Postoperative complications and myocardial injury in patients receiving air or oxygen. Prospective, randomised and pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Supplementary oxygen is administered during anaesthesia to increase oxygen delivery and prevent hypoxia. Recent studies have questioned this routine. In this pilot study, our main aim was to investigate if 21% oxygen compared to ≥50% reduces the risk of postoperative complications and myocardial injury. METHODS: In this pragmatic, multicentre, single-blind study, patients undergoing vascular surgery were randomised to receive a fraction of inspired oxygen (Fi O2 ) ≥ 0.50 and oxygen saturation determined by pulse oximetry (SpO2 ) ≥ 98% (group H) or Fi O2 of 0.21 and SpO2 > 90% (group N) oxygen perioperatively. The primary outcome was a composite outcome of major pre-defined postoperative complications assessed at 30 days. Myocardial injury was determined by serial troponin measurements. Data were analysed using generalised estimating equation, Mann-Whitney U test or chi-squared test, as appropriate. RESULTS: The 191 patients were randomised, and per-protocol principle was used for analyses. At 30-day follow-up, 43 out of 94 patients (46%) had a postoperative complication in group H and 36 out of 90 patients (40%) in group N, p = .46. New myocardial injury was seen in 27% versus 22% in Groups H and N respectively (p = .41). No differences in other outcomes were observed between the groups. Twelve patients (13%) in Group N had SpO2 < 90%, six recovered spontaneously and six required supplemental oxygen. At 1-year follow-up, one patient in group H had died. CONCLUSION: In this pilot study, postoperative complications were similar between the groups in patients randomised to Fi O2 of 0.21 or ≥0.50 and no difference was found in the incidence of new myocardial injury. Larger, prospective adequately powered studies are needed.

More than 20 years' experience of left ventricular assist device implantation at a non-transplant Centre.

OBJECTIVES: Over recent decades implantable left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) have increased the possibility of improved survival in patients with advanced heart failure who also benefit from a better quality of life. The aim of this retrospective survey was to review the clinical results of LVAD implantation at a low-volume non-transplant centre (Linköping, Sweden) between 1993 and 2016. Our aim was also to assess the mortality and morbidity rates associated with implantation of three LVAD versions at our centre, and to compare our results with those from transplant centres. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was performed examining the medical records of patients who had a HeartMate® (HMI, HMII, HMIII) LVAD implanted as a bridge to heart transplantation (BTT) or as destination therapy (DT) at the University Hospital, Linköping. RESULTS: Our main finding was a survival to heart transplantation rate of 82% among our BTT LVAD patients. The most common adverse event among our patients was infection. A higher frequency of temporary dialysis was seen in the HMII group compared to the HMI group, and the frequency of right ventricular failure was higher in our HMII material. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggests that patients requiring long-term LVAD support can safely have their device implanted and cared for at a non-transplant centre.

Young woman with breast cancer and cardiotoxicity with severe heart failure treated with a HeartMate IITM for nearly 6 years before heart transplantation.

Cardiotoxicity is a multifactorial problem, which has emerged with the improvement of cancer therapies and survival. Heart transplantation is relatively contraindicated in patients with breast cancer, until at least 5 years after complete remission. We present a case where a young woman who in 2001, at the age of 31, was diagnosed with breast cancer. She was considered cured, but 4 years later she suffered a relapse. During her second treatment, in 2006, she suffered from severe heart failure. She received a HeartMate II, as a long-term bridge to transplantation and 6 years later she was successfully transplanted. In this case report we discuss the use of mechanical circulatory support in cancer patients with drug-induced heart failure.

Acoustic analysis of a mechanical circulatory support.

