Parakinesia: A Delphi consensus report.

Abnormal movements are intrinsic to some forms of endogenous psychoses. Spontaneous dyskinesias are observed in drug-naïve first-episode patients and at-risk subjects. However, recent descriptions of spontaneous dyskinesias may actually represent the rediscovery of a more complex phenomenon, 'parakinesia' which was described and documented in extensive cinematographic recordings and long-term observations by German and French neuropsychiatrists decades before the introduction of antipsychotics. With the emergence of drug induced movement disorders, the description of parakinesia has been refined to emphasize the features enabling differential diagnosis with tardive dyskinesia. Unfortunately, parakinesia was largely neglected by mainstream psychiatry to the point of being almost absent from the English-language literature. With the renewed interest in motor phenomena intrinsic to SSD, it was timely not only to raise awareness of parakinesia, but also to propose a scientifically usable definition for this phenomenon. Therefore, we conducted a Delphi consensus exercise with clinicians familiar with the concept of parakinesia. The original concept was separated into hyperkinetic parakinesia (HPk) as dyskinetic-like expressive movements and parakinetic psychomotricity (PPM), i.e., patient's departing from the patient's normal motion style. HPk prevails on the upper part of the face and body, resembling expressive and reactive gestures that not only occur inappropriately but also appear distorted. Abnormal movements vary in intensity depending on the level of psychomotor arousal and are thus abated by antipsychotics. HPk frequently co-occurs with PPM, in which gestures and mimics lose their naturalness and become awkward, disharmonious, stiff, mannered, and bizarre. Patients are never spontaneously aware of HPk or PPM, and the movements are never experienced as self-dystonic or self-alien. HPk and PPM are highly specific to endogenous psychoses, in which they are acquired and progressive, giving them prognostic value. Their differential diagnoses and correspondences with current international concepts are discussed.

The polysemous concepts of psychomotricity and catatonia: A European multi-consensus perspective.

Current classification systems use the terms "catatonia" and "psychomotor phenomena" as mere a-theoretical descriptors, forgetting about their theoretical embedment. This was the source of misunderstandings among clinicians and researchers of the European collaboration on movement and sensorimotor/psychomotor functioning in schizophrenia and other psychoses or ECSP. Here, we review the different perspectives, their historical roots and highlight discrepancies. In 1844, Wilhelm Griesinger coined the term "psychic-motor" to name the physiological process accounting for volition. While deriving from this idea, the term "psychomotor" actually refers to systems that receive miscellaneous intrapsychic inputs, convert them into coherent behavioral outputs send to the motor systems. More recently, the sensorimotor approach has drawn on neuroscience to redefine the motor signs and symptoms observed in psychoses. In 1874, Karl Kahlbaum conceived catatonia as a brain disease emphasizing its somatic - particularly motor - features. In conceptualizing dementia praecox Emil Kraepelin rephrased catatonic phenomena in purely mental terms, putting aside motor signs which could not be explained in this way. Conversely, the Wernicke-Kleist-Leonhard school pursued Kahlbaum's neuropsychiatric approach and described many new psychomotor signs, e.g. parakinesias, Gegenhalten. They distinguished 8 psychomotor phenotypes of which only 7 are catatonias. These barely overlap with consensus classifications, raising the risk of misunderstanding. Although coming from different traditions, the authors agreed that their differences could be a source of mutual enrichment, but that an important effort of conceptual clarification remained to be made. This narrative review is a first step in this direction.

