RESUMO
BackgroundThere is increasing concern that persistent infection of SARS-CoV-2 within immunocompromised hosts could serve as a reservoir for mutation accumulation and subsequent emergence of novel strains with the potential to evade immune responses. MethodsWe describe three patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia who were persistently positive for SARS-CoV-2 by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Viral viability from longitudinally-collected specimens was assessed. Whole-genome sequencing and serological studies were performed to measure viral evolution and evidence of immune escape. FindingsWe found compelling evidence of ongoing replication and infectivity for up to 162 days from initial positive by subgenomic RNA, single-stranded RNA, and viral culture analysis. Our results reveal a broad spectrum of infectivity, host immune responses, and accumulation of mutations, some with the potential for immune escape. InterpretationOur results highlight the need to reassess infection control precautions in the management and care of immunocompromised patients. Routine surveillance of mutations and evaluation of their potential impact on viral transmission and immune escape should be considered. FundingThe work was partially funded by The Saban Research Institute at Childrens Hospital Los Angeles intramural support for COVID-19 Directed Research (X.G. and J.D.B.), the Johns Hopkins Center of Excellence in Influenza Research and Surveillance HHSN272201400007C (A.P.), NIH/NIAID R01AI127877 (S.D.B.), NIH/NIAID R01AI130398 (S.D.B.), NIH 1U54CA260517 (S.D.B.), an endowment to S.D.B. from the Crown Family Foundation, an Early Postdoc.Mobility Fellowship Stipend to O.F.W. from the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF), and a Coulter COVID-19 Rapid Response Award to S.D.B. L.G. is a SHARE Research Fellow in Pediatric Hematology-Oncology.
RESUMO
Testing efforts for SARS-CoV-2 have been burdened by the scarcity of testing materials and personal protective equipment for healthcare workers. The simple and painless process of saliva collection allows for widespread testing, but enthusiasm is hampered by variable performance compared to nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) samples. We prospectively collected paired NPS and saliva samples from a total of 300 unique adult and pediatric patients. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in 32.2% (97/300) of the individuals using the TaqPath COVID-19 Combo Kit (Thermo Fisher). Performance of saliva and NPS were compared against the total number of positives regardless of specimen type. The overall concordance for saliva and NPS was 91.0% (273/300) and 94.7% (284/300), respectively. The positive percent agreement (PPA) for saliva and NPS was 81.4% (79/97) and 89.7% (87/97), respectively. Saliva detected 10 positive cases that were negative by NPS. In symptomatic and asymptomatic pediatric patients not previously diagnosed with COVID-19, the performances of saliva and NPS were comparable (PPA: 82.4% vs 85.3%). The overall PPA for adults were 83.3% and 90.7% for saliva and NPS, respectively, with saliva detecting 4 cases less than NPS. However, saliva performance in symptomatic adults was identical to NPS (PPA of 93.8%). With lower cost and self-collection capabilities, saliva can be an appropriate alternative sample choice to NPS for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in children and adults. SummarySaliva is an acceptable alternative specimen compared to nasopharyngeal swabs for detection of SARS-CoV-2. Specifically, saliva demonstrated comparable performance to nasopharyngeal swabs in symptomatic and asymptomatic pediatric patients and in symptomatic adults.
RESUMO
IntroductionThe progression and severity of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), an infectious disease caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), varies significantly in the population. While the hallmarks of SARS-CoV-2 and severe COVID-19 within routine laboratory parameters