Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rivaroxaban in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: results from ROCKET AF.

Two once-daily rivaroxaban dosing regimens were compared with warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in ROCKET AF: 20 mg for patients with normal/mildly impaired renal function and 15 mg for patients with moderate renal impairment. Rivaroxaban population pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) modeling data from ROCKET AF patients (n = 161) are reported and are used to confirm established rivaroxaban PK and PK/PD models and to re-estimate values of the models' parameters for the current AF population. An oral one-compartment model with first-order absorption adequately described rivaroxaban PK. Age, renal function, and lean body mass influenced the PK model. Prothrombin time and prothrombinase-induced clotting time exhibited a near-linear relationship with rivaroxaban plasma concentration; inhibitory effects were observed through to 24 hours post-dose. Rivaroxaban plasma concentration and factor Xa activity had an inhibitory maximum-effect (Emax ) relationship. Renal function (on prothrombin time; prothrombinase-induced clotting time) and age (on factor Xa activity) had moderate effects on PK/PD models. PK and PK/PD models were shown to be adequate for describing the current dataset. These findings confirm the modeling and empirical results that led to the selection of doses tested against warfarin in ROCKET AF.

Comparison of ximelagatran, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor, with enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip replacement. A randomized, double-blind study.

BACKGROUND: Prophylaxis is recommended following total joint replacement because of the high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Postoperative low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) reduces the incidence of venographically detected deep vein thrombosis (DVT) to about 10-15% in total hip replacement (THR) patients. Ximelagatran is a novel, oral direct thrombin inhibitor that selectively and competitively inhibits both free and clot-bound thrombin. We compared the efficacy and safety of ximelagatran with those of enoxaparin for the prevention of VTE in patients undergoing THR. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, multicenter, double-blind study conducted principally in the USA and Canada. Patients received fixed-dose oral ximelagatran 24 mg bid or subcutaneous enoxaparin 30 mg bid and matched placebo for 7-12 days; both regimens were initiated the morning after surgery. The incidence of VTE (by postoperative day 12) included thrombosis determined by mandatory venography of the leg on which surgery was performed and symptomatic, objectively proven DVT or pulmonary embolism (PE). VTE and bleeding events were interpreted by an independent central adjudication committee for primary analysis. RESULTS: Of the 1838 patients randomized, 1557 had either adequate venography or symptomatic, proven VTE (efficacy population). Overall rate of venography acceptable for evaluation was 85.4%. Overall rates of total VTE were 7.9% (62 of 782 patients) in the ximelagatran group and 4.6% (36 of 775 patients) in the enoxaparin group, with an absolute difference of 3.3% and a 95% confidence interval for the difference of 0.9% to 5.7%. Proximal DVT and/or PE occurred in 3.6% (28 of 782 patients) in the ximelagatran group and 1.2% (nine of 774 patients) in the enoxaparin group. Major bleeding events were observed in 0.8% (seven of 906) of the ximelagatran-treated patients and in 0.9% (eight of 910) of the enoxaparin-treated patients (P > 0.95). Non-inferiority of ximelagatran 24 mg bid based on a prespecified margin of 5% was not met, resulting in superiority of the enoxaparin regimen. CONCLUSIONS: Both ximelagatran and enoxaparin decreased the overall rate of VTE compared with that reported historically. However, in this study, enoxaparin 30 mg bid was more effective than ximelagatran 24 mg bid for prevention of VTE in THR. Oral ximelagatran was used without coagulation monitoring, was well tolerated, and had bleeding rates comparable to those of enoxaparin. Further refinement by testing a higher dose of ximelagatran in the patients undergoing THR is warranted.

Hormonal effects on tirilazad clearance in women: assessment of the role of CYP3A.