Guía de consenso de expertos para la monitorización terapéutica de drogas en neuropsicofarmacología / Consensus guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring in neuropsychopharmacology

OBJETIVO: La Monitorización Terapéutica de Drogas (llamada en inglés TDM: therapeutic drug monitoring) combina la cuantificación de las concentraciones de medicamentos en la sangre, la interpretación farmacológica y las directrices de tratamiento. La TDM introduce una herramienta de medicina de precisión en una ípoca de gran conciencia de la necesidad de tratamientos personalizados en neurología y psiquiatría. Las indicaciones claras de la TDM incluyen la ausencia de respuesta clínica en el rango de dosis terapéuticas, la evaluación de la adherencia farmacológica, problemas de tolerancia e interacciones medicamentosas. MÉTODOS: Basándose en la literatura existente, se describieron los rangos de referencia terapéutica recomendables, los valores críticos de laboratorio y los niveles de recomendación para usar la TDM para la optimización de dosis sin indicaciones específicas, se calcularon los factores de conversión, los factores para el cálculo de concentraciones medicamentosas relacionadas con la dosis (en inglés DRC dose-to-ratioconcentration) y el cociente entre el metabolito y el compuesto original (en inglés se llama MPR: metabolite-to-parent ratio). RESULTADOS: Este resumen de las guías actualizadas del consenso por la Task Force del TDM del Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Neuropsychopharmakologie und Pharmakopsychiatrie, ofrece el conocimiento práctico y teórico para la integración de la TDM como parte de la farmacoterapia con medicamentos neuropsiquiátricos en la práctica clínica rutinaria. CONCLUSIONES: La presente traducción en español, de la guía para la aplicación del TDM en medicamentos neuropsiquiátricos, tiene como objetivo ayudar a los clínicos a mejorar la seguridad y la eficacia de los tratamientos

OBJECTIVES: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) combines the quantification of drug concentrations in blood, pharmacological interpretation, and treatment guidance. TDM introduces a precision medicine tool in times of increasing awareness of the need for personalised treatment. In neurology and psychiatry, TDM can guide pharmacotherapy for patient subgroups such as children, adolescents, pregnant women, elderly patients, patients with intellectual disabilities, patients with substance use disorders, individuals with pharmacokinetic peculiarities, and forensic patients. Clear indications for TDM include lack of clinical response in the therapeutic dose range, assessment of drug adherence, tolerability issues, and drug-drug interactions. METHODS: Based upon existing literature, recommended therapeutic reference ranges, laboratory alert levels, and levels of recommendation to use TDM for dosage optimisation without specific indications, conversion factors, factors for calculation of dose-related drug concentrations, and metabolite-to-parent ratios were calculated. RESULTS: This summary of the updated consensus guidelines by the TDM task force of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Neuropsychopharmakologie und Pharmakopsychiatrie (AGNP) offers the practical and theoretical knowledge for the integration of TDM as part of pharmacotherapy with neuro- psychiatric agents into clinical routine. CONCLUSIONS: The present guidelines for TDM application for neuropsychiatric agents aim to assist clinicians in enhancing safety and efficacy of treatment

Wernicke-Kleist-Leonhard phenotypes of endogenous psychoses: a review of their validity
.

While the ICD-DSM paradigm has been a major advance in clinical psychiatry, its usefulness for biological psychiatry is debated. By defining consensus-based disorders rather than empirically driven phenotypes, consensus classifications were not an implementation of the biomedical paradigm. In the field of endogenous psychoses, the Wernicke-Kleist-Leonhard (WKL) pathway has optimized the descriptions of 35 major phenotypes using common medical heuristics on lifelong diachronic observations. Regarding their construct validity, WKL phenotypes have good reliability and predictive and face validity. WKL phenotypes come with remarkable evidence for differential validity on age of onset, familiality, pregnancy complications, precipitating factors, and treatment response. Most impressive is the replicated separation of high- and low-familiality phenotypes. Created in the purest tradition of the biomedical paradigm, the WKL phenotypes deserve to be contrasted as credible alternatives with other approaches currently under discussion.
.

Mettre la traduction ES.

Mettre la traduction FR.

The Combination of Lithium and ACE Inhibitors: Hazardous, Critical, Possible?

