A noninvasive eye fixation monitoring system for CyberKnife radiotherapy of choroidal and orbital tumors.

A new noninvasive monitoring system for fixing the eye has been developed to treat orbital and choroidal tumors with CyberKnife-based radiotherapy. This device monitors the eye during CT/MRI scanning and during treatment. The results of this study demonstrate the feasibility of the fixation light system for CyberKnife-based treatments of orbital and choroidal tumors and supports the idea that larger choroidal melanomas and choroidal metastases could be treated with CyberKnife without implanting fiducial markers.

Peripheral dose in ocular treatments with CyberKnife and Gamma Knife radiosurgery compared to proton radiotherapy.

Peripheral radiation can have deleterious effects on normal tissues throughout the body, including secondary cancer induction and cataractogenesis. The aim of this study is to evaluate the peripheral dose received by various regions of the body after ocular treatment delivered with the Model C Gamma Knife, proton radiotherapy with a dedicated ocular beam employing no passive-scattering system, or a CyberKnife unit before and after supplemental shielding was introduced. TLDs were used for stray gamma and x-ray dosimetry, whereas CR-39 dosimeters were used to measure neutron contamination in the proton experiments. Doses to the contralateral eye, neck, thorax and abdomen were measured on our anthropomorphic phantom for a 56 Gy treatment to a 588 mm(3) posterior ocular lesion. Gamma Knife (without collimator blocking) delivered the highest dose in the contralateral eye, with 402-2380 mSv, as compared with 118-234 mSv for CyberKnife pre-shielding, 46-255 mSv for CyberKnife post-shielding and 9-12 mSv for proton radiotherapy. Gamma Knife and post-shielding CyberKnife delivered comparable doses proximal to the treatment site, with 190 versus 196 mSv at the thyroid, whereas protons doses at these locations were less than 10 mSv. Gamma Knife doses decreased dramatically with distance from the treatment site, delivering only 13 mSv at the lower pelvis, comparable to the proton result of 4 to 7 mSv in this region. In contrast, CyberKnife delivered between 117 and 132 mSv to the lower pelvis. In conclusion, for ocular melanoma treatments, a proton beam employing no double scattering system delivers the lowest peripheral doses proximally to the contralateral eye and thyroid when compared to radiosurgery with the Model C Gamma Knife or CyberKnife. At distal locations in the pelvis, peripheral doses delivered with proton and Gamma Knife are of an order of magnitude smaller than those delivered with CyberKnife.

Economic evaluation of interventions to reduce road traffic injuries--a review of the literature with applications to low and middle-income countries.

Road Traffic Injuries (RTIs) kill over one million people worldwide annually. This article takes the perspective of economic costs and benefits to review the impact of available road safety interventions in industrialized countries--and the potential effect of these interventions in low and middle-income countries, where RTIs pose an increasingly large public health problem. A comprehensive review of the literature on cost-benefits and cost-effectiveness studies related to road traffic injuries internationally, with comparisons of costs adjusted for inflation and exchange differentials was conducted. In the United States (U.S.), motor vehicle inspection laws resulted in annual savings of US $1.7 to $2.3 billion. The installation of seatbelts results in net savings of $162 per vehicle; with benefits outweighing costs by a factor ranging from 240 to 1727. Other cost effective interventions include mandatory seatbelt use, lowering speed limits, motorcycle helmet laws, and traffic calming devices such as speed bumps and road deviations. The dearth of similar economic evaluations of interventions for road traffic injuries in low and middle-income countries represents a serious research gap and hinders the implementation of effective strategies in those countries.

