A North Central Cancer Treatment Group phase II trial of topotecan in relapsed gliomas.

Current systemic treatment options for patients with relapsed gliomas are limited. The topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan has demonstrated broad antitumor activity in both preclinical studies as well as a number of phase I and II trials in humans. Studies in primates have shown good cerebrospinal fluid levels of topotecan following systemic administration. We therefore performed this phase II trial in patients who developed evidence of progressive glioma after definitive radiation therapy. Patients were treated with 1.5 mg/m2 intravenously daily for 5 consecutive days repeated every three weeks. For patients who had received prior nitrosourea-containing chemotherapy, the starting dose was 1.25 mg/m2. Thirty-three patients were entered on this study. All patients were eligible and evaluable for both response and toxicity. Seven patients experienced grade 4 leukopenia with 2 of these patients dying of infection-related complications. Six of these seven patients were not taking anticonvulsants during treatment. Nine patients developed grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia, seven of whom were not taking anticonvulsants. Nonhematologic side effects were infrequent and manageable. One patient experienced a partial response to this treatment for an overall response rate of 3% (95% binomial confidence interval 0.3%-20.4%). The median time to progression was 14.9 weeks and median survival 19.9 weeks. Topotecan at this dose and schedule showed no substantial activity in relapsed gliomas.

A phase II study of high-dose cimetidine and the combination 5-fluorouracil, interferon alpha-2A, and leucovorin in advanced renal cell adenocarcinoma.

Cimetidine is an H2-receptor antagonist used in the management of peptic ulcer disease and other hypersecretory gastrointestinal disorders. This agent has intriguing immunomodulatory characteristics. A phase II trial of cimetidine in 19 patients with advanced malignant melanoma yielded an objective response rate of 16%. Having demonstrated that cimetidine is active in malignant melanoma, the authors conducted a phase II trial of cimetidine, 800 mg twice daily by mouth, in patients with advanced renal cell cancer. Among the 31 eligible patients, only one (3.2%) achieved a regression. It was a partial regression lasting 93 days. Median time to treatment failure was 83 days. The combination of interferon alpha-2A (IFL-RA) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has been shown to be synergistic against experimental cell lines in vitro. Citrovorum factor (CF) added to 5-FU has been shown to improve objective tumor response compared with single-agent 5-FU in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Fluorinated pyrimidines have shown some activity against renal cell cancer. We conducted a phase II trial of the combination of CF at 20 mg/m2 intravenous push followed by 5-FU at 325 mg/m2 intravenously daily for 5 days every week with interferon alpha-2A 5 x 10(6) units/m2 subcutaneously on days 1, 3, 5 in patients with advanced renal cell cancer. Among the 31 eligible patients, only two (6.5%) achieved a regression. Both were partial regressions. Median time to treatment failure was 84 days. Neither regimen is recommended for further testing in patients with advanced renal cell adenocarcinoma.

Randomized trial of radiation therapy (RT) plus dibromodulcitol (DBD) versus RT plus BCNU in high grade astrocytoma.

PURPOSE: We performed a randomized trial to compare survival distributions and toxicity of radiation therapy (RT) and DBD with RT and BCNU in patients with high-grade astrocytoma. METHODS: A total of 238 patients with supratentorial grade 3 and grade 4 astrocytoma were studied. Patients were stratified by age, extent of surgery, tumor grade, and performance score and randomly assigned to receive RT 55-60 Gy and either DBD, 200 mg/m2 orally on Days 1-10 every five weeks or BCNU, 200 mg/m2 intravenously every seven weeks. Median age was 60 years; 62% were 55 years or older. Eighty-three percent had subtotal resection, 58% had grade 4 tumors, and 83% had performance scores of 0-2. RESULTS: Survival distributions for all patients in the two arms were similar, with median survival of 41 weeks in each arm. Time to progression distributions were virtually identical, with medians of 22 weeks. BCNU produced significantly greater hematologic toxicity; median leukocyte and platelet nadirs on the first cycle were 3.6 vs. 4.7 (P = 0.0001) and 117 vs. 162 (P < 0.0001), and overall platelet nadirs were 80.5 vs. 114 (P = 0.0019). Non-hematologic toxicities were also significantly greater with BCNU, including nausea (57% vs. 31%; P < 0.0001) and vomiting (45% vs. 17%; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: This trial found no evidence of differences in treatment efficacy when either DBD or BCNU is combined with radiation therapy for patients with high-grade astrocytoma.

Phase II trial of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in advanced/recurrent endometrial carcinoma.

