Co-creating community wellbeing initiatives: what is the evidence and how do they work?

BACKGROUND: Addressing wellbeing at the community level, using a public health approach may build wellbeing and protective factors for all. A collaborative, community-owned approach can bring together experience, networks, local knowledge, and other resources to form a locally-driven, place-based initiative that can address complex issues effectively. Research on community empowerment, coalition functioning, health interventions and the use of local data provide evidence about what can be achieved in communities. There is less understanding about how communities can collaborate to bring about change, especially for mental health and wellbeing. METHOD: A comprehensive literature search was undertaken to identify community wellbeing initiatives that address mental health. After screening 8,972 titles, 745 abstracts and 188 full-texts, 12 exemplar initiatives were identified (39 related papers). RESULTS: Eight key principles allowed these initiatives to become established and operate successfully. These principles related to implementation and outcome lessons that allowed these initiatives to contribute to the goal of increasing community mental health and wellbeing. A framework for community wellbeing initiatives addressing principles, development, implementation and sustainability was derived from this analysis, with processes mapped therein. CONCLUSION: This framework provides evidence for communities seeking to address community wellbeing and avoid the pitfalls experienced by many well-meaning but short-lived initiatives.

Altered transcriptomic immune responses of maintenance hemodialysis patients to the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine.

Background: End-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients experience immune compromise characterized by complex alterations of both innate and adaptive immunity, and results in higher susceptibility to infection and lower response to vaccination. This immune compromise, coupled with greater risk of exposure to infectious disease at hemodialysis (HD) centers, underscores the need for examination of the immune response to the COVID-19 mRNA-based vaccines. Methods: The immune response to the COVID-19 BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine was assessed in 20 HD patients and cohort-matched controls. RNA sequencing of peripheral blood mononuclear cells was performed longitudinally before and after each vaccination dose for a total of six time points per subject. Anti-spike antibody levels were quantified prior to the first vaccination dose (V1D0) and 7 d after the second dose (V2D7) using anti-spike IgG titers and antibody neutralization assays. Anti-spike IgG titers were additionally quantified 6 mo after initial vaccination. Clinical history and lab values in HD patients were obtained to identify predictors of vaccination response. Results: Transcriptomic analyses demonstrated differing time courses of immune responses, with prolonged myeloid cell activity in HD at 1 wk after the first vaccination dose. HD also demonstrated decreased metabolic activity and decreased antigen presentation compared to controls after the second vaccination dose. Anti-spike IgG titers and neutralizing function were substantially elevated in both controls and HD at V2D7, with a small but significant reduction in titers in HD groups (p<0.05). Anti-spike IgG remained elevated above baseline at 6 mo in both subject groups. Anti-spike IgG titers at V2D7 were highly predictive of 6-month titer levels. Transcriptomic biomarkers after the second vaccination dose and clinical biomarkers including ferritin levels were found to be predictive of antibody development. Conclusions: Overall, we demonstrate differing time courses of immune responses to the BTN162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in maintenance HD subjects comparable to healthy controls and identify transcriptomic and clinical predictors of anti-spike IgG titers in HD. Analyzing vaccination as an in vivo perturbation, our results warrant further characterization of the immune dysregulation of ESRD. Funding: F30HD102093, F30HL151182, T32HL144909, R01HL138628. This research has been funded by the University of Illinois at Chicago Center for Clinical and Translational Science (CCTS) award UL1TR002003.

Coordinated elimination of bacterial taxa optimally attenuates alloimmunity and prolongs allograft survival.

This study aimed to dissect the relationship between specific gut commensal bacterial subgroups, their functional metabolic pathways, and their impact on skin allograft outcome and alloimmunity. We previously showed that oral broad-spectrum antibiotic (Abx) pretreatment in mice delayed skin, heart, and lung allograft rejection and dampened alloimmune responses. Here, rationally designed Abx combinations targeting major bacterial groups were used to elucidate their individual contribution to modulating alloimmune responses. Abx cocktails targeting intestinal gram-negative, gram-positive, or anaerobic/gram-positive bacteria by oral gavage, all delayed skin allograft rejection, and reduced alloreactive T cell priming to different extents. Notably, the most pronounced extension of skin allograft survival and attenuation of alloimmunity were achieved when all gut bacterial groups were simultaneously targeted. These results suggest a model in which the strength of the alloimmune response is additively tuned up by gut microbial diversity. Shotgun metagenomic sequencing enabled strain-level resolution and identified a shared commensal, Parabacteroides distasonis, as the most enriched following all Abx treatments. Oral administration of P.distasonis to mice harboring a diverse microbiota significantly prolonged skin allograft survival, identifying a probiotic with therapeutic benefit in transplantation.