The impact of laboratory closing times on delay of adequate therapy in blood stream infections.

BACKGROUND: Patients with bloodstream infections need early adequate antimicrobial treatment to reduce mortality. This raises the question of timing and logistics. How important is the time of day when a culture is flagged positive to the processing of blood cultures and optimisation of antimicrobial therapy? METHODS: We performed a retrospective study assessing the time delay of a positive blood culture result during and after office hours and its impact on adequate antimicrobial therapy. Process duration from the moment of culture positivity to Gram stain completion was compared at different timepoints during the day in a medium-sized hospital with an offsite microbiological laboratory. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients with positive, noncontaminated blood cultures were included. Sixty-six patients (70%) received adequate empirical therapy; this increased to 76 cases (82%) and to 88 cases (95%) after analysis of Gram stain results and complete determination, respectively (p < 0.05 for all comparisons). Median duration from culture positivity to Gram stain completion (including offsite culture transport) increased from a median of four to 12 hours if time of cultures turned positive after office hours (p < 0.05), irrespective of the adequacy of empirical coverage. This also resulted in a median 12-hour delay for the complete process from time of culture positivity to administration of the antimicrobial drug (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Processing blood cultures after office hours is often deferred, which can lead to a delay in adequate antimicrobial therapy for patients with bloodstream infections.

The microbiome of diabetic foot osteomyelitis.

The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the diversity of bacteria in diabetic foot osteomyelitis using a 16S rRNA sequencing approach and to compare the results with conventional culture techniques. In this prospective observational study, we obtained 34 bone samples from patients admitted to our hospital with a moderate-severe diabetic foot infection. We analysed the distribution of the 16S rRNA gene sequences in the bone samples, using an Illumina MiSeq Personal Sequencer. We compared the genera that were detected with the cultured pathogens in the bone samples with conventional techniques. In the 23 samples that had positive results with both techniques, Staphylococcus, Corynebacterium, Streptococcus and Propionibacterium spp. were detected in 20, 18, 13 and 11 samples, respectively. Significantly more anaerobes were detected with 16S rRNA sequencing compared to conventional techniques (86.9 % vs. 23.1 %, p = 0.001) and more Gram-positive bacilli were present (78.3 % vs. 3.8 %, p < 0.001). Staphylococcus spp. were identified in all of the sequenced bone samples that were negative with conventional techniques. Mixed genera were present in 83.3 % (5 of 6) of the negative samples. Anaerobic and fastidious organisms may play a more significant role in osteomyelitis than previously reported. Further studies with larger populations are needed in order to fully understand the clinical importance of the microbial diversity of diabetic foot osteomyelitis.

Acute hepatitis C in the Netherlands: characteristics of the epidemic in 2014.

Within the Dutch Acute HCV in HIV Study, a surveillance system was initiated to estimate the incidence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections in 2014. Following the Dutch HIV treatment guidelines, HIV-positive men having sex with men (MSM) in 19 participating centers were screened. Ninety-nine acute HCV infections were reported, which resulted in a mean incidence of 11 per 1000 patient-years of follow-up. Unfortunately, the HCV epidemic among Dutch HIV-positive MSM is not coming to a halt.

The effect of lower extremity nerve decompression on health-related quality of life and perception of pain in patients with painful diabetic polyneuropathy: a prospective randomized trial.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess whether surgical decompression of nerves in the lower extremity in people with painful diabetic polyneuropathy would have an effect on health-related quality of life and to determine minimal clinically important differences in pain and quality of life scores. METHODS: The design was a randomized controlled trial in which 42 participants with painful diabetic painful neuroapthy underwent unilateral decompression of nerves in their left or right leg, using the other leg as a control, with 12 months follow-up. Surgical decompression was performed at the tibial, superficial, deep and common peroneal nerves. Preoperatively, and at 6 and 12 months post operatively, a visual analogue scale for pain and the 36 item short-form health survey and EuroQual 5 Dimensions questionnaires were completed. RESULTS: At 12 months follow-up, the visual analogue scale was significantly reduced, but decompression surgery did not significantly alter health-related quality of life scores. The minimal clinically important difference for visual analogue scale reduction was determined at 2.9 points decrease, a threshold reached by 42.5% of the study population. CONCLUSIONS: Although decompression surgery does not influence health-related quality of life, it achieves a clinically relevant reduction of pain in ~42.5% of people with diabetic peripheral neuropathy. It can therefore be considered for patients who do not adequately respond to pain medication.

