Pain management after laparoscopic appendectomy: Comparative effectiveness of innovative pre-emptive analgesia using liposomal bupivacaine.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic appendectomy is standard of care for appendicitis in the US. Pain control that limits opioids is an important area of research given the opioid epidemic. This study examined post-appendectomy inpatient opioid use and pain scores following intraoperative use of liposomal bupivacaine (LB) versus non-liposomal bupivacaine. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 155 adults who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis. Patients were divided into four cohorts based on the analgesia administered: (i) bupivacaine hydrochloride (BH)± epinephrine; (ii) undiluted LB; (iii) LB diluted with normal saline; and (iv) LB diluted with BH. RESULTS: Baseline demographic/clinical attributes, intra-operative findings, and post-operative pain scores were equivalent across cohorts. Post-operative pre-discharge opioid use was higher in the BH vs. LB cohorts (mean 60.4 vs. 46.0, 35.5, and 30.4 morphine milligram equivalents, respectively; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-emptive analgesia with LB during laparoscopic appendectomy can reduce inpatient opioid use without significantly increasing post-operative pain scores.

Better with age? A comparison of geriatric and non-geriatric trauma patients' psychological outcomes 6 months post-injury.

This is the first study to compare both physical and psychological outcomes in geriatric and non-geriatric patients (n = 268) at baseline and 6 months post-trauma. Demographic, clinical, and psychological data, including screens for alcohol use, depressive symptoms, and post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) were collected from 67 geriatric patients (70.7 ± 8.0 years) and 201 non-geriatric patients (40.2 ± 12.8 years) admitted to a Level I trauma center for ≥ 24 h. Geriatric patients were significantly less likely to screen positive for alcohol use at baseline, and depression, PTSS, and alcohol use at follow-up. When not controlling for discharge to rehabilitation or nursing facility, geriatric patients had significantly lower odds of alcohol use at follow-up. There was no significant difference in injury severity, resilience, or pre-trauma psychological status between the two groups. Results indicate that geriatric trauma patients fare better than their younger counterparts at 6 months post-trauma on measures of alcohol use, depression, and PTSS. Screenings and interventions for both age groups could improve psychological health post-trauma, but younger patients may require additional attention.

The role of depression and social support on readmission rates within one year of traumatic injury.

OBJECTIVE: Hospital readmission rates have become a quality metric-particularly in trauma and acute care, where up to one third of individuals with traumatic injury return to the hospital. Thus, identifying predictors of readmission is a priority in an effort to reduce readmissions. Based on previous theoretical work, this study tests the utility of social support and depression in predicting readmissions up to one year after initial injury. METHOD: Data from 180 injured individuals admitted to a large, urban Level 1 trauma center were matched to a regional readmissions database. Logistic regression was used to assess whether social support levels or positive depression screens during initial trauma visit predicted unplanned (a) readmissions or (b) emergency/urgent outpatient visits. RESULTS: Within the sample, there were 32 total readmissions and 50 total emergency outpatient encounters following initial injury. Depression continued to be a risk factor for emergency outpatient visits only (OR = 2.75). Patients with greater social integration (OR = 0.78), more guidance (advice or information; OR = 0.72) and more reliable alliance (OR = 0.72) as forms of social support were less likely to readmit. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the utility of screening for depression and social support in predicting readmission within one year after traumatic injury. Future efforts should continue emphasizing the impact of initial depression and the need for patients to have trusted individuals in their lives to whom they can turn during recovery; doing so may lower the probability that patients return to hospital. (PsycINFO Database Record

