RECITAL: a non-inferiority randomised control trial evaluating a virtual fracture clinic compared with in-person care for people with simple fractures (study protocol).

INTRODUCTION: Most simple undisplaced fractures can be managed without surgery by immobilising the limb with a splint, prescribing medication for pain, and providing advice and early rehabilitation. Recent systematic reviews based on retrospective observational studies have reported that virtual fracture clinics can deliver follow-up care that is safe and cost-effective. However, no randomised controlled trial has investigated if a virtual fracture clinic can provide non-inferior physical function outcomes compared with an in-person clinic for patients with simple fractures. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: 312 participants will be recruited from 2 metropolitan hospitals located in Sydney, Australia. Adult patients will be eligible if they have an acute simple fracture that can be managed with a removable splint and is deemed appropriate for follow-up at either the virtual or in-person fracture clinic by an orthopaedic doctor. Patients will not be eligible if they have a complex fracture that requires a cast or surgery. Eligible participants will be randomised to receive their follow-up care either at the virtual or the in-person fracture clinic. Participants at the virtual fracture clinic will be reviewed within 5 days of receiving a referral through video calls with a physiotherapist. Participants at the in-person fracture clinic will be reviewed by an orthopaedic doctor within 7-10 days of receiving a referral. The primary outcome will be the patient's function measured using the Patient-Specific Functional Scale at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes will include health-related quality of life, patient-reported experiences, pain, health cost, healthcare utilisation, medication use, adverse events, emergency department representations and surgery. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the Sydney Local Health District Ethics Review Committee (RPAH Zone) (X23-0200 and 2023/ETH01038). The trial results will be submitted for publication in a reputable international journal and will be presented at professional conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12623000934640.

Trends in shoulder surgery patient-reported outcome measures.

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are a vital part of the toolkit for the current practice of orthopedic surgery. We are witnessing the expansion of the use of PROMs in clinical practice and in research; the ultimate direction of this expansion is unclear. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify the trends in the use of PROMs in major upper limb publications over a 7-year period. We retrospectively reviewed all articles published in 6 of the most influential upper limb orthopedic journals based on impact factor from January 2013 to January 2020. PubMed, Medline, and Embase were used to access the abstracts for all articles published for this period. We included all articles related to shoulder arthroplasty, shoulder instability, rotator cuff surgery, and involving the use of PROMs. There were 4175 articles identified from the selected journals over the chosen time period, of which 607 were eligible for inclusion in the study. The number of articles reporting PROMs increased from 57 in 2013 to 115 in 2019, which was a 102% increase. The total number of PROM usages recorded was 1593 which was comprised of 63 different scoring systems, with each article using a median of 3 different PROMs. The most commonly used score in articles originating from North America was the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (216 uses in 273 articles; 78.1%), from Europe it was the Constant-Murley Score (129 uses in 183 articles; 70.4%), and from Asia it was the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (80 uses in 126 articles; 63.4%). The use of PROMs is evolving with an increasing prevalence of and diversity of PROMs being used in upper limb surgery. There is geographical variation in the use of PROMs, and a variety of systems used, with only 3 of the top 10 most used PROMs reporting on patient satisfaction or wellbeing. Given that a diverse range of PROMs study a diverse range of conditions and procedures, there may not be a need for a consensus on the best overall use of PROMs, but there may be ideal PROMs suited to answer specific questions.

