Clinician and administrator perspectives on outpatient administration of ciltacabtagene autoleucel in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.

Introduction: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy (CAR T therapy) is a treatment option for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma that has led to unprecedented treatment outcomes. Among CAR T therapies available, ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) is a good candidate for outpatient administration due to its generally predictable safety profile. There are multiple advantages of outpatient administration of cilta-cel, including reduced healthcare burden, expanded access, and patient autonomy. This mixed methods qualitative study aimed to identify key factors for outpatient administration of CAR T and best practice recommendations by combining a targeted literature review with expert interviews and panels. Methods: The targeted review (Phase 1) aimed to identify factors for outpatient CAR T administration in the US and determine key topics for the exploratory interviews (Phase 2) and expert panels (Phase 3), which aimed to inform on best practices and challenges of outpatient CAR T administration (focusing on cilta-cel). Participants in clinical and administrative positions based in treatment centers that had experience with real-world outpatient administration of cilta-cel were recruited. Results: Seventeen studies were identified in Phase 1. Key factors for outpatient administration included the development of protocols for CAR T complications, education for caregivers, outpatient specialists, hospital staff, and emergency services staff for identification and referral after possible adverse events, the creation of multidisciplinary teams for effective communication and management, straightforward patient intake processes encompassing financial eligibility review and provision of patient education materials, and close patient monitoring throughout the treatment journey. In Phase 2, 5 participants from 2 centers were interviewed. In Phase 3, 14 participants across 6 treatment centers were interviewed. Two 90-minute virtual panel discussions took place. All participants agreed that cilta-cel can be safely and effectively administered in an outpatient setting. Key recommendations included the creation of educational resources for patients and caregivers, the development of standard operating procedures, dedicated outpatient infrastructure and establishment of interdisciplinary teams, outpatient monitoring for toxicity management, and monitoring of the reimbursement landscape. Discussion: This study offers a comprehensive understanding of the feasibility of outpatient cilta-cel administration in participating CAR T centers and provides actionable recommendations while acknowledging existing challenges.

Real-world analysis of tumor lysis syndrome in patients started on venetoclax combination for acute myeloid leukemia.

INTRODUCTION: Venetoclax is utilized with low-dose cytarabine or a hypomethylating agent for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia. Clinical trials report a risk of tumor lysis syndrome and the package insert recommends a venetoclax dose ramp-up at the initiation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk of tumor lysis syndrome in a large population of patients with acute myeloid leukemia outside of a clinical trial and evaluate the incidence of hospital-acquired complications during inpatient ramp-up. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia receiving venetoclax with a hypomethylating agent or low-dose cytarabine. The primary outcome was the incidence of tumor lysis syndrome. Secondary outcomes included risk factors for tumor lysis syndrome, length of admission, and incidence of hospital-acquired complications. RESULTS: One hundred thirteen patients were included. Although all patients were given some form of prophylaxis, the incidence of tumor lysis syndrome was 8.8%. All were laboratory tumor lysis syndrome; one with hyperuricemia, nine with hypocalcemia, and ten with hyperphosphatemia. Six patients received sevelamer. Tumor lysis syndrome was resolved in all cases. No clinical tumor lysis syndrome occurred. Hepatic dysfunction, tumor lysis syndrome high-risk stratification, higher baseline white blood cell count, and lactate dehydrogenase levels were more common in the tumor lysis syndrome group. Hospital-acquired complications reached 13% in those directly admitted for dose ramp-up. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor lysis syndrome was uncommon and manifested as minor lab abnormalities. White blood cell count continues to be an indicator of risk for tumor lysis syndrome. Those who present with an elevated white blood cell or are otherwise at high risk for tumor lysis syndrome should be admitted for ramp-up. Otherwise, initiation and monitoring of venetoclax are feasible in the outpatient setting.