Implementation strategies within a complex environment: A qualitative study of a shared decision-making intervention during childbirth.

BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making (SDM) may improve communication, teamwork, patient experience, respectful maternity care, and safety during childbirth. Despite these benefits, SDM is not widely implemented, and strategies for implementing SDM interventions are not well described. We assessed the acceptability and feasibility of TeamBirth, an SDM solution that centers the birthing person in decision-making through simple tools that structure communication among the care team. We identified and described implementation strategies that bridge the gap between knowledge and practice. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study among four hospitals in the United States to understand the acceptability and feasibility of TeamBirth. We interviewed 103 clinicians and conducted 16 focus group discussions with 52 implementers between June 2018 and October 2019. We drew on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to understand acceptability and feasibility, and to identify and describe the underlying contextual factors that affected implementation. RESULTS: We found that clinicians and implementers valued TeamBirth for promoting clarity about care plans among the direct care team and for centering the birthing person in decision-making. Contextual factors that affected implementation included strength of leadership, physician practice models, and quality improvement culture. Effective implementation strategies included regular data feedback and adapting "flexible" components of TeamBirth to the local context. DISCUSSION: By identifying and describing TeamBirth's contextual factors and implementation strategies, our findings can help bridge the implementation gap of SDM interventions. Our in-depth analysis offers tangible lessons for other labor and delivery unit leaders as they seek to integrate SDM practices in their own settings.

Acute Funisitis Correlates With the Risk of Early-Onset Sepsis in Term Newborns Assessed Using the Kaiser Sepsis Calculator.

BACKGROUND: The risk of neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) is traditionally assessed on maternal signs of clinical chorioamnionitis. Recently, an online EOS risk calculator was developed by Kaiser Permanente using maternal and neonatal clinical parameters. We were interested in whether an increased Kaiser sepsis risk score correlates with histologic acute chorioamnionitis or acute funisitis. DESIGN: Included in this retrospective review are 119 chorioamnionitis-exposed term neonates from January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2016. Clinical charts from mother-baby pairs were reviewed. An EOS risk score was obtained using the online Kaiser Sepsis Calculator. The presence and severity of acute chorioamnionitis and acute funisitis were recorded. A SPSS software was used for statistical analysis (IBM, New Jersey, USA). RESULTS: The Kaiser Sepsis Calculator could identify 97 of 119 (81.5%) neonates without increased risk for sepsis. Histologic acute chorioamnionitis was present in 100 of 119 cases (84%), in which 44 cases (44%) show severe acute chorioamnionitis. Acute funisitis was recognized in 87 of 119 (73.1%) cases, all of which had concurrent acute chorioamnionitis. Severe funisitis was seen in 38 of the 87 cases (43.7%). The Kaiser Sepsis risk score correlates with the presence and severity of acute funisitis (P = .037 and P = .044, respectively) but not with the presence or the severity of acute chorioamnionitis (P = .105 and P = .672, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our study provides histological evidence to support that the Kaiser Sepsis Calculator may help to effectively reduce unwarranted blood culture, antibiotics exposure, and neonatal intensive care unit admission in term neonates.

Use of an Early Onset-Sepsis Calculator to Decrease Unnecessary NICU Admissions and Increase Exclusive Breastfeeding.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of use of the Kaiser Neonatal Early-Onset Sepsis Calculator (NEOSC) on NICU admissions, laboratory testing, antibiotic exposure, and exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) rates in full-term neonates exposed to chorioamnionitis. DESIGN: Quality improvement project with review of retrospective data. SETTING/LOCAL PROBLEM: In this single-site, community hospital with approximately 4,000 births per year, all neonates exposed to chorioamnionitis required NICU admission, laboratory evaluation, and empiric antibiotics. PARTICIPANTS: Term neonates born to mothers diagnosed with chorioamnionitis identified through the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes based on the discharge diagnosis. INTERVENTION/MEASUREMENTS: The baseline retrospective analysis included calculation of sepsis risk with the Kaiser NEOSC through a chart review of neonates exposed to chorioamnionitis from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2016. We compared the risk for sepsis with actual laboratory testing and antibiotic use and examined EBF before implementation of the use of the NEOSC. Implementation began January 2017; postintervention data were examined at 6 months and 1 year. All cases of neonates exposed to chorioamnionitis after the intervention were reviewed for use of the NEOSC, NICU admission/readmission for sepsis, laboratory testing, use of antibiotics, and EBF. RESULTS: In the 12 months after NEOSC use was implemented, NICU admissions, laboratory testing, and antibiotic use decreased. Among all neonates exposed to chorioamnionitis after implementation (N = 74), 68 (93%) were not admitted to the NICU, and only 8 (11%) required laboratory evaluation. Rates of EBF in neonates exposed to chorioamnionitis increased from less than 10% to greater than 50% after implementation. The length of the NICU stay for neonates exposed to chorioamnionitis decreased from an average of 138 to 12 days with no negative consequences. CONCLUSION: Most neonates exposed to chorioamnionitis appeared well and did not require NICU admission, laboratory testing, or antibiotic therapy. Rates of EBF improved after use of NEOSC was implemented. The practice change helped prevent adverse consequences, such as painful interventions and separation of the mother and neonate. No neonates were readmitted for sepsis.