Lithium is a well established therapeutic agent in the treatment of uni- and bipolar affective disorders. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are the most frequently used class of drugs in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Combination therapy with both may be considered in clinical practice on occurrence of arterial hypertension after years of successful lithium therapy, yet an increased risk of lithium intoxication in combination with ACE inhibitors has been described and thus the combination has been warned against. We describe three cases in which enalapril, lisinopril or ramipril was combined with lithium. Either additional co-medication with hydrochlorothiazide or dehydration rather than co-medication with ACE inhibitors could be identified as necessary factors for lithium intoxication. These cases suggest that a combination of lithium with ACE inhibitors is possible when sufficient hydration is ensured and a combination with hydrochlorothiazide is avoided. Lithium concentration should be controlled on a regular level.

[Therapeutic drug monitoring in neuropsychopharmacology : Summary of the consensus guidelines 2017 of the TDM task force of the AGNP]. / Therapeutisches Drug-Monitoring in der Neuropsychopharmakologie : Zusammenfassung der Konsensusleitlinien 2017 der TDM-Arbeitsgruppe der AGNP.

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is the quantification and interpretation of drug concentrations in blood serum or plasma to optimize pharmacological therapy. TDM is an instrument with which the high interindividual variability of pharmacokinetics of patients can be identified and therefore enables a personalized pharmacotherapy. In September 2017 the TDM task force of the Working Group for Neuropsychopharmacology and Pharmacopsychiatry (AGNP) published an update of the consensus guidelines on TDM published in 2011. This article summarizes the essential statements for the clinical practice in psychiatry and neurology.

Comedication of Valproic Acid Is Associated With Increased Metabolism of Clozapine.

OBJECTIVES: Valproic acid and clozapine are drugs commonly used in the treatment of schizophrenic and schizoaffective disorders. Pharmacokinetic interactions of valproic acid with several drugs are well known, yet results concerning the interaction with clozapine are inconsistent. METHODS: Steady-state dose-corrected serum concentrations of clozapine and its main metabolite norclozapine were retrospectively analyzed in 45 patients receiving both clozapine and valproic acid. Controls were matched for sex, age, smoking, comedication, and inflammatory response. RESULTS: The group receiving comedication with valproic acid showed significantly lower median dose-corrected serum concentrations of norclozapine (0.44 [0.27-0.58] (ng/mL)/(mg/d) vs 0.78 [0.60-1.07] (ng/mL)/(mg/d)) as well as metabolite to parent compound ratios (0.40 [0.36-0.47] vs 0.71 [0.58-0.84]) by approximately 44%. Dose-corrected serum concentrations of clozapine were not significantly lower. The effect of valproic acid was independent of sex and smoking. CONCLUSIONS: Comedication with valproic acid accelerated metabolism of clozapine with predominant effects on the degradation of norclozapine. Therapeutic drug monitoring should be applied to guide individual patient responses upon initiation of comedication.

TDM in psychiatry and neurology: A comprehensive summary of the consensus guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring in neuropsychopharmacology, update 2017; a tool for clinicians.

OBJECTIVES: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) combines the quantification of drug concentrations in blood, pharmacological interpretation and treatment guidance. TDM introduces a precision medicine tool in times of increasing awareness of the need for personalized treatment. In neurology and psychiatry, TDM can guide pharmacotherapy for patient subgroups such as children, adolescents, pregnant women, elderly patients, patients with intellectual disabilities, patients with substance use disorders, individuals with pharmacokinetic peculiarities and forensic patients. Clear indications for TDM include lack of clinical response in the therapeutic dose range, assessment of drug adherence, tolerability issues and drug-drug interactions. METHODS: Based upon existing literature, recommended therapeutic reference ranges, laboratory alert levels, and levels of recommendation to use TDM for dosage optimization without specific indications, conversion factors, factors for calculation of dose-related drug concentrations and metabolite-to-parent ratios were calculated. RESULTS: This summary of the updated consensus guidelines by the TDM task force of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Neuropsychopharmakologie und Pharmakopsychiatrie offers the practical and theoretical knowledge for the integration of TDM as part of pharmacotherapy with neuropsychiatric agents into clinical routine. CONCLUSIONS: The present guidelines for TDM application for neuropsychiatric agents aim to assist clinicians in enhancing safety and efficacy of treatment.