A phase II combination chemotherapy protocol combining methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin was designed to evaluate tumor response and survival in patients with advanced/recurrent endometrial carcinoma. Thirty patients with advanced/recurrent endometrial carcinoma were assigned to chemotherapy treatment at 4-week intervals with methotrexate 30 mg/m2 i.v. Days 1, 15, and 22; vinblastine 3 mg/m2 i.v. Days 2, 15, and 22; doxorubicin 30 mg/m2 i.v. Day 2; and cisplatin 70 mg/m2 i.v. Day 2. After a median of four cycles (maximum number two cycles beyond complete regression; minimum six cycles for stable partial regression), we observed objective regression in 20 patients (67%) (95% CI, 50, 84) with complete regression in 8 patients (27%) and partial regression in 12 patients (40%). Median overall survival was 9.9 months (range, 0.3-34.2), and median survival of responders was 11.0 months (range, 2.6-34.2) from initial date of response. Toxicity was substantial with two treatment-related deaths and consisted predominantly of neutropenia (grade 3 or greater in 93% of the patients), alopecia, nausea, emesis, stomatitis, and azotemia. In conclusion, MVAC is a highly active outpatient chemotherapy regimen in patients with advanced/recurrent endometrial carcinoma, achieving a high complete and partial response rate. Toxicity is substantial in this elderly patient population.

Placebo-controlled trial of hydrazine sulfate in patients with newly diagnosed non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Hydrazine sulfate, an agent that appears to inhibit gluconeogenesis, has been studied in cancer patients for approximately 20 years. There was a recent resurgence of interest in this drug when subset analysis of a small placebo-controlled, double-blind, clinical trial reported improved survival among non-small-cell lung cancer patients with a good performance status who were randomized to receive this drug along with standard chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients on this trial had newly diagnosed, unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer and were treated with cisplatin and etoposide. In addition, they were randomized to receive hydrazine sulfate or placebo in a double-blind manner. RESULTS: A total of 243 patients were randomized. Response rates were similar in the two treatment arms. There were trends for worse time to progression and survival in the hydrazine sulfate arm. No significant differences were noted in the two study arms with regard to toxicity or quality of life (QL). CONCLUSION: This trial failed to demonstrate any benefit for patients who received hydrazine sulfate.

A double-blind trial of tamoxifen plus prednisolone versus tamoxifen plus placebo in postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer. A collaborative trial of the North Central Cancer Treatment Group and Mayo Clinic.

This trial was conducted to determine if the reported superiority of tamoxifen (TAM) plus prednisolone (PRDLN) over TAM alone in postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer could be corroborated. A total of 326 patients were randomized on a double-blind trial to TAM (10 mg twice daily) plus placebo or TAM plus PRDLN (5 mg twice daily). Six patients (2%) were disqualified. Considering 256 patients with measurable or evaluable disease, objective responses were seen in 48 (38%) of 126 TAM patients and 61 (47%) of 130 TAM plus PRDLN patients (chi-square, P = 0.15). Considering all 320 evaluated patients, median time to disease progression was 11 months for TAM and 10 months for TAM plus PRDLN (log rank, P = 0.81), and median survival time was 35 and 32 months, respectively (P = 0.40). Covariate analyses showed no significant association between treatment and outcome. Weight gain and edema were significantly greater with TAM plus PRDLN. The addition of PRDLN to TAM is not advocated for the management of postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer.

A prospective, randomized evaluation of intensive-course 5-fluorouracil plus doxorubicin as surgical adjuvant chemotherapy for resected gastric cancer.

This study evaluated combined 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and doxorubicin as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for patients who had undergone potentially curative resection of a primary gastric adenocarcinoma. One hundred twenty-five eligible and evaluable patients were stratified according to extent of surgical resection, location of the primary tumor within the stomach, and lymph node status. They were then randomized to either receive three cycles of chemotherapy or be observed. The median time from patient entry was 7 years. Results showed no significant difference in time to recurrence. The 5-year survival rate was 33% for the observation arm and 32% for the adjuvant therapy arm. The data excluded a 16% improvement in the 5-year survival rate for patients receiving chemotherapy with a P value less than 0.05. There were two drug-related fatalities due to sepsis. These results demonstrate no substantive benefit for this chemotherapy regimen as postoperative adjuvant treatment of resected gastric cancer.

A clinical trial of biochemical modulation of 5-fluorouracil with N-phosphonoacetyl-L-aspartate and thymidine in advanced gastric and anaplastic colorectal cancer.

