Cost-effectiveness analysis of empagliflozin treatment in people with Type 2 diabetes and established cardiovascular disease in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial.

AIM: In the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial, empagliflozin therapy reduced cardiovascular death by 38% compared with placebo when added to standard of care. Using the trial results, we created a discrete-event simulation model to assess lifetime health economic outcomes in people with Type 2 diabetes and established cardiovascular disease. METHODS: Time-dependent survival regression analysis was performed on data from EMPA-REG OUTCOME for 10 cardiovascular and renal events (e.g. stroke, heart failure hospitalization, macroalbuminuria, cardiovascular mortality) to capture event rates over time, and interaction between events. Model performance was assessed by comparing predicted and observed outcomes at 3 years. Costs in the United Kingdom (UK) and health utilities were obtained from published literature. Outcomes included cumulative event rates, life-years, costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). RESULTS: The model predicted an 18% relative increase (by 2.1 life-years) in survival for empagliflozin (14.0 life-years) vs. standard of care (11.9 life-years), attributable to direct treatment effect on cardiovascular mortality, and to indirect effect via reductions in other events. Participants treated with empagliflozin may experience improved quality of life (1.0 QALY) and higher costs (£3737/participant), yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £4083/QALY. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these results to changes in input parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Based on extrapolation of EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial data using a participant-level simulation model, empagliflozin in addition to standard of care is projected to be highly cost-effective using UK healthcare costs. The impact in other countries will vary due to differences in drug pricing and accrual of other costs. (Clinical Trial Registry No: NCT01131676).

Diagnosis of impaired glucose tolerance in hypertensive patients in daily clinical practice.

Many patients with hypertension suffer from impaired glucose tolerance or type 2 diabetes mellitus. Although these diagnoses are generally simple and reliable, it is more difficult to diagnose impaired glucose tolerance. As the gold standard (oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)) is complicated to perform, a simpler alternative would be useful. The aims of the Pre-Diabetes Score study are to correlate demographic and/or laboratory parameters that are clinically simple to determine with the results of the OGTT and to determine the diagnostic significance of the combinations of parameters with regard to impaired glucose tolerance. A total of 260 patients were included in the evaluation; 39% had impaired glucose tolerance and 12% had diabetes mellitus. A combination of HbA1c of > or =6%, a venous fasting glucose of > or =110 mg/dl, an age of > or =55 years, a systolic blood pressure of > or =140 mmHg and an enlarged waist size is highly predictive of impaired glucose tolerance.

Comparison of safety and efficacy of carvedilol and metoprolol in stable angina pectoris.

In a double-blind, randomized, 3-month multicenter study, the safety and tolerability and the antianginal and anti-ischemic efficacy of carvedilol 25 to 50 mg twice daily were assessed in comparison with metoprolol 50 to 100 mg twice daily in younger and elderly patients with stable angina. After a 7-day placebo run-in at the end of which a symptom-limited bicycle ergometric exercise was performed, 368 patients were randomly allocated to the parallel treatment groups. After 4 weeks of therapy with a low dose, a further exercise test was performed and patients were titrated in single-blind fashion to the higher dose if the increase in total exercise time was < 1 minute, and there was no safety concern. After a further 8 weeks of treatment a third exercise test was performed. Carvedilol low dose/high dose was shown to be at least as safe and well tolerated as metoprolol low dose/high dose both in younger and elderly patients. There were no hitherto unknown adverse events and no marked change in the types of events after increase of the doses. Early adverse events after treatment initiation or uptitration were equal with both medications, indicating no particular risk associated with carvedilol's vasodilatory action. No rebound phenomena were observed. Both drugs showed good antianginal and anti-ischemic efficacy, with marked increases on uptitration including patients > or = 65 years of age. However, in the doses selected, which appeared equipotent with respect to beta blockade, carvedilol's improvement of time to 1-mm ST-segment depression was statistically significantly greater than that of metoprolol. This could be due to its additional vasodilatory or antioxidative actions. Based on the safety and efficacy data of the present study, use of the higher of the 2 recommended doses of carvedilol and metoprolol appears justified in younger and elderly patients without adequate therapeutic control at lower doses.

Therapeutic use of the natriuretic peptide ularitide in acute renal failure.

