[Common errors, pitfalls, and management of complications of prostate biopsy : The most common diagnostic and procedural challenges of transrectal fusion prostate biopsy in the initial diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer]. / Häufige Fehler, "Pitfalls" und Komplikationsmanagement der Prostatabiopsie : Die häufigsten diagnostischen und prozeduralen Herausforderungen der transrektalen Fusionsbiopsie der Prostata bei Erstdiagnose eines klinisch signifikanten Prostatakarzinoms.

BACKGROUND: Transrectal (TR) prostate biopsy is the gold standard in diagnosis of prostate cancer (PC). It requires a precise and safe technique for sample acquisition. OBJECTIVE: Several approaches will be discussed to avoid overdiagnosis, false-negative results, and complications of the procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed national and European guidelines, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, as well as prospective and retrospective studies to describe current trends in indication and performance of biopsies. RESULTS: Incorporation of risk calculators and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) into daily routine reduces biopsy rates and results in a more precise diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPC). Combination of random- and MRI-fusion guided biopsy-but also extending the radius of sampling by 10 mm beyond the MRI lesion and a transperineal (TP) sampling approach - lead to a higher tumor-detection rate. Bleeding is the most common complication after prostate biopsy and is usually self-limiting. Postbiopsy infection rates can be reduced through TP biopsy. CONCLUSION: TR MRI-fusion guided biopsy is a widely acknowledged tool in primary diagnostics of csPC. Higher detection rates and safety can be achieved through a TP sampling approach.

[Transrectal vs. transperineal fusion biopsy of the prostate : Time to switch to the perineal technique-comparison of methods and description of the transperineal procedure under local anesthesia]. / Transrektale vs. transperineale Fusionsbiopsie der Prostata : Zeit für einen Wechsel zur perinealen Technik ­ Vergleich der Methoden und Beschreibung des transperinealen operativen Vorgehens in Lokalanästhesie.

The clinical and histological diagnosis of prostate cancer is a crucial aspect of the routine work of a urologist. The high prevalence of multiresistant microorganisms leads to an increased incidence of sepsis after transrectal prostate biopsy. It requires a switch from the still gold-standard method to the transperineal fusion biopsy procedure after multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This article provides an overview of the most important differences between the two methods and gives a detailed methodological description of transperineal fusion biopsy under local anesthesia.

Adverse Pathology after Radical Prostatectomy of Patients Eligible for Active Surveillance-A Summary 7 Years after Introducing mpMRI-Guided Biopsy in a Real-World Setting.

OBJECTIVE: Over the last decade, active surveillance (AS) of low-risk prostate cancer has been increasing. The mpMRI fusion-guided biopsy of the prostate (FBx) is considered to be the gold standard in preoperative risk stratification. However, the role of FBx remains unclear in terms of risk stratification of low-risk prostate cancer outside high-volume centers. The aim of this study was to evaluate adverse pathology after radical prostatectomy (RP) in a real-world setting, focusing on patients diagnosed with Gleason score (GS) 6 prostate cancer (PCa) and eligible for AS by FBx. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Between March 2015 and March 2022, 1297 patients underwent FBx at the Department of Urology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Germany. MpMRI for FBx was performed by 111 different radiology centers. FBx was performed by 14 urologists from our department with different levels of experience. In total, 997/1297 (77%) patients were diagnosed with prostate cancer; 492/997 (49%) of these patients decided to undergo RP in our clinic and were retrospectively included. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate clinical and histopathological parameters associated with adverse pathology comparing FBx and RP specimens. To compare FBx and systematic randomized biopsies performed in our clinic before introducing FBx (SBx, n = 2309), we performed a propensity score matching on a 1:1 ratio, adjusting for age, number of positive biopsy cores, and initial PSA (iPSA). RESULTS: A total of 492 patients undergoing FBx or SBx was matched. In total, 55% of patients diagnosed with GS 6 by FBx were upgraded to clinically significant PCa (defined as GS ≥ 7a) after RP, compared to 52% of patients diagnosed by SBx (p = 0.76). A time delay between FBx and RP was identified as the only correlate associated with upgrading. A total of 5.9% of all FBx patients and 6.1% of all SBx patients would have been eligible for AS (p > 0.99) but decided to undergo RP. The positive predictive value of AS eligibility (diagnosis of low-risk PCa after biopsy and after RP) was 17% for FBx and 6.7% for SBx (p = 0.39). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we show, in a real-world setting, that introducing FBx did not lead to significant change in ratio of adverse pathology for low-risk PCa patients after RP compared to SBx.

[Special diagnostics in pediatric urology-Ultrasound, VCUG, CT and MRI : Part 1: tips for the practice]. / Spezielle Diagnostik in der Kinderurologie ­ konventionelle und spezielle Sonographie, MCU, CT und MRT : Teil 1: Tipps für die Praxis.

The diagnostics and treatment of pediatric urology patients in the clinical routine can be extremely challenging. In comparison to adult patients, congenital diseases, more time consuming examinations and limited options in addition to the parents' expectations must be taken into account in the diagnostic work up. In this first of two parts we will delve into ultrasound diagnostics as the cornerstone in the diagnostic pathway of children with hydronephrosis ans take a closer look on contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Conventional voiding cystourethrography still plays a major role in the diagnostic pathway of vesicoureteric reflux and will be treated in this article. Computed tomography should only be considered in pediatric patients in rare cases, always taking radiation into critical account. Magnetic resonance imaging provides an excellent anatomical overview without exposing the child to unnecessary radiation. This article provides an overview on the diagnostic imaging studies in pediatric urology and brings tips for the diagnostic evaluation.

[Special diagnostics in pediatric urology-Nuclear medicine diagnostics, advanced diagnostics for bladder voiding disorders and imaging diagnostics in the operating room : Tips for the practice part 2]. / Spezielle Diagnostik in der Kinderurologie ­ Nuklearmedizinische Diagnostik, weiterführende Diagnostik bei Blasenentleerungsstörungen und bildgebende Diagnostik im OP : Teil 2: Tipps für die Praxis.

The diagnostics and treatment of pediatric urology patients in the clinical routine can be extremely challenging. In contrast to adult patients, the main concerns in the diagnostics of congenital diseases are time consuming examinations and limited options in addition to the expectations of the parents. The exact knowledge of the diagnostic possibilities in association with the correct interpretation of the indications is essential. Simple processes can be much more time consuming because of a lack of compliance, especially in very young children. Sonography is considered the standard for imaging in pediatric urology. Profound knowledge of the embryonal development and also physiological processes throughout childhood contribute to making the correct diagnosis. This article deals with the possibilities of nuclear medicine diagnostics, advanced diagnostics in bladder voiding disorders and finally imaging diagnostics in the pediatric urological operating room.