Effect of pioglitazone on the metabolic and hormonal response to a mixed meal in type II diabetes.

We explored the mechanisms by which a 4-month, placebo-controlled pioglitazone treatment (45 mg/day) improves glycemic control in type II diabetic patients (T2D, n=27) using physiological testing (6-h mixed meal) and a triple tracer technique ([6,6-(2)H(2)]glucose infusion, (2)H(2)O and [6-(3)H]glucose ingestion) to measure endogenous glucose production (EGP), gluconeogenesis (GNG), insulin-mediated glucose clearance and beta-cell glucose sensitivity (by c-peptide modeling). Compared to sex/age/weight-matched non-diabetic controls, T2D patients showed inappropriately (for prevailing insulinemia) raised glucose production (1.05[0.53] vs 0.71[0.36]mmol min(-1) kg(ffm)(-1) pM, P=0.03) because of enhanced GNG (73.1+/-2.4 vs 59.5+/-3.6%, P<0.01) persisting throughout the meal, reduced insulin-mediated glucose clearance (6[5] vs 12[13]ml min(-1) kg(ffm)(-1) nM(-1), P<0.005), and impaired beta-cell glucose-sensitivity (27[38] vs 71[37]pmol min(-1) m(-2) mM(-1), P=0.002). Compared to placebo, pioglitazone improved glucose overproduction (P=0.0001), GNG and glucose underutilization (P=0.05) despite lower insulinemia. GNG improvement was quantitatively related to raised adiponectin. beta-cell glucose sensitivity was unchanged. In mild-to-moderate T2D, pioglitazone monotherapy decreased fasting and post-prandial glycemia, principally via inhibition of gluconeogenesis, improved hepatic and peripheral insulin resistance.

Predominant role of reduced beta-cell sensitivity to glucose over insulin resistance in impaired glucose tolerance.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) is an insulin-resistant state and a risk factor for Type 2 diabetes. The relative roles of insulin resistance and insulin deficiency in IGT have been disputed. METHODS: In 40 IGT subjects and 63 sex-, age-, and weight-matched controls with normal glucose tolerance (NGT), we measured (i) indices of insulin sensitivity of fasting glucose production (by tracer glucose) and glucose disposal (M value on a 240 pmol x min(-1) x m(-2) insulin clamp) and (ii) indices of beta-cell function (glucose sensitivity, rate sensitivity, and potentiation) derived from model analysis (Am J Physiol 283:E1159-E1166, 2002) of the insulin secretory response (by C-peptide deconvolution) to oral glucose. RESULTS: In comparison with NGT, IGT were modestly insulin resistant (M=29+/-2 vs 35+/-2 micromol x min(-1) x kg(FFM)(-1), p=0.01); insulin sensitivity of glucose production also was reduced, in approximate proportion to M. Despite higher baseline insulin secretion rates, IGT was characterized by a 50% reduction in glucose sensitivity [53 (36) vs 102 (123) pmol x min(-1) x m(-2) x mM(-1), median (interquartile range), p=0.001] and impaired potentiation [1.6 (0.8) vs 2.0 (1.5) units, p<0.04] of insulin release, whereas rate sensitivity [1.15 (1.15) vs 1.38 (1.28) nmol x m(-2) x mM(-1)] was not significantly reduced. Glucose sensitivity made the single largest contribution (approximately 50%) to the observed variability of glucose tolerance. CONCLUSION/INTERPRETATION: In IGT the defect in glucose sensitivity of insulin release quantitatively predominates over insulin resistance in the genesis of the reduced tolerance to oral glucose.

Effect of physiological hyperinsulinemia on gluconeogenesis in nondiabetic subjects and in type 2 diabetic patients.

