Low socio-economic status is a newly identified independent risk factor for poor vitamin D status in severely obese adults.

BACKGROUND: Hypovitaminosis D is very prevalent, especially in the obese population. However, the degree of severity and the parameters involved in vitamin D deficiency in this population are still unclear. The present study aimed to identify, from among the factors known to influence vitamin D status in a healthy population, those impacting the same parameter in obese population. METHODS: Serum 25-OH-D concentration was measured in 564 patients with class III obesity [i.e. severe and morbid obesity; mean (SD) body mass index (BMI) 42.04 (6.92) kg m-2 ] and their demographic, clinical, biological, anthropometric, dietary and socio-economic data were collected. RESULTS: We observed that 96% of the obese patients had serum 25-OH-D lower than 30 ng mL-1 . Severe vitamin D deficiency (serum 25-OH-D concentration <10 ng mL-1 ) affected 35% of this population. We found an inverse relationship between 25-OH-D levels and BMI (P = 0.012), fat mass (P = 0.041), metabolic syndrome (P < 0.0001), fasting blood glucose (P = 0.023), homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance (P = 0.008), waist circumference (P = 0.001), and fasting blood triglycerides (P = 0.002) and C-reactive protein (P = 0.005). Low socio-economic status independently increased the risk of severe vitamin D deficiency [odds ratio (OR) = 1.98; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25-3.13], especially in the autumn-winter season (OR = 2.94; 95% CI 1.98-4.36), morbid obesity (OR = 3.19; 95% CI 1.49-6.82), metabolic syndrome (OR = 1.6; 95% CI 1.06-2.42) and inflammation (OR = 1.03; 95% CI 1.01-1.06). CONCLUSIONS: Vitamin D deficiency is extremely common among obese patients, and the prevalence of severe deficiency is high. The association of adiposity, high body mass index, metabolic syndrome and inflammation with vitamin D status is marked, whereas low socio-economic status appears to be a major risk factor for severe vitamin D deficiency, suggesting that vitamin D deficiency may at least in part be responsible for the greater health vulnerability of populations with low socio-economic status.

Rates of progression of weight and forced vital capacity as relevant measurement to adapt amyotrophic lateral sclerosis management for patient Result of a French multicentre cohort survey.

OBJECTIVES: To compare survival, to describe the progression of anthropometry, pulmonary capacity and functioning in ALS (Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis) and to identify the most relevant variables to adapt ALS management for patients. METHODS: A cohort study was performed in French ALS centres between January 2003 and July 2005. Eligible patients were treated by Riluzole and had a slow vital capacity (SVC) or a forced vital capacity (FVC) at least equal to 60%. Demographic, medical and ALS characteristics were registered. Manual Muscular Testing (MMT) and ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS) were performed. Kaplan Meier method was used to analyse survival. ALS progression was measured by the percentage weight, FVC, SVC, MMT and ALSFRS loss and was analysed as longitudinal data using mixed model. RESULTS: Three hundred and eighty three patients were included. The median survival since ALS diagnosis was 2.34 years (95%CI 2.10-2.65). Mixed model analyses revealed a more significant worsening progression of weight and FVC loss for bulbar onset. The drop of ALSFRS and SVC is similar whatever the ALS forms. CONCLUSIONS: Rates of progression of weight and FVC should be regularly watched over to support neurologists to adapt ALS management for patients.

Screening for deprivation using the EPICES score: a tool for detecting patients at high risk of diabetic complications and poor quality of life.

AIM: Deprivation has been linked to more complicated and uncontrolled diabetes. The validated Évaluation de la précarité et des inégalités de santé dans les centres d'examens de santé (EPICES; Evaluation of the Deprivation and Inequalities of Health in Healthcare Centres) score could help to identify such deprived patients. The present study evaluated the relationships between deprivation and prevalence of complications, uncontrolled diabetes and quality of life. METHODS: This prospective study was conducted in the diabetology department of a tertiary university hospital from November 2006 to July 2007. Patients with diabetes were divided into two groups, according to their deprivation status [non-deprived: EPICES score<30.17; deprived: EPICES score≥30.17 (56.5%)]. Diabetes control, complications and quality of life [Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)] were compared in the two groups. RESULTS: Of a total of 102 patients, 97 completed all of the questionnaires: 18 had type 1 diabetes and 79 had type 2 diabetes, in a geographical area moderately affected by deprivation. No statistical relationship could be demonstrated between deprivation and HbA(1c). Deprived patients with diabetes presented with higher levels of fasting blood glucose, lower levels of LDL cholesterol and a significantly higher risk of obesity (P=0.0020). As for complications, microalbuminuria was linked to deprivation (P=0.03), but no associations with other complications were found. Quality of life was poorer for all physical, mental and social dimensions in deprived patients. CONCLUSION: In this diabetic population, deprivation and glycaemic control were not associated. However, more deprived subjects with diabetes were at higher risk of renal disease. A deprived state was related to an altered quality of life as assessed by the SF-36 score.