Are clindamycin and ciprofloxacin appropriate for the empirical treatment of diabetic foot infections?

The objective of this study was to determine if specific species of microorganisms are associated with severe infection and amputation in patients with a diabetic foot infection and to evaluate the effectiveness of clindamycin and ciprofloxacin in this population. A retrospective cohort study was performed at the University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands, for the period January 1st 2005 to January 1st 2010. Patients with ICD-9 codes 'diabetic foot' were selected from the hospital database. We evaluated the association of Staphylococcus aureus and Gram-negative species (GNS) with severity of infection, number of amputations, and healing rates. No significant association was found between the different microorganisms and infection severity. Coinfections of GNS and S. aureus were significantly associated with amputation compared to infections with only S. aureus [p = 0.016, odds ratio (OR) 4.9, confidence interval (CI) 1.4-16.9]. The empiric antibiotic regimen of clindamycin and ciprofloxacin covered only 85 % of S. aureus and 78 % of GNS diabetic foot infections. In mild diabetic foot infection in the studied population, where methicillin-sensitive S. aureus and streptococci are the most likely pathogens, a beta-lactam antibiotic such as flucloxacillin would likely be more effective than clindamycin. In moderate and severe infections, where GNS as a causative organism cannot be safely excluded, broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy may be more adequate.

Antimicrobials and Non-healing Wounds Evidence, controversies and suggestions.

Non-healing wounds are a significant problem for health-care systems worldwide. In the industrialised world, almost 1-1.5% of the population will have a problem wound at any one time. Furthermore, wound management is expensive; in Europe, the average cost per episode is 6650 euros for leg ulcers and 10 000 euros for foot ulcers, and wound management accounts for 2-4% of health-care budgets. These figures are expected to rise along with an increased elderly and diabetic population.1-4.

Mycobacterium genavense in the Netherlands: an opportunistic pathogen in HIV and non-HIV immunocompromised patients. An observational study in 14 cases.

Mycobacterium genavense is an opportunistic non-tuberculous mycobacterium previously mostly associated with HIV-infected patients with CD4 counts below 100/µL. In this retrospective observational study of medical charts we studied all Dutch patients in whom M. genavense was detected between January 2002 and January 2010. Of the 14 patients identified, 13 (93%) showed clinically relevant M. genavense disease. All patients with M. genavense disease were severely immunocompromised, including HIV-infected patients, solid organ transplant recipients, those with chronic steroid use in combination with other immune modulating drugs, recipients of chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and those with immunodeficiency syndromes. Two patients had non-disseminated pulmonary M. genavense disease. Of the 12 patients treated, eight (75%) showed a favourable outcome. Four patients died in this study, three despite treatment for M. genavense disease. We conclude that M. genavense is a clinically relevant pathogen in severely immunocompromised patients that causes predominantly disseminated disease with serious morbidity and mortality. M. genavense is increasingly seen among non-HIV immunocompromised patients.

A systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions in the management of infection in the diabetic foot.