Gluconeogenesis (GNG) is enhanced in type 2 diabetes. In experimental animals, insulin at high doses decreases the incorporation of labeled GNG precursors into plasma glucose. Whether physiological hyperinsulinemia has any effect on total GNG in humans has not been determined. We combined the insulin clamp with the (2)H(2)O technique to measure total GNG in 33 subjects with type 2 diabetes (BMI 29.0 +/- 0.6 kg/m(2), fasting plasma glucose 8.1 +/- 0.3 mmol/l) and in 9 nondiabetic BMI-matched subjects after 16 h of fasting and after euglycemic hyperinsulinemia. A primed-constant infusion of 6,6-(2)H-glucose was used to monitor endogenous glucose output (EGO); insulin (40 mU. min(-1). m(-2)) was then infused while clamping plasma glucose for 2 h (at 5.8 +/- 0.1 and 4.9 +/- 0.2 mmol/l for diabetic and control subjects, respectively). In the fasting state, EGO averaged 15.2 +/- 0.4 micromol. min(-1). kg(-1)(ffm) (62% from GNG) in diabetic subjects and 12.2 +/- 0.7 micromol. min(-1). kg(-1)(ffm) (55% from GNG) in control subjects (P < 0.05 or less for both fluxes). Glycogenolysis (EGO - GNG) was similar in the two groups (P = NS). During the last 40 min of the clamp, both EGO and GNG were significantly (P < 0.01 or less, compared with fasting) inhibited (EGO 7.1 +/- 0.9 and 3.6 +/- 0.5 and GNG 7.9 +/- 0.5 and 4.5 +/- 1.0 respectively) but remained significantly (P < 0.05) higher in diabetic subjects, whereas glycogenolysis was suppressed completely and equally in both groups. During hyperinsulinemia, GNG micromol. min(-1). kg(-1)(ffm) in diabetic and control subjects, was reciprocally related to plasma glucose clearance. In conclusion, physiological hyperinsulinemia suppresses GNG by approximately 20%, while completely blocking glycogenolysis. Resistance of GNG (to insulin suppression) and resistance of glucose uptake (to insulin stimulation) are coupled phenomena. In type 2 diabetes, the excess GNG of the fasting state is carried over to the insulinized state, thereby contributing to glucose overproduction under both conditions.

Influence of obesity and type 2 diabetes on gluconeogenesis and glucose output in humans: a quantitative study.

The contribution of gluconeogenesis (GNG) to endogenous glucose output (EGO) in type 2 diabetes is controversial. Little information is available on the separate influence of obesity on GNG. We measured percent GNG (by the 2H2O technique) and EGO (by 6,6-[2H]glucose) in 37 type 2 diabetic subjects (9 lean and 28 obese, mean fasting plasma glucose [FPG] 8.3 +/- 0.3 mmol/l) and 18 control subjects (6 lean and 12 obese) after a 15-h fast. Percent GNG averaged 47 +/- 5% in lean control subjects and was significantly increased in association with both obesity (P < 0.01) and diabetes (P = 0.004). By multivariate analysis, percent GNG was independently associated with BMI (partial r = 0.27, P < 0.05, with a predicted increase of 0.9% per BMI unit) and FPG (partial r = 0.44, P = 0.0009, with a predicted increase of 2.7% per mmol/l of FPG). In contrast, EGO was increased in both lean and obese diabetic subjects (15.6 +/- 0.5 micromol x min(-1) x kg(-1) of fat-free mass, n = 37, P = 0.002) but not in obese nondiabetic control subjects (13.1 0.7, NS) as compared with lean control subjects (12.4 +/- 1.4). Consequently, gluconeogenic flux (percent GNG x EGO) was increased in obesity (P = 0.01) and markedly elevated in diabetic subjects (P = 0.0004), whereas glycogenolytic flux was reduced only in association with obesity (P = 0.05). Fasting plasma glucagon levels were significantly increased in diabetic subjects (P < 0.05) and positively related to EGO, whereas plasma insulin was higher in obese control subjects than lean control subjects (P = 0.05) and unrelated to measured glucose fluxes. We conclude that the percent contribution of GNG to glucose release after a 15-h fast is independently and quantitatively related to the degree of overweight and the severity of fasting hyperglycemia. In obese individuals, reduced glycogenolysis ensures a normal rate of glucose output. In diabetic individuals, hyperglucagonemia contributes to inappropriately elevated rates of glucose output from both GNG and glycogenolysis.