Genetic Screening and Teratogenic Exposures: Considerations in Caring for the Uterus Transplant Patient.

Counseling the uterus transplant patient requires an enhanced knowledge of unique genetic challenges that include an understanding of the spectrum of Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome. Patients should understand their options for genetic screening and testing including preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy, genetic screening, and diagnostic testing. This patient population is potentially at risk for fetal anomalies due to the increased susceptibility to infections, such as cytomegalovirus. There are management strategies to minimize this risk. The risk of teratogenicity from mycophenolate is eliminated by a washout period before embryo transfer.

Antepartum Care of the Uterus Transplant Patient: The Experience of 3 Successful US Centers.

We offer consensus recommendations for the antepartum management of the uterus transplant pregnancy based on our experience at 3 US centers. Patient access to accurate information is important to manage expectations and make informed decisions. Unique aspects of medical management include monitoring tacrolimus levels and performing cervical biopsies for rejection. Low-dose aspirin for preeclampsia is routinely used. Vigilant screening for gestational diabetes and preeclampsia allows for the prompt diagnosis and treatment of these common complications. We aim to deliver patients at 37 to 38 weeks by cesarean section. Shared decision making dominates whether to consider future pregnancies and timing of hysterectomy.

New Frontier: Role of the Radiologist in Uterine Transplantation.

Uterine transplantation (UT) is a novel treatment for absolute uterine factor infertility (AUFI) that is currently being performed under experimental protocols in multiple medical centers worldwide. At the time of this publication, there have been at least 10 live births by women with a transplanted uterus. As successful outcomes from this innovative procedure increase, it is likely that more centers will perform UT. Imaging is performed in multiple steps of the UT process, including preoperative imaging of potential donors and recipients, posttransplant surveillance, and monitoring of pregnancy. Fetal imaging is performed by maternal-fetal medicine professionals, but most imaging examinations in UT are performed by radiologists. Given the significant role of imaging in this groundbreaking surgery, radiologists must be familiar with the causes of AUFI and the role of imaging in establishing this diagnosis. Radiologists working in medical centers where UT is performed should understand the role of imaging in preoperative planning and postoperative surveillance. While data regarding complications of UT are preliminary at best, radiologists must be aware of the risk of vascular compromise and graft failure and their imaging features. The authors provide a brief history of UT and define the radiologist's role in pre- and postoperative imaging assessments.©RSNA, 2019.

Deceased Donor Uterine Transplantation: Innovation and Adaptation.

This commentary endeavors to share our practical experience in developing and implementing the first uterine transplant clinical trial in the United States. Uterine transplant is a promising novel treatment for uterine factor infertility. After reported successful live births after uterine transplant in Sweden, research teams around the world are either embarking on or are considering the development of uterine transplant protocols. Our observations on the applied rather than theoretical aspects of uterine transplantation research in human subjects are detailed in this article. Important among these considerations are composing a broad and experienced multidisciplinary team as well as performing adequate preclinical preparations, including ideally animal studies and practice organ procurements. Ethical preparation is tantamount to clinical preparation for the complexities inherent in uterine transplant, and our suggestions for updating the current ethical criteria for uterine transplant are outlined here. We also describe our perspectives on the strengths and weaknesses of living compared with deceased donor models. Finally, we describe how a strong program can recover and adapt in the face of setbacks to continue a path toward innovation.

Interpregnancy change in smoking habits and risk of preeclampsia: a population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Maternal smoking has been associated with decreased risk of preeclampsia; however, it is uncertain whether this association is causal. An argument for causality would be strengthened if changes in smoking status across consecutive pregnancies were related to the risk of preeclampsia. METHODS: We used data from the National Swedish Birth Register to ascertain the associations between changes in smoking status during the first two successive pregnancies and risk of preeclampsia in the second pregnancy in 371,627 women between 1992 and 2006. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Compared to women who did not smoke in either pregnancy, the risk of preeclampsia was reduced in women who smoked in both pregnancies (adjusted OR = 0.54; 95% CI = 0.47, 0.63), in those who only smoked in second pregnancy (OR = 0.76; 95% CI = 0.58, 0.99) and, to a lesser extent, in women who smoked only in the first pregnancy (OR = 0.81; 95% CI = 0.70, 0.94). History of preeclampsia in the first pregnancy did not substantially modify these associations. CONCLUSION: These data add support to a causal interpretation of the observed inverse association between smoking during pregnancy and risk of preeclampsia.

Methods of induction of labour: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Rates of labour induction are increasing. We conducted this systematic review to assess the evidence supporting use of each method of labour induction. METHODS: We listed methods of labour induction then reviewed the evidence supporting each. We searched MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library between 1980 and November 2010 using multiple terms and combinations, including labor, induced/or induction of labor, prostaglandin or prostaglandins, misoprostol, Cytotec, 16,16,-dimethylprostaglandin E2 or E2, dinoprostone; Prepidil, Cervidil, Dinoprost, Carboprost or hemabate; prostin, oxytocin, misoprostol, membrane sweeping or membrane stripping, amniotomy, balloon catheter or Foley catheter, hygroscopic dilators, laminaria, dilapan, saline injection, nipple stimulation, intercourse, acupuncture, castor oil, herbs. We performed a best evidence review of the literature supporting each method. We identified 2048 abstracts and reviewed 283 full text articles. We preferentially included high quality systematic reviews or large randomised trials. Where no such studies existed, we included the best evidence available from smaller randomised or quasi-randomised trials. RESULTS: We included 46 full text articles. We assigned a quality rating to each included article and a strength of evidence rating to each body of literature. Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and vaginal misoprostol were more effective than oxytocin in bringing about vaginal delivery within 24 hours but were associated with more uterine hyperstimulation. Mechanical methods reduced uterine hyperstimulation compared with PGE2 and misoprostol, but increased maternal and neonatal infectious morbidity compared with other methods. Membrane sweeping reduced post-term gestations. Most included studies were too small to evaluate risk for rare adverse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Research is needed to determine benefits and harms of many induction methods.