The International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot expert panel on infection conducted a systematic review of the published evidence relating to treatment of foot infection in diabetes. Our search of the literature published prior to August 2010 identified 7517 articles, 29 of which fulfilled predefined criteria for detailed data extraction. Four additional eligible papers were identified from other sources. Of the total of 33 studies, 29 were randomized controlled trials, and four were cohort studies. Among 12 studies comparing different antibiotic regimens in the management of skin and soft-tissue infection, none reported a better response with any particular regimen. Of seven studies that compared antibiotic regimens in patients with infection involving both soft tissue and bone, one reported a better clinical outcome in those treated with cefoxitin compared with ampicillin/sulbactam, but the others reported no differences between treatment regimens. In two health economic analyses, there was a small saving using one regimen versus another. No published data support the superiority of any particular route of delivery of systemic antibiotics or clarify the optimal duration of antibiotic therapy in either soft-tissue infection or osteomyelitis. In one non-randomized cohort study, the outcome of treatment of osteomyelitis was better when the antibiotic choice was based on culture of bone specimens as opposed to wound swabs, but this study was not randomized, and the results may have been affected by confounding factors. Results from two studies suggested that early surgical intervention was associated with a significant reduction in major amputation, but the methodological quality of both was low. In two studies, the use of superoxidized water was associated with a better outcome than soap or povidone iodine, but both had a high risk of bias. Studies using granulocyte-colony stimulating factor reported mixed results. There was no improvement in infection outcomes associated with hyperbaric oxygen therapy. No benefit has been reported with any other intervention, and, overall, there are currently no trial data to justify the adoption of any particular therapeutic approach in diabetic patients with infection of either soft tissue or bone of the foot.

Expert opinion on the management of infections in the diabetic foot.

This update of the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot incorporates some information from a related review of diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) and a systematic review of the management of infection of the diabetic foot. The pathophysiology of these infections is now well understood, and there is a validated system for classifying the severity of infections based on their clinical findings. Diagnosing osteomyelitis remains difficult, but several recent publications have clarified the role of clinical, laboratory and imaging tests. Magnetic resonance imaging has emerged as the most accurate means of diagnosing bone infection, but bone biopsy for culture and histopathology remains the criterion standard. Determining the organisms responsible for a diabetic foot infection via culture of appropriately collected tissue specimens enables clinicians to make optimal antibiotic choices based on culture and sensitivity results. In addition to culture-directed antibiotic therapy, most infections require some surgical intervention, ranging from minor debridement to major resection, amputation or revascularization. Clinicians must also provide proper wound care to ensure healing of the wound. Various adjunctive therapies may benefit some patients, but the data supporting them are weak. If properly treated, most diabetic foot infections can be cured. Providers practising in developing countries, and their patients, face especially challenging situations.

Candidemic complications in patients with intravascular catheters colonized with Candida species: an indication for preemptive antifungal therapy?

BACKGROUND: The impact of Candida-colonized catheter tips in patients without candidemia is unclear. METHODS: A retrospective study of patients with tip cultures positive for Candida was conducted over an 8-year period, to determine the outcomes in patients with Candida cultured from an intravascular catheter tip in the absence of preceding Candida-positive blood cultures. The primary outcome measure was definite candidemia. Secondary outcomes included possible candidemia and in-hospital mortality. A possible candidemia was defined as clinical signs and symptoms of invasive candidiasis without explanation other than a candidemia, but with negative blood cultures. RESULTS: Sixty-eight cultures from 64 patients were included in the study. Definite candidemia developed in three cases (4%) and possible candidemia developed in five cases (7%). In-hospital mortality was significantly increased in patients with definite or possible candidemia (63% vs. 22%, p=0.028). Risk factors for the development of definite or possible candidemia were catheter time in situ >8 days (odds ratio (OR) 6.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-32.9) and abdominal surgery (OR 6.0, 95% CI 1.1-32.4). CONCLUSIONS: Intravascular catheter tip colonization in patients without preceding blood cultures with Candida is associated with candidemia in from 4% of patients (definite candidemia) up to 12% of patients (definite and possible candidemia combined). Considering the adverse prognosis associated with delayed treatment of candidemia, preemptive treatment based on catheter tip cultures might outweigh the disadvantages of costs and side effects of antifungal therapy.

Pharmacotherapy of diabetic foot osteomyelitis.

Diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) complicates about 20% of diabetic foot infections (DFIs) and increases the risk of lower extremity amputation. This contentious infection is important to discuss, given the frequency with which diabetes mellitus and its complications occur and the devastating consequences of amputation. The diagnosis and management of DFO is complicated by the diverse presentations, delayed recognition, poorly defined diagnostic criteria, and lack of validated treatment regimens. Major issues of concern include when to undertake bone resection surgery and which antimicrobial agents to use, by what route, and for how long. Patients in whom DFO is suspected are best cared for by a multidisciplinary team, including infectious disease physicians or clinical microbiologists, orthopaedic, plastic and vascular surgeons, diabetologists, primary care physicians, podiatrists and specialist (especially tissue viability) nurses. Such multidisciplinary teams have repeatedly been shown to improve disease outcomes. We herein analyse the limited, and recently published, literature on the pharmacotherapy of DFO and put it into the broader context of management of DFI and osteomyelitis.

Unresolved issues in the management of ulcers of the foot in diabetes.

Management of diabetic foot ulcers presents a major clinical challenge. The response to treatment is often poor and the outcome disappointing, while the costs are high for both healthcare providers and the patient. In such circumstances, it is essential that management should be based on firm evidence and follow consensus. In the case of the diabetic foot, however, clinical practice can vary widely. It is for these reasons that the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot has published guidelines for adoption worldwide. The Group has now also completed a series of non-systematic and systematic reviews on the subjects of soft tissue infection, osteomyelitis, offloading and other interventions designed to promote ulcer healing. The current article collates the results of this work in order to demonstrate the extent and quality of the evidence which is available in these areas. In general, the available scientific evidence is thin, leaving many issues unresolved. Although the complex nature of diabetic foot disease presents particular difficulties in the design of robust clinical trials, and the absence of published evidence to support the use of an intervention does not always mean that the intervention is ineffective, there is a clear need for more research in the area. Evidence from sound clinical studies is urgently needed to guide consensus and to underpin clinical practice. It is only in this way that patients suffering with these frequently neglected complications of diabetes can be offered the best hope for a favourable outcome, at the least cost.

Diabetic foot osteomyelitis: a progress report on diagnosis and a systematic review of treatment.

The International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot appointed an expert panel to provide evidence-based guidance on the management of osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot. Initially, the panel formulated a consensus scheme for the diagnosis of diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) for research purposes, and undertook a systematic review of the evidence relating to treatment. The consensus diagnostic scheme was based on expert opinion; the systematic review was based on a search for reports of the effectiveness of treatment for DFO published prior to December 2006. The panel reached consensus on a proposed scheme that assesses the probability of DFO, based on clinical findings and the results of imaging and laboratory investigations. The literature review identified 1168 papers, 19 of which fulfilled criteria for detailed data extraction. No significant differences in outcome were associated with any particular treatment strategy. There was no evidence that surgical debridement of the infected bone is routinely necessary. Culture and sensitivity of isolates from bone biopsy may assist in selecting properly targeted antibiotic regimens, but empirical regimens should include agents active against staphylococci, administered either intravenously or orally (with a highly bioavailable agent). There are no data to support the superiority of any particular route of delivery of systemic antibiotics or to inform the optimal duration of antibiotic therapy. No available evidence supports the use of any adjunctive therapies, such as hyperbaric oxygen, granulocyte-colony stimulating factor or larvae. We have proposed a scheme for diagnosing DFO for research purposes. Data to inform treatment choices in DFO are limited, and further research is urgently needed.

Fever and high lactate dehydrogenase in HIV-positive patients from the Antilles and Surinam: histoplasmosis?

We describe four cases of HIV-positive patients, two from Surinam, one from the Dutch Antilles and one from Nigeria, who presented with a febrile illness and a high lactate dehydrogenase plasma level. In all four, the diagnosis of disseminated histoplasmosis was made, in three of them by liver biopsy. Two patients had retinal abnormalities compatible with a systemic fungal infection. Three patients were treated successfully with antifungal agents. One patient died. Between 2000 and 2006, only 14 patients with HIV have been found to have histoplasmosis in the Netherlands. Although histoplasmosis is not endemic in the Netherlands, physicians are more likely to see cases because of a growing number of HIV -positive immigrants from endemic regions.