This study assessed whether the previously reported difference in tirilazad clearance between pre- and postmenopausal women is reversed by hormone replacement and whether this observation can be explained by differences in CYP3A4 activity. Ten healthy women from each group were enrolled: premenopausal (ages 18-35), postmenopausal (ages 50-70), postmenopausal receiving estrogen, and postmenopausal women receiving estrogen and progestin. Volunteers received 0.0145 mg/kg midazolam and 3.0 mg/kg tirilazad mesylate intravenously on separate days. Plasma tirilazad and midazolam were measured by HPLC/dual mass spectrophotometry (MS/MS) assays. Tirilazad clearance was significantly higher in premenopausal women (0.51 +/- 0.09 L/hr/kg) than in postmenopausal groups (0.34 +/- 0.07, 0.32 +/- 0.06, and 0.36 +/- 0.08 L/hr/kg, respectively) (p = 0.0001). Midazolam clearance (0.64 +/- 0.12 L/hr/kg) was significantly higher in premenopausal women compared to postmenopausal groups (0.47 +/- 0.11, 0.49 +/- 0.11, and 0.53 +/- 0.19 L/hr/kg, respectively) (p = 0.037). Tirilazad clearance was weakly correlated with midazolam clearance (r2 = 0.129, p = 0.02). Tirilazad clearance is faster in premenopausal women than in postmenopausal women, but the effect of menopause on clearance is not reversed by hormone replacement. Tirilazad clearance in these women is weakly related to midazolam clearance, a marker of CYP3A activity.

Biotransformation of tirilazad in human: 4. effect of finasteride on tirilazad clearance and reduced metabolite formation.

The effect of oral finasteride, an inhibitor of 5alpha-reductase, on the clearance of tirilazad, a membrane lipid peroxidation inhibitor, was assessed in eight healthy men who received: 1) 10 mg/kg tirilazad mesylate solution orally on the 7th day of a 10-day regimen of 5 mg finasteride once daily, 2) 10 mg/kg tirilazad mesylate orally, 3) 2 mg/kg tirilazad mesylate i.v. on the 7th day of a 10-day regimen of 5 mg finasteride once daily and 4) 2 mg/kg tirilazad mesylate i.v., in a four-way cross-over design. Plasma concentrations of tirilazad and its active reduced metabolites (U-89678 and U-87999) were measured by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS). Finasteride increased mean tirilazad areas under the curve by 21 and 29% for i.v. and p.o. tirilazad, respectively. Mean U-89678 areas under the curve were decreased 92 and 75% by finasteride administration with i.v. and p.o. tirilazad, respectively, and decreases of 94 and 85% in mean U-87999 area under the curve values were observed. These differences were statistically significant. These results indicate that finasteride inhibits the metabolism of tirilazad to U-89678. However, this inhibition has only a moderate effect on the overall clearance of tirilazad. These results thus confirm earlier in vitro work that showed that tirilazad is predominantly metabolized by CYP3A4. Although the major circulating metabolites of tirilazad are formed via reduction, this represents a minor route of tirilazad elimination in man.

Induction of tirilazad clearance by phenytoin.

Tirilazad is a membrane lipid peroxidation inhibitor being studied for the management of subarachnoid hemorrhage; phenytoin is used for seizure prophylaxis in the same disorder. The induction of tirilazad clearance by phenytoin was assessed in 12 volunteers (6 male, 6 female). Subjects received phenytoin orally every 8 h for 7 days (200 mg for nine doses and 100 mg for 13 doses) in one phase of a crossover study. In both study phases, 1.5 mg kg-1 tirilazad mesylate was administered by i.v. infusion every 6 h for 29 doses. Tirilazad mesylate and U-89678 (an active metabolite) in plasma were quantified by HPLC. After the final dose, tirilazad clearance was increased by 91.8% in subjects receiving phenytoin + tirilazad versus tirilazad alone. AUC0-6 for U-89678 after the last tirilazad dose was reduced by 93.1% by concomitant phenytoin. These effects were statistically significant. The time course of induction was consistent with that of phenytoin's effect on the ratio of urinary 6 beta-hydroxycortisol to cortisol, a measure of hepatic CYP3A activity. The results show that phenytoin induces metabolism of tirilazad and U-89678 in healthy subjects and that, under these conditions, tirilazad clearance approaches liver blood flow.

Steady-state pharmacokinetic properties of pramipexole in healthy volunteers.