The role of Pannexin gene variants in schizophrenia: systematic analysis of phenotypes.

Pannexins are a group of brain-expressed channel proteins thought to be regulators of schizophrenia-linked pathways including glutamate release, synaptic plasticity and neural stem proliferation. We got evidence for linkage of a catatonic phenotype to the PANX2 locus in a family study. Aim of our study was to evaluate the role of Pannexins in schizophrenia and clinical phenotypes, particularly with regard to periodic catatonia. We genotyped six single-nucleotide polymorphisms at PANX1, five at PANX2 and three at PANX3 in 1173 German cases with schizophrenia according to DSM-5 and 480 controls. Our sample included 338 cases with periodic catatonia corresponding to Leonhard's classification. Association with schizophrenia according to DSM-5 was limited to genotype rs4838858-TT [p = 0.02, odds ratio (OR) 3.1] and haplotype rs4838858T-rs5771206G (p = 0.02, OR 2.7) at PANX2. We found no significant association with clinical phenotypes. Our limited findings do not support a major contribution of PANX1-3 to disease risk of schizophrenia according to DSM-5. We cannot confirm an association of the PANX2 loci at chromosome 22q13 with periodic catatonia.

Increase of Heart Rate and QTc by Amitriptyline, But Not by Venlafaxine, Is Correlated to Serum Concentration.

Electrocardiographic pathologies are a common problem during antidepressant treatment. The authors investigated the association of serum concentrations of antidepressants and heart rate, QT, and QTc. Polymorphisms of NOS1AP (nitric oxide synthase 1 adaptor protein) rs10494366 and rs12143842 as potential influence factors also were considered. In the amitriptyline sample (n = 59), significant Spearman ρ correlations were found between serum concentration and QTc (r = 0.333, P = 0.010), as well as heart rate (r = 0.407, P = 0.001). Patients with a serum concentration greater than the therapeutic range (>200 ng/mL) exhibit significantly higher heart rates (87.0 ± 13.3 vs 80.0 ± 13.9, U test P = 0.011) and higher QTc values (443.8 ± 28.8 vs 427.9 ± 20.6, U test P = 0.022). Excluding the 26 patients with a serum concentration greater than the therapeutic range, patients with rs12143842 risk alleles exhibit higher heart rates and as a trend lower QT intervals with no difference in QTc. In the venlafaxine sample (n = 81), no significant association between serum concentration and heart rate, QT, or QTc was revealed. In summary, the risk for relevant electrocardiographic alterations induced by tricyclic antidepressants, such as amitriptyline, is dependent on serum concentrations. NOS1AP polymorphisms may be a genetic vulnerability factor.

The comparison of brand-name and generic formulations of venlafaxine: a therapeutic drug monitoring analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Venlafaxine (VEN) is a widely used antidepressant drug, which is available in both brand-name and generic formulations. Bioequivalence studies indicate some pharmacokinetic variability. However, naturalistic therapeutic drug monitoring studies of different generic formulations are lacking. METHODS: In 2010, inpatients of the Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics, and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Würzburg, were treated with either slow-release brand-name VEN (Trevilor) or slow-release generic VEN (Venlafaxin Hexal) depending on the respective inpatient ward. Routine therapeutic drug monitoring analyses of both groups were compared after matching samples regarding dose of VEN, gender, age, smoking habits, and evaluation of co-medication. RESULTS: Both groups did not differ in mean values of VEN, O-desmethyl-VEN (ODV), VEN + ODV serum concentrations, and ODV/VEN ratio. No difference in dose-corrected serum concentrations between generic and brand-name VEN was revealed for males, females, smokers, or nonsmokers. In both groups, Spearman Rho correlation between VEN dose and VEN + ODV serum concentration was moderate but significant (P < 0.001; generic: r = 0.554; brand name: r = 0.668). Within the generic subgroup, females had a significantly higher dose-corrected serum concentration of VEN (U test, P < 0.05), whereas within brand name, no gender influence was detected. Spearman Rho correlation of age and dose-corrected ODV (P < 0.05) and VEN + ODV (P < 0.05) was significant only in the generic group. In the brand-name sample, smokers had significantly lower dose-corrected serum concentrations of ODV (U test, P < 0.01) and VEN + ODV (P < 0.01). In the generic group, smoking habit was without any influence. DISCUSSION: No differences in serum concentrations in dependence of either VEN formulations suggest a safe and efficient treatment of patients using the evaluated generic VEN. However, differences within one formulation regarding gender, age, and smoking status suggest variability of serum concentrations and thus could endanger safety and efficacy of drug use.

