Diagnosis of prostate cancer with magnetic resonance imaging in men treated with 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors.

PURPOSE: The primary aim of this study was to evaluate if exposure to 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs) modifies the effect of MRI for the diagnosis of clinically significant Prostate Cancer (csPCa) (ISUP Gleason grade ≥ 2). METHODS: This study is a multicenter cohort study including patients undergoing prostate biopsy and MRI at 24 institutions between 2013 and 2022. Multivariable analysis predicting csPCa with an interaction term between 5-ARIs and PIRADS score was performed. Sensitivity, specificity, and negative (NPV) and positive (PPV) predictive values of MRI were compared in treated and untreated patients. RESULTS: 705 patients (9%) were treated with 5-ARIs [median age 69 years, Interquartile range (IQR): 65, 73; median PSA 6.3 ng/ml, IQR 4.0, 9.0; median prostate volume 53 ml, IQR 40, 72] and 6913 were 5-ARIs naïve (age 66 years, IQR 60, 71; PSA 6.5 ng/ml, IQR 4.8, 9.0; prostate volume 50 ml, IQR 37, 65). MRI showed PIRADS 1-2, 3, 4, and 5 lesions in 141 (20%), 158 (22%), 258 (37%), and 148 (21%) patients treated with 5-ARIs, and 878 (13%), 1764 (25%), 2948 (43%), and 1323 (19%) of untreated patients (p < 0.0001). No difference was found in csPCa detection rates, but diagnosis of high-grade PCa (ISUP GG ≥ 3) was higher in treated patients (23% vs 19%, p = 0.013). We did not find any evidence of interaction between PIRADS score and 5-ARIs exposure in predicting csPCa. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of PIRADS ≥ 3 were 94%, 29%, 46%, and 88% in treated patients and 96%, 18%, 43%, and 88% in untreated patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to 5-ARIs does not affect the association of PIRADS score with csPCa. Higher rates of high-grade PCa were detected in treated patients, but most were clearly visible on MRI as PIRADS 4 and 5 lesions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The present study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT05078359.

Nationwide analysis of survival after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in Finland.

BACKGROUND: Population-based survival results after radical cystectomy (RC) are limited. Our objective was to report short and long-term survival results after RC for bladder cancer from Finland in a population-based setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Finnish National Cystectomy Database containing retrospectively collected essential RC data covering the years 2005-2017 was combined with the survival data from the Finnish Cancer Registry. Kaplan-Meier plots were used to estimate survival and the survival graphs were illustrated according to the final pathological staging. Centers were divided according to operational volume, and the results were then compared using Pearsons's Chi-squared test. RESULTS: A total of 2047 patients were included in the study. 30-, and 90-day mortality was 1.3%, and 3.8%, respectively. The OS of the entire RC population at 5- and 10 years was 66% and 55%, and CSS was 74% and 72%, respectively. Center volume did not significantly associate with surgical mortality or long-term survival. The 5- and 10-year OS according to pT-category was 87% and 74% for pT0, 85% and 69% for pTa-pTis-pT1, 70% and 58% for pT2, 50% and 42% for pT3 and 41% and 30% for pT4. The corresponding 5- and 10-year CSS rates were 96% and 93% for pT0, 91% and 90% for pTa-pTis-pT1, 78% and 75% for pT2, 56% and 55% for pT3 and 47% and 44% for pT4. The 5- and 10-year OS rates in patients with no lymph node metastases (pN-) were 74% and 62%, and CSS 82% and 80%, respectively. If lymph nodes were positive (pN+), the corresponding OS rates were 44% and 34% and CSS 49% and 48%, respectively. CONCLUSION: RC survival results have improved in contemporary series and are associated with the pTNM-status. The nationwide results from Finland demonstrate outcome comparable to high volume single-center series.

The Mount Sinai Prebiopsy Risk Calculator for Predicting any Prostate Cancer and Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Development of a Risk Predictive Tool and Validation with Advanced Neural Networking, Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Outcome Database, and European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator.

