RESUMO
Endometriosis affects a significant number of young premenopausal women. Quite apart from the medical challenges, endometriosis is a relevant burden for healthcare and social security systems. Standardized quality indicators for the treatment of endometriosis have not previously been systematically verified. The three-stage study QS ENDO was initiated to record and improve the reality and quality of care. One of its aims is to create quality indicators for the diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis. For the first stage of QS ENDO Real, letters were sent to all 1014 gynecological departments in the German-speaking area of Europe (the DACH region) which included a questionnaire as a means of surveying the current state of care. A total of 296 (29.2%) of the centers which received the questionnaire participated in the survey. The subsequent evaluation of the completed questionnaires showed that the majority of patients with endometriosis (around 60%, based on estimates from the data) are not treated in hospitals which have been certified by the SEF. The guidelines recommend the use of specific classification systems (rASRM, ENZIAN) but, depending on the level of care offered by the hospital, only around 44.4 to 66.4% of departments used the rASRM score and only 27% of hospitals used the ENZIAN classification system to describe deep-infiltrating endometriosis. When taking patients' medical history, some centers (6.6â-â17.9%) considered questions about leading symptoms such as dyschezia, dysuria and dyspareunia to be unimportant. QS ENDO Real has made it possible, for the first time, to get an overview of the reality of care provided to patients with endometriosis in the German-speaking areas of Europe. The findings indicate that several of the measures recommended in international guidelines as the gold standard of care are only used to treat some of the patients. In this respect, more efforts will be needed to provide more advanced training. The approach used for treatment must be guideline-based, also in not-certified centers, to improve the quality of care in the treatment of patients with endometriosis.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to assess the effect of 360mg magnesium oral substitution daily among pregnant women suffering from leg cramps in pregnancy, defined as painful cramps different from restless legs symptoms. STUDY DESIGN: In a double blind randomised controlled trial healthy pregnant women between 18 and 36 weeks of pregnancy suffering from painful leg cramps, at least twice a week, were invited to participate. Forty-five women were enrolled initially, 38 completed the treatment and were treated during 2 weeks with either magnesium (360mg=15mmol magnesium lactate and magnesium citrate, Nycoplus Magnesium), or placebo tablets. Serum magnesium and calcium were investigated together with urine magnesium and magnesium-creatinin ratio on day 1 and day 15. Frequency and intensity of leg cramps were recorded. The study was powered to detect a 50% reduction in leg cramps. RESULTS: Registration of pain frequency and intensity during the two study weeks demonstrated no significant differences between the two groups. Mean number and intensity of cramps were 9.5 (S.D. 5.1) and 13.2 (S.D. 6.5) in the magnesium group, compared to 7.7 (S.D. 4.7) and 11.4 (S.D. 8.5) in the placebo group. Baseline magnesium levels were 0.77 and 0.74mmol/L in the magnesium group and the placebo group, respectively No significant differences between the two groups, or within the groups, were found when comparing serum values of serum magnesium and total calcium at inclusion time and at the end of the treatment. There was a statistically significant increase in magnesium excretion in the magnesium treatment group (p<0.01). The number of dropouts was two in the treatment group and five in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: No significant effect on frequency or intensity of leg cramps in pregnant women of magnesium treatment with 360mg daily could be detected in this trial.