Serious suicidal behaviors: socio-demographic and clinical features in a multinational, multicenter sample.

BACKGROUND: Declared suicidal intent and physical danger are both considered important components in defining suicidal behaviors (SB). AIMS: 1) To investigate characteristics of serious suicidal behaviors (SSB), defined by either suicidal intent or lethality; 2) To determine any difference in terms of socio-demographic, clinical and/or service usage variables between SSB and non-serious suicidal behaviors (NSSB). METHODS: A total of 2631 contacts for SB were registered in the context of the MONSUE (Monitoring Suicidal Behavior in Europe) study project. Demographic and clinical information were registered. ICD-10 was used for classifying data about psychiatric diagnoses, methods used for SB and injuries reported. Clear intentionality, high-case fatality methods and serious injuries all defined SSB (n = 1169; 44.4%) RESULTS: SSB were more often preceded by a contact with an inpatient (either psychiatric or somatic) rather than an outpatient service. Among those having a previous history of SB, SSB subjects had fewer contacts with health services before the previous attempt. The strongest predictors for SSB appeared to be older age and not professing a religion. CONCLUSION: Many of the known factors contributing to the risk of completed suicide were also present for SSB. Our findings on service usage by suicide attempters show which aspects of mental health services should be strengthened in order to improve suicide prevention.

[Differences between patients in consultation psychiatry and psychiatric inpatients]. / Unterschiede zwischen Patienten im psychiatrischen Konsildienst und stationär-psychiatrischen Patienten.

OBJECTIVE: To optimize psychiatric consultation service epidemiological information is needed. METHODS: We compared data on gender, age and diagnoses of patients in the consultation service to psychiatric inpatients. RESULTS: In psychiatric consultation service patients are older (56.6 vs. 44.9 years, p < 0.05) and males are older than females (58.8 vs. 54.4 years, p < 0.05). For male patients, the psychiatric consultation service is contacted more often in cases of organic disorders, for females in adjustment disorders (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The diagnostic spectrum in psychiatric consultation service is different for males and females with relevance for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures.

Interaction of valproic acid and the antidepressant drugs doxepin and venlafaxine: analysis of therapeutic drug monitoring data under naturalistic conditions.

Valproic acid and the antidepressants doxepin and venlafaxine are frequently used psychotropic drugs. In the literature, an influence of valproic acid on serum levels of antidepressants has been described, although studies have focused on amitriptyline. The authors assessed their therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) database for patients receiving a combination of doxepin or venlafaxine and valproic acid and compared these samples with matched controls without valproic acid comedication in terms of the serum concentration of antidepressants. The mean dose-corrected serum concentration of doxepin+N-doxepin in 16 patients who received valproic acid comedication was higher (2.171±1.482 ng/ml/mg) than that in the matched controls (0.971±0.857 ng/ml/mg, P<0.003). We also found a significant correlation between valproic acid serum level and dose-corrected doxepin+N-doxepin serum level (Spearman's ρ r=0.602, P<0.014). The mean dose-corrected serum level of venlafaxine+O-desmethylvenlafaxine in 41 patients who received valproic acid comedication did not differ significantly from that of the matched controls (P<0.089), but there was a significant difference between both groups in the dose-corrected serum level of O-desmethylvenlafaxine (1.403±0.665 vs. 1.102±0.444, P<0.017). As a consequence, if a combination of valproic acid with doxepin or venlafaxine is administered, cautious dosing is advisable and TDM should be performed.

