[Indications for fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in medical retina: Changes from 2015 and 2018]. / Indications d'angiographie à la fluorescéine et d'OCT-angiographie en consultation de rétine médicale : comparaison entre 2015 et 2018.

INTRODUCTION: Non-invasive multimodal imaging, including optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA), has demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity for the management of retinal diseases. Since the availability of OCTA in 2015, we have developed a policy of "as little fluorescein angiography as possible". In this study, we describe the rate of OCTA and fluorescein angiography (FA) performed and their indications. METHODS: Retrospective descriptive single-centre study. Chart review of patients examined for retinal disorders by one medical retina specialist between January 2015 and June 2018. RESULTS: 3487 patients were examined for a retinal disease. The charts of 651 of these patients (1170 eyes) were randomly selected for analysis (study group). The mean age in the study group was 72 years (60% female). Overall, OCTA and FA were performed in 49.4% and 6.5% of the studied eyes respectively. After the first year, the rate of FA decreased to 2%. The main indications for OCTA were age-related macular degeneration (AMD): 50%, central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC): 12% and retinal vascular occlusion: 10%. The most frequent indications for FA were AMD: 49%, diabetic retinopathy (DR): 18% and CSC: 14%. FA was performed in 16%, 11% and 10% of eyes diagnosed with DR, CSC and AMD respectively (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: In routine practice, OCTA was performed in half of the eyes examined for a retinal disorder. The overall rate of FA was 6.5% and dropped to 2% after the first year of OCTA use. DR was the main disorder still requiring FA.

[Extemporaneous withdrawal with a mini-spike filter: A low infection risk technique for drawing up bevacizumab for intravitreal injection]. / Prélèvement extemporané du bévacizumab avec un mini-spike pour les injections intravitréennes : une technique de déconditionnement à risque infectieux minime.

PURPOSE: To describe a technique for extemporaneously drawing up bevacizumab for intravitreal injection (IVT) and report the rate of post-injection endophthtalmitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective monocentric analysis (January 2010-December 2014) of all IVT of bevacizumab drawn up with the following technique: in the operating room (class ISO 7) through a mini-spike with an integrated bacteria retentive air filter. The surgeon was wearing sterile gloves and a mask. The assisting nurse wore a mask. The bevacizumab vial was discarded at the end of each session. RESULTS: Six thousand two hundred and thirty-six bevacizumab injections were performed. One case of endophthalmitis was noted (0.016%). During the same period, 4 cases of endophthalmitis were found after IVT of other drugs (4/32,992; 0.012%. P=0.8). CONCLUSION: Intravitreal injection of bevacizumab after extemporaneous withdrawal through a mini-spike filter is a simple and safe technique. The risk of postoperative endophthalmitis is very low. This simple technique facilitates access to compounded bevacizumab.

[Efficiency of surgical treatment for chronic macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion]. / Efficacité du traitement chirurgical de l'oedème maculaire chronique secondaire à une occlusion de branche veineuse rétinienne.

INTRODUCTION: Internal limiting membrane peeling has recently given interesting results in the management of macular edema in diabetic patients, even in the absence of vitreomacular tractions. This study was conducted to evaluate the results of a surgical treatment for macular edema resulting from branch retinal vein occlusion. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A nonrandomized prospective study was conducted between March 2001 and April 2002 on 12 eyes of 12 consecutive patients with a visual acuity of 20/40 or less resulting from branch retinal vein occlusion with macular edema. Internal limiting membrane peeling associated with arteriovenous crossing sheathotomy was performed on six eyes and internal limiting membrane peeling alone was performed on six eyes. Patients were tested with ETDRS visual acuity, fluorescein angiography, automated perimetry, and OCT pre- and postoperatively (at 3 and 6 months). RESULTS: At 6 months, postoperative visual acuity was improved in all patients (mean VA=20/40; range, 20/125-20/20), with an average gain of three lines of vision (or 14 ETDRS points) (p=0.002). Fundus examination and fluorescein angiography results were improved in all patients. At 6 months, on automated field testing, the mean corrected defect improved from 3.4+/-0.9dB to 2.3+/-0.9dB (p=0.008). On OCT, mean foveal thickness decreased from 419+/-57 micro m to 233+/-10 micro m (p=0.02). No difference was noted between simple vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling and arteriovenous crossing sheathotomy in terms of visual acuity (p=0.5), visual field (p=0.2), or foveal thickness (p=0.6) improvement. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that internal limiting membrane removal for macular edema may improve the functional prognosis in patients with branch retinal vein occlusion. Adventitial sheathotomy did not yield further functional benefits in these cases.

[Radial optic neurotomy for severe central retinal vein occlusion: preliminary results]. / Traitement des occlusions sévères de la veine centrale de la rétine par neurotomie optique radiaire. Résultats préliminaires.

PURPOSE: To describe the results of radial optic neurotomy for the treatment of severe central retinal vein occlusion. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective noncomparative single-center study. Analysis of ten eyes of ten consecutive patients whose visual acuity was 0.1 or less. They underwent fluorescein angiography, visual field testing by automated perimetry, and macular thickness analysis by optical coherence tomography preoperatively at 3 months and at 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Mean visual acuity on an ETDRS chart increased from 30+/-12 points preoperatively to 42+/-15 points at the 3-month visit, (p=0.03), and mean macular thickness decreased from 580+/-150 micro m to 361+/-52 micro m (p=0.04). All patients had clinical improvement as determined by fundus examination and fluorescein angiography. An improvement in the central visual field was observed in all eyes. Mean visual acuity of the five patients followed-up for 6 months was 52.8+/-20 points. No visual loss was observed. None of the patients underwent laser photocoagulation or has presented with neovascularization so far. Optociliary veins developed in three eyes and a retinochoroidal anastomosis within the disk incision was observed in two eyes. CONCLUSION: These preliminary results are encouraging when compared to the reported natural progression of severe central retinal vein occlusion. A bypass of the site of occlusion is a possible mechanism for radial optic neurotomy. A randomized study should be conducted to assess the efficacy of radial optic neurotomy and determine the best candidates for surgery.