Toxicity following high-dose three-dimensional conformal and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To report the toxicity profile of patients treated with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) or intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) receiving doses of 82 Gy or more to portions of their prostate. METHODS: Forty-four patients treated with radiation therapy for prostate cancer between June 1992 and August 1998 at the University of California, San Francisco received a maximal dose within the target volume (Dmax) of 82 Gy or more. Eighteen patients were boosted selectively to a limited portion of their prostate using IMRT, whereas 26 patients were treated with 3D-CRT and had unselected "hot spots" within their prostate. The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) acute and late toxicity scales were used to score gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) morbidity. RESULTS: Median follow-up and Dmax were 23.1 months (range 10.0 to 84.7) and 84.5 Gy (range 82.0 to 96.7), respectively. Of the patients, 59.1% and 34.1% developed some level of acute GU and GI toxicity, respectively. One patient experienced grade 3 acute GI toxicity. No other grade 3 or greater acute toxicity was observed. The 2-year actuarial rates for freedom from late GI and GU morbidity were 77.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 60.4% to 87.5%) and 79.5% (95% CI 62.7% to 89.3%), respectively. Although no grade 3 or greater late GU morbidity has been observed to date, 3 patients experienced grade 3 late GI morbidity. However, these cases involved rectal bleeding and were effectively managed with laser coagulation/fulguration. CONCLUSIONS: Doses of 82 Gy or more to a portion of the prostate gland can be tolerated with acceptable morbidity. This observation supports the continued investigation of IMRT as a means for improving disease control in prostate cancer.

Phase III trial of accelerated hyperfractionation with or without difluromethylornithine (DFMO) versus standard fractionated radiotherapy with or without DFMO for newly diagnosed patients with glioblastoma multiforme.

PURPOSE: To report the results of a prospective Phase III trial for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), treated with either accelerated hyperfractionated irradiation with or without difluromethylornithine (DFMO) or standard fractionated irradiation with or without DFMO. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Adult patients with newly diagnosed GBM were registered and randomized following surgery to one of 4 treatment arms: Arm A, accelerated hyperfractionation alone using 2 fractions a day of 1.6 Gy to a total dose of 70.4 Gy in 44 fractions; Arm B, accelerated hyperfractionation as above plus DFMO 1.8 gm/m2 by mouth every 8 h beginning one week before radiation until the last fraction was given; Arm C, single-fraction irradiation of 1.8 Gy/day to 59.4 Gy; Arm D, single-fraction irradiation as in Arm C plus DFMO given as in Arm B. Patients were followed for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), as well as for toxicity. Eligibility required histologically proven GBM, age > or =18, Karnofsky performance status (KPS) > or =60, and no prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy was not used in this protocol. RESULTS: A total of 231 eligible patients were enrolled. There were 95 men and 136 women with a median age of 57 years, and median KPS of 90. Extent of resection was total in 23, subtotal in 152, and biopsy only in 56 patients. The 4 arms were balanced with respect to age, KPS, and extent of resection. Times to event measurements are from date of diagnosis. Median OS and PFS were 40 and 19 weeks for Arm A; 42 and 22 weeks for Arm B; 37 and 16 weeks for Arm C; and 44 and 19 weeks for Arm D (p = 0.48 for survival; p = 0.32 for PFS). Comparison of the 2 arms treated with DFMO to the 2 arms without DFMO revealed no difference in OS (37 weeks vs. 42 weeks, p = 0.12) or PFS and thus no benefit to the use of DFMO. Comparison of the 2 standard fractionation arms to the 2 accelerated hyperfractionation arms also resulted in no difference in OS (42 weeks vs. 41 weeks, p = 0.75) or PFS, showing no benefit to accelerated hyperfractionated irradiation. CONCLUSION: In this prospective Phase III study, no survival or PFS benefit was seen with accelerated hyperfractionated irradiation to 70.4 Gy, nor was any benefit seen with DFMO as a radiosensitizer. Standard fractionated irradiation to 59.4 Gy remains the treatment of choice for newly diagnosed patients with glioblastoma multiforme.

A Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) phase III randomized study to compare hyperfractionation and two variants of accelerated fractionation to standard fractionation radiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: first report of RTOG 9003.