Background: The European Association of Urology guidelines recommend the use of imaging, biomarkers, and risk calculators in men at risk of prostate cancer. Risk predictive calculators that combine multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging with prebiopsy variables aid as an individualized decision-making tool for patients at risk of prostate cancer, and advanced neural networking increases reliability of these tools. Objective: To develop a comprehensive risk predictive online web-based tool using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical data, to predict the risk of any prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant PCa (csPCa) applicable to biopsy-naïve men, men with a prior negative biopsy, men with prior positive low-grade cancer, and men with negative MRI. Design setting and participants: Institutional review board-approved prospective data of 1902 men undergoing biopsy from October 2013 to September 2021 at Mount Sinai were collected. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to evaluate clinical variables such as age, race, digital rectal examination, family history, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), biopsy status, Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score, and prostate volume, which emerged as predictors for any PCa and csPCa. Binary logistic regression was performed to study the probability. Validation was performed with advanced neural networking (ANN), multi-institutional European cohort (Prostate MRI Outcome Database [PROMOD]), and European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator (ERSPC RC) 3/4. Results and limitations: Overall, 2363 biopsies had complete clinical information, with 57.98% any cancer and 31.40% csPCa. The prediction model was significantly associated with both any PCa and csPCa having an area under the curve (AUC) of 81.9% including clinical data. The AUC for external validation was calculated in PROMOD, ERSPC RC, and ANN for any PCa (0.82 vs 0.70 vs 0.90) and csPCa (0.82 vs 0.78 vs 0.92), respectively. This study is limited by its retrospective design and overestimation of csPCa in the PROMOD cohort. Conclusions: The Mount Sinai Prebiopsy Risk Calculator combines PSA, imaging and clinical data to predict the risk of any PCa and csPCa for all patient settings. With accurate validation results in a large European cohort, ERSPC RC, and ANN, it exhibits its efficiency and applicability in a more generalized population. This calculator is available online in the form of a free web-based tool that can aid clinicians in better patients counseling and treatment decision-making. Patient summary: We developed the Mount Sinai Prebiopsy Risk Calculator (MSP-RC) to assess the likelihood of any prostate cancer and clinically significant disease based on a combination of clinical and imaging characteristics. MSP-RC is applicable to all patient settings and accessible online.

Awareness of Smoking as a Risk Factor in Bladder Cancer: Results from the Prospective FinnBladder 9 Trial.

BACKGROUND: Data regarding patient education and smoking habits among bladder cancer patients are scarce. OBJECTIVE: To investigate awareness of smoking as a risk factor for bladder cancer among bladder cancer patients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This is a substudy of a prospective, randomized, multicenter phase 3 trial (FinnBladder 9, NCT01675219). The data were collected at baseline and after 12 mo of follow-up between 2012 and 2020. INTERVENTION: Patients completed a comprehensive nonvalidated questionnaire on smoking in relation to bladder cancer. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The outcomes measured were patient-reported awareness of smoking as a risk factor for bladder cancer, and the effect of smoking on bladder cancer-related recurrence, progression, and death. Parametric data were compared using Student's t test and proportions using Fischer's exact test. Factors affecting baseline awareness of the effect of smoking cessation on bladder cancer were studied using logistic regression. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Of the 411 patients randomized, 370 completed the baseline questionnaire and were included in the analysis. At baseline, 44% of patients were uncertain if smoking was a risk factor for bladder cancer. Patient awareness of the fact that smoking cessation reduces the risk of bladder cancer recurrence increased from 86% to 92% after 12 mo of follow-up (p = 0.038). Older patients and patients with recurrent bladder cancer had significantly less knowledge about the effect of smoking on bladder cancer recurrence, progression, and mortality. A major limitation is that the response rate was lower at the 12-mo follow-up visit than at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Awareness of smoking as a bladder cancer risk factor is low. Older patients and patients with recurrent bladder cancer may need special attention regarding education. PATIENT SUMMARY: We looked at outcomes for smoking-related patient education on bladder cancer in a Finnish population. We conclude that older patients and patients with recurrent bladder cancer may need to be educated on this subject.

Combined Use of Prostate-specific Antigen Density and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Biopsy Decision Planning: A Retrospective Multi-institutional Study Using the Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Outcome Database (PROMOD).