Overlapping surgery in arthroplasty - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Planned overlapping surgery can improve efficiency, reduce costs and help manage long waiting lists; yet, this practice has been questioned due to patient safety concerns. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to answer the question: (1) are there any differences in the risk of postoperative adverse outcomes; and (2) are there any differences in length of stay or length of surgery, in elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performed either as non-overlapping surgery (NOS) or overlapping surgery (OS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A systematic search of literature in the databases of MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase and Cochrane from dates of inception was performed. All studies published in English were included. Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework were utilised. Relative risk (RR) was used for dichotomous outcomes, while mean difference (MD) was used for continuous variables, with 95% confidence intervals. Alpha was set at 0.05. RESULTS: A total of nine studies with 120,625 patients were included for analyses. There were no statistically significant differences for overall rates of postoperative complications, dislocations, fractures, infections, readmissions or revision surgery nor with length of stay or length of surgery (p>0.05). Patient characteristics between groups were similar (p>0.05). DISCUSSION: There were no differences in postoperative adverse outcomes for elective orthopaedic THA and TKA performed as NOS when compared to OS. Operating schedules for OS in elective lower limb arthroplasty appear to be safe, given appropriate patient selection processes and may be a useful method to improve hospital efficiency. Informed consent and preoperative patient education should remain paramount. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Fibular fixation in mid and distal extra-articular tibia fractures - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The surgical management of extra-articular mid and distal tibia fractures has primarily focused on reducing rates of non-union and malunion, preserving hip-knee-ankle alignment and improving functional outcomes. Fibular fractures commonly accompany these injuries and the contributory role of fixation of these fractures has been increasingly studied. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to determine whether concurrent fibular fixation (FF) during extra-articular mid and distal tibia fracture fixation (AO/OTA 42 and 43-A) altered the risk of malunion, non-union and post-operative complications when compared to no fibular fixation (NF). METHODS: A systematic search of literature in the databases of MEDLINE (via OvidSP), PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) from the dates of inception was performed for randomised and non-randomised controlled trials. All studies published in English were included. Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies (ROBINS-I) and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) framework were utilised. Relative risk (RR) was used for dichotomous outcomes, while mean difference (MD) was used for continuous variables, with 95% confidence intervals. Alpha was set at 0.05. RESULTS: A total of ten studies with 1174 patients were included for analysis. There was a statistically significant reduced risk of overall malunion in the FF group compared to the NF group (11.8% vs 21.9%, RR 0.63, 95% CI: 0.41-0.98, p = 0.04) and this was supported through a sensitivity analysis of only randomised controlled trials (21.8% vs 40.3%, RR 0.37, 95% CI: 0.18-0.76, p = 0.006). There was no statistically significant difference in rates of non-union between groups (p > 0.05). Overall, there were similar incidences of diabetes, open fractures and smoking history between groups (p > 0.05). Detailed information regarding methods of tibial fixation were not available for subgroup analysis. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, in extra-articular mid and distal tibia (AO/OTA 42 and 43-A) fracture fixation, additional fibular fixation (FF) appears to significantly reduce the risk of overall malunion (RR, 0.37, 95% CI: 0.18-0.76, p = 0.006) without increasing the risk of non-union. These results should be interpreted with caution given the lack of subgroup analysis for methods of tibial fixation. Future high-quality randomised controlled trials should therefore delineate between types of tibial fixation.

Hip fracture surgery performed out-of-hours-A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: . Early hip fracture surgery (<48 hours) has shown to improve mortality for geriatric patients and is recommended in national hip fracture guidelines. However, this may be at the expense of surgery being performed out-of-hours where concerns about mortality risk exist. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to determine the mortality risk for hip fracture surgery performed in-hours (IH) compared to out-of-hours (OH), and on weekdays (WD) compared to weekends (WE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: . A systematic search of literature in the databases of MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase and Cochrane from the dates of inception was performed. All studies published in English were included. Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies (ROBINS-I) and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) framework were utilised. Relative risk (RR) was used for dichotomous outcomes, while mean difference (MD) was used for continuous variables, with 95% confidence intervals. Alpha was set at 0.05. RESULTS: . A total of 13 studies with 177,090 patients were included for analysis. Overall, there was no statistically significant difference for 30-day or inpatient mortality in IH vs OH groups (RR 0.93, p=0.46 and RR 1.16, p=0.63) and for WD vs WE groups (RR 0.98, p=0.73 and RR 0.76, p=0.67). There was no difference in length of stay between groups (p>0.05). The number of patients with American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA) physical status classification ≥3 and male gender between the groups were similar (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: . Performing hip fracture surgery OH or on the WE does not appear to increase the risk of 30-day or inpatient mortality or post-operative complications. Consideration should be given to performing hip fracture surgery out-of-hours to meet national guidelines (<48 hours).