Hospital-Based Health Care After Traumatic Brain Injury.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate trends of hospital-based health care utilization after admission to a level I trauma center after acute traumatic brain injury (TBI). DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Large urban trauma hospital and a hospital council data registry consisting of 88 member institutions (>150 hospitals) covering 15,000 square miles. PARTICIPANTS: All patients (N=5291) admitted to a level I trauma center between January 1, 2006, and June 30, 2014, who experienced an acute TBI based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision coding. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Included the incidence and type of select hospital-based services received. Analyses were also categorized based on demographic and injury-related information. RESULTS: Of the 5291 patients with newly acquired TBI who were admitted, 512 died, leaving 4779 patients for inclusion in the final analysis. Additional health care utilization from January 1, 2006, and June 30, 2014, was recorded for 3158 patients (66%), totaling 12,307 encounters, with a median of 3 encounters (interquartile range, 1-5) and a maximum of 102 encounters. Most nonadmission urgent or procedural visits (96%) and inpatient encounters (93%) occurred in the first year. Of all the additional encounters, 9769 visits were nonadmission urgent or procedural visits (79%) with a median charge of $1955. The most common type of encounter was elective (46%), followed by medical emergency (29%). Of the remaining 2538 inpatient encounters (21%), the mean length of stay was 6 days with a median charge of $28,450. Medical emergency (39%) and elective admissions (33%) again were the most common encounter type. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis encompasses health care utilization across the range of TBI severity and numerous hospital systems, allowing for a more comprehensive and objective identification of reasons for readmission. This represents an initial step to developing a preventive intervention to manage secondary complications postinjury.

Validation of a brief, two-question depression screen in trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: Increasingly, depression following traumatic injury is recognized as a complication of injury. Unlike mandated screening for risky alcohol use in trauma centers, screening for psychological risks is not required by the American College of Surgeons' Committee on Trauma. Limited resources and time constraints are commonly given reasons against routine screening. The purpose of this study was to determine if a two-item screen was as valid as an eight-question screen for depression. METHODS: A total of 421 patients were given the Patient Health Questionnaire 8 (PHQ-8) during initial hospitalization to assess depression in a prospective study at a Level I trauma center. A cutoff score of 10 or higher (possible range, 0-24) on the PHQ-8 is used as diagnostic for depression. The PHQ-2 (possible range, 0-6) is derived from the first two questions of the PHQ-8 and contains items assessing sad mood and loss of interest/pleasure during the previous 2 weeks. A cutoff score of 3 or higher was considered to be a positive screen result. Discriminatory ability of the PHQ-2 was calculated. RESULTS: The sample was predominantly male (65%) and white (67%). The majority (85%) sustained a blunt trauma, and the primary cause of injury was motor vehicle collision (37%), with a mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 11.6. A total of 142 patients (34%) were positive for depression on the PHQ-8. When comparing the PHQ-2 with the PHQ-8, a sensitivity of 76.1 and a specificity of 92.8 were found, as well as a positive predictive value of 84.4. CONCLUSION: The result of our study confirms that depression is a frequent condition (34%) among individuals who sustain physical injury. The PHQ-2 seems to have acceptable sensitivity and specificity to identify depression in this population. The use of a two-item screening questionnaire is a minimal addition to the evaluation of patients after injury, allowing for earlier intervention and better outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic study, level IV; prognostic/epidemiologic study, level III.

Evaluation and management of blunt traumatic aortic injury: a practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma.

BACKGROUND: Blunt traumatic aortic injury (BTAI) is the second most common cause of death in trauma patients. Eighty percent of patients with BTAI will die before reaching a trauma center. The issues of how to diagnose, treat, and manage BTAI were first addressed by the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) in the practice management guidelines on this topic published in 2000. Since that time, there have been advances in the management of BTAI. As a result, the EAST guidelines committee decided to develop updated guidelines for this topic using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework recently adopted by EAST. METHODS: A systematic review of the MEDLINE database using PubMed was performed. The search retrieved English language articles regarding BTAI from 1998 to 2013. Letters to the editor, case reports, book chapters, and review articles were excluded. Topics of investigation included imaging to diagnose BTAI, type of operative repair, and timing of operative repair. RESULTS: Sixty articles were identified. Of these, 51 articles were selected to construct the guidelines. CONCLUSION: There have been changes in practice since the publication of the previous guidelines in 2000. Computed tomography of the chest with intravenous contrast is strongly recommended to diagnose clinically significant BTAI. Endovascular repair is strongly recommended for patients without contraindications. Delayed repair of BTAI is suggested, with the stipulation that effective blood pressure control must be used in these patients.