BACKGROUND: Previous studies suggested that prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density (PSAd) combined with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may help avoid unnecessary prostate biopsy (PB) with a limited risk of missing clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa; Gleason grade group [GGG] >1). OBJECTIVE: To define optimal diagnostic strategies based on the combined use of PSAd and MRI in patients at risk of prostate cancer (PCa). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective analysis of the international multicenter Prostate MRI Outcome Database (PROMOD), including 2512 men having undergone PSAd and prostate MRI before PB between 2013 and 2019, was performed. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Rates of avoided PB, missed GGG 1, and csPCa according to 10 strategies based on PSAd values and MRI reporting scores (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System [PI-RADS]/Likert/IMPROD biparametric prostate MRI Likert). Decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to statistically compare the net benefit of each strategy. Combined systematic and targeted biopsies were used for reference. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: According to DCA, the best strategy in biopsy-naive patients was #7 (PI-RADS/Likert 4-5 or PI-RADS/Likert 3 if PSAd >0.2), which avoided 41.2% PBs while missed 44% of GGG 1 and 10.9% of csPCa cases. From a clinical standpoint, however, strategies with a lower risk of missing csPCa included #10 (PI-RADS/Likert 4-5 or PI-RADS 3 if PSAd >0.10 or PSAd >0.2), which avoided 27% PBs while missing 24.4% GGG 1 and 4% csPCa cases, or #5 (PI-RADS/Likert 3-5 or PSAd>0.15), which avoided 14.7% PBs while missing 9.3% GGG 1 and 1.7% csPCa cases. Similar results were found in patients with a previous negative biopsy. This study is limited by its retrospective nature, and no central review of MRI and histopathological findings. CONCLUSIONS: Combined PSAd and MRI findings allows individualization of the decision to perform PB on the basis of the risk of missing PCa that both patients and clinicians are ready to accept to avoid this procedure. PATIENT SUMMARY: We compared several biopsy strategies based on a combination of prostate magnetic resonance imaging findings and prostate-specific antigen density, providing a readily available tool for each center and practicing urologist to counsel patients about their individual risk of significant prostate cancer.

Negative Predictive Value of Biparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Excluding Significant Prostate Cancer: A Pooled Data Analysis Based on Clinical Data from Four Prospective, Registered Studies.

BACKGROUND: Multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) can be considered the gold standard in prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Biparametric prostate MRI (bpMRI) is faster and could be a feasible alternative to mpMRI. OBJECTIVE: To determine the negative predictive value (NPV) of Improved Prostate Cancer Diagnosis (IMPROD) bpMRI as a whole and in clinical subgroups in primary diagnostics of clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPCa). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This is a pooled data analysis of four prospective, registered clinical trials investigating prebiopsy IMPROD bpMRI. Men with a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer (PCa) were included. INTERVENTION: Prebiopsy IMPROD bpMRI was performed, and an IMPROD bpMRI Likert scoring system was used. If suspicious lesions (IMPROD bpMRI Likert score 3-5) were visible, targeted biopsies in addition to systematic biopsies were taken. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Performance measures of IMPROD bpMRI in CSPCa diagnostics were evaluated. NPV was also evaluated in clinical subgroups. Gleason grade ≥3 + 4 in any biopsy core taken was defined as CSPCa. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 639 men were included in the analysis. The mean age was 64 yr, mean prostate-specific antigen level was 8.9 ng/ml, and CSPCa prevalence was 48%. NPVs of IMPROD bpMRI Likert scores 3-5 and 4-5 for CSPCa were 0.932 and 0.909, respectively, and the corresponding positive predictive values were 0.589 and 0.720. Only nine of 132 (7%) men with IMPROD bpMRI Likert score 1-2 had CSPCa and none with Gleason score >7. Thus, 132 of 639 (21%) study patients could have avoided biopsies without missing a single Gleason >7 cancer in the study biopsies. In the subgroup analysis, no clear outlier was present. The limitation is uncertainty of the true CSPCa prevalence. CONCLUSIONS: IMPROD bpMRI demonstrated a high NPV to rule out CSPCa. IMPROD bpMRI Likert score 1-2 excludes Gleason >7 PCa in the study biopsies. PATIENT SUMMARY: We investigated the feasibility of prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with the Improved Prostate Cancer Diagnosis (IMPROD) biparametric MRI (bpMRI) protocol in excluding significant prostate cancer. In this study, highly aggressive prostate cancer was excluded using the publicly available IMPROD bpMRI protocol (http://petiv.utu.fi/multiimprod/).

Prediction of prostate cancer aggressiveness using 18F-Fluciclovine (FACBC) PET and multisequence multiparametric MRI.

