Assembling a consensus on actinic cheilitis: A Delphi study.

AIMS: To discuss the terminology to define and classify actinic cheilitis (AC) and to build a consensus on the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to AC. METHODS: Two-round Delphi study using a questionnaire including 34 closed sentences (9 on terminology and taxonomy, 5 on potential for malignant transformation, 12 on diagnostic aspects, 8 on treatment) and 8 open questions. Experts' agreement was rated using a Likert scale (1-7). RESULTS: A consensus was reached on 24 out 34 statements (73.5%) and on 5 out of 8 (62.5%) close-ended questions. The response rate was identical in both rounds (attrition of 0%). AC is the term with the highest agreement (median of 7 (strongly agree; IQR: 6-7)) and the lowest dispersion (VC = 21.33). 'Potentially malignant disorder' was the preferred classification group for AC (median of 7) and 85.6% of participants showing some level of agreement (CV < 50). Experts (66.75%) consider AC a clinical term (median: 7; IQR: 4-7) and believe definitive diagnosis can be made clinically (median: 6; IQR: 5-7), particularly by inspection and palpation (median: 5; IQR: 4-6). Histopathological confirmation is mandatory for the management of AC (median: 5; IQR: 2.5-7), even for homogeneous lesions (median: 5; IQR: 3.5-6). Consensus was reached on all treatment statements (VC < 50). CONCLUSIONS: AC is a potentially malignant disorder with a significant lack of agreement on diagnostic criteria, procedures, biopsy indications and the importance of techniques to assist in biopsy. A consensus was reached on nomenclature and management of this disorder.

Cutaneous adverse events and quality of life in outpatients receiving anticancer agents: results from an observational, cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Despite growing interest in cutaneous adverse events (CAEs) and their management in patients with cancer, they are often underreported and there are no extensive data on their impact on quality of life (QoL). Healthcare professionals should consider this issue in order to minimize its negative impact on QoL and improve patient outcomes. This study evaluates the impact of CAEs on QoL in outpatients receiving anticancer drugs and aims to determine the differences in QoL between conventional chemotherapy versus targeted therapies. METHODS: A total of 114 cancer patients with CAEs were included in this observational, cross-sectional study. Patient-reported outcomes instruments (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General, Dermatology Life Quality Index, and Skindex-16) were used. RESULTS: Mean scores in QoL indices were 65.3±13.4, 8.4±5, and 30.8±16.9 in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General, Dermatology Life Quality Index, and Skindex-16, respectively. The CAEs that had the greatest impact on dermatologic-related QoL were hand-foot skin reaction, rash, palmo-plantar erythrodysesthesia, and papulopustular eruption. No significant differences in QoL indices according to the type of treatment (conventional chemotherapy versus targeted therapy) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: CAEs, and particularly hand-foot toxicities, rashes, and papulopustular eruptions, can have an impact on QoL in outpatients receiving anticancer drugs as evaluated with three different patient-reported outcomes instruments. No differences in QoL related to CAEs were observed between conventional chemotherapy and targeted therapy.

Use of lip photoprotection in patients suffering from actinic cheilitis.

BACKGROUND: Actinic cheilitis (AC) is a chronic condition that affects mainly the lower lip. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the use of lip photoprotection in patients with AC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional multicentre study of patients, ≥45 years of age, was performed in eight dermatology departments in the Galicia region over a period of one year. From 1,239 patients included in the study, 410 were diagnosed with AC and complete data were available for 408. An analysis of lip photoprotection habits and possible associations in patients with AC is reported. RESULTS: Mean age of patients with AC was 71.9 years and 53.8% were women. More than 90% of AC patients (370/408) had never used lip photoprotection. In the group of patients who used it, 62.16% of them had only used a single stick within the previous year. The only variable significantly associated with the use of lip sun protection was low Fitzpatrick's skin types I and II (p=0.039). Study limitations include the inclusion of patients 45 years or older and the use of a semiquantitative scale for measuring the frequency of application of lip photoprotection. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first European study focused on lip photoprotection in patients suffering from AC. Only a minority of AC patients protect their lips from UV radiation. Specific lip sun protection recommendations should be promoted, especially in high-risk populations.

Actinic Cheilitis Prevalence and Risk Factors: A Cross-sectional, Multicentre Study in a Population Aged 45 Years and Over in North-west Spain.

Actinic cheilitis is thought to be a premalignant lesion or a superficial squamous cell carcinoma. The prevalence of actinic cheilitis in Europe is unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of actinic cheilitis in the Galicia region (north-west Spain). Secondary objectives were the description of risk factors of actinic cheilitis. A cross-sectional multicentre study in patients ≥ 45 years of age was performed in 8 dermatology departments in Galicia region during a 1-year period. The prevalence of actinic cheilitis was 31.3%. Significant and independent risk factors of actinic cheilitis after multivariate analysis were age ≥ 60 years, Fitzpatrick skin phototype II, outdoor working for more than 25 years, and previous history of non-melanoma skin cancer. This is the first cross-sectional multicentre study of the prevalence of actinic cheilitis in Europe. Actinic cheilitis was present in almost one-third of the screened patients. Lip examination should be performed in all patients with chronic actinic damage.

Tinea pedis causada por Trichophyton violaceum / Tinea pedis due to Trichophyton violaceum

-La tinea pedis es una dermatofitosis de los pies cuya incidencia ha aumentado fundamentalmente debido a factores ocupacionales y medioambientales diversos. El agente causal más frecuente en los países occidentales es Trichophyton rubrum seguido de T. mentagrophytes var. interdigitale y Epidermophyton floccosum.Se presenta el caso de una niña de 14 años, piragüista federada, con afectación interdigital de los pies consistente en maceración y fisuración, cuyo estudio micológico evidenció Trychophyton violaceum. Este agente es poco frecuente en la tinea pedis. En los países industrializados se presenta, en la mayoría de los casos, como causante de tinea capitis en inmigrantes de áreas donde dicho agente es endémico. Se discuten aspectos diagnósticos y terapéuticos de este proceso (AU)