Evaluation and management of blunt traumatic aortic injury: a practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma.

BACKGROUND: Blunt traumatic aortic injury (BTAI) is the second most common cause of death in trauma patients. Eighty percent of patients with BTAI will die before reaching a trauma center. The issues of how to diagnose, treat, and manage BTAI were first addressed by the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) in the practice management guidelines on this topic published in 2000. Since that time, there have been advances in the management of BTAI. As a result, the EAST guidelines committee decided to develop updated guidelines for this topic using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework recently adopted by EAST. METHODS: A systematic review of the MEDLINE database using PubMed was performed. The search retrieved English language articles regarding BTAI from 1998 to 2013. Letters to the editor, case reports, book chapters, and review articles were excluded. Topics of investigation included imaging to diagnose BTAI, type of operative repair, and timing of operative repair. RESULTS: Sixty articles were identified. Of these, 51 articles were selected to construct the guidelines. CONCLUSION: There have been changes in practice since the publication of the previous guidelines in 2000. Computed tomography of the chest with intravenous contrast is strongly recommended to diagnose clinically significant BTAI. Endovascular repair is strongly recommended for patients without contraindications. Delayed repair of BTAI is suggested, with the stipulation that effective blood pressure control must be used in these patients.

Psychological factors predicting outcome after traumatic injury: the role of resilience.

BACKGROUND: Increasingly, studies have examined the psychological impact on individuals who survive a traumatic physical injury. The primary aim of this study was to determine the stability of resilience and its association with depressive symptoms. METHODS: This study included 110 adults admitted to a Level I trauma center. Resilience and depression were measured at baseline and 12 months. Injury-related variables included Glasgow Coma Scale, Injury Severity Score, etiology of injury, and type of injury. RESULTS: Analysis revealed that resilience remained stable over 12 months regardless of injury severity, etiology, or type. Negative correlations were found between baseline resilience and 12-month depression (P < .01), as well as Glasgow Coma Scale and depression (P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Injured individuals with low resilience are more likely to be depressed at 12 months. Assessing resilience at the time of injury may be useful in identifying those at risk for depression 1 year later.

Predictors of PTSD symptoms in adults admitted to a Level I trauma center: a prospective analysis.

Trauma centers are an ideal point of intervention in efforts to prevent posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). In order to assist in the development of prevention efforts, this study sought to identify early predictors of PTSD symptoms among adults admitted to a Level I trauma center using a novel analytic strategy (Fournier et al., 2009). Upon admission, participants (N=327) were screened for PTSD symptoms and provided information on potential predictor variables. Their PTSD symptoms were assessed again 3 months later (N=227). Participants were classified as symptomatic (positive PTSD screen) or asymptomatic (negative PTSD screen) at the follow-up assessment. Multinomial logistic regression showed that age, depression, number of premorbid psychiatric disorders, gunshot wound, auto vs. pedestrian injury, and alcohol use predicted who had PTSD symptoms at FU with 76.3% accuracy. However, when controlling for PTSD severity at baseline, only age, number of premorbid psychiatric disorders, and gunshot wounds predicted PTSD symptoms at FU but with 78.5% accuracy. These findings suggest that psychological prevention efforts in trauma centers may be best directed toward adults who are young, have premorbid psychiatric disorders, and those admitted with gunshot wounds.

Posttraumatic stress disorder following traumatic injury at 6 months: associations with alcohol use and depression.