A novel sequential administration schedule of PALA (N-phosphonoacetyl-L-aspartate) and thymidine to enhance the cytotoxic effect of 5-fluorouracil (5FU) was tested in 36 patients with advanced gastric cancer and 21 patients with advanced poorly differentiated (anaplastic) colorectal cancer. The potency of 5FU was dramatically increased as indicated by the observation of dose-limiting leukopenia at less than one tenth the maximum tolerated dose of 5FU when given as a single agent by intravenous bolus technique. Twenty-five percent of gastric cancer patients and 33% of colorectal cancer patients experienced an objective tumor response, including three patients with complete response. However, response duration was brief (median, 6 months), and there were four treatment-related fatalities due to severe and unpredictable leukopenia leading to sepsis. Survival was short with a median of 6 months for gastric cancer patients and 3 1/2 months for colorectal cancer patients. We conclude that therapeutic index of 5FU was not improved by the addition of PALA and thymidine in this patient population based on considerations of objective tumor response rate, patient survival, and toxicity.

Evaluation of the continuous infusion of etoposide plus cisplatin in metastatic breast cancer. A collaborative North Central Cancer Treatment Group/Mayo Clinic phase II study.

A prospective clinical trial was done to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of cisplatin plus etoposide (VP-16) in patients with breast cancer who failed one previous chemotherapy regimen for advanced disease or relapsed within 12 months of adjuvant chemotherapy. Partial responses occurred in 11 of 44 evaluable patients (25%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 13% to 40%). The median time to disease progression in responding patients was 4 months (range, 3 to 6+ months), whereas the median time to disease progression and survival for all patients who were treated were 3 and 7 months, respectively. There was marked toxicity related to this protocol treatment including pancytopenia, gastrointestinal upset, and renal insufficiency. Two treatment-related deaths occurred; one from sepsis and one from renal failure. Thus, this regimen, as second-line chemotherapy for women with metastatic breast cancer, resulted in moderate, short-term, antitumor activity at the expense of marked toxicity.

Randomized trial of doxorubicin alone or combined with vincristine and mitomycin C in women with metastatic breast cancer.

A randomized clinical trial was performed to determine if combination therapy with doxorubicin, vincristine, and mitomycin C (DVM) was superior to doxorubicin alone in women with metastatic breast cancer for whom prior chemotherapy had failed. A total of 185 women were randomized to monthly courses of D (60 mg/m2, observation after 500 mg/m2); or D (50 mg/m2, maximum cumulative dose 500 mg/m2), V (1 mg/m2), and M (10 mg/m2, given every other cycle). Patients failing after D alone could receive V (1 mg weekly for 5 weeks, then 1.2 mg/m2 every 5 weeks) plus M (12 mg/m2 every 5 weeks). Objective responses were seen in 24 of 95 patients (25%) on D alone and 39 of 90 patients (43%) on DVM (two-sided p = 0.01). The time to disease progression distribution was significantly better for DVM (two-sided p = 0.02), but the magnitude of the advantage was small with the medians being 2.7 months for D and 4.2 months for DVM. There was no significant difference in survival between the two regimens. The degree of leukopenia was greater for DVM both in terms of median white blood cell nadir (1,300/microL versus 1,700/microL) and percentage of patients with a nadir less than 1,000/microL (33% versus 16%). A total of 45 patients received VM following D alone, and only seven (16%) achieved an objective response. We conclude that, despite a significantly higher response rate and longer time to progression, the degree of clinical benefit is not sufficient to recommend the combination of DVM over D alone as second-line therapy for women with metastatic breast cancer. The level of efficacy seen with VM as tertiary therapy is low and is of such a magnitude to suggest that V adds little but toxicity to M.

Randomized clinical trial of CFP versus CMFP in women with metastatic breast cancer.

A randomized trial was performed to determine relative efficacy and toxicity of two first-line combination chemotherapy regimens in women with metastatic breast cancer: CFP (cyclophosphamide, 5-fluorouracil, prednisone) and CMFP (cyclophosphamide, 5-fluorouracil, methotrexate, prednisone). Both regimens have reported efficacy in this setting but differ in dosages and scheduling of the agents they have in common. Three hundred thirty-six women with no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease were eligible and evaluable, and 309 had either measurable or evaluable disease and were assessable for objective response. Responses were seen in 65 of 153 (42%) on CFP and 83 of 156 (53%) on CMFP (two-sided P = 0.06). Median durations of response were 7.1 months for CFP and 8.5 months for CMFP (log-rank, two-sided P = 0.67). Considering all 336 patients, the median times to disease progression were 4.7 months for CFP and 6.2 months for CMFP (log-rank P = 0.31) and median survivals were 15.2 and 14.9 months, respectively (log-rank P = 0.88). Covariate analysis did not alter these findings. Median leukocyte nadirs were 1800 for CFP and 1500 for CMFP, with 22% and 21%, respectively, having nadirs less than 1000/microliters. Emesis was more frequent on CFP (49%) than on CMFP (26%) but was severe in only 7% and 5%, respectively. It is concluded that despite a higher response rate on CMFP and some differences in toxicities including a higher reported incidence of emesis on CFP, there was no substantial difference in efficacy or tolerability between the two regimens.

