Interplay Of Serum Bilirubin and Tobacco Smoking with Lung and Head and Neck Cancers in a Diverse, EHR-linked Los Angeles Biobank.

Background: Bilirubin is a potent antioxidant with a protective role in many diseases. We examined the relationships between serum bilirubin (SB) levels, tobacco smoking (a known cause of low SB), and aerodigestive cancers, grouped as lung cancers (LC) and head and neck cancers (HNC). Methods: We examined the associations between SB, LC, and HNC using data from 393,210 participants from a real-world, diverse, de-identified data repository and biobank linked to the UCLA Health system. We employed regression models, propensity score matching, and polygenic scores to investigate the associations and interactions between SB, tobacco smoking, LC, and HNC. Results: Current tobacco smokers showed lower SB (-0.04mg/dL, 95% CI: [-0.04, -0.03]), compared to never-smokers. Lower SB levels were observed in HNC and LC cases (-0.10 mg/dL, [-0.13, -0.09] and - 0.09 mg/dL, CI [-0.1, -0.07] respectively) compared to cancer-free controls with the effect persisting after adjusting for smoking. SB levels were inversely associated with HNC and LC risk (ORs per SD change in SB: 0.64, CI [0.59,0.69] and 0.57, CI [0.43,0.75], respectively). Lastly, a polygenic score (PGS) for SB was associated with LC (OR per SD change of SB-PGS: 0.71, CI [0.67, 0.76]). Conclusions: Low SB levels are associated with an increased risk of both HNC and LC, independent of the effect of tobacco smoking. Additionally, tobacco smoking demonstrated a strong interaction with SB on LC risk. Lastly, genetically predicted low SB (using a polygenic score) is negatively associated with LC. These findings suggest that SB could serve as a potential early and low-cost biomarker for LC and HNC. The interaction with tobacco smoking suggests that smokers with lower bilirubin could likely be at higher risk for LC compared to never smokers, suggesting the utility of SB in risk stratification for patients at risk for LC. Lastly, the results of the polygenic score analyses suggest potential shared biological pathways between the genetic control of SB and the risk of LC development.

Interplay Of Serum Bilirubin and Tobacco Smoking with Lung and Head and Neck Cancers in a Diverse, EHR-linked Los Angeles Biobank.

Background: Bilirubin is a potent antioxidant with a protective role in many diseases. We examined the relationships between serum bilirubin (SB) levels, tobacco smoking (a known cause of low SB), and aerodigestive cancers, grouped as lung (LC) and head and neck (HNC). Methods: We examined the associations between SB, LC and HNC using data from 393,210 participants from UCLA Health, employing regression models, propensity score matching, and polygenic scores. Results: Current tobacco smokers showed lower SB (-0.04mg/dL, 95% CI: [-0.04, -0.03]), compared to never-smokers. Lower SB levels were observed in HNC and LC cases (-0.10 mg/dL, [-0.13, -0.09] and -0.09 mg/dL, CI [-0.1, -0.07] respectively) compared to cancer-free controls with the effect persisting after adjusting for smoking. SB levels were inversely associated with HNC and LC risk (ORs per SD change in SB: 0.64, CI [0.59,0.69] and 0.57, CI [0.43,0.75], respectively). Lastly, a polygenic score (PGS) for SB was associated with LC (OR per SD change of SB-PGS: 0.71, CI [0.67, 0.76]). Conclusions: Low SB levels are associated with an increased risk of both HNC and LC, independent of the effect of tobacco smoking with tobacco smoking demonstrating a strong interaction with SB on LC risk. Additionally, genetically predicted low SB (from polygenic scores) is negatively associated with LC. Impact: These findings suggest that SB could serve as a potential early biomarker for LC and HNC.

Disease risk and healthcare utilization among ancestrally diverse groups in the Los Angeles region.

An individual's disease risk is affected by the populations that they belong to, due to shared genetics and environmental factors. The study of fine-scale populations in clinical care is important for identifying and reducing health disparities and for developing personalized interventions. To assess patterns of clinical diagnoses and healthcare utilization by fine-scale populations, we leveraged genetic data and electronic medical records from 35,968 patients as part of the UCLA ATLAS Community Health Initiative. We defined clusters of individuals using identity by descent, a form of genetic relatedness that utilizes shared genomic segments arising due to a common ancestor. In total, we identified 376 clusters, including clusters with patients of Afro-Caribbean, Puerto Rican, Lebanese Christian, Iranian Jewish and Gujarati ancestry. Our analysis uncovered 1,218 significant associations between disease diagnoses and clusters and 124 significant associations with specialty visits. We also examined the distribution of pathogenic alleles and found 189 significant alleles at elevated frequency in particular clusters, including many that are not regularly included in population screening efforts. Overall, this work progresses the understanding of health in understudied communities and can provide the foundation for further study into health inequities.

Genotype error due to low-coverage sequencing induces uncertainty in polygenic scoring.

Polygenic scores (PGSs) have emerged as a standard approach to predict phenotypes from genotype data in a wide array of applications from socio-genomics to personalized medicine. Traditional PGSs assume genotype data to be error-free, ignoring possible errors and uncertainties introduced from genotyping, sequencing, and/or imputation. In this work, we investigate the effects of genotyping error due to low coverage sequencing on PGS estimation. We leverage SNP array and low-coverage whole-genome sequencing data (lcWGS, median coverage 0.04×) of 802 individuals from the Dana-Farber PROFILE cohort to show that PGS error correlates with sequencing depth (p = 1.2 × 10-7). We develop a probabilistic approach that incorporates genotype error in PGS estimation to produce well-calibrated PGS credible intervals and show that the probabilistic approach increases classification accuracy by up to 6% as compared to traditional PGSs that ignore genotyping error. Finally, we use simulations to explore the combined effect of genotyping and effect size errors and their implication on PGS-based risk-stratification. Our results illustrate the importance of considering genotyping error as a source of PGS error especially for cohorts with varying genotyping technologies and/or low-coverage sequencing.

Polygenic scoring accuracy varies across the genetic ancestry continuum.

Polygenic scores (PGSs) have limited portability across different groupings of individuals (for example, by genetic ancestries and/or social determinants of health), preventing their equitable use1-3. PGS portability has typically been assessed using a single aggregate population-level statistic (for example, R2)4, ignoring inter-individual variation within the population. Here, using a large and diverse Los Angeles biobank5 (ATLAS, n = 36,778) along with the UK Biobank6 (UKBB, n = 487,409), we show that PGS accuracy decreases individual-to-individual along the continuum of genetic ancestries7 in all considered populations, even within traditionally labelled 'homogeneous' genetic ancestries. The decreasing trend is well captured by a continuous measure of genetic distance (GD) from the PGS training data: Pearson correlation of -0.95 between GD and PGS accuracy averaged across 84 traits. When applying PGS models trained on individuals labelled as white British in the UKBB to individuals with European ancestries in ATLAS, individuals in the furthest GD decile have 14% lower accuracy relative to the closest decile; notably, the closest GD decile of individuals with Hispanic Latino American ancestries show similar PGS performance to the furthest GD decile of individuals with European ancestries. GD is significantly correlated with PGS estimates themselves for 82 of 84 traits, further emphasizing the importance of incorporating the continuum of genetic ancestries in PGS interpretation. Our results highlight the need to move away from discrete genetic ancestry clusters towards the continuum of genetic ancestries when considering PGSs.