PURPOSE: The optimal fractionation schedule for radiotherapy of head and neck cancer has been controversial. The objective of this randomized trial was to test the efficacy of hyperfractionation and two types of accelerated fractionation individually against standard fractionation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer were randomly assigned to receive radiotherapy delivered with: 1) standard fractionation at 2 Gy/fraction/day, 5 days/week, to 70 Gy/35 fractions/7 weeks; 2) hyperfractionation at 1. 2 Gy/fraction, twice daily, 5 days/week to 81.6 Gy/68 fractions/7 weeks; 3) accelerated fractionation with split at 1.6 Gy/fraction, twice daily, 5 days/week, to 67.2 Gy/42 fractions/6 weeks including a 2-week rest after 38.4 Gy; or 4) accelerated fractionation with concomitant boost at 1.8 Gy/fraction/day, 5 days/week and 1.5 Gy/fraction/day to a boost field as a second daily treatment for the last 12 treatment days to 72 Gy/42 fractions/6 weeks. Of the 1113 patients entered, 1073 patients were analyzable for outcome. The median follow-up was 23 months for all analyzable patients and 41.2 months for patients alive. RESULTS: Patients treated with hyperfractionation and accelerated fractionation with concomitant boost had significantly better local-regional control (p = 0.045 and p = 0.050 respectively) than those treated with standard fractionation. There was also a trend toward improved disease-free survival (p = 0.067 and p = 0.054 respectively) although the difference in overall survival was not significant. Patients treated with accelerated fractionation with split had similar outcome to those treated with standard fractionation. All three altered fractionation groups had significantly greater acute side effects compared to standard fractionation. However, there was no significant increase of late effects. CONCLUSIONS: Hyperfractionation and accelerated fractionation with concomitant boost are more efficacious than standard fractionation for locally advanced head and neck cancer. Acute but not late effects are also increased.

Randomized trial of radiation for age-related macular degeneration.

PURPOSE: To assess external beam radiation efficacy for subfoveal neovascularization associated with age-related macular degeneration. METHODS: All patients were evaluated in the same institution. In this prospective trial, 27 eyes (27 patients) with subfoveal neovascularization associated with age-related macular degeneration were randomized to either single fraction radiation (750 centigray) or observation. Endpoints were assessed by fluorescein angiography and Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity. Examiners were masked to patient treatment status. Parametric and nonparametric statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were entered into the trial with a mean age of 76 years (range, 64 to 89) and a mean follow-up of 17 months (range, 7 to 32). The visual acuity loss was slightly less in the irradiated group, a finding of borderline significance (P < .046). There was no significant difference in fluorescein angiographic evidence of subretinal neovascular membrane change in the control group vs the irradiated group. CONCLUSIONS: External beam radiation, at this dose and fractionation, did not appear harmful. There was slightly less visual loss in irradiated eyes. No difference in fluorescein angiographic characteristics of subfoveal neovascularization size or progression in eyes with age-related macular degeneration was noted.

Irradiation with or without misonidazole for patients with stages IIIB and IVA carcinoma of the cervix: final results of RTOG 80-05. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate tumor response, progression-free survival, local tumor control, patterns of relapse, and toxicity in patients with Stages IIIb and IVa squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix treated with irradiation or irradiation and misonidazole. This is a report of the final results of the study. METHODS: This study was a prospective randomized Phase III trial performed by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG). Between August 1980 and November 1984, 120 patients with Stages IIIb and IVa squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix were randomized to receive either standard irradiation or standard irradiation and misonidazole. Irradiation consisted of 46 Gy to the pelvis plus a 10 Gy parametrial boost followed by intracavitary brachytherapy or external irradiation boost to the primary tumor. Misonidazole was administered at 400 mg/m2 daily, 2-4 h before irradiation. Patients in the 2 treatment groups were evenly distributed by stage, Karnofsky Performance Status, and positive para-aortic lymph nodes. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients were treated with irradiation alone, and 59 patients received irradiation and misonidazole. Complete response in the pelvis occurred in 44 (75%) of those treated with irradiation and in 38 (64%) of those treated with irradiation and misonidazole. The progression-free survivals were 22% at 5 years for the control group, and 29% at 5 years for the misonidazole group. At the time of last follow-up, 18 patients in the control arm were free of disease, and in the experimental arm, 19 were free of disease. The patterns of failure for those treated with irradiation alone were local-only in 9 patients, distant-only in 8 patients, and local and distant in 11 patients. The patterns of failure for those receiving irradiation and misonidazole were local-only in 3 patients, distant-only in 8 patients, and local and distant in 8 patients. The maximum toxicity experienced per patient was grade 3 in 18%, grade 4 in 8%, and no grade 5 toxicity for those treated with irradiation alone compared to 8%, 2%, and 2%, respectively, for the experimental arm. CONCLUSION: There were no statistically significant differences in pelvic response, disease-free survivals, patterns of failure, or toxicity for the irradiation alone group or for the irradiation and misonidazole group as administered in this study for patients with Stages IIIb and IVa squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix.

Radiosurgery for brain metastases: is whole brain radiotherapy necessary?