The aim of this prospective single-institution clinical trial (NCT02002455) was to evaluate the potential of advanced post-processing methods for 18F-Fluciclovine PET and multisequence multiparametric MRI in the prediction of prostate cancer (PCa) aggressiveness, defined by Gleason Grade Group (GGG). 21 patients with PCa underwent PET/CT, PET/MRI and MRI before prostatectomy. DWI was post-processed using kurtosis (ADCk, K), mono- (ADCm), and biexponential functions (f, Dp, Df) while Logan plots were used to calculate volume of distribution (VT). In total, 16 unique PET (VT, SUV) and MRI derived quantitative parameters were evaluated. Univariate and multivariate analysis were carried out to estimate the potential of the quantitative parameters and their combinations to predict GGG 1 vs >1, using logistic regression with a nested leave-pair out cross validation (LPOCV) scheme and recursive feature elimination technique applied for feature selection. The second order rotating frame imaging (RAFF), monoexponential and kurtosis derived parameters had LPOCV AUC in the range of 0.72 to 0.92 while the corresponding value for VT was 0.85. The best performance for GGG prediction was achieved by K parameter of kurtosis function followed by quantitative parameters based on DWI, RAFF and 18F-FACBC PET. No major improvement was achieved using parameter combinations with or without feature selection. Addition of 18F-FACBC PET derived parameters (VT, SUV) to DWI and RAFF derived parameters did not improve LPOCV AUC.

Impact of biparametric prebiopsy prostate magnetic resonance imaging on the diagnostics of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy naïve men.

Background: The objective of this study was to compare the prevalence of clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPCa) in men with biparametric prebiopsy prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and lesion-targeted biopsies (TBs) to the group of men without prebiopsy MRI in an initial biopsy session.Methods: The MRI group consists of men enrolled into four prospective clinical trials investigating a biparametric MRI (bpMRI) and TB while the non-MRI group was a retrospective cohort of men collected from an era prior to a clinical use of a prostate MRI. All men had standard biopsies (SBs). In the MRI group, men had additional TBs from potential cancer-suspicious lesions. CSPCa was defined as Gleason score ≥3 + 4 in any biopsy core taken. All the patients were prostate biopsy naïve.Results: The MRI group consists of 507 while the non-MRI group 379 men. Mean age and prostate specific antigen (PSA) level differed significantly (p < 0.05) between the groups: In the MRI group, 64 years and 7.6 ng/ml, respectively, and in the non-MRI group 68 years and 8.2 ng/ml, respectively. Significantly (p < 0.05) more CSPCa was diagnosed with initial biopsies in the MRI group (48%) compared to non-MRI group (34%). In men with no CSPCa diagnosed during the initial biopsies, significantly fewer (p < 0.05) men had upgrading re-biopsies in the MRI group (5%) than in the non-MRI group (19%) during the follow up.Conclusions: Prebiopsy bpMRI with TBs combined with SBs could lead to earlier diagnoses of CSPCa compared with men without prebiopsy prostate MRI used in initial PCa diagnostics.

Prediction of biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer patients who underwent prostatectomy using routine clinical prostate multiparametric MRI and decipher genomic score.

BACKGROUND: Biochemical recurrence (BCR) affects a significant proportion of patients who undergo robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP). PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of a routine clinical prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and Decipher genomic classifier score for prediction of biochemical recurrence in patients who underwent RALP. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective cohort study. SUBJECTS: Ninety-one patients who underwent RALP performed by a single surgeon, had mpMRI before RALP, Decipher taken from RALP samples, and prostate specific antigen (PSA) follow-up for >3 years or BCR within 3 years, defined as PSA >0.2 mg/ml. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: mpMRI was performed at 27 different institutions using 1.5T (n = 10) or 3T scanners and included T2 w, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), or dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI. ASSESSMENT: All mpMRI studies were reported by one reader using Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System v. 2.1 (PI-RADsv2.1) without knowledge of other findings. Eighteen (20%) randomly selected cases were re-reported by reader B to evaluate interreader variability. STATISTICAL TESTS: Univariate and multivariate analysis using greedy feature selection and tournament leave-pair-out cross-validation (TLPOCV) were used to evaluate the performance of various variables for prediction of BCR, which included clinical (three), systematic biopsy (three), surgical (six: RALP Gleason Grade Group [GGG], extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, intraoperative surgical margins [PSM], final PSM, pTNM), Decipher (two: Decipher score, Decipher risk category), and mpMRI (eight: prostate volume, PSA density, PI-RADv2.1 score, MRI largest lesion size, summed MRI lesions' volume and relative volume [MRI-lesion-percentage], mpMRI ECE, mpMRI seminal vesicle invasion [SVI]) variables. The evaluation metric was the area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: Forty-eight (53%) patients developed BCR. The best-performing individual features with TLPOCV AUC of 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64-0.82) were RALP GGG, MRI-lesion-percentage followed by biopsy GGG (0.72, 0.62-0.82), and Decipher score (0.71, 0.60-0.82). The best performance was achieved by feature selection of Decipher+Surgery and MRI + Surgery variables with TLPOCV AUC of 0.82 and 0.81, respectively DATA CONCLUSION: Relative lesion volume measured on a routine clinical mpMRI failed to outperform Decipher score in BCR prediction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:1075-1085.