Subacromial analgesia via continuous infusion catheter vs. placebo following arthroscopic shoulder surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

BACKGROUND: Subacromial analgesia (SAA) is hypothesized to reduce pain after arthroscopic shoulder surgery by delivering a continuous infusion of local anesthetic directly to the surgical site. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of SAA vs. placebo for pain relief after arthroscopic subacromial shoulder procedures. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing SAA with placebo after arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Outcomes collected included pain scores (converted to equivalent ordinal visual analog scores; minimal clinically important difference 1.4 cm), oral morphine equivalents used postoperatively, and catheter-related complications. Meta-analysis was performed via a random-effects model. Included trials underwent a risk of bias and quality of evidence assessment. RESULTS: Nine studies involving 459 participants were included. There were no clinically significant changes for pain scores in SAA at 6-, 12-, 24-, and 48-hour postoperative timepoints. Patients receiving SAA used less morphine equivalents of pain medication at 12 hours only (-0.37 mg, 95% confidence interval: -0.63 to -0.11), but there was no significant difference at 24 and 48 hours. There were no major complications (infection or reoperation). Included trials demonstrated a moderate risk-of-bias, and low to very low quality of evidence for primary outcomes. CONCLUSION: Subacromial continuous infusion of local anesthetic does not provide a clinically significant benefit compared with placebo as part of a multimodal analgesia regime after arthroscopic subacromial surgical procedures. Future, high-quality trials are required to further assess the efficacy of SAA against placebo.

The utility of Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) clinical shock grading in assessment of trauma.

BACKGROUND: Acute haemorrhage is a major contributor to trauma related morbidity and mortality. Quantifying blood loss acutely and accurately is a difficult task and no currently accepted standard exists. We introduce a simple shock grading tool incorporating vital signs, fluid response and estimated blood loss to describe shock grade during the primary survey based on the original Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) classification. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study of all trauma patients admitted to our emergency room over a 1-year period to evaluate the utility of this tool for emergency physicians to detect significant haemorrhage in the trauma patient. Shock grades were prospectively assigned to patients by the trauma team as part of the primary survey, and followed up to assess for outcomes. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of clinical, radiological and operative findings consistent with significant haemorrhage. Data were analysed using linear and logistic regression to assess predictive ability and receiver operator characteristic curve to assess overall diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity of the shock grading tool was 83%. The diagnostic accuracy based on area under receiver operator characteristic curve was 0.86. There was also a significant association between increasing shock grade and both injury severity score (ß coefficient 7.0, p<0.001, 95% CI 6.2 to 7.8) and the presence of significant haemorrhage (OR 5.1, p<0.001, 95% CI 3.6 to 7.3). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that a simple ATLS based clinical tool that objectively categorises haemorrhagic shock is a useful part of the primary survey of the trauma patient, although a larger study with higher statistical power is required to evaluate this conclusion further.

A trauma quality improvement programme associated with improved patient outcomes: 21 years of experience at an Australian Major Trauma Centre.

INTRODUCTION: Quality improvement programmes are an important part of care delivery in trauma centres. The objective was to describe the effect of a comprehensive quality improvement programme on long term patient outcome trends at a low volume major trauma centre in Australia. METHODS: All patients aged 15 years and over with major trauma (Injury Severity Score>15) admitted to a single inner city major trauma centre between 1992 and 2012 were studied. The outcomes of interest were in-hospital mortality and transfer to rehabilitation. Time series analysis using integer valued autoregressive Poisson models was used to determine the reduction in adjusted monthly count data associated with the intervention period (2007-2012). Risk adjusted odds ratios for mortality over three yearly intervals was also obtained using multivariable logistic regression. Crude and risk adjusted mortality was compared before and after the implementation period. RESULTS: 3856 patients were analysed. Crude in-hospital mortality fell from 16% to 10% after implementation (p<0.001). The intervention period was associated with a 25% decrease in monthly mortality counts. Risk adjusted mortality remained stable from 1992 to 2006 and did not fall until the intervention period. Crude and risk adjusted transfer to in-patient rehabilitation after major trauma also declined during the intervention period. CONCLUSION: In this low volume major trauma centre, the implementation of a comprehensive quality improvement programme was associated with a reduction in crude and risk adjusted mortality and risk adjusted discharge to rehabilitation in severely injured patients.