BACKGROUND: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is progressively recognized as a psychological morbidity in injured patients. Participants in a longitudinal study were identified as PTSD positive or PTSD negative at 6 months following injury. Risky alcohol use, depression, demographic, and injury-related variables were explored. METHODS: This prospective cohort included patients 18 years or older, admitted to our Level I trauma center. Outcome measures included PTSD Checklist-Civilian Version (PCL-C), Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT-C), and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8). Demographic and injury variables were collected. RESULTS: A total of 211 participants enrolled in the study, and 118 participants completed measures at both baseline and 6 months. Of the participants, 25.4% (n = 30) screened positive for PTSD at 6 months. The entire sample showed a decline in risky alcohol use at 6 months (p = 0.0043). All PTSD-positive participants at 6 months were also positive for depression (p < 0.0001). For the entire sample, there was a 10% increase in depression from baseline to 6 months (p = 0.03). However, for those participants who were PTSD positive at 6 months, there was a 53% increase in depression from baseline (p = 0.0002) as compared with the group at 6 months without PTSD. Statistically significant differences were found between PTSD-positive and PTSD-negative participants regarding age (40.1 [15.9] vs. 50.9 [18.2], p = 0.0047), male (77% vs. 50%, p = 0.0109), penetrating injury (30% vs. 4%, p < 0.0001), PTSD history (17% vs. 4%, p = 0.0246), or other psychiatric condition (63% vs. 19%, p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION: PTSD was not associated with risky alcohol use at 6 months. Surprisingly, risky alcohol use declined in both groups. Incidence of PTSD (25.4%, n = 30) and risky alcohol use (25%, n = 29) were equal at 6 months. Although the American College of Surgeons' Committee on Trauma requires brief screening and intervention for risky alcohol use owing to societal impact, reinjury rates, and cost effectiveness, our study suggests that screening for psychological conditions may be equally important. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic study, level III.

Clamping thoracostomy tubes: a heretical notion?

To determine the safety and complications of chest tube clamping, a retrospective chart review was conducted at Baylor University Medical Center's level I trauma center. The records of 243 patients with pneumothoraces, hemothoraces, or a combination were identified and analyzed; 134 patients underwent clamping according to the care path, and 109 did not. The demographic characteristics of age, gender, and mechanism of injury were similar in both groups, as was the frequency of pneumothoraces, hemothoraces, and combined hemo/pneumothoraces. Subsequent radiographs showing recurrence or patient symptoms were noted in 13 patients (9.7%), requiring unclamping. Nine patients (6.7%) who had passed the clamping trial prior to removal required reinsertion of a chest tube due to recurrent pneumothoraces. One clamped patient required urgent insertion of a second thoracostomy tube due to occlusive thrombus within the residing chest tube. No deaths were documented as a result of the care path or of clamping. Overall, the clamped chest tube allows for more definitive assessment of persistent occult air leaks based on a 6-hour chest radiograph and avoidance of premature removal and did not appear to have any adverse effects on patient safety. Further refinements of the clamping procedure may be needed, as some patients still required reinsertion despite an absence of pneumothorax after a 6-hour clamping trial. Given these data, a prospective study with clamping is warranted to evaluate whether or not such a system can increase the speed with which chest tubes are removed and decrease the length of stay while maintaining patient safety.

Active intravascular rewarming for hypothermia associated with traumatic injury: early experience with a new technique.

Hypothermia is a significant contributor to mortality in severely injured patients. Rewarming is an enormous challenge, especially in those who require operative or angiographic intervention. In this patient population, external warming methods are only capable of reducing further heat loss, whereas active rewarming adds heat to the body's core but is invasive. This article analyzes our initial experience with a minimally invasive, continuous, automated, and easily portable intravascular rewarming technique using the Alsius Corporation's CoolGard system. The records of 11 hypothermic critically injured patients presenting to our level 1 trauma center over a 6-month period were reviewed. The patients' mean age was 39 +/- 22 years, 7 (64%) were male, and 7 (64%) had blunt mechanisms of injury. The mean injury severity score was 40 +/- 16, and the mean initial systolic blood pressure was 91 +/- 60 mm Hg. The mean core temperature at the initiation of rewarming was 33.6 +/- 1.0 degrees C, and the mean rewarming rate was 1.5 +/- 1.0 degrees C/h. Six patients died (55%), two of acute exsanguination and four of unsurvivable traumatic brain injuries. One patient developed a deep vein thrombosis at the femoral catheter site and experienced a nonfatal pulmonary embolus. Our experience demonstrates that active intravascular balloon-catheter rewarming represents a practical, automated technique for the immediate and continuous treatment of hypothermia in all phases of the acute care of trauma patients.