Qualitative and Quantitative Reporting of a Unique Biparametric MRI: Towards Biparametric MRI-Based Nomograms for Prediction of Prostate Biopsy Outcome in Men With a Clinical Suspicion of Prostate Cancer (IMPROD and MULTI-IMPROD Trials).

BACKGROUND: Multiparametric MRI of the prostate has been shown to improve the risk stratification of men with an elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA). However, long acquisition time, high cost, and inter-center/reader variability of a routine prostate multiparametric MRI limit its wider adoption. PURPOSE: To develop and validate nomograms based on unique rapid biparametric MRI (bpMRI) qualitative and quantitative derived variables for prediction of clinically significant cancer (SPCa). STUDY TYPE: Retrospective analyses of single (IMPROD, NCT01864135) and multiinstitution trials (MULTI-IMPROD, NCT02241122). POPULATION: 161 and 338 prospectively enrolled men who completed the IMPROD and MULTI-IMPROD trials, respectively. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: IMPROD bpMRI: 3T/1.5T, T2 -weighted imaging, three separate diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) acquisitions: 1) b-values 0, 100, 200, 300, 500 s/mm2 ; 2) b values 0, 1500 s/mm2 ; 3) values 0, 2000 s/mm2 . ASSESSMENT: The primary endpoint of the combined trial analysis was the diagnostic accuracy of the combination of IMPROD bpMRI and clinical variables for detection of SPCa. STATISTICAL TESTS: Logistic regression models were developed using IMPROD trial data and validated using MULTI-IMPROD trial data. The model's performance was expressed as the area under the curve (AUC) values for the detection of SPCa, defined as ISUP Gleason Grade Group ≥2. RESULTS: A model incorporating clinical variables had an AUC (95% confidence interval) of 0.83 (0.77-0.89) and 0.80 (0.75-0.85) in the development and validation cohorts, respectively. The corresponding values for a model using IMPROD bpMRI findings were 0.93 (0.89-0.97), and 0.88 (0.84-0.92), respectively. Further addition of the quantitative DWI-based score did not improve AUC values (P < 0.05). DATA CONCLUSION: A prediction model using qualitative IMPROD bpMRI findings demonstrated high accuracy for predicting SPCa in men with an elevated PSA. Online risk calculator: http://petiv.utu.fi/multiimprod/ Level of Evidence: 1 Technical Efficacy Stage: 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:1556-1567.

Prebiopsy IMPROD Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined with Prostate-Specific Antigen Density in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: An External Validation Study.