Quetiapine and flupentixol differentially improve anterior cingulate cortex function in schizophrenia patients: an event-related potential study.

Atypical antipsychotic agents are a frequently and effectively used treatment in schizophrenia and psychotic disorders. Other than conventional antipsychotics, which mainly exert their pharmacological effect in subcortical dopaminergic systems, atypical antipsychotics additionally affect partly serotonergically innervated structures within prefrontal areas, such as the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). However, only few controlled, randomized studies have so far investigated direct and indirect effects of atypical antipsychotics on the ACC and, up until now, no clinical investigation has exclusively addressed the specific effects of quetiapine on ACC function. The present study assessed ACC function in 18 quetiapine-medicated patients and 13 flupentixol-treated patients suffering from schizophrenia by means of the error-related negativity (ERN), a neurophysiological marker of ACC function, in a pre-post design. Between-group comparisons revealed different effects of quetiapine and flupentixol on ACC function despite similar improvement in psychopathology, cognitive performance and quality of life. Whereas atypical treatment was associated with an increase in amplitudes over time, there were prolonged ERN peak latencies in patients treated with the typical agent. Moreover, treatment effects depended on baseline prefrontal cortex function in both groups. We conclude that both flupentixol and quetiapine improve prefrontal function especially in patients with weak initial ACC function which might be due to their shared affinity for serotonin receptors in frontal brain regions. However, since this affinity is more pronounced for quetiapine, patients treated with quetiapine seemed to profit more evidently concerning their prefrontal cortex function compared to patients of the flupentixol group, who exhibited a compensatory prolongation of processes.

Interaction of valproic acid and amitriptyline: analysis of therapeutic drug monitoring data under naturalistic conditions.

Amitriptyline (AMI) and valproic acid (VPA) are common psychotropic drugs which are frequently used in psychiatry and also administered in neurology or anesthesia in the absence of a psychiatric indication. On the basis of the case of a 73-year-old man with therapy-resistant major depressive episode who experienced anticholinergic delirium after adding VPA to AMI, we retrospectively analyzed therapeutic drug monitoring data of the years 2008 to 2010. We assessed cases receiving a combination of AMI and VPA, and obtained a control sample of AMI patients without VPA which were matched for sex, age, daily dose, and comedication. Both samples were compared regarding the serum levels of AMI and nortriptyline (NOR) as well as the ratio of NOR and AMI with the Mann-Whitney U test. The combination of AMI and VPA led to a remarkable increase of AMI and NOR serum levels. When comparing 33 patients who received comedication with VPA versus 33 matched controls, the total concentration by combining mean AMI and NOR serum levels (237.1 [119.9] vs 126.4 [52.8] ng/mL) and NOR/AMI ratio (1.300 [0.905] vs 0.865 [0.455]) was significantly higher. Both AMI and VPA are widely prescribed drugs. A combination of both is common for psychiatric or neurologic patients. A cautious dosing of AMI with VPA comedication is advisable, and therapeutic drug monitoring should be performed because this combination may lead to a remarkable increase of AMI and NOR serum levels.

The relation between dosage, serum concentrations, and clinical outcome in children and adolescents treated with sertraline: a naturalistic study.

