The Role of Social Determinants of Health in the Use of Telemedicine for Asthma in Children.

Asthma is the most common chronic health condition among children in the United States. The adverse impacts of social determinants of health often manifest in unmet health-related social needs, potentially contributing to worse asthma outcomes. With the onset and rapid spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and the identification of asthma as a potential risk factor for more severe disease, our asthma program quickly pivoted to a remote-access telemedicine asthma population management platform to best meet the needs of our most at-risk patients. Our practice provides care to a large proportion of Black and Latino/a/e children in urban areas insured by the State Medicaid Program and impacted by unmet social needs. As we pivoted to telemedicine, we consistently reached a greater number of patients and families than prepandemic and observed decreased emergency department visits and hospitalizations. About 1 in 5 families received resource touch points spanning categories of transportation, food and supplies, clothing, utilities, and rent. Overall, families reported positive experiences with telemedicine, including the ability to connect remotely with our social work and resource teams. Telemedicine may be an effective strategy for addressing both the medical and the social needs of children with asthma at risk for worse outcomes.

A Group Visit for High-Risk Pediatric Asthma Patients: A Quality Improvement Initiative to Improve Asthma Care.

INTRODUCTION: Asthma disproportionately affects poor and minority children. Limited parental knowledge and confidence in asthma management, as well as stress from chronic illness, may contribute to poor outcomes. Novel approaches for providing care are essential for this vulnerable population. Our objective was to evaluate the feasibility and impact of an asthma group visit for high-risk children. METHODS: Our primary care practice cares for more than 2600 children with asthma. The majority have public insurance. Children classified as high risk (≥1 asthma-related emergency department visit/hospitalization in the preceding 2 years) were eligible. Children received brief physical examinations, medication review, and updated Asthma Action Plans. Educational sessions were held for children and parents. Pre and post surveys were used to assess parents' experience and changes in confidence in asthma management. RESULTS: Twenty children and their parents participated. Mean parent confidence scores (5-point Likert-type scale, 5 indicating greatest confidence) improved in managing their child's asthma symptoms (3.60, 4.40, P ≤ .005), managing their child's asthma medications (3.85, 4.30, P ≤ .005), using their child's Asthma Action Plan (3.79, 4.45, P ≤ .02), communicating with the school about their child's food allergies (4.32, 4.72, P ≤ .03), and helping their child relax to reduce emotional triggers of asthma (3.25, 4.47, P ≤ .01). All families reported that they would return to a group visit. CONCLUSION: Group visits are feasible for providing care, education, and peer support to a vulnerable population. Parents expressed satisfaction and improved confidence in aspects of asthma management. Group visits have the potential to improve asthma outcomes for high-risk families.