BACKGROUND: Biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) combined with prostate-specific antigen density (PSAd) may be an effective strategy for selecting men for prostate biopsy. It has been shown that performing biopsy only for men with bpMRI Likert scores of 4-5 or PSAd ≥0.15 ng/ml/cm3 is the most efficient strategy. OBJECTIVE: To externally validate previously published biopsy strategies using two prospective bpMRI trial cohorts. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: After IMPROD bpMRI, 499 men had systematic transrectal prostate biopsies and men with IMPROD bpMRI Likert scores of 3-5 had an additional two to four targeted biopsies. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Various IMPROD bpMRI Likert score and PSAd thresholds were assessed using detection rates for significant prostate cancer (sPCa; Gleason score ≥3 + 4), predictive values, and proportion of biopsies avoided. Net benefits and decision curve analyses (DCA) were compared with the aim of finding an optimal strategy for sPCa detection. Combined biopsies were used for reference. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The negative predictive value (NPV) for sPCa in IMPROD bpMRI Likert 3-5 and 4-5 score groups was 93% and 92%, respectively, while the corresponding positive predictive value (PPV) was 57% and 72%, respectively. In DCA, the optimal combination was IMPROD bpMRI Likert score 4-5 or Likert 3 with PSAd ≥0.20 ng/ml/cm3, which had NPV of 93% and PPV of 67%. Using this combination, 35% of the study patients would have avoided biopsies and 13 sPCas (6%, 13/229, of all sPCas diagnosed) would have been missed. CONCLUSIONS: IMPROD bpMRI demonstrated a good NPV for sPCa. PSAd improved the NPV mainly among men with equivocal suspicion on IMPROD bpMRI. However, the additional value of PSAd was marginal: the NPV and PPV for IMPROD bpMRI Likert 4-5 score group were 92% and 72%, respectively, while the corresponding values for the best combination strategy were 93% and 67%. PATIENT SUMMARY: We investigated a rapid prostate magnetic resonance imaging protocol (IMPROD bpMRI) combined with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density for detection of significant prostate cancer. Our results show that IMPROD bpMRI is a good diagnostic tool, but the additional value provided by PSA density is marginal.

Correlation between 18F-1-amino-3-fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid (18F-fluciclovine) uptake and expression of alanine-serine-cysteine-transporter 2 (ASCT2) and L-type amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1) in primary prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the expression of alanine-serine-cysteine-transporter 2 (ASCT2) and L-type amino acid transporter1 (LAT1) in prostate cancer (PCa) and their impact on uptake of 18F-1-amino-3-fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid (18F-fluciclovine) which is approved for the detection of recurrent PCa. METHODS: Twenty-five hormone-naïve patients with histologically confirmed PCa underwent PET/CT before prostatectomy. Dynamic imaging was performed immediately after injection of 368 ± 10 MBq of 18F-fluciclovine and the uptake in PCa was expressed as SUVmax at six sequential 4-min time frames and as tracer distribution volume (VT) using Logan plots over 0-24 min. The expression of ASCT2 and LAT1 was studied with immunohistochemistry (IHC) on a tissue microarray (TMA) containing three cores per carcinoma lesion. The TMA slides were scored independently by two trained readers based on visual intensity of ASCT2/LAT1 expression on a four-tiered scale. The correlations between ASCT2/LAT1 staining intensity, SUVmax/VT, and Gleason grade group (GGG) were assessed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (ρ). RESULTS: Forty tumor foci (> 0.5 mm in diameter, max. 3 per patient) were available for TMA. In visual scoring, low, moderate, and high staining intensity of ASCT2 was observed in 4 (10%), 24 (60%), and 12 (30%) tumors, respectively. No tumors showed high LAT1 staining intensity while moderate intensity was found in 10 (25%), 25 (63%) showed low, and the remaining 5 (12%) were negative for staining with LAT1. Tumors with GGG > 2 showed significantly higher uptake of 18F-fluciclovine and higher LAT1 staining intensity (p < 0.05). The uptake of 18F-fluciclovine correlated significantly with LAT1 expression (ρ = 0.39, p = 0.01, for SUVmax at 2 min and ρ = 0.39, p = 0.01 for VT). No correlation between ASCT2 expression and 18F-fluciclovine uptake or GGG was found. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that LAT1 is moderately associated with the transport of 18F-fluciclovine in local PCa not exposed to hormonal therapy. Both high and low Gleason grade tumors express ASCT2 while LAT1 expression is less conspicuous and may be absent in some low-grade tumors. Our observations may be of importance when using 18F-fluciclovine imaging in the planning of focal therapies for PCa.