Mechanical circulatory support technology is continually improving. However, adverse complications do occur with devastating consequences, for example, pump thrombosis that may develop in several parts of the pump system. The aim of this study was to design an experimental clot/thrombosis model to register and analyze acoustic signals from the left ventricular assist device (LVAD) HeartMate II (HMII) (Thoratec Corporation, Inc., Pleasanton, CA, USA) and detect changes in sound signals correlating to clots in the inflow, outflow, and pump housing. Using modern telecom techniques, it was possible to register and analyze the HMII pump-specific acoustic fingerprint in an experimental model of LVAD support using a mock loop. Increase in pump speed significantly (P<0.005) changed the acoustic fingerprint at certain frequency (0-23,000 Hz) intervals (regions: R1-3 and peaks: P1,3-4). When the ball valves connected to the tubing were narrowed sequentially by ∼50% of the inner diameter (to mimic clot in the out- and inflow tubing), the frequency spectrum changed significantly (P<0.005) in P1 and P2 and R1 when the outflow tubing was narrowed. This change was not seen to the same extent when the lumen of the ball valve connected to the inflow tube was narrowed by ∼50%. More significant (P<0.005) acoustic changes were detected in P1 and P2 and R1 and R3, with the largest dB figs. in the lower frequency ranges in R1 and P2, when artificial clots and blood clots passed through the pump system. At higher frequencies, a significant change in dB figs. in R3 and P4 was detected when clots passed through the pump system. Acoustic monitoring of pump sounds may become a valuable tool in LVAD surveillance.

Long-term left ventricular support in patients with a mechanical aortic valve.

OBJECTIVES: The presence of a mechanical prosthesis has been regarded as an increased risk of thromboembolic complications and as a relative contraindication for a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Five patients in our center had a mechanical aortic valve at the time of device implantation and were studied regarding thromboembolic complications. DESIGN: Five patients operated upon with an LVAD (1 HeartMate I™, 4 HeartMate II™) between 2002 and 2011 had a mechanical aortic valve at the time of implantation. The first patient had a patch closure of the aortic valve. In four patients, the prosthesis was left in place. Anticoagulants included aspirin, warfarin, and clopidogrel. RESULTS: The average and accumulated treatment times were 150 and 752 days, respectively. Three of the five patients showed early signs of valve thrombosis on echo with concomitant valve dysfunction. Four patients were transplanted without thromboembolic events during pump treatment. One patient died from a hemorrhagic stroke after 90 days on the LVAD. CONCLUSIONS: The strategy of leaving a mechanical heart valve in place at the time of LVAD implantation in five patients led to valvular thrombosis in three but did not provoke embolic events. It increased the complexity of postoperative anticoagulation.

Second harmonic echocardiography and spontaneous contrast during implantation of a left ventricular assist device.

Implantable mechanical left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are used as a bridge or alternative to heart transplantation. Peroperative transesophageal echocardiography is commonly applied during implantation. Significant air embolism may occur as a result of air leakage at connections and anastomoses when LV filling becomes inadequate, and this must be prevented. Early suspicion and detection of air is mandatory to avoid negative circulatory effects. We hypothesized that monitoring of heart chamber size and occurrence of single air bubbles using second harmonic imaging (SHI) echocardiography may prevent risk for significant air embolism. After implantation of the LVAD in 10 calves, invasive hemodynamic monitoring and epicardial SHI were performed while increasing pump speed. Air bubbles in the ascending aorta were monitored and the left heart visualized for off-line dimensional analysis. Detection of air bubbles in the ascending aorta preceded their appearance in the left ventricle. They occurred exclusively but not always after a decrease in left atrial (LA) size. Decrease in LA pressure did not predict bubble detection or reduction in LA size. We conclude that SHI detects spontaneous ultrasound contrast during implantation of a LVAD and that a decrease in LA size is a warning that air embolism is imminent.

A single center experience with the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device (LVAD).