Pramipexole is a dopamine receptor agonist that has proved effective in the treatment of Parkinson's disease. The pharmacokinetic properties of pramipexole at steady-state concentrations were studied in 16 healthy men and women at four dose levels throughout the range recommended for Parkinson's patients. Plasma and urine samples collected within the four dose intervals were assayed for concentrations of pramipexole, using high-performance liquid chromatography. The total oral clearance for all participants was 419 mL/min. The mean volume of distribution and elimination half-life for all participants was 486 +/- 93.2 L and 12.9 +/- 3.27 hours. Concentrations of pramipexole were proportional to dose, although the drug's pharmacokinetic properties differed between men and women. The area under the concentration-time curve for each dose level was 35% to 43% greater in women, mainly because of a 24% to 27% lower oral clearance. The mean creatinine clearance in men and women was 112 +/- 12.8 mL/ min/1.73 m2 and 80.9 +/- 15.6 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. The renal clearance of pramipexole accounts for approximately 80% of oral clearance, and there was a significant correlation between renal and creatinine clearances. The influence of gender could not be distinguished from the influence of age and the resulting reduced creatinine clearance, but the measurement of pharmacokinetic properties produced linear results in both men and women.

Pharmacokinetics of tirilazad in healthy male subjects at doses above 6 mg/kg/day.

The dose proportionality of tirilazad pharmacokinetics at dosages above 6.0 mg/kg/day were assessed in 18 healthy male volunteers between the ages of 19 and 46 years. Subjects were randomized to receive either 1.5 mg/kg, 3.0 mg/kg, or 4.0 mg/kg tirilazad mesylate every 6 hours for 29 doses (daily doses of 6.0, 12.0, and 16.0 mg/kg/day for 7 days). Each drug dose was administered intravenously over 10 minutes. Plasma tirilazad, U-89678, and U-87999 (active reduced metabolites) were quantified by HPLC. Two subjects in the high dose group withdrew before the end of the study. Following the first dose of tirilazad, dose-corrected pharmacokinetic parameters for all 3 compounds did not differ significantly among dose groups. After the final tirilazad the mean half-life of tirilazad was approximately 80 hours. Mean apparent tirilazad clearance did not differ significantly among groups. Mean U-89678 AUC0-6 following the last tirilazad dose did not differ significantly between the 6.0 and 12.0 mg/kg/day doses, but the value for the 16.0 mg/kg dose was higher than values from both lower doses (p = 0.044 and 0.056, respectively). Similar results were obtained for U-87999. The dose effects observed for the pharmacokinetics of these 2 metabolites may have been a function of intersubject variability. When combined with previous data concerning the dose proportionally of tirilazad pharmacokinetics at doses less than 6.0 mg/kg/day, the data from the present study suggest that the pharmacokinetics of tirilazad are approximately linear over a dosage range of 1.0-16.0 mg/kg/day. Due to the inability to assess the plasma protein binding of tirilazad and its reduced metabolites, the clinical significance of the departure from linearity of the pharmacokinetics of U-89678 and U-87999 cannot be directly assessed. Further study at higher doses will be needed to address this issue.

Environmental aspects of arsenic toxicity.

The toxicity of arsenic and its long history of use in human culture has resulted in widespread concern about the natural and anthropogenic levels of arsenic in our environment. In this article, an overview of the current environmental status of arsenic is presented. A brief history of the usage of this element is followed by a discussion of the current applications. Both natural as well as anthropogenic sources of input are described and discussed in terms of their relative impact on the Earth's environment. Numerous control mechanisms for arsenic exist in the environment, and the major processes involved (physical, chemical, and biological) are highlighted. Natural cycling of this element through the various environmental compartments (air, water, soil, and biota) are described as well as some current methods for the removal of arsenic from natural and industrial waters. Finally, a brief overview of the most common methods for the analysis of arsenic in environmental samples is presented.

Pharmacokinetics of tirilazad and U-89678 in ischemic stroke patients receiving a loading regimen and maintenance regimen of 10 mg/kg/day of tirilazad.