Validation of IMPROD biparametric MRI in men with clinically suspected prostate cancer: A prospective multi-institutional trial.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) combined with targeted biopsy (TB) is increasingly used in men with clinically suspected prostate cancer (PCa), but the long acquisition times, high costs, and inter-center/reader variability of routine multiparametric prostate MRI limit its wider adoption. METHODS AND FINDINGS: The aim was to validate a previously developed unique MRI acquisition and reporting protocol, IMPROD biparametric MRI (bpMRI) (NCT01864135), in men with a clinical suspicion of PCa in a multi-institutional trial (NCT02241122). IMPROD bpMRI has average acquisition time of 15 minutes (no endorectal coil, no intravenous contrast use) and consists of T2-weighted imaging and 3 separate diffusion-weighed imaging acquisitions. Between February 1, 2015, and March 31, 2017, 364 men with a clinical suspicion of PCa were enrolled at 4 institutions in Finland. Men with an equivocal to high suspicion (IMPROD bpMRI Likert score 3-5) of PCa had 2 TBs of up to 2 lesions followed by a systematic biopsy (SB). Men with a low to very low suspicion (IMPROD bpMRI Likert score 1-2) had only SB. All data and protocols are freely available. The primary outcome of the trial was diagnostic accuracy-including overall accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value-of IMPROD bpMRI for clinically significant PCa (SPCa), which was defined as a Gleason score ≥ 3 + 4 (Gleason grade group 2 or higher). In total, 338 (338/364, 93%) prospectively enrolled men completed the trial. The accuracy and NPV of IMPROD bpMRI for SPCa were 70% (113/161) and 95% (71/75) (95% CI 87%-98%), respectively. Restricting the biopsy to men with equivocal to highly suspicious IMPROD bpMRI findings would have resulted in a 22% (75/338) reduction in the number of men undergoing biopsy while missing 4 (3%, 4/146) men with SPCa. The main limitation is uncertainty about the true PCa prevalence in the study cohort, since some of the men may have PCa despite having negative biopsy findings. CONCLUSIONS: IMPROD bpMRI demonstrated a high NPV for SPCa in men with a clinical suspicion of PCa in this prospective multi-institutional clinical trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02241122.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Does Not Increase the Morbidity of Radical Cystectomy: A 10-year Retrospective Nationwide Study.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is underutilized in the treatment of bladder cancer (BC). OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of NAC on the risk of surgical complications for radical cystectomy (RC) in a population-based setting. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: All radical cystectomies performed in Finland during 2005-2014 were included in the study. Data were collected retrospectively using a web-based data collection platform. Complications were recorded for 90 d using the Clavien classification. Patients treated with NAC were compared to patients receiving RC alone using three cohorts and approaches: the entire cohort, a neoadjuvant period cohort, and a matched cohort. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: For all three cohorts, odds ratios (ORs) were estimated using simple binary logistic regression. In addition, a multivariable stratified logistic model with propensity score was used. For the matched cohort analysis, both univariate and adjusted analyses were carried out. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: During 2005-2014, 1427 RCs were performed in Finland, of which 1385 were included in the analyses. NAC was introduced in 2008, and 231 patients (16%) were assigned to NAC and 214 (15%) received two or more cycles of chemotherapy. Within 90 d, 61% of patients experienced complications and mortality was 4% (1.9% in the NAC group, and 4.4% in the RC-alone group). In simple binary logistic regression, NAC patients had significantly fewer complications, but this was not observed in multivariable or propensity score analyses. In the matched cohort analyses, no differences in complication rates could be observed. None of the analyses demonstrated higher complication rates in the NAC group. CONCLUSIONS: Our retrospective study reports on nationwide use of NAC for BC and demonstrates that NAC does not increase RC morbidity. PATIENT SUMMARY: Chemotherapy given before radical surgery does not increase severe postoperative complications in the treatment of bladder cancer.

Prospective evaluation of 18F-FACBC PET/CT and PET/MRI versus multiparametric MRI in intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer patients (FLUCIPRO trial).

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate 18F-FACBC PET/CT, PET/MRI, and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) in detection of primary prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS: Twenty-six men with histologically confirmed PCa underwent PET/CT immediately after injection of 369 ± 10 MBq 18F-FACBC (fluciclovine) followed by PET/MRI started 55 ± 7 min from injection. Maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) were measured for both hybrid PET acquisitions. A separate mpMRI was acquired within a week of the PET scans. Logan plots were used to calculate volume of distribution (VT). The presence of PCa was estimated in 12 regions with radical prostatectomy findings as ground truth. For each imaging modality, area under the curve (AUC) for detection of PCa was determined to predict diagnostic performance. The clinical trial registration number is NCT02002455. RESULTS: In the visual analysis, 164/312 (53%) regions contained PCa, and 41 tumor foci were identified. PET/CT demonstrated the highest sensitivity at 87% while its specificity was low at 56%. The AUC of both PET/MRI and mpMRI significantly (p < 0.01) outperformed that of PET/CT while no differences were detected between PET/MRI and mpMRI. SUVmax and VT of Gleason score (GS) >3 + 4 tumors were significantly (p < 0.05) higher than those for GS 3 + 3 and benign hyperplasia. A total of 442 lymph nodes were evaluable for staging, and PET/CT and PET/MRI demonstrated true-positive findings in only 1/7 patients with metastatic lymph nodes. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative 18F-FACBC imaging significantly correlated with GS but failed to outperform MRI in lesion detection. 18F-FACBC may assist in targeted biopsies in the setting of hybrid imaging with MRI.