Predictors of transfer to rehabilitation for trauma patients admitted to a level 1 trauma centre--a model derivation and internal validation study.

OBJECTIVE: Determine the predictors of transfer to rehabilitation in a cohort of trauma patients and derive a risk score based clinical prediction tool to identify such patients during the acute phase of injury management. METHODS: Trauma registry data at a single level one trauma centre were obtained for all patients aged between 15 and 65 years admitted due to injury between 2007 and 2011. Multivariable logistic regression with stepwise selection was performed to derive a prediction model for transfer to rehabilitation. The model was tested on a validation dataset using receiver operator characteristic analyses and bootstrap cross validation on the entire dataset. A clinical prediction risk score was developed based on the final model. RESULTS: There were 4900 patients included in the study. Variables found to be the strongest predictors of rehabilitation after logistic regression with stepwise selection were pelvic injuries (OR 12.6 95% CI 6.2, 25.2 p<0.001), need for intensive care unit admission (OR 7.2 95% CI 4.2, 12.3 p<0.001) and neurosurgical operation (OR 10.5 95% CI 4.7, 23.1 p<0.001). After bootstrap cross validation the mean AUC was 0.86 (95% CI 0.84, 0.89). The model had a sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 64%. CONCLUSION: Intensive unit admission, neurosurgical operation, pelvic injuries and other lower limb injuries were the most important predictors of the need for rehabilitation after trauma. The prediction model has good overall sensitivity, discrimination and could be further validated for use in clinical practice.

Redefining the golden hour for severe head injury in an urban setting: the effect of prehospital arrival times on patient outcomes.

BACKGROUND: In patients with severe head injuries, transportation to a trauma centre within the "golden hour" are important markers of trauma system effectiveness but evidence regarding impacts on patient outcomes is limited. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of patient arrival within the golden hour on patient outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of adult patients with severe head injuries (head AIS ≥ 3) arriving within 24h of injury was identified using the trauma registry from 2000 to 2011. Survival analysis was used to determine the effect of patient arrival time on overall mortality. Study outcomes were in hospital mortality and survival to hospital discharge without requiring transfer for ongoing rehabilitation or nursing home care. RESULTS: There was a significant association with mortality with each incremental minute of patient arrival (HR 1.002, 95%CI 1.001-1.004, p=0.001). There was however no survival benefit observed for patients arriving within 60 min of injury time (HR 0.77, 95%CI 0.50-1.18, p=0.22) but an apparent benefit for those presenting within 2h of injury time (HR 0.31, 95%CI 0.15-0.66, p=0.002). Patient arrival within 60 min of injury time was associated with increased odds of survival to hospital discharge without requiring ongoing rehabilitation (OR 1.78, 95%CI 1.14-2.79, p=0.01). CONCLUSION: A survival benefit exists in patients arriving earlier to hospital after severe head injury but the benefit may extend beyond the golden hour. There was evidence of improved functional outcomes in patients arriving within 60 min of injury time.

Growing trend in older patients with severe injuries: mortality and mechanisms of injury between 1991 and 2010 at an inner city major trauma centre.

BACKGROUND: Elderly patients with major trauma are an increasingly important public health concern. The objective of the study was to describe the long term trend in patients aged 65 years and older with major trauma. METHODS: A retrospective single centre trauma registry study conducted at an inner city Major Trauma Centre in Sydney. Data on patients aged 65 years or older with major trauma (Injury Severity Score greater than 15) presenting between 1991 and 2010 were extracted from the data registry. Demographic data, mechanism of injury, injury severity scores and outcomes were collected. Study outcomes were proportion of total major trauma volume due to patients aged 65 years and older, in hospital mortality and total beddays occupied per year. RESULTS: The proportion of major trauma volume due to older patients increased by 4.9% per year currently accounting for a third of major trauma volume. The proportion of major trauma in older patients due to falls has also increased. Standardised mortality rates have declined by 2.2% per year. CONCLUSION: There has been a disproportionate increase in the proportion of major trauma due to older patients at this institution over the past twenty years. If this trend continues, it is likely to have significant impacts on future hospital and rehabilitation resources.