OBJECTIVE: This naturalistic therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) study aimed to evaluate the relationship between dosage, serum concentration, and clinical outcome in children and adolescents treated with the serotonin reuptake inhibitor sertraline for different indications. METHODS: Steady-state trough serum concentrations were analyzed in 90 subjects, treated with 25-200 mg sertraline per day. Therapeutic efficacy was assessed by the Clinical Global Impression Improvement subscale and side effects by the Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser-Side Effect Rating Scale. RESULTS: In the study population, children were administered higher body weight normalized daily doses than adolescents. The relationships between sertraline daily dosage and serum concentrations (rs = 0.67, P < 0.0001) as well as between body weight normalized daily doses and serum concentrations (r = 0.62, P < 0.0001) were linear. In the whole patient group, no correlation between serum concentrations and either the therapeutic effect or side effects could be observed, neither significant effects of gender, age, concomitant medications, or smoking habits. When analyzing just the patients with depression, those with side effects had significantly higher sertraline serum concentrations than those without (44.8 ng/mL versus 22.3 ng/mL, P = 0.01). In general, occurrence of side effects was significantly more frequent in patients with psychiatric comedication (37.9%) than those without (11.5%, P = 0.002). DISCUSSION: As this study has the typical limitations of naturalistic studies, the results should be interpreted cautiously. From the data, it is not possible to suggest an age-specific therapeutic window for children and adolescents. However, as the intraindividual variability of sertraline serum concentrations is known to be low, TDM may certainly help to predict serum concentrations after dose adjustment, to assess pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions influencing serum concentrations and the patient's compliance, finally allowing for personalizing dose through TDM.

Cycloid psychoses: Leonhard's descriptions revisited

Background and Objectives: Cycloid psychoses are characterized by polymorphic symptomatology with intraphasic bipolarity, a remitting and recurrent course and favourable prognosis. Perris and Brockington (P&B) described the first set of operational criteria that were partly incorporated in ICD-10. The present study investigates psychopathological profiles according to the P&B criteria and the original descriptions by Leonhard, both against the background of the criteria from the prevailing international classification systems. Methods: Eighty patients with psychotic disorders were recruited and assessed with various psychometric instruments at baseline and after six weeks of antipsychotic treatment in order to investigate the presence of cycloid psychoses according to Leonhard (LCP) and the effect of treatment with antipsychotics. The overlap between LCP and DSM-IV Brief Psychotic Disorder (BPD), ICD Acute Polymorphic Psychotic Disorder (APP) and P&B criteria was calculated. Results: Using P&B criteria and a symptom checklist adapted from the original descriptions by Leonhard, 14 and 12 cases of cycloid psychosis were identified respectively reflecting a prevalence of 15-18%. Small though significant concordance rates were found between LCP and both DSM-BPD and ICD-APP. Concordance between LCP and P&B criteria was also significant, but modest. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that LCP can be identified in a substantial number of patients with psychotic disorders. Cycloid psychoses are not adequately covered in current classification systems and criteria. Since they are demonstrated to have a specific psychopathological profile, relapsing course and favourable prognosis, it is advocated to include these psychoses in daily differential diagnostic procedures (AU)

Interactions and monitoring of antipsychotic drugs.

As a consequence of individualized antipsychotic pharmacotherapy, many patients need more than a single drug, since they do not respond sufficiently to monotherapy. Other patients suffer from comorbid diseases and therefore require additional drugs from other pharmacological classes. Drug combinations, however, can give rise to pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic drug-drug interactions. Evaluation of pharmacokinetic interactions with antipsychotic drugs must consider substrate, inhibitor, and inducer properties for the cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzymes of all combined drugs. For consideration of pharmacodynamic interactions, special attention must be given to effects on dopamine D(2), histamine H(1), and acetylcholine M(1) receptors and on cardiac potassium channels. Additive pharmacological actions of combined drugs on these target structures can induce adverse reactions such as extrapyramidal symptoms, drowsiness, metabolic disturbances leading to weight gain and cardiac problems, cognitive impairment, delirium, or ventricular arrhythmia. Measuring plasma concentrations, i.e., therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), is valuable to adjust antipsychotic medication when drug combinations contain inhibitors or inducers that alter plasma concentrations of the antipsychotic drugs. Amalgamating the broad knowledge on drug-drug interactions and using appropriately the option to monitor plasma concentrations in blood will help to apply complex combination therapies with antipsychotic drugs with maximal efficiency and safety.