PURPOSE: Because whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) may cause dementia in long-term survivors, selected patients with brain metastases may benefit from initial treatment with radiosurgery (RS) alone reserving WBRT for salvage as needed. We reviewed results of RS +/- WBRT in patients with newly diagnosed brain metastasis to provide background for a prospective trial. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with single or multiple brain metastases managed initially with RS alone vs. RS + WBRT (62 vs. 43 patients) from 1991 through February 1997 were retrospectively reviewed. The use of upfront WBRT depended on physician preference and referral patterns. Survival, freedom from progression (FFP) endpoints, and brain control allowing for successful salvage therapy were measured from the date of diagnosis of brain metastases. Actuarial curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Analyses to adjust for known prognostic factors were performed using the Cox proportional hazards model (CPHM) stratified by primary site. RESULTS: Survival and local FFP were the same for RS alone vs. RS + WBRT (median survival 11.3 vs. 11.1 months and 1-year local FFP by patient 71% vs. 79%, respectively). Brain FFP (scoring new metastases and/or local failure) was significantly worse for RS alone vs. RS + WBRT (28% vs. 69% at 1 year; CPHM adjustedp = 0.03 and hazard ratio = 0.476). However, brain control allowing for successful salvage of a first failure was not significantly different for RS alone vs. RS + WBRT (62% vs. 73% at 1 year; CPHM adjusted p = 0.56). CONCLUSIONS: The omission of WBRT in the initial management of patients treated with RS for up to 4 brain metastases does not appear to compromise survival or intracranial control allowing for salvage therapy as indicated. A randomized trial of RS vs. RS + WBRT is needed to assess survival, quality of life, and cost in good-prognosis patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases.

Identification of a high-risk clinically localized prostate cancer subgroup receiving maximum benefit from whole-pelvic irradiation.

PURPOSE: We recently identified a progression-free survival advantage for clinically localized high-risk prostate cancer patients receiving whole-pelvic irradiation. We now seek to identify a subgroup most likely to benefit from whole-pelvic irradiation. METHODS: Between October 1987 and December 1995, 506 clinically localized prostate cancer patients were treated with definitive radiotherapy consisting of whole-pelvic irradiation followed by a prostate-only boost, or prostate-only treatment (median follow-up, 35 months vs 30 months). Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure was defined as (1) a PSA value > or = 1 ng/mL or (2) a PSA value that rose > or = 0.5 ng/mL in < or = 1 year posttreatment on two consecutive measurements, with the first rise defined as the time of failure. The calculated risk of lymph node positivity (%rLN+) was defined as 2/3 (initial PSA) + 10(Gleason score - 6), with intermediate risk defined as 15% < or = %rLN+ < 35% and highest risk defined as %rLN+ > or = 35%. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: Intermediate-risk patients receiving whole-pelvic irradiation had significantly improved freedom from PSA failure compared with those receiving prostatic irradiation only (median progression-free survival 39.5 months vs 22.5 months; P < 0.0001); highest-risk patients did not (median progression-free survival 27.2 months vs 20.8 months, P = NS). Multivariate analysis revealed type of radiation treatment to be the most significant independent predictor of outcome (P < 0.0001). DISCUSSIONS: Whole-pelvic radiotherapy most significantly improves the PSA failure-free survival in patients with an intermediate calculated risk of lymph node positivity, suggesting that highest-risk patients may present with distant micrometastases.

Improved freedom from PSA failure with whole pelvic irradiation for high-risk prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the impact of whole pelvic irradiation on the risk of PSA failure in prostate cancer patients, at high predicted risk for lymph node involvement, receiving definitive radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between October 1987 and December 1995, 506 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer were treated with definitive radiotherapy at UCSF and affiliated institutions. Treatment consisted of 4-field whole pelvic irradiation followed by a prostate-only boost, or prostate-only treatment (median follow-up was 35 months and 30 months, respectively). PSA failure was defined as: 1. a PSA value > or = 1 ng/ml; or 2. a PSA value that rose > or = 0.5 ng/ml in < or = 1 year posttreatment on two consecutive measurements, with the first rise defined as the time of failure. The calculated risk of lymph node positivity (%rLN+) was defined as 2/3(iPSA) + 10(GS-6), and high risk was defined as %rLN+ > or = 15%. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 201 high-risk patients were identified. High-risk patients who received whole pelvic irradiation had significantly improved freedom from PSA failure compared to those who received prostate-only treatment (median PFS = 34.3 months vs. 21.0 months; p = 0.0001). Potential confounding variables, including initial PSA, Gleason score, T stage, radiation dose, year of treatment, use of three-dimensional (3D) conformal techniques, and use of hormone therapy, did not account for the observed difference in time to PSA failure. Multivariate analysis revealed type of radiation treatment to be the most significant independent predictor of outcome. CONCLUSION: Whole pelvic radiotherapy significantly improves the PSA failure-free survival in patients with a high calculated risk of lymph node positivity.