Prospective evaluation of a two-tiered trauma activation protocol in an Australian major trauma referral hospital.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a two-tiered trauma activation protocol in a major trauma referral hospital in Australia. METHODS: A prospective study performed over a 12-month period of all consecutive trauma activations in a major trauma referral hospital. The triage tool assigned patients into two tiers of trauma activation. The full trauma activation was initiated where physiological or anatomical criteria were present. These patients were assessed by a multispecialty trauma team. A consult trauma activation was initiated where only mechanism of injury criteria was present. These patients were assessed by the Emergency Department Registrar and Surgical Registrar. The primary endpoint was major trauma outcome defined as either injury severity score (ISS) greater than 15, requirement for High Dependency Unit or Intensive Care Unit (HDU/ICU) admission, need for urgent operative intervention, or in hospital mortality. RESULTS: Of 1144 trauma activations, 468 (41%) were full trauma and 676 (59%) were consult trauma activations. The full trauma activation group had a significantly higher proportion of the major trauma outcome (34% vs. 5%, p<0.01) and all 18 patients (2%) who died were in the full trauma activation group. Sensitivity of the triage tool for the major trauma outcome was 83%, specificity was 68%, undertriage was 3% and overtriage was 27%. CONCLUSIONS: The two-tiered trauma activation protocol is effective in identifying patients with major trauma from those with minor trauma. There were no deaths in undertriaged patients.

Severe trauma caused by stabbing and firearms in metropolitan Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

BACKGROUND: Stabbing and firearm trauma causing severe injuries (injury severity score (ISS) >15) and death is uncommon in Australia. The present study describes the experience with stabbings and firearm trauma causing severe injuries at a major Australian urban trauma centre. METHODS: Data from a prospectively generated trauma registry regarding all patients presenting to Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, Australia with penetrating trauma causing severe injuries from July 1991 to June 2001 was retrospectively analysed. RESULTS: Of all patients presenting to RPAH with stabbing and firearms wounds over the 11 year study period, 28% received an ISS >15. One hundred and forty patients were identified. 94% were male. The mean age was 34 years (15-82 years). The number of cases/year has not shown an increasing trend. Thirty per cent of patients sustained firearm related injuries, with the remainder mainly caused by knives or machetes. Fifteen per cent of injuries were self inflicted. The most common location of injury was on a public street. Fifty-two per cent of patients were injured in more than one anatomical region, with the abdomen being the most common site of injury (53%). On hundred and seventy-four operations were performed - laparotomies (43%), thoracotomies (26%), craniotomies (5%) and orthopaedic, vascular, wound explorations and other procedures (26%). Twenty-eight per cent of patients suffered at least one complication during their admission, with coagulopathy being the most common complication (20%). Mean length of stay was 10.4 days (1-107 days). The total mortality rate for the severely injured patients was 21%, with gun-related injuries having a higher mortality rate than stabbing injury (36%vs 15%). Sixty per cent of deaths were related to exsanguination. CONCLUSIONS: Stabbings and firearm trauma are associated with significant morbidity, mortality and utilization of hospital resources in metropolitan Sydney. Overall mortality rates are similar to institutions with higher volumes of penetrating trauma.

Paediatric trauma teams in Australia.

BACKGROUND: Trauma teams have been associated with improved survival probability of paediatric trauma patients. The present study seeks to estimate the use of trauma teams in Australian paediatric tertiary referral centres and describe their medical composition, leadership and criteria for activation. METHODS: Australian paediatric tertiary referral centres were identified. A structured questionnaire assessing the presence, composition and means of activation of a trauma team was mailed to the 'Director, Emergency Department' of all identified hospitals. Three months later, all hospitals were contacted by telephone to complete and verify data collection. RESULTS: Questionnaires were distributed to eight hospitals. Seventy-five per cent had an established trauma team. Hospitals without a trauma team claimed to have insufficient doctors to form a team and insufficient trauma caseload to justify a team. All trauma teams were potentially activated by prehospital paramedic data (field triage) and required a combination of anatomical, physiological and mechanistic criteria for activation. The two methods of mobilizing a trauma team were by dispatching a common call onto individual pagers (66%) or a specific trauma pager (33%) carried by trauma team members. Fifty per cent of hospitals had a two-tier, stratified trauma team response. All teams consisted of emergency, surgical and intensive care unit registrars. Trauma team leaders were emergency medicine specialists/registrars (33%), surgical registrars (33%) and non-defined (33%). Consultant surgeons were not members of any trauma team. Eighty-three per cent of trauma teams consisted of more junior members after hours. Fifty per cent of hospitals did not have a surgical registrar on site outside of business hours. Eighty-eight per cent of hospitals engaged in some form of trauma audit. CONCLUSIONS: Trauma teams are utilized by most Australian paediatric tertiary referral centres, with fairly uniform medical composition and criteria for activation. Paediatric surgeons presently have limited leadership roles and membership of Australian paediatric trauma teams.