OBJECTIVES: Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD), used in the setting bridge-to-transplantation and destination therapy, for patients with deteriorating severe heart failure are continuously developing. The second generation, the axial flow pumps, have been introduced since some years. DESIGN: Eleven consecutive patients, seven male, with severe heart failure due to ischemic cardiomyopathy (n=5), dilated cardiomyopathy (n=5) and cytotoxic etiology (n=1) were implanted with the HeartMate-II. They were preoperatively treated with inotropic support (n=9), ventricular assist device (n=2) and mechanical ventilation (n=4). RESULTS: Eight patients were bridged to transplant after median 155 days (range, 65 to 316 days). One patient is ongoing for 748 days, intended for destination therapy. Ten of eleven patients were discharged after median 64 days (range, 40 to 105 days). Four patients were reoperated due to bleeding. Two embolic events were recorded. One perioperative death. CONCLUSION: Eleven HM-II LVAD's have been implanted in our institution with good early results. Eight patients were successfully bridged to heart transplantation. One patient is intended for destination therapy and is ongoing since November 2006. In these severely ill patients, this technique offers a good chance surviving until heart transplantation. In selected cases the technique also offers the possibility of a permanent support and longevity.

Axial flow pump treatment during myocardial depression in calves: an invasive hemodynamic and echocardiographic tissue Doppler study.

The aim of this study was to investigate flow characteristics and myocardial function after implantation of an axial pump left ventricular assist device while varying afterload and during progressive myocardial depression. Ten calves were included, seven of which fulfilled the protocol. Invasive hemodynamic monitoring and echocardiography with color-coded systolic tissue Doppler velocity (TD velocity) were used during prepump conditions, at three different pump speeds, during modification of the systemic vascular resistance (SVR), and during increasing degrees of beta-blockade. The TD velocity decreased with the myocardial function whereas left ventricular size, fractional shortening, and pump speed did not correlate significantly with the TD velocity. The TD velocity correlated significantly with native stroke volume, heart rate, SVR and cardiac output but none of these alone could explain more than 20% of the changes in TD velocity. The axial flow pump studied is effective in unloading the severely depressed heart and has a high capacity for maintaining an adequate cardiac output, regardless of differing hemodynamic conditions, pump speed or decreasing LV function. Echocardiography with volumetric rendering and TD velocity imaging are valuable tools for monitoring and quantifying residual myocardial function during pump treatment.

Impella used for hemostasis by left ventricular unloading, in a case with left ventricular posterior wall rupture.

Left ventricle wall rupture is a feared complication in mitral valve surgery. We report a combined mitral valve anuloplasty and coronary artery bypass grafting procedure with severe, life-threatening bleeding complication due to left ventricular posterior wall rupture. The patient was successfully treated with a temporary left ventricular assist device to decompress the left ventricle in an attempt to minimize the bleeding, as the patient's condition did not allow standard repair of the left ventricle.

Risk factor analysis of Swedish Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) patients.

BACKGROUND: The use of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) is established as a bridge to heart transplantation. METHODS: All Swedish patients on the waiting list for heart transplantation, treated with LVAD since 1993 were retrospectively collected into a database and analyzed in regards to risk factors for mortality and morbidity. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients (46 men) with a median age of 49 years (range, 14 to 69 years), Higgins score median of 9 (range, 3 to 15), EuroScore median of 10 (range, 5 to 17) were investigated. Dominating diagnoses were dilated cardiomyopathy in 61% (n = 36) and ischemic cardiomyopathy in 18.6% (n = 11). The patients were supported with LVAD for a median time of 99.5 days (range, 1 to 873 days). Forty-five (76%) patients received transplants, and 3 (5.1%) patients were weaned from the device. Eleven patients (18.6%) died during LVAD treatment. Risk factor analysis for mortality before heart transplantation showed significance for a high total amount of autologous blood transfusions (p < 0.001), days on mechanical ventilation postoperatively (p < 0.001), prolonged postoperative intensive care unit stay (p = 0.007), and high central venous pressure 24 hours postoperatively and at the final measurement (p = 0.03 and 0.01, respectively). Mortality with LVAD treatment was 18.6% (n = 11). High C-reactive protein (p = 0.001), low mean arterial pressure (p = 0.03), and high cardiac index (p = 0.03) preoperatively were risk factors for development of right ventricular failure during LVAD treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The Swedish experience with LVAD as a bridge to heart transplantation was retrospectively collected into a database. This included data from transplant and nontransplant centers. Figures of mortality and morbidity in the database were comparable to international experience. Specific risk factors were difficult to define retrospectively as a result of different protocols for follow-up among participating centers.