Novel biparametric MRI and targeted biopsy improves risk stratification in men with a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer (IMPROD Trial).

PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of a 3T biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI), T2 -weighted imaging, and three separate diffusion-weighted imaging acquisitions combined with targeted biopsy (TB) for improving risk stratification of men with elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between March 2013 and February 2015, 175 men with a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer (PCa) were offered bpMRI (NCT01864135) based on a suspicion of PCa (two repeated PSA measurements in the range 2.5-20.0 ng/ml and/or abnormal digital rectal examination). Men with an equivocal to high suspicion of PCa had two TBs of the dominant lesion using cognitive ultrasound guidance, followed by systematic biopsy (SB). Men with a low to very low suspicion had only SB. In total, 161 (161/175, 92%) prospectively enrolled men completed the trial and were included in the final analyses. The primary endpoint of the trial was the cancer detection rate (CDR) of TB and SB. Clinically significant cancer (SPCa) was defined as Gleason score ≥3 + 4. RESULTS: TB compared with SB had higher CDR for SPCa (45%, 72/161 vs. 39%, 63/161, respectively; P > 0.05) and a lower CDR for Gleason score 3 + 3 (8%, 15/161 vs. 16%, 30/161; P < 0.05). Restricting biopsy to men with equivocal to highly suspicious bpMRI findings would have resulted in a 24% (38/161) reduction in the number of men undergoing biopsy, while missing 4 (2%) with SPCa. All anonymized datasets, including bpMRI reports and follow up information, are freely available on the trial server. CONCLUSION: Prebiopsy bpMRI and TB in men with a clinical suspicion of PCa improved risk stratification. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 5 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017;46:1089-1095.

Stratification of aggressive prostate cancer from indolent disease-Prospective controlled trial utilizing expression of 11 genes in apparently benign tissue.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic power of molecular markers in men with a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer (PCa) using apparently benign areas as targeted by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: In the study, 99 consecutive men with clinical suspicion of PCa in a prospective controlled trial (IMPROD, NCT01864135) were included. In addition to 12-core systematic and MRI-targeted biopsies, cores from normal-appearing prostate areas, based on clinical examination, ultrasound, and biparametric prostate MRI, were obtained. The RNA transcript levels of ACSM1, AMACR, CACNA1D, DLX1, KLK3, PCA3, PLA2G7, RHOU, SPINK1, SPON2, TMPRSS2-ERG, and TDRD1 were measured with quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Of the 99 men, 69 were diagnosed with PCa, 31 with primary Gleason pattern 3 and 38 with primary Gleason 4 or 5. TDRD1 messenger RNA (mRNA) levels were 1.3 times higher (P = 0.029) and the presence of TMPRSS2-ERG mRNAs more frequent in biopsies from men diagnosed with PCa (27/69, 39%) than in men without (5/30, 16%) (P = 0.035). The 2 markers identified aggressive PCa defined as Gleason sum≥7 at biopsy: median TDRD1 mRNA level was 1.4 higher (P = 0.005) and TMPRSS2-ERG expression more frequent (P<0.001) in high-grade cancer. A multivariate analysis of mRNA expression of 11 candidate genes combined with KLK3, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), percentage-free PSA, and prostate volume improved the discrimination between aggressive and nonaggressive PCa (area under the curve = 0.77) compared with the use of the candidate genes or clinical parameters alone. However, serum PSA, percentage-free PSA, and prostate volume resulted in the best discrimination between non-organ-confined PCa (T3) from organ-confined PCa (T2) and healthy prostate (area under the curve = 0.86). CONCLUSIONS: Of the 11 studied genes, TDRD1 and TMPRSS2-ERG were able to statistically significantly differentiate men with PCa from men without it as single markers. However, a multivariate analysis using 15 features outperformed each individual marker in identifying aggressive PCa.