Compliance with recommended pneumococcal vaccination schedule in patients treated for rheumatoid arthritis: A retrospective cohort study in the Veterans Affairs population.

INTRODUCTION: Invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) is a leading cause of death. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients are at risk of IPD due to immunosuppressant medications. Up until 2022, two pneumococcal vaccines, the 13-valent Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) and pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23), were recommended. Despite the recommendation change to give a single 20-valent PCV vaccine (PCV20), some still require multiple vaccinations. There is a need to identify barriers to vaccine uptake. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study to assess the on-time vaccination rates for PCV13 and PPSV23 in treated RA patients between 2010 and 2018 using national Veterans Affairs data. Patients > 18 years of age diagnosed with RA and newly initiated on RA treatment were included. Pneumococcal vaccine compliance was assessed by measuring on-time receipt of PCV13 and PPSV23 vaccinations. We identified factors using multivariate logistic regression and described the occurrence of these factors using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: A total of 39,243 patients were included in the study. Most patients were white (75.8 %), male (85.4 %), on methotrexate therapy (41.4 %). The average age was 62.3 years. The proportion of patients considered vaccine compliant is 43.9 %. The primary independent risk factors for vaccine non-compliance were black/African American race (Odds Ratio [OR] 1.26, 95 % Confidence Interval [CI] 1.19-1.34) or missing/unknown race (OR 1.45, 95 % CI 1.31-1.61), missing/unknown ethnicity (OR 1.21, 1.02-1.43), never married (OR 1.10, 95 % CI 1.02-1.19) or widowed (OR 1.23, 95 % CI 1.12-1.34), diagnosed with congestive heart failure (OR 1.10, 95 % CI 1.00-1.22), or dementia (OR 1.48, 95 % CI 1.16-1.91). The proportion of patients who were non-compliant in patients who were vaccine naïve was 32.1 % and the non-compliance rate for non-naïve patients was 65.3 %. CONCLUSIONS: Providers should identify barriers to pneumococcal vaccination in RA patients to improve compliance. Efforts to increase vaccination should be tailored to specific high-risk groups.

Infected Mosquitoes Have Altered Behavior to Repellents: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Here we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to reach a consensus on whether infected and uninfected mosquitoes respond differently to repellents. After screening 2,316 published studies, theses, and conference abstracts, we identified 18 studies that tested whether infection status modulated the effectiveness of repellents. Thirteen of these studies had outcomes available for meta-analysis, and overall, seven repellents were tested (typically DEET with 62% of outcomes), six mosquito species had repellence behaviors measured (typically Aedes aegypti (L.) (Diptera: Culicidae) mosquitoes with 71% of outcomes), and a broad diversity of infections were tested including Sindbis virus (Togaviridae: Alphavirus) (33% of outcomes), Dengue (Flaviviridae: Flavivirus) (31%), malaria (Plasmodium berghei Vincke & Lips (Haemospororida: Plasmodiidae) or P. falciparum Welch (Haemospororida: Plasmodiidae); 25%), Zika (Flaviviridae: Flavivirus) (7%), and microsporidia (4%). Pooling all outcomes with meta-analysis, we found that repellents were less effective against infected mosquitoes-marking an average 62% reduction in protective efficacy relative to uninfected mosquitoes (pooled odds ratio = 0.38, 95% confidence interval = 0.22-0.66; k = 96). Older infected mosquitoes were also more likely to show altered responses and loss of sensitivity to repellents, emphasizing the challenge of distinguishing between age or incubation period effects. Plasmodium- or Dengue-infected mosquitoes also did not show altered responses to repellents; however, Dengue-mosquito systems used inoculation practices that can introduce variability in repellency responses. Given our findings that repellents offer less protection against infected mosquitoes and that these vectors are the most dangerous in terms of disease transmission, then trials on repellent effectiveness should incorporate infected mosquitoes to improve predictability in blocking vector-human contact.