Detection of aortic wall instability with the new dissectometer: Correlation with histological findings.

OBJECTIVES: Although risk stratification for aortic dissection or rupture based on aortic diameter is quite suboptimal, alternative methods for the assessment of the aortic wall stability are rare. We assessed the mechanical properties of the aortic wall by a new custom-made device mimicking transversal aortic wall shear stress during open heart surgery in comparison with histological examination. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One-hundred and five aortic walls were tested by the 'dissectometer' (seven different measured and two calculated values) as well as histological examination was performed. RESULTS: Histological examination classified the aortic wall as normal in 54 (51.4%) patients and pathologic in 51 (48.6%) patients. Six out of nine parameters assessed by the dissectometer showed a significant correlation to histological findings. Using ROC-analysis, the most reliable parameter (P9) showed a sensitivity of 93.3% and a specificity of 80.4% with an area under the curve of 0.89 when using a cut-off value of 3.4. In the logistic regression analysis, P9 was an independent predictor for aortic wall instability (OR 28.983, 95% CI 11.507-72.993, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The dissectometer is suitable for discriminating between stable and unstable aortic walls with a good correlation to histological examination holding promise for direct and quick intraoperative identification of aortic walls at risk for dissection.

Recurrent lymphocytic myocarditis in a young male with ulcerative colitis.

Awareness of myocarditis in association with inflammatory bowel diseases is crucial as it bears a rare but serious risk for mortality. This report describes the case of a young Caucasian male, whose heart biopsy was tested negative for giant cells and bacterial or viral genomes or proteins. He was experiencing severe lymphocytic myocarditis (other than mesalamine-induced) along with cardiogenic shock during ulcerative colitis exacerbation. This is an extremely rare, if not unique, clinical constellation. We chose to study the epidemiologic grounds and all major aspects of differential pathogenesis and treatment of this serious health problem.

Coronary atherosclerosis burden, but not transient troponin elevation, predicts long-term outcome in recreational marathon runners.

We determined the prognostic value of transient increases in high-sensitive serum troponin I (hsTnI) during a marathon and its association with traditional cardiovascular risk factors and imaging-based risk markers for incident coronary events and all-cause mortality in recreational marathon runners. Baseline data of 108 marathon runners, 864 age-matched controls and 216 age- and risk factor-matched controls from the general population were recorded and their coronary event rates and all-cause mortality after 6 ± 1 years determined. hsTnI was measured in 74 marathon finishers before and after the race. Other potential predictors for coronary events, i.e., Framingham Risk Score (FRS), coronary artery calcium (CAC) and presence of myocardial fibrosis as measured by magnetic resonance imaging-based late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), were also assessed. An increase beyond the 99 % hsTnI-threshold, i.e., 0.04 µg/L, was observed in 36.5 % of runners. FRS, CAC, or prevalent LGE did not predict hsTnI values above or increases in hsTnI beyond the median after the race, nor did they predict future events. However, runners with versus without LGE had higher hsTnI values after the race (median (Q1/Q3), 0.08 µg/L (0.04/0.09) versus 0.03 µg/L (0.02/0.06), p = 0.039), and higher increases in hsTnI values during the race (median (Q1/Q3), 0.05 µg/L (0.03/0.08) versus 0.02 µg/L (0.01/0.05), p = 0.0496). Runners had a similar cumulative event rate as age-matched or age- and risk factor-matched controls, i.e., 6.5 versus 5.0 % or 4.6 %, respectively. Event rates in runners with CAC scores <100, 100-399, and ≥400 were 1.5, 12.0, and 21.4 % (p = 0.002 for trend) and not different from either control group. Runners with coronary events had a higher prevalence of LGE than runners without events (57 versus 8 %, p = 0.003). All-cause mortality was similar in marathon runners (3/108, 2.8 %) and controls (26/864, 3.0 % or 5/216, 2.4 %, respectively). Recreational marathon runners with prevalent myocardial fibrosis develop higher hsTnI values during the race than those without. Increasing coronary artery calcium scores and prevalent myocardial fibrosis, but not increases in hsTnI are associated with higher coronary event rates. All-cause mortality in marathon runners is similar to that in risk factor-matched controls.

