Ancestral Reconstruction and the Evolution of Protein Energy Landscapes.

A protein's sequence determines its conformational energy landscape. This, in turn, determines the protein's function. Understanding the evolution of new protein functions therefore requires understanding how mutations alter the protein energy landscape. Ancestral sequence reconstruction (ASR) has proven a valuable tool for tackling this problem. In ASR, one phylogenetically infers the sequences of ancient proteins, allowing characterization of their properties. When coupled to biophysical, biochemical, and functional characterization, ASR can reveal how historical mutations altered the energy landscape of ancient proteins, allowing the evolution of enzyme activity, altered conformations, binding specificity, oligomerization, and many other protein features. In this article, we review how ASR studies have been used to dissect the evolution of energy landscapes. We also discuss ASR studies that reveal how energy landscapes have shaped protein evolution. Finally, we propose that thinking about evolution from the perspective of an energy landscape can improve how we approach and interpret ASR studies. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Biophysics, Volume 53 is May 2024. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.

Topiary: Pruning the manual labor from ancestral sequence reconstruction.

Ancestral sequence reconstruction (ASR) is a powerful tool to study the evolution of proteins and thus gain deep insight into the relationships among protein sequence, structure, and function. A major barrier to its broad use is the complexity of the task: it requires multiple software packages, complex file manipulations, and expert phylogenetic knowledge. Here we introduce topiary, a software pipeline that aims to overcome this barrier. To use topiary, users prepare a spreadsheet with a handful of sequences. Topiary then: (1) Infers the taxonomic scope for the ASR study and finds relevant sequences by BLAST; (2) Does taxonomically informed sequence quality control and redundancy reduction; (3) Constructs a multiple sequence alignment; (4) Generates a maximum-likelihood gene tree; (5) Reconciles the gene tree to the species tree; (6) Reconstructs ancestral amino acid sequences; and (7) Determines branch supports. The pipeline returns annotated evolutionary trees, spreadsheets with sequences, and graphical summaries of ancestor quality. This is achieved by integrating modern phylogenetics software (Muscle5, RAxML-NG, GeneRax, and PastML) with online databases (NCBI and the Open Tree of Life). In this paper, we introduce non-expert readers to the steps required for ASR, describe the specific design choices made in topiary, provide a detailed protocol for users, and then validate the pipeline using datasets from a broad collection of protein families. Topiary is freely available for download: https://github.com/harmslab/topiary.

Evolution avoids a pathological stabilizing interaction in the immune protein S100A9.

Stability constrains evolution. While much is known about constraints on destabilizing mutations, less is known about the constraints on stabilizing mutations. We recently identified a mutation in the innate immune protein S100A9 that provides insight into such constraints. When introduced into human S100A9, M63F simultaneously increases the stability of the protein and disrupts its natural ability to activate Toll-like receptor 4. Using chemical denaturation, we found that M63F stabilizes a calcium-bound conformation of hS100A9. We then used NMR to solve the structure of the mutant protein, revealing that the mutation distorts the hydrophobic binding surface of hS100A9, explaining its deleterious effect on function. Hydrogen-deuterium exchange (HDX) experiments revealed stabilization of the region around M63F in the structure, notably Phe37. In the structure of the M63F mutant, the Phe37 and Phe63 sidechains are in contact, plausibly forming an edge-face π-stack. Mutating Phe37 to Leu abolished the stabilizing effect of M63F as probed by both chemical denaturation and HDX. It also restored the biological activity of S100A9 disrupted by M63F. These findings reveal that Phe63 creates a molecular staple with Phe37 that stabilizes a nonfunctional conformation of the protein, thus disrupting function. Using a bioinformatic analysis, we found that S100A9 proteins from different organisms rarely have Phe at both positions 37 and 63, suggesting that avoiding a pathological stabilizing interaction indeed constrains S100A9 evolution. This work highlights an important evolutionary constraint on stabilizing mutations, namely, that they must avoid inappropriately stabilizing nonfunctional protein conformations.