Results and prognostic factors in the retreatment of locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To review the results and evaluate the prognostic factors in the retreatment of locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We reviewed the records of 74 patients with locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated at the University of California, San Francisco between 1957 and 1995. The histologic types included squamous cell carcinoma in 6 (8.1%), nonkeratinizing carcinoma in 48 (64.9%), and undifferentiated carcinoma in 20 (27%) cases. The site of recurrence was in the primary in 46 (62.2%), in the neck nodes in 20 (27%), and in both sites in 8 (10.8%) patients. The recurrent disease was Stage I in 10 (13.5%), Stage II in 16 (21.6%), Stage III in 20 (27%), and Stage IV in 28 (37.9%) patients. Thirty-seven (50%) patients developed recurrence within 2 years and 58 (78.4%) within 5 years after initial treatment. Radiotherapeutic techniques used in the retreatment of primary recurrence consisted of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), intracavitary brachytherapy, heavy-charged particle beam, and gamma knife, alone or in combination. Reirradiation doses ranged from 18 to 108 Gy, with a median dose of 60 Gy. Treatment of recurrent neck nodes consisted of radical neck dissection (RND) +/- intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT), or EBRT +/- hyperthermia, or chemotherapy +/- hyperthermia. Chemotherapy was used in 22 (30%) patients. Median follow-up was 20 months (range: 2 to 308 months). RESULTS: The 3-, 5-, and 10-year actuarial overall survival following retreatment were 49, 37, 18%, respectively. Thirty-six patients (49%) were free of further local-regional recurrence after retreatment. The 3-, 5-, and 10-year local-regional progression-free rates were 52, 40, and 38%, respectively. On univariate analysis, histologic type (p < 0.0001), interval to recurrence (p = 0.034), and treatment modality for early-stage disease (p = 0.01) were significant prognostic factors for overall survival, with age being marginally significant (p = 0.053). For local-regional progression-free rate, only histology was significant (p = 0.035). On multivariate analysis, age (p = 0.026), histology (p = 0.015), and interval to recurrence (p = 0.030) were significant for overall survival, and only histology (p = 0.002) and presence of complications (p = 0.016) were significant for local-regional progression-free rate. Of the 64 reirradiated patients, late complications were documented in 29 (45%) patients. The late complications were permanent in 21 (33%) and severe in 15 (23%) patients. CONCLUSION: Retreatment using radiotherapy alone or in combination with other treatment modalities can achieve long-term local-regional control and survival in a substantial proportion of patients with locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Age, histology, and interval to recurrence were independent prognostic factors for overall survival, but only histology and presence of complications were significant for local-regional progression-free rate.

Gamma knife radiosurgery for malignant melanoma brain metastases.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of gamma knife radiosurgery in the treatment of melanoma metastases to the brain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 55 patients with single or multiple intracranial melanoma metastases treated at the University of California, San Francisco, with gamma knife radiosurgery from 1991 through 1995. Sixteen patients were treated with gamma knife radiosurgery for recurrence following previous radiation therapy, 11 received radiosurgery as a boost to whole-brain radiation therapy, and 28 had radiosurgery alone for initial management of brain metastases. The median minimum radiosurgery tumor dose for 140 treated lesions was 19 Gy (range, 10-22 Gy) prescribed at the 35% to 90% isodose contour (median, 50%). The median total target volume per patient was 6.1 cc (range, 0.25-28.3 cc). RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 75 weeks in living patients, the median survival times were 35 weeks overall: 35 weeks for patients with solitary metastases versus 33 weeks for those with multiple metastases. A factor that was significant in univariate analysis of survival was total target volume treated. This parameter remained significant on multivariate analysis. The actuarial median freedom from progression analyzed by lesion for 113 lesions in 46 patients with imaging follow-up was 89 weeks with 6-month and 1-year actuarial freedom from progression rates of 89% (95% confidence interval, 80%-95%) and 77% (95% confidence interval, 62%-87%). In univariate analysis, improved freedom from progression was associated with smaller target volume treated, smaller maximum diameter, or higher prescribed dose. Four patients (7%) developed acute Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grade > or = 2 morbidity, and five patients (9%) developed late grade > or = 2 morbidity. DISCUSSION: Median survival and freedom from progression in patients treated with radiosurgery for melanoma metastatic to the brain are comparable to results in published radiosurgery series of grouped histologies. For melanoma patients, total intracranial tumor volume appears to be of greater prognostic significance than the absolute number of metastases treated. We conclude that gamma knife radiosurgery is effective and should be considered among various management strategies.