The pharmacokinetics of tirilazad mesylate and its active reduced metabolite, U-89678, were evaluated in ischemic stroke patients receiving 2.5 mg/kg tirilazad every 3 hours for the first 12 hours of dosing followed by 2.5 mg/kg every 6 hours for a total of 22 doses (5 days). Trough and serial samples drawn during the 6 hours after administration of the last dose were analyzed for plasma levels of tirilazad and U-89678 by means of high-performance liquid chromatography. Complete concentration-time profiles were available for 20 patients, including 12 men (mean age, 68.0 years) and 8 women (mean age, 75.0 years). Trough concentrations of tirilazad and U-89678 were consistent with the loading regimen used. The mean area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to 6 hours (AUC0-6) of tirilazad was 8181 +/- 2398 ng.hr/mL in men and 8135 +/- 3671 ng.hr/mL in women. The mean AUC0-6 of U-89678 was 2761 +/- 1834 ng.hr/mL in men and 1477 +/- 903 ng.hr/mL in women. These results show that gender has a modest effect on the pharmacokinetics of U-89678 but little effect on the pharmacokinetics of tirilazad in elderly ischemic stroke patients. These observations are consistent with previous findings in healthy young and elderly subjects.

Biotransformation of tirilazad in human: 2. Effect of ketoconazole on tirilazad clearance and oral bioavailability.

The effect of ketoconazole, a CYP3A inhibitor, on the oral bioavailability of tirilazad mesylate was assessed in 12 healthy subjects, who received the following treatments in a crossover design: a) 10 mg/kg tirilazad mesylate solution orally on the fourth day of a 7-day regimen of 200 mg ketoconazole once daily, b) 10 mg/kg tirilazad mesylate solution orally, c) 2 mg/kg i.v. tirilazad mesylate solution on the fourth day of a 7-day regimen of 200 mg ketoconazole once daily and d) 2mg/kg i.v. tirilazad mesylate solution. Plasma concentrations of tirilazad mesylate and its active reduced metabolites (U-89678 and U-87999) were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. Urinary ratios of 6 beta-hydroxycortisol to cortisol (6 beta-OHC/C) were measured as an index of hepatic CYP3A activity. Ketoconazole increased mean tirilazad mesylate area under the curve (AUC) values by 67% and 309% for i.v. and oral administration, respectively. Mean AUC values for U-89678 were increased 472% and 720% by ketoconazole coadministration with i.v. and oral tirilazad, respectively, whereas increases of > 10-fold in mean U-87999 AUC values were observed. These differences were statistically significant. These results indicate that ketoconazole inhibits the metabolism of these three compounds, which suggests that all of the compounds are substrates for CYP3A. Urinary 6 beta-OHC/C ratios did not reflect this level of effect of ketoconazole on CYP3A; this probe may not be useful for assessing the effect of CYP3A inhibitors. The absolute bioavailability of oral tirilazad was 8.7 +/- 4.8%; ketoconazole increased the bioavailability to 20.9 +/- 6.5%. Ketoconazole increased tirilazad mesylate bioavailability by decreasing the first-pass liver and gut wall metabolism of tirilazad mesylate to similar degrees.

Comparison of the pharmacokinetics of tirilazad mesylate in healthy volunteers and stable subjects with mild liver cirrhosis.

OBJECTIVE: The pharmacokinetics of tirilazad mesylate and an active reduced metabolite, U89678, were studied in 7 volunteers with mild cirrhosis of the liver, and seven age, sex, weight and smoking status matched healthy normal volunteers. Subjects received a single intravenous infusion of 2.0 mg.kg-1 tirilazad mesylate over 10 min. RESULTS: Mean tirilazad AUCzero-infinity was 8.83 mumol h.l-1 and 18.6 mumol h.l-1 in healthy volunteers and cirrhotic subjects, respectively. Mean tirilazad clearance in cirrhotics (12.7 l.h-1) was approximately 2.1 fold lower than in healthy volunteers (27.8 l.h-1). The differences were statistically significant. Mean U-89678 AUCzero-infinity in cirrhotic subjects (3.88 mumol h.l-1) was 2.5 fold higher than in healthy controls (1.53 mumol h.l-1), but the difference was marginally significant. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that clearance of both tirilazad mesylate and U89678 is decreased in subjects with hepatic impairment. This observation may be attributed either to decreases in liver blood flow and/or intrinsic clearance. The results of this study thus suggest that increased monitoring and or a reduction in tirilazad dosing may be necessary in patients with hepatic impairment.

Gender does not affect the degree of induction of tirilazad clearance by phenobarbital.