Results of salvage hormonal therapy and salvage chemotherapy in women failing adjuvant chemotherapy after mastectomy for breast cancer.

We have evaluated the results of salvage systemic therapy in 257 patients with breast cancer recurrent after surgical adjuvant treatment with cyclophosphamide, fluorouracil, and prednisone (CFP) with or without tamoxifen. The overall objective response rate to salvage hormonal therapy was 29% (47 responses in 161 patients) and to salvage chemotherapy was 28% (43 responses in 156 patients). Response rates to salvage chemotherapy were similar whether or not prior salvage hormonal therapy or local modalities had been administered. Retreatment with CFP as a salvage chemotherapy yielded responses in 11 of 44 patients (25%). Response rates were similar for patients who began salvage CFP less than or equal to 12 months or greater than 12 months after completion of adjuvant CFP. We conclude that when this unselected population of patients failing adjuvant CFP is considered, 1) response rates to salvage chemotherapy were low regardless of whether or not prior salvage hormonal or local therapies were given, 2) repeating adjuvant chemotherapy (CFP) following relapse produced a low response rate, and 3) response rates to salvage hormonal therapy were low, but on the order of those observed in patients with advanced disease unselected by estrogen receptor status who are treated with first line hormonal maneuvers.

Phase II evaluation of carboplatin in advanced endometrial carcinoma.

Carboplatin was administered by iv bolus every 28 days to 26 patients who had extensive metastatic or recurrent endometrial adenocarcinoma and no prior chemotherapy exposure. The dose level was 400 mg/m2 in 5 patients with and 4 patients without prior irradiation and 300 mg/m2 in 16 patients with prior pelvic irradiation. Partial disease regressions were seen in 28% of patients (95% confidence interval, 12%-50%), with a median response duration of 129 days. Median survival of all patients was 215 days; median time to disease progression for all patients was 117 days. We conclude that carboplatin is an active agent in advanced endometrial carcinoma and is worthy of further investigation in single-agent and combination chemotherapy.

Randomized clinical trial of doxorubicin alone or combined with mitolactol in women with advanced breast cancer and prior chemotherapy exposure.

One hundred fifty-one women with advanced breast cancer who had failed prior chemotherapy were randomized to monthly courses of doxorubicin (60 mg/m2 I.V. day 1, observation after 500 mg/m2) or doxorubicin (40 mg/m2 I.V. day 1; maximum 500 mg/m2) and mitolactol (135 mg/m2 orally, days 1-10; 180 mg/m2 after maximum doxorubicin). Median survival times were 232 days for doxorubicin and 225 days for doxorubicin + mitolactol, and median times to progression were 112 days and 97 days, respectively. Results are inconsistent with a 25% improvement in survival or time to progression for doxorubicin + mitolactol (p = 0.04 and 0.02, respectively, adjusted for stratification factors but not multiple testing). Regression rates for all patients, both measurable and evaluable, were 30% for doxorubicin alone and 26% for doxorubicin + mitolactol. Regression rates were significantly higher in patients with measurable indicator lesions. Cardiac toxicity was seen in four patients, all of whom were receiving doxorubicin alone. It appears that the combination of doxorubicin + mitolactol is not substantially more effective than doxorubicin alone in women with advanced breast cancer and prior chemotherapy exposure.

Randomized clinical trial of cyclophosphamide, 5-FU, and prednisone with or without tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer.

The purpose of this study was to determine if tamoxifen added to the efficacy of a CFP (cyclophosphamide, 5-FU, and prednisone) regimen. One hundred thirty-one postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer without prior chemotherapy exposure were randomized to receive CFP alone or combined with tamoxifen; six were disqualified because of ineligibility. Objective responses were seen in 68% of the eligible patients receiving CFP and in 61% of those receiving CFP plus tamoxifen. Median times to progression were 287 days for CFP and 158 days for CFP plus tamoxifen (two-sided log-rank test of equality of progression distributions, P = 0.07). Median survival times were 544 days for CFP and 394 days for CFP plus tamoxifen (two-sided log-rank test of equality of survival distributions, P = 0.14). The addition of tamoxifen to CFP was not associated with longer time to progression or survival in any Cox covariate model. On the basis of our data, it can be concluded that the addition of tamoxifen to CFP does not substantially improve either the time to disease progression or survival in women with metastatic breast cancer.