Influence of airway trolley organization on efficiency and team performance: A randomized, crossover simulation study.

BACKGROUND: Failed management of unanticipated difficult airway situations contributes to significant anesthesia-related morbidity and mortality. Optimization of design and layout of difficult airway trolleys (DATs) may influence outcomes during airway emergencies. The main objective of the current study was to evaluate whether a difficult airway algorithm-based DAT with integrated cognitive aids improves efficiency and team performance in difficult airway scenarios. METHODS: In a crossover design, 16 teams (anesthetist, nurse anesthetist, assistant nurse) completed two high-fidelity simulated unanticipated difficult airway scenarios. Teams used both an algorithm-based DAT and a comparison, standard DAT, in the scenarios and were randomized to order of trolley type. Outcome measures included objective efficiency parameters, team performance assessment and subjective user-ratings. Linear mixed models ANOVA, including DAT type and order of condition as main factors, was utilized for the primary analyses of the team results. RESULTS: Usage of the algorithm-based DAT was associated with fewer departures from the difficult airway algorithm (p = .010), and reduced number of unnecessary drawer openings (p = .002), but no significant differences in time to retrieval of airway devices or time to first effective ventilation, compared to the standard DAT. There were no significant differences in team performance, although participants expressed strong preference for the algorithm-based DAT (all user-rated measures p < .0001). Higher percentage of female members of the team improved adherence to the difficult airway algorithm (p = .043). CONCLUSIONS: Algorithm-based DATs with integrated cognitive aids may improve efficiency in difficult airway situations, compared to traditional DATs. These findings have implications for improvement of anesthetic practice.

Pain management with popliteal block for fibular graft harvesting in head and neck reconstruction; a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Curative treatment for locally advanced head and neck tumours often includes reconstructive surgery using a microvascular free flap. Effective recuperation is essential but may be impeded by postoperative donor site pain. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a continuous popliteal block on postoperative pain after fibular graft harvesting. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study adult patients scheduled for reconstructive head and neck surgery with a microvascular free fibular graft received an indwelling popliteal nerve block catheter and were randomized to receive continuous levobupivacaine/ropivacaine or placebo during the first postoperative week. Primary outcome was postoperative extremity pain assessed using the numerated rating scale (NRS). Secondary outcomes included opioid consumption. RESULTS: In total 24 patients were included. The median (median, IQR [range]) postoperative extremity NRS scores was lower in the local anaesthetic (LA) group (2, 0-3 [0-10]) compared to the placebo group (2, 1-4 [0-10]), p = 0.008. The LA group also experienced fewer episodes of breakthrough pain, defined as NRS ≥ 4 (17% vs 33% of observations), p = 0.009. Furthermore, median (median, IQR [range]) opioid consumption the first postoperative week was lower in the LA group (109 mg, 74-134 [19-611]) compared to the placebo group (202 mg, 135-241 [78-749]), p = 0.010. No complications attributed to the blocks were observed. CONCLUSION: Continuous popliteal block significantly reduced postoperative extremity pain and opioid consumption in patients undergoing fibular graft harvesting for head and neck reconstructive surgery.

Availability and organization of difficult airway equipment in Swedish hospitals: A national survey of anaesthesiologists.

BACKGROUND: Airway complications account for almost one third of anaesthesia-related brain damage and death. Immediate access to equipment enabling rescue airway strategies is crucial for successful management of unanticipated difficult airway situations. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide survey of Swedish anaesthesiologists to analyse availability and organization of difficult airway trolleys (DATs), and multiple factors pertaining to difficult airway management, to highlight areas of potential improvement. RESULTS: Six hundred and thirty-nine anaesthesiologists completed the 14-item survey. Whereas DATs were almost ubiquitous (95%) in main operating departments of hospitals, prevalence was low in remote anaesthetizing locations (20.3%) and electroconvulsive therapy units (26.6%). Approximately 60% of emergency departments had a DAT. Immediate (within 60 seconds) access to videolaryngoscopes in all units where general anaesthesia is conducted was reported by 56.8%. Almost half of anaesthesiologists reported that all DATs at their workplace were standardized. Forty-six per cent reported that the DATs were organized according to a difficult airway algorithm; almost 90% believe that such an organization can impact the outcome of a difficult airway situation positively. Only 36.2% of DATs contained second-generation supraglottic airway devices exclusively. Most Swedish anaesthesiologists use the Swedish Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive care Medicine difficult airway algorithm, but almost one fifth prefer the Difficult Airway Society algorithm. Less than half of respondents underwent formal difficult airway training annually. CONCLUSION: Our results motivate efforts to (a) increase availability of DATs in remote anaesthetizing locations, (b) increasingly standardize DATs and organize DATs according to airway algorithms, and (c) increase the frequency of difficult airway training.