OBJECTIVE: Tirilazad mesylate is a membrane lipid peroxidation inhibitor being evaluated for the treatment of patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH); phenobarbital may be administered to these patients for seizure prophylaxis. Therefore, the effect of phenobarbital on tirilazad mesylate pharmacokinetics was assessed in 15 healthy volunteers (7M, 8F). METHODS: Subjects received 100 mg phenobarbital orally daily for 8 days in one phase of a two-way crossover study. In both phases, 1.5 mg.kg-1 tirilazed mesylate was administered (as a 10 minute IV infusion) every 6 hours for 29 doses. Three weeks separated study phases. Tirilazad mesylate and U-89678 (an active metabolite) in plasma were quantified by HPLC. RESULTS: Phenobarbital had no effect on the first dose pharmacokinetics of tirilazad or U-89678. After the final dose, clearance for tirilazad was increased 25% in males and 29% in females receiving phenobarbital + tirilazad versus tirilazad mesylate alone. These differences were statistically significant, and the degree of induction was not significantly different between genders. AUC(zero)-6 for U-89678 after the last tirilazad mesylate dose was reduced 51% in males and 69% in females. The decreases were statistically significant, and there was no gender by treatment interaction. CONCLUSION: The results show that phenobarbital induces metabolism of tirilazad and U-89678 similarly in both men and women. Lower levels of tirilazad and U-89678 in SAH patients receiving phenobarbital may adversely impact clinical response.

Phenytoin causes a rapid increase in 6 beta-hydroxycortisol urinary excretion in humans--a putative measure of CYP3A induction.

This study was conducted in eight healthy volunteers to assess the time course of induction of cytochrome P-450 by phenytoin. subjects received 200 mg of phenytoin every 8 h for 11 doses and 100 mg every 8 h for 8 doses. Trough concentrations of phenytoin in plasma were measured by HPLC. Urine samples were collected between 08:00 and 12:00 on days -1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7. Urinary concentrations of 6 beta-hydroxycortisol (6 beta-OHC) and cortisol (C) were determined by HPLC and were reported as a ratio (6 beta-OHC/C); this ratio is a marker for the 3A isozyme family of cytochrome P-450 (CYP3A). Mean plasma phenytoin concentrations on day 7 were 15.4 +/- 7.20 micrograms/mL. Mean 6 beta-OHC/C ratios increased by a factor of 2.37 from baseline during the course of the study. Values for the ratios on days 4, 5, and 7 were significantly higher than baseline by Dunnett's test (one-sided) (p < 0.05); the day 3 value was borderline statistically significant. These results show that phenytoin rapidly induces the activity of the CYP3A family of isozymes, with effects apparent within 48 h after the initiation of phenytoin therapy.

The effect of phenytoin on the pharmacokinetics of tirilazad mesylate in healthy male volunteers.

The pharmacokinetic interaction between phenytoin and tirilazad was studied in 12 healthy men who received 200 mg phenytoin orally every 8 hours for 11 doses and 100 mg for the remaining 5 doses in one period of a two-way crossover study. In both periods, 1.5 mg/kg tirilazad mesylate was administered (as 10-minute intravenous infusions) every 6 hours for 21 doses (5 days). Plasma tirilazad mesylate and U-89678 (an active metabolite) were quantified by HPLC. After dose 21, area under the plasma concentration-time curve [AUC(0-6)] for tirilazad mesylate was significantly lower (p = 0.0061) after phenytoin treatment (3029 +/- 982 ng.hr/ml) than after tirilazad mesylate alone (4647 +/- 1562 ng.hr/ml). AUC(0-6) for U-89,678 after dose 21 was reduced from 1485 +/- 1173 ng.hr/ml after tirilazad mesylate alone to 195 +/- 223 ng.hr/ml after phenytoin coadministration. U-89678 normally accumulates during multiple dosing, but mean U-89678 trough concentrations decreased after 24 hours during tirilazad and phenytoin coadministration. No clinically significant interactions of tirilazad mesylate and phenytoin for medical events, vital signs, or laboratory parameters were identified. These results suggest that phenytoin rapidly induces tirilazad mesylate metabolism; it may also induce the metabolism of U-89678 or shunt tirilazad mesylate metabolism through other pathways.

Lack of a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic interaction between nimodipine and tirilazad mesylate in healthy volunteers.