Influence of bromodeoxyuridine radiosensitization on malignant glioma patient survival: a retrospective comparison of survival data from the Northern California Oncology Group (NCOG) and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trials (RTOG) for glioblastoma multiforme and anaplastic astrocytoma.

PURPOSE: To examine the effect of treatment using Bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) during radiation therapy on malignant glioma patient survival by comparing historical survival data from several large clinical trials. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patient data from Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) trials 74-01, 79-18, and 83-02 and the Northern California Oncology Group (NCOG) study 6G-82-1 was conducted. Patient data was supplied by both groups, and analyzed by the RTOG. Pretreatment characteristics including age, extent of surgery, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), and histopathology were collected; the only treatment variable evaluated was the use of BrdU during radiation therapy. Radiation dose, dose-fractionation schedule, use of chemotherapy, and/or type of chemotherapy was not controlled for in the analyses. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to examine the potential treatment effect of BrdU on patient survival. RESULTS: Data from 334 patients treated with BrdU on NCOG 6G-82-1 and 1743 patients treated without BrdU on 3 RTOG studies was received. Patients were excluded from the review if confirmation of eligibility could not be obtained, if the patient was ineligible for the study they entered, if central pathology review was not done, or if radiotherapy data was not available. Patients treated according to the RTOG studies had to start radiotherapy within 4 weeks of surgery; no such restriction existed for the NCOG studies. To ensure comparability between the studies, patients from the NCOG studies who began treatment longer than 40 days from surgery were also excluded. The final data set included 296 cases from the NCOG studies (89%) and 1478 cases from the RTOG studies (85%). For patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) the median survival was 9.8 months in the RTOG studies and 13.0 months in the NCOG trial (p < 0.0001). For patients with AA the median survival was 35.1 months for the RTOG studies and 42.8 months in the NCOG trial (p = 0.126). Univariate results showed consistent results favoring BrdU among patients over 30 years of age, across the extent of surgery, and for GBM patients. A proportional hazards regression model that included treatment, histopathology, KPS, age, and extent of surgery demonstrated that treatment with BrdU was included in the best model only for the GBM group of patients (risk ratio 0.83). CONCLUSIONS: Because of the heterogeneity of the treatment groups, including potentially important differences in pathology reviewers assessment of nonglioblastoma cases, differences in radiation dose and schedules, and chemotherapy during or after radiation, these analyses cannot provide the definitive answer as to whether BrdU given during radiation therapy improves survival in patients with malignant glioma. There does appear to be a favorable treatment effect seen in patients with GBM, with a lesser effect in patients with AA.

Survival benefit of hyperthermia in a prospective randomized trial of brachytherapy boost +/- hyperthermia for glioblastoma multiforme.

