Update on Pediatric Medial Epicondyle Fractures.

The ideal evaluation and treatment of pediatric patients with medial epicondyle fractures remain controversial. It is important to examine the most recent literature and provide an update on the current clinical practices, imaging modalities, treatment techniques, outcomes, and complications associated with displaced pediatric medial epicondyle fractures. There remains substantial variability across recommended treatment options and the outcomes between surgical versus nonsurgical management of these injuries. Despite the lack of consensus regarding management of pediatric medial epicondyle fractures, both nonsurgical and surgical approaches have demonstrated equivocal results.

Surgeon Volume and Social Disparity are Associated with Postoperative Complications After Lumbar Fusion.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the volume dependence of both facilities and surgeons on postoperative complications after lumbar fusion and characterize the role of socioeconomic status. METHODS: Adults who underwent lumbar fusion from 2011 to 2015 were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnostic codes for lumbar disc degeneration or spondylolisthesis and procedure codes for lumbar fusion in the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database. Complications were compared across surgeon and facility volumes using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, controlling for patient demographic and clinical factors. Surgeon and facility volumes were compared between the lowest and highest 20%. RESULTS: Of the 26,211 patients identified with a lumbar fusion, 16,377 patients were treated at a high-volume or low-volume facility or by a high-volume or low-volume surgeon. Low-volume facilities had higher 3-month and 12-month rates of readmission, pneumonia, and cellulitis; lower 1-month, 3-month, and 12-month rates of deep vein thrombosis; and lower 1-month rates of wound complications. Low-volume surgeons had higher 1-month, 3-month, and 12-month rates of readmission, acute renal failure, surgical site infection, and wound complications; high 1-month and 3-month rates of urinary tract infection and pulmonary embolism; and a lower 12-month rate of revision. Patients who were treated by low-volume surgeons and had complications were more concentrated to ZIP codes with high social deprivation. CONCLUSIONS: Both high-volume facilities and high-volume surgeons show lower rates of complications and readmission. There are significant socioeconomic disparities regarding which patients can access high-volume surgeons.

The Insurance Coverage Paradox - Characterizing Outcomes among Dual-Eligible Hemorrhagic Stroke Patients.

BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic factors, such as insurance status, have been shown to affect outcomes for patients following emergency injuries. Dual-eligible beneficiaries, receiving both Medicare and Medicaid, constitute an especially vulnerable population. There is limited data addressing whether dual-eligible beneficiaries with hemorrhagic stroke display unique characteristics and outcomes compared to patients with Medicare, Medicaid, or private insurance. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 10-years of National Inpatient Sample data. Using ICD-9-CM codes, we identified adult patients with known insurance status who were emergently hospitalized for intracranial hemorrhage; epidural, subdural, subarachnoid, and intracerebral hemorrhages were included. Patient characteristics including whether they underwent surgical intervention were collected. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for confounders. Primary clinical outcomes of interest included mortality (in-hospital), complications (any), and favorable discharge (home/home with services). RESULTS: Among 410,621 patients, dual-eligible (6.8%) patients were on average older (mean age = 73yrs) compared to Medicaid (46yrs), private insurance (67yrs), or no-charge (47yrs) patients. Caucasian race was highest among Medicare patients (83%) while African-American race was highest among Medicaid (22%). Among all patients, 5.3% underwent operative intervention. Dual-eligibles had significantly higher odds of in-hospital mortality compared to no-charge (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.61, 95% CI = [1.04 - 2.49]), but no significant difference between Medicare and Medicaid although dual-eligibles. Dual-eligibles had significantly increased odds of complications compared to Medicaid (aOR = 1.23, 95% CI = [1.11 - 1.37]) and privately insured patients (aOR = 1.19, 95% CI = [1.11 - 1.28]), both p < 0.001, and lower odds of favorable discharge compared to all other groups, all p < 0.001. Dual-eligibles underwent a shorter length of stay, an 18% decrease, compared to Medicaid patients (ß-Coefficient = 0.82, 95% CI = [0.78 - 0.86], p < 0.001), and inflation adjusted admission costs that were 24% lower compared to Medicaid patients (ß-Coefficient = 0.76, 95% CI = [0.73 - 0.80], p < 0.001), amounting to a $3,684 decrease in cost. CONCLUSIONS: Dual-eligible beneficiaries experience unique health disparities from lower odds of favorable discharge to increased odds of complications and in-hospital mortality compared to other insured and uninsured groups. Adverse outcomes among dual-eligible beneficiaries highlight the need to uncover and address unknown sources of disparities to improve emergency treatment of hemorrhagic stroke in this population.