The potential interaction between tirilazad mesylate, a membrane lipid peroxidation inhibitor, and nimodipine, a calcium-channel antagonist, was assessed in 12 healthy male volunteers. Subjects received 60 mg nimodipine orally, 2.0 mg/kg tirilazad mesylate as a 10-minute intravenous infusion, and a combination of the two treatments according to a balanced 3-way crossover design. No significant effects of nimodipine on tirilazad mesylate pharmacokinetic parameters were observed (P > .05). Values for tirilazad mesylate clearance (34.9 +/- 8.96 L/hr) and half-life (29 +/- 7.83 hr) were consistent with previous studies. Nimodipine pharmacokinetic parameters exhibited substantial variability, and mean AUC was approximately 25% below the range of previously published values. However, no significant differences in nimodipine pharmacokinetics were observed between treatments. Nimodipine administration increased heart rate slightly without a change in blood pressure, which was not observed after tirilazad administration and was not altered when tirilazad and nimodipine were coadministered. Thus, no significant interaction between tirilazad mesylate and nimodipine is detectable after single-dose administration.

Multiple-dose tolerability and pharmacokinetics of tirilazad mesylate at doses of up to 10 mg/kg/day administered over 5-10 days in healthy volunteers.

Multiple dose pharmacokinetics and tolerability of tirilazad mesylate were assessed at the maximum dosage and duration expected for tirilazad mesylate therapy of subarachnoid hemorrhage and head injury. Healthy male subjects (47) received either 1 mg/kg/day, 3 mg/kg/day, 6 mg/kg/day, or 10 mg/kg/day tirilazad mesylate, given as 10 minute i.v. infusions every 6 hours for 21 (at the highest dose) or 41 doses. Plasma tirilazad mesylate and U-89678, an active metabolite, were quantified by HPLC. Thirty-nine subjects completed the study. Tirilazad mesylate was generally well tolerated; injection site irritation was the primary adverse effect. Sporadic, dose unrelated elevations in liver enzymes were observed. All medical events were reversible. No clinically significant effects on vital signs, cardiac telemetry, or other laboratory values were seen. Both tirilazad and U-89678 accumulated on multiple dosing, and steady-state plasma levels were approximated by day 11 of dosing. U-89678 average steady-state concentrations approached 58% of those of the parent compound in the 6.0 mg/kg/day dose group. Following the last dose, mean half-lives for tirilazad ranged from 61.2-123 hours; mean U-89678 half-lives ranged from 60.5-111 hours. Tirilazad mesylate pharmacokinetics exhibited slight nonlinearity, AUC0-6 values for the 6 mg/kg/day were 33% higher than those predicted based on data from the 1.0 mg/kg dose group. Neither the long half-lives of U-89678 and tirilazad nor slight nonlinearity of tirilazad pharmacokinetics are likely to have significant clinical impact during short-term treatment of acute neurological injury.

Effect of age and gender on tirilazad pharmacokinetics in humans.

Tirilazad mesylate pharmacokinetics were assessed in 12 young and 12 elderly volunteers (six men and six women per age group). Subjects received single 10-minute intravenous infusions of 1.5 mg/kg and 3.0 mg/kg tirilazad mesylate. Plasma tirilazad mesylate concentrations were determined by HPLC. There were no significant dose effects on clearance, but half-life increased with dose because of assay insensitivity at the lower dose. Mean half-lives were 16.3 +/- 15.5 and 21.4 +/- 12.6 hours for young and elderly subjects, respectively, at the 3.0 mg/kg dose. At the same dose, mean tirilazad mesylate systemic clearance was 0.630 +/- 0.254 and 0.428 +/- 0.090 L/hr/kg, respectively. The decreased clearance in elderly volunteers was primarily attributable to a lower clearance in elderly women relative to young women. The small effect of age on tirilazad clearance is likely to have minimum clinical impact. Tirilazad clearance was approximately 40% higher in young women than in young men. The clinical importance of this observation is unknown.

Organizational and business issues affecting integrated delivery systems.

This chapter discusses the nature of an integrated system, the reasons for developing an integrated delivery system, and various organizational structures that might be used. The chapter then identifies several of the critical business issues affecting the development of an integrated system.