Resources for managing trauma in rural New South Wales, Australia.

BACKGROUND: Trauma bypass is not always appropriate in the management of rural trauma because of the large distances and travel times. Rural hospitals in New South Wales, Australia are an essential component of the statewide integrated trauma system. The present study profiles the trauma resources of base hospitals in rural New South Wales. METHODS: A structured questionnaire, addressed to the 'Director, Emergency Department' was distributed to all rural base hospitals in New South Wales. Follow-up telephone interviews were administered to complete data collection. RESULTS: Fourteen hospitals were identified. General and orthopaedic surgeons provided trauma care in all hospitals. Forty-three per cent of hospitals had resident subspecialty surgeons. Fifty per cent of hospitals had a formal hospital trauma team. In the remaining hospitals, the most common reason (86%) stated for the absence of a formal trauma team was a lack of personnel to provide 24 h immediate response to all trauma presentations. Seventy-one per cent of hospitals are staffed by a single doctor after hours. All hospitals had 24 h access to plain radiography and blood products. 86% had 24 h access to ultrasound and computed tomography, although always on an 'on-call' basis after hours. All hospitals had the capability to maintain ventilated patients, averaging two ventilated beds per hospital. An average of two trauma patients per hospital per month is transferred to a larger institution. Sixty-four per cent of hospitals participated in a trauma retrievals for their surrounding areas. Seventy-one per cent of hospitals engaged in quality assurance activities regarding trauma outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Formal responses to major trauma in rural base hospitals in New South Wales are often restricted by a lack of specialist medical personnel. Nevertheless, the majority of hospitals have the resources to manage major trauma.

Trauma teams in Australia: a national survey.

BACKGROUND: Trauma teams have been associated with improved trauma patient outcomes. The present study seeks to estimate the use of trauma teams in Australian hospitals and describe their medical composition, leadership and criteria for activation. METHODS: Australian public hospitals with more than 100 beds, an emergency department and offering surgical services were identified. A survey assessing the presence, composition and means of activation of a trauma team was mailed to the 'Director, Emergency Department' of all identified hospitals. Three months later, all hospitals were contacted by telephone to complete and verify data collection. RESULTS: Questionnaires were distributed to 130 hospitals. After exclusion of hospitals that did not receive patients with traumatic injuries, and dedicated paediatric tertiary referral centres, 111 hospitals remained for analysis. Of these, 56% had an established trauma team, while 71% of hospitals without a trauma team claimed to have insufficient doctors to form one team. Ninety-five per cent of trauma teams were potentially activated by prehospital paramedic data (field triage). For 92% of trauma teams a combination of anatomical, physiological and mechanistic criteria were required for activation. The most common methods of mobilizing a trauma team were by dispatching a common call onto individual pagers (31%) or by paging trauma team members individually (31%). Fifty-eight per cent of trauma team leaders were emergency medicine specialists/registrars, while 8% of trauma teams were led by surgeons/registrars. Consultant surgeons were members of 23% of trauma teams and 74% of trauma teams consisted of more junior members after hours. Some form of trauma audit was engaged in by 64% of hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Trauma teams are yet to be utilized by many Australian hospitals that provide trauma care. Australian surgeons presently have limited leadership roles and membership in trauma teams. Trauma audit can be more widely adopted in Australian hospitals.