Age, admission platelet count, and mortality in severe isolated traumatic brain injury: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: We asked whether patients >50 years of age with acute traumatic brain injury (TBI) present with lower platelet counts and whether lower platelet counts are independently associated with mortality. METHODS: We combined trauma registry and laboratory data on a retrospective cohort of all patients ≥18 years of age admitted to our Level 1 US regional trauma center 2015-2021 with severe (Head Abbreviated Injury Score [AIS] ≥3), isolated (all other AIS <3) TBI who had a first platelet count within 1 h of arrival. Age and platelet count were assessed continuously and as groups (age 18-50 vs. >50, platelet normals, and at conventional transfusion thresholds). Outcomes such as mean admission platelet counts and in-hospital mortality were assessed categorically and with logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 44,056 patients, 1298 (3%, median age: 52 [IQR 33,68], 76.1% male) met all inclusion criteria with no differences between younger and older age groups for (ISS; 18 [14,26] vs. 17 [14,26], p = .22), New ISS (NISS; 29 [19,50] vs. 28 [17,50], p = .36), or AIS-Head (4 [3,5] vs. 4 [3,5]; p = .87). Patients aged >50 had lower admission platelet counts (219,000 ± 93,000 vs. 242,000 ± 76,000/µL; p < .001) and greater in-hospital mortality (24.5% vs. 15.6%, p < .001) than those 18-50. In multivariable regression, firearms injuries (OR9.08), increasing age (OR1.004), NISS (OR1.007), and AIS-Head (OR1.05), and decreasing admission platelet counts (OR0.998) were independently associated with mortality (p < .001-.041). Platelet transfusion in the first 4 h of care was more frequent among older patients (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Older patients with TBI had lower admission platelet counts, which were independently associated with greater mortality.

Drivers of blood use in paediatric trauma: A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: We asked whether age or injury severity drives blood use patterns in paediatric trauma. BACKGROUND: Transfusion for paediatric trauma care is complicated by known developmental differences in coagulation and injury patterns. METHODS/MATERIALS: We linked 10 years of Trauma Registry and blood bank data, 2011-2020, for all acute trauma patients aged <18 treated at a large US Level 1 adult and paediatric trauma centre. We assessed age, injury severity and mechanism for association with any blood use, use within the first 4 h of care, and resuscitation balance, using grouped-age Chi-square and multivariable regression models. RESULTS: Of 60 066 acute trauma arrivals at our centre in the study period, 7979 (13.3%) met inclusion criteria. Median age (IQR) was (7.6[2.4-14.5]); 6230(78.1%) were < 15 years old; 590(7.4%) received any blood products; and 128(1.6%) died. Among the 5842(73.2%) patients with impact-related injury, 2023(34.6%) met standards for severe injury (New Injury Severity Score [NISS] ≥ 16); 541(9.3%) were transfused, 171(31.6%) in the first 4 h and 72(13.3%) using ≥3 units of products in the first hour. Firearms injuries were the most severe, most likely to be transfused urgently, using balanced resuscitation, and to die (p < 0.001 for all). Multivariable logistic regression showed any blood use as strongly associated with NISS (Odds Ratio 1.124832; p < 0.0001; 95% CI 1.11-1.13) but not with age (OR 0.98; p = 0.07; 95% CI 0.96-1.00). CONCLUSION: Transfusion in the care of acute paediatric trauma is uncommon (<10% of injured minors in our cohorts received any blood products), and injury severity, particularly firearms injury-not age-drove transfusion.

Developing a National Trauma Research Action Plan: Results from the acute resuscitation, initial patient evaluation, imaging, and management research gap Delphi survey.

BACKGROUND: Injury is the leading cause of death in patients aged 1 to 45 years and contributes to a significant public health burden for individuals of all ages. To achieve zero preventable deaths and disability after injury, the National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine called for the development of a National Trauma Research Action Plan to improve outcomes for military and civilian trauma patients. Because rapid resuscitation and prompt identification and treatment of injuries are critical in achieving optimal outcomes, a panel of experts was convened to generate high-priority research questions in the areas of acute resuscitation, initial evaluation, imaging, and definitive management on injury. METHODS: Forty-three subject matter experts in trauma care and injury research were recruited to perform a gap analysis of current literature and prioritize unanswered research questions using a consensus-driven Delphi survey approach. Four Delphi rounds were conducted to generate research questions and prioritize them using a 9-point Likert scale. Research questions were stratified as low, medium, or high priority, with consensus defined as ≥60% of panelists agreeing on the priority category. Research questions were coded using a taxonomy of 118 research concepts that were standard across all National Trauma Research Action Plan panels. RESULTS: There were 1,422 questions generated, of which 992 (69.8%) reached consensus. Of the questions reaching consensus, 327 (33.0%) were given high priority, 621 (62.6%) medium priority, and 44 (4.4%) low priority. Pharmaceutical intervention and fluid/blood product resuscitation were most frequently scored as high-priority intervention concepts. Research questions related to traumatic brain injury, vascular injury, pelvic fracture, and venous thromboembolism prophylaxis were highly prioritized. CONCLUSION: This research gap analysis identified more than 300 high-priority research questions within the broad category of Acute Resuscitation, Initial Evaluation, Imaging, and Definitive Management. Research funding should be prioritized to address these high-priority topics in the future.