BACKGROUND: Ularitide is a member of the natriuretic peptide family. This hormone exhibits an N-terminal extension by four amino acids compared with atrial natriuretic peptide. Ularitide was shown to exert strong diuretic and natriuretic effects when infused intravenously. Its main action sites are the glomerulum, inducing preglomerular vasodilation and postglomerular vasoconstriction and thereby elevating the glomerular filtration rate, and the tubular system inhibiting Na(+)-reabsorption. In initial uncontrolled clinical trials, this peptide was shown to have beneficial effects in patients suffering from oliguric acute renal failure. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, dose-finding trial recruiting 176 patients randomized into 4 different Ularitide doses groups (U5, U20, U40, and U80 ng/kg/min) and a placebo group (U0). Ularitide/placebo infusion was performed for 5 days with half the originally infused dose on day 5. The primary objective of the study was to test various doses of Ularitide in patients suffering from oliguric acute renal failure to avoid mechanical renal replacement therapy during the first 12 hours. FINDINGS: The results indicate that Ularitide does not reduce the incidence of mechanical renal replacement therapy compared with placebo-treated patients during the first 12 h of treatment (U0: 36 (20), U5: 35 (11), U20: 36 (9), U40: 28 (8), U80: 41 (12), (% (n) (p = 0.87)). Diuresis increased in the Ularitide-treated groups and the placebo group after onset of infusion and did not show any significant difference in the first 12 h collection period (U0: 576, U5: 514, U20: 500, U40: 360, U80: 158 ML/12h (Median), (p = 0.16)). INTERPRETATION: In summary, the incidence of mechanical renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients suffering from oliguric acute renal failure could not be altered positively by Ularitide administration according to our protocol. Further prospective clinical trials are needed to answer the question whether a different patient collective or a prophylactic administration of Ularitide are more promising approaches in the clinical setting of oliguric acute renal failure.

Effect of reteplase on hemostasis variables: analysis of fibrin specificity, relation to bleeding complications and coronary patency.

UNLABELLED: The first aim of the present study was to characterize the systemic and fibrin-specific lytic effect of reteplase in the treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction. The second aim was to investigate the relation of hemostasis variables to risk of bleeding complications and to coronary patency. The present study is a hemostatic substudy of the German Recombinant Activator Study. Forty two patients have been treated with 10 MU of reteplase (Group A) and 100 patients with 15 MU of reteplase (Group B), given as a single bolus. Blood samples for assessment of fibrinogen, plasminogen, alpha-2-antiplasmin, fibrinogen degradation products (FDP) and D-dimers were obtained before and at 2, 4, 8, and 24 h after thrombolytic therapy. The median fibrinogen concentration was decreased from 279 to 169 mg/dl in Group A and from 254 to 92 mg/dl in Group B four hours after administration of reteplase. The decrease in fibrinogen was significantly more pronounced in Group B (P=0.0004). The median plasminogen concentration was decreased to 53% in Group A and to 33% in Group B two hours after administration of reteplase (P=0.0001). Alpha-2-antiplasmin was reduced to 27% and 17,5%, respectively (P=0.0007). D-Dimer levels were increased to 5.2 microg/ml in Group A and 11,6 microg/ml in Group B (P=0.02) and FDP levels to 3.0 microg/ml in Group A and 12,6 microg/ml in Group B (P=0.04). Patients with bleeding complications revealed significant lower nadir levels of fibrinogen than patients without bleeding complications (54 mg/dl versus 125.5 mg/dl, P=0.02). There was no significant difference in any hemostatic parameter between patients with patent and nonpatent infarct related arteries. CONCLUSIONS: Reteplase causes a moderate systemic lytic effect comparable with other relative fibrin specific thrombolytic agents. An increase in the dose from 10 to 15 MU is associated with a marked increase in both fibrin specific and systemic lytic effect. Patients with bleeding complications reveal significant lower nadir levels of fibrinogen than patients without bleeding complications. Determination of any hemostatic parameter seems to be no useful method to predict efficacy of thrombolysis in terms of coronary patency in the individual patient.

Carvedilol versus verapamil in chronic stable angina: a multicentre trial.

OBJECTIVE: In a multicentre, double-blind, parallel group study, the anti-anginal and the anti-ischaemic efficacy of 12 weeks of therapy with the vasodilating beta-adrenoceptor-blocker carvedilol 25 mg b.i.d. was compared with verapamil 120 mg t.i.d. METHODS: During a 2-week placebo run-in period, patients were required to have two treadmill exercise tests (modified Bruce Protocol) differing by not more than 15% with regard to total exercise time (TET). Of 313 patients enrolled, 248 were randomized and 212 completed the study according to the protocol. RESULTS: The primary variable TET was analysed using the Cox Proportional Hazards Model to take into account censored values due to the patient stopping the exercise test for reasons other than angina. Forty-three per cent of patients allocated to carvedilol and 36% to verapamil did not stop with angina at the final visit. There was no difference in the TET between the groups, the risk ratio being 1.14 in favour of carvedilol (90% CI 0.85-1.52). TET increased from 378 s at baseline to 436 s at the final visit in the carvedilol group and from 386 to 438 s in the verapamil group. Results for time to angina and time to 1 mm ST-segment depression were similar. Compared to verapamil, carvedilol significantly reduced HR, systolic BP and rate pressure product at peak exercise. Analysis of 48 h Holter monitor data showed a greater reduction of HR and PVCs with carvedilol. Lown grading improved in both groups. Adverse events were reported by 48% (3.2% serious adverse events) of patients taking carvedilol and 58% (5.7% serious adverse events) taking verapamil. CONCLUSION: Carvedilol is at least as effective as verapamil in the management of chronic stable angina and demonstrated a favourable adverse event profile.