Adjustment of aortic annulus size during David re-implantation (how to do it).

Stability of the aortic annulus is a key factor in achieving long-term durability of the aortic valve re-implantation. We propose a new method of sub-annular fixation of the root prosthesis, enabling post-procedural transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)-guided adjustment of the aortic annulus dimensions.

Is there any difference in aortic wall quality between patients with aortic stenosis and those with regurgitation?

OBJECTIVES: The interaction between aortic valve (AV) and aortic wall pathology is currently unclear. No intraoperative examination or investigation is able to predict postoperative dissection or aneurysm formation in patients operated on for primary AV pathology. The aim of the present study was therefore to evaluate the mechanical and histological properties of the aortic wall in patients operated on for aortic stenosis (AS) or regurgitation (AR). METHODS: The aortic walls of 229 patients (age 67.5 ± 11.0 years) operated on for AS (n = 135, Group 1) or AR (n = 94, Group 2) were subjected to mechanical stress testing and postoperative histological examination. Ascending aortic diameter was ≥50 mm in 46/229 patients and 40-49 mm in 52/229 patients. RESULTS: AR was associated with an increased tendency to aortic media disruption (P < 0.001) and with media degeneration (P < 0.001) compared with AS patients. The incidence of aortic aneurysm (≥50 mm) was increased in AR patients (35 in AR and 11 in AS, P < 0.01). The aortic wall cohesion was better in patients with an aortic diameter of <40 mm compared with those with moderate dilatation of 40-49 mm (P = 0.009) or an aortic aneurysm (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Our study proves that patients presenting for AV replacement with AR have a poorer quality of the ascending aorta despite a superior thickness compared with patients with AS. In addition, patients with a slightly dilated aorta (40-49 mm) have a poorer cohesion of the aortic wall than those with normal aortic dimensions.

Carotid and peripheral atherosclerosis in male marathon runners.

PURPOSE: We measured extracoronary atherosclerotic plaque burden and its association with cardiovascular risk factors and with coronary atherosclerosis in male marathon runners. METHODS: We studied 100 male presumably healthy runners, aged 50-75 yr, who completed at least five marathons during the preceding 3 yr. Presence of plaque in the carotid, abdominal, and lower limb arteries was imaged using B-mode ultrasound. In all runners, traditional cardiovascular risk factors and the electron beam computed tomography-based coronary artery calcium (CAC) score were determined. RESULTS: Ten runners were free from any plaque in the carotid or peripheral arteries. Runners with plaque were older (58±6 vs 54±5 yr, P=0.04), had a higher 10-yr Framingham risk score (7.2±3.8 vs 5.0±1.9, P=0.026), and tended to have a higher prevalence of CAC (76.7% vs 50.0%, P=0.07) compared with those without. Runners with CAC≥100 had larger peripheral artery diameters (aorta and iliac and common femoral arteries) but smaller lumen than runners with CAC<100, indicating atherosclerotic remodeling. A stepwise model selection process to predict CAC on the basis of age and peripheral atherosclerosis yielded a model as follows: log2(CAC+1)=0.181 age (yr)+0.435 maximum carotid plaque thickness (mm)-6.487, with a coefficient of determination of 22.8%. However, positive and negative predictive values were too low to predict CAC≥100 with sufficient accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of carotid and peripheral atherosclerosis in marathon runners is high and is related to cardiovascular risk factors and the coronary atherosclerotic burden. Remodeling of peripheral arteries is greatest in runners with the most evidence of atherosclerosis. These data support an increased awareness of atherosclerosis prevalence and cardiovascular risk factors in marathon runners.