Daptomycin and Ceftaroline Combination Therapy in Complicated Endovascular Infections Caused by Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Background In complicated endovascular infections by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE), when first-line therapy with vancomycin (VAN) or daptomycin (DAP) fails, combination therapy with ceftaroline (CFT) and DAP has been shown to be a useful approach as salvage therapy for persistent MRSA bacteremia. Objectives This study aimed to describe experience with daptomycin and ceftaroline combination therapy in MRSE-complicated endovascular infections. Methods A single-center retrospective review of consecutive patients with MRSE-complicated endovascular infections treated with ≥72 hours of DAP+CFT at any time during the course of treatment, from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2020, at Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João (CHUSJ), Porto, Portugal, was conducted. The exclusion criteria were known resistance to daptomycin or ceftaroline, total time of combination therapy <72 hours and loss to follow-up. Results We identified seven cases that matched our criteria: five endocarditis and two central venous catheter infections. Six patients switched to combination therapy due to treatment failure with first-line agents - three due to persistent bacteremia and three due to progression of infection despite negative blood cultures. Effective surgical source control took one to four weeks to occur. Three patients died during the treatment, one from progression of the disease and two due to another infection. Conclusions We consider the DAP+CFT combination therapy to be a valid and safe therapeutic choice in complicated patients, such as those with severe infection, poor functional status, and impossibility or delay of surgical source control. However, conclusions on the role of combination therapy should be careful due to the low number of patients and the several confounding factors.

Quality of Life Changes After Surgery for Metastatic Spinal Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a systematic review and meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to assess the quality of life (QoL) after open surgery for spinal metastases, and how surgery affects physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: It remains questionable to what extent open surgery improves QoL for metastatic spinal disease, it would be interesting to quantify the magnitude and duration of QoL benefits-if any-after surgery for spinal metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Included were studies measuring QoL before and after nonpercutaneous, open surgery for spinal metastases for various indications including pain, spinal cord compression, instability, or tumor control. A random-effect model assessed standardized mean differences (SMDs) of summary QoL scores between baseline and 1, 3, 6, or 9-12 months after surgery. RESULTS: The review yielded 10 studies for data extraction. The pooled QoL summary score improved from baseline to 1 month (SMD=1.09, P<0.001), to 3 months (SMD=1.28, P<0.001), to 6 months (SMD=1.21, P<0.001), and to 9-12 months (SMD=1.08, P=0.001). The surgery improved physical well-being during the first 3 months (SMD=0.94, P=0.022), improved emotional (SMD=1.19, P=0.004), and functional well-being (SMD=1.08, P=0.005) during the first 6 months, and only improved social/family well-being at month 6 (SMD=0.28, P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The surgery improved QoL for patients with spinal metastases, and rapidly improved physical, emotional, and functional well-being; it had minimal effect on social/family well-being. However, choosing the optimal candidate for surgical intervention in the setting of spinal metastases remains paramount: otherwise postoperative morbidity and complications may outbalance the intended benefits of surgery. Future research should report clear definitions of selection criteria and surgical indication and provide stratified QoL results by indication and clinical characteristics such as primary tumor type, preoperative Karnofsky, and Bilsky scores to elucidate the optimal candidate for surgical intervention.

Modified En Bloc Spondylectomy for Tumors of the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine: Surgical Technique and Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) for the treatment of spinal tumors decreases local recurrence and improves survival compared with intralesional resection. TES approaches vary in both the number of stages to complete the procedure and instruments with which osteotomies are performed. METHODS: We describe a 2-stage technique that employs the use of threadwire saws. We performed a retrospective review of cases of primary tumors and solitary metastases involving the thoracic or lumbar spine treated with use of our modified technique at our institution between 2010 and 2016, identifying eligible patients by searching for specific phrases in operative reports found in our oncologic database. Clinical notes, operative notes, imaging reports, and pathology reports were reviewed for all patients. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients underwent our modified technique, in which we pass a threadwire saw between the vertebral body and the thecal sac. The most common tumor type was chordoma (64%), and tumors were most commonly located in the lumbar spine (61%). There were no intraoperative injuries to the spinal cord or great vessels. One patient experienced a dural tear secondary to the passage of a saw. Seventeen (52%) of the patients had perioperative complications, with 1 death. Seven (22%) of the patients had complications occurring within 90 days after discharge, and 8 (25%) had complications occurring >90 days after discharge. Instrumentation failure was observed in 8 cases (25%). Negative margins were obtained in 94% of the cases. Local recurrence was observed in 2 cases (6%). The majority of patients had normal motor function at the time of the most recent follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Our modified en bloc spondylectomy represents an effective technique for the resection of spinal tumors in selected patients, allowing for visualization of vessels anterior to the spine and the avoidance of spinal cord injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Factors associated with infection after reconstructive shoulder surgery for proximal humerus tumors.

BACKGROUND: The main reconstruction techniques for proximal humerus tumors include osteoarticular allografts (OAs), endoprostheses (EPs), or allograft prosthetic composites (APCs). A common complication is infection, and constructs involving the use of allografts are believed to be at a higher risk of infection. Literature comparing infection rates between different modalities of reconstruction is scarce and underpowered. The study purposes were (1) to determine and compare the prevalence of infection in patients who underwent reconstruction of the proximal humerus including OAs, EPs, and APCs; (2) to identify preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative predictors of infection that might be modifiable; and (3) to present our protocol of treatment in patients with superficial and deep infections. METHODS: We reviewed 150 patients of all ages with proximal humerus tumors treated by an OA, EP, or APC at 2 tertiary institutions. The prevalence of infection for each modality was calculated and compared between groups. We identified potential predictors of infection with stepwise backward multivariate Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: An infection developed in 19 patients (12%): 5 of 45 (11%) in the OA group, 12 of 85 (14%) in the EP group, and 2 of 20 (10%) in the APC group (P = .740). A lower preoperative hemoglobin blood level and low preoperative albumin blood level were independently associated with infection. CONCLUSIONS: We found similar infection rates compared with previously reported series. However, we did not identify a higher infection prevalence in constructs using allografts. Patients with a lower preoperative hemoglobin or albumin level are at higher risk of infection and should undergo optimization before surgery.

Resection of Obstructive Left-Sided Colon Cancer at a National Level: A Prospective Analysis of Short-Term Outcomes in 1,816 Patients.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The prematurely closed Stent-In II trial in patients with left-sided obstructive colon cancer may have influenced clinical decision making in The Netherlands. The aim of this study was to evaluate treatment of left-sided malignant colon obstruction at a population level since then. METHODS: Short-term outcomes of all patients who underwent resection for left-sided obstructive colon cancer between 2009 and 2012 were assessed based on a prospective national registry. RESULTS: In total, 1,816 evaluable patients were included; acute resection was performed in 1,485 (81.8%), and endoscopic stent or decompressing stoma followed by resection in 196 (10.8%) and 135 (7.4%), respectively. The use of endoscopic stenting significantly decreased from 18% (2009) to 6% (2012). Overall 30-day or in-hospital mortality rate was 6.9, 5.6, and 3.7%, respectively (p = 0.107). Mortality rate after acute resection was 2.9% in patients <70 [corrected] years, but mortality rates up to 32.2% were observed in high-risk elderly patients. CONCLUSION: Acute resection as first choice treatment seems justified for patients <70 [corrected] years of age given a mortality rate of 3%. For the elderly frail patients, mortality rates over 30% after acute resection stress the need for alternative treatment strategies.