/farmacologia , Memantina/farmacologia , Metadona/farmacologia , Naltrexona/farmacologia , Antagonistas de Entorpecentes/farmacologia , Tratamento de Substituição de Opiáceos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/tratamento farmacológico , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Síndrome de Abstinência a Substâncias/tratamento farmacológico , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Buprenorfina/administração & dosagem , Quimioterapia Combinada , Antagonistas de Aminoácidos Excitatórios/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Memantina/efeitos adversos , Metadona/administração & dosagem , Naltrexona/administração & dosagem , Antagonistas de Entorpecentes/administração & dosagem
15.
Ann Surg ; 270(6): e65-e67, 2019 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30985370

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the association between gabapentinoids on the day of surgery and adverse postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing colorectal surgery in the United States. BACKGROUND: Gabapentinoids, gabapentin and pregabalin, are recommended in multimodal analgesia protocols for acute postoperative pain management after colorectal surgery. However, current literature focuses on the efficacy in reducing opioid consumption, but provides limited information about adverse risks. METHODS: This was a retrospective study including 175,787 patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery using the Premier database between 2009 and 2014. Multilevel regression models measured associations of receipt of gabapentinoids with naloxone use after surgery, non-invasive ventilation (NIV), invasive ventilation (IMV), hospital length of stay (LOS), and parental morphine equivalents (PMEs) on the day of surgery and on the day before discharge. RESULTS: Overall, 4677 (2.7%) patients received gabapentinoids on the day of surgery, with use doubling (1.7% in 2009 to 4.3% in 2014). Compared with patients who were unexposed to ganapentinoids, gabapentinoid exposure was associated with lower PMEs on the day of surgery [-2.7 mg; 95% confidence interval (CI), -5.2 to -0.0 mg], and with higher odds of NIV [odds ratio (OR) 1.22, 95% CI, 1.00-1.49] and receipt of naloxone (OR 1.58, 95% CI, 1.11-2.26). There was no difference between the groups with respect to IMV or PMEs on the day before discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Although use of gabapentinoids on the day of surgery was associated with slightly lower PMEs on the day of surgery, it was associated with higher odds of NIV and naloxone use after surgery.


Assuntos
Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/efeitos adversos , Gabapentina/uso terapêutico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Pregabalina/uso terapêutico , Respiração Artificial , Adulto , Colo/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Morfina , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/tratamento farmacológico , Reto/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos
16.
J Arthroplasty ; 34(5): 893-897, 2019 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30777627

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In the United States, opioids are commonly prescribed to treat knee pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). While surgery leads to decreased pain in most patients, a sizable minority continue to experience severe pain and consume opioids chronically after TKA. We sought to determine the population-level effect of TKA on opioid consumption by detailing the pattern of opioid prescriptions before and after surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively identified US Veterans Health Administration TKA patients from 2010 to 2015. Outpatient opioid prescriptions were identified from 18 months before to 18 months after surgery, and mean daily opioid doses were calculated. Our primary end point was the achievement of opioid-freedom, defined as a period of at least 6 months without opioids. We compared the percentage of patients who were opioid-free preoperatively to the percentage who were opioid-free 18 months after surgery (no prescriptions after postoperative month 12). We identified factors associated with opioid-freedom. RESULTS: In a cohort of 33,927 patients, 41% were opioid-free in the month before surgery compared to 54% 18 months after surgery (P < .001). Preoperative freedom from opioids (odds ratio, 4.59; 95% confidence interval, 4.34 to 4.85; P < .001) was more strongly associated with postoperative freedom from opioids than patient medical and social factors. CONCLUSION: TKA was associated with an increase in postoperative freedom from opioids. Low preoperative dose of opioids was more strongly associated with postoperative opioid-freedom than patient characteristics, suggesting that opioid prescription patterns are a chief driver of opioid use after surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: Retrospective cohort study.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Articulação do Joelho/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Período Pós-Operatório , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...