PURPOSE: To determine if adjuvant interstitial hyperthermia (HT) significantly improves survival of patients with glioblastoma undergoing brachytherapy boost after conventional radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Adults with newly-diagnosed, focal, supratentorial glioblastoma < or = 5 cm in diameter were registered postoperatively on a Phase II/III randomized trial and treated with partial brain radiotherapy to 59.4 Gy with oral hydroxyurea. Those patients whose tumor was still implantable after teletherapy were randomized to brachytherapy boost (60 Gy at 0.40-0.60 Gy/h) +/- HT for 30 min immediately before and after brachytherapy. Time to progression (TTP) and survival from date of diagnosis were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: From 1990 to 1995, 112 eligible patients were entered in the trial. Patient ages ranged from 21-78 years (median, 54 years) and KPS ranged from 70-100 (median, 90). Most commonly due to tumor progression or patient refusal, 33 patients were never randomized. Of the patients, 39 were randomized to brachytherapy ("no heat") and 40 to brachytherapy + HT ("heat"). By intent to treat, TTP and survival were significantly longer for "heat" than "no heat" (p = 0.04 and p = 0.04). For the 33 "no heat" patients and 35 "heat" patients who underwent brachytherapy boost, TTP and survival were significantly longer for "heat" than "no heat" (p = 0.045 and p = 0.02, respectively; median survival 85 weeks vs. 76 weeks; 2-year survival 31% vs. 15%). A multivariate analysis for these 68 patients adjusting for age and KPS showed that improved survival was significantly associated with randomization to "heat" (p = 0.008; hazard ratio 0.51). There were no Grade 5 toxicities, 2 Grade 4 toxicities (1 on each arm), and 7 Grade 3 toxicities (1 on "no heat" and 6 on the "heat" arm). CONCLUSION: Adjuvant interstitial brain HT, given before and after brachytherapy boost, after conventional radiotherapy significantly improves survival of patients with focal glioblastoma, with acceptable toxicity.

Radiation therapy and hydroxyurea followed by the combination of 6-thioguanine and BCNU for the treatment of primary malignant brain tumors.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to evaluate a combined modality treatment for malignant gliomas using radiation therapy with a radiosensitizer and an adjuvant chemotherapy regimen designed to modify resistance to BNCU. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients were eligible if they were 15 years of age or older, and had newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), or anaplastic glioma (AG). Treatment consisted of external beam radiotherapy given to a dose of 60 Gy using a single daily fraction Monday to Friday. Concurrent hydroxyurea at a dose of 300 mg/m2 every 6 h every other day was given during radiation. Following radiotherapy, patients were then treated with BCNU and 6-Thioguanine (6TG). The 6-TG was given by mouth every 6 h for 12 doses prior to BCNU. Patients were initially treated with 60 mg/m2/dose of 6TG, with escalation to a maximum dose of 100 mg/m2/dose. The primary study end points were time to tumor progression and survival. RESULTS: A total of 245 eligible patients were enrolled from 1/18/88 to 12/26/91. The histologic subtypes included 135 GBM, and 110 with AG (103 with anaplastic astrocytoma, 7 with high-grade mixed oligoastrocytoma). For the GBM group, the median time to tumor progression (TTP) and median survival were 33 (95% CI 26, 39) and 56 (95% CI 49, 69) weeks, respectively. For the AG group the median TTP was 282 weeks (95% lower confidence bound = 155 weeks). Median survival for this group has not been reached (95% lower confidence bound = 284 weeks) with a median follow-up for surviving patients of 298 weeks. A proportional hazards model was used to look at potential prognostic factors for survival, including initial Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), age, and extent of surgery, as well as dose of 6TG. Higher KPS, and lower age, predicted for longer survival (p < 0.01, < 0.001) in GBM patients; lower age was significant (p = 0.05) for AG cases. A higher (greater than 95 mg/m2) or lower dose of 6TG was not statistically significant in this model. CONCLUSIONS: This therapy was no more effective in patients with GBM than other reported series. In patients with malignant gliomas other than GBM, prolonged progression-free and overall survival is noted, without a median survival reached at the time of this report. In this subset of AG patients, survival is comparable to recent studies using halogenated prymidines during radiation and Procarbazine, CCNU, and Vincristine (PCV) as adjuvant chemotherapy.

15 years experience with helium ion radiotherapy for uveal melanoma.

PURPOSE: To review the long-term experience of helium ion therapy as a therapeutic alternative to enucleation for uveal melanoma, particularly with respect to survival, local control, and morbidity. METHODS AND MATERIALS: 347 patients with uveal melanoma were treated with helium ion RT from 1978-1992. A nonrandomized dose-searching study was undertaken, with doses progressively reduced from 80 GyE in five fractions to 48 GyE in four fractions, given in 3-15 days, mean of 7 days. RESULTS: Local control was achieved in 96% of patients, with no difference in the rate of local control being seen at 80, 70, 60, or 50 GyE in five fractions. At the lowest dose level of 48 GyE in four fractions, the local control rate fell to 87%. Fifteen of 347 patients (4%) had local regrowth in the eye requiring enucleation (12 patients), laser (1 patient) or reirradiation (2 patients). The time of appearance of local regrowth ranged from 4 months to 5 years posttreatment, with 85% occurring within 3 years. Of the 347 patients, 208 are alive as of May 1, 1997. The median follow up of all patients is 8.5 years, range 1-17 years. Kaplan-Maier (K-M) survival is 80% at 5 years, 76% at 10 years, and 72% at 15 years posttreatment. Patients with tumors not involving the ciliary body have a 15-year K-M survival of 80%. The results for patients whose tumors involved the ciliary body are poor, with a 15-year K-M survival of 43%. Seventy-five percent of patients with tumors at least 3.0 mm from the fovea and optic nerve, and initial ultrasound height less than 6.0 mm, retained vision of 20/200 or better posttreatment. Patients with tumors larger than 6 mm in thickness, or with tumors lying close to the optic nerve or fovea, have a reduced chance of retaining useful vision. The enucleation rate is 19%, 3% for local failure and 16% because of complications of the helium RT, particularly neovascular glaucoma, which occurred in 35% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Local control and retention of the eye are excellent. Complications of therapy reduce vision and eye preservation. Twenty-four percent of patients manifested distant metastases 6 to 146 months posttreatment, mean of 43 months, median of 36 months. Late-appearing distant metastases do not appear to be caused by persistent tumor in the eye. The risk of metastases is high for patients with tumors greater than 7 mm in initial ultrasound height (37%), anterior tumors involving the ciliary body (47%), and in those with local failure (53%). Patients with tumors not involving the ciliary body and initial dimensions less than 10 mm had only an 8% chance of death from melanoma. A search for effective adjuvant therapy is needed for patients at high risk of metastases (large tumors, ciliary body involved, local regrowth in eye).

Effects of cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents on split-dose repair in intestinal crypt cells.

PURPOSE: Many cancer chemotherapeutic agents interact with radiation to enhance the amount of radiation damage observed in both tumor and normal tissues. It is important to predict this interaction and to determine the effect of drug on sublethal damage repair. To evaluate for effects in rapid renewing normal tissues, the intestinal crypt cell in vivo assay is an excellent one to employ. These studies investigate the effect of eleven cancer chemotherapeutic drugs on split-dose repair in the intestinal crypt cell of the mouse. METHODS AND MATERIALS: LAF1 male mice, age 10-12 weeks, were exposed to whole-body irradiation with orthovoltage x-rays delivered as a single dose or as equally divided doses delivered with intervals between the two exposures of 2 to 24 h. In the experimental group, the cancer chemotherapeutic agent was administered intraperitoneally 2 h before the first radiation dose. At 3.6 days after the second irradiation, the mice were sacrificed; the jejunum was removed, fixed, and sectioned for light microscopy. The number of regenerating crypts were counted and corrected to represent the number of surviving cells per circumference. RESULTS: Of the eleven drugs tested, only carmustine eliminated split-dose repair. Cisplatin delayed repair, and methotrexate caused marked synchronization obliterating the observation of split-dose repair. CONCLUSIONS: Most cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents do not inhibit sublethal damage repair in intestinal crypt cells when given 2 h before the first radiation exposure. Absence of the initial increase in survival seen with split-dose radiation is noted with carmustine and high-dose methotrexate.

Uveal melanoma. Growth rate and prognosis.

OBJECTIVE: To study in vivo tumor growth rates, doubling times, and the association of these parameters with local tumor control and melanoma-related mortality. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed uveal melanomas with documented growth on serial evaluations before treatment. The tumor dimensions were based on clinical measurements for tumor diameters and quantitative echography to determine tumor thickness. One hundred forty-five patients met study criteria. All tumors were initially measured by the same observer with the same techniques, and, in 133 cases, serial observations and treatment were performed at our institution. RESULTS: Tumor-doubling time estimates were log normally distributed, with a median of 1.4 years. Those 13 patients in whom metastases developed tended to have more rapid tumor growth rates. Iodine 125 brachytherapy failed in 8 patients with more rapidly growing tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Faster growing tumors appear to be more likely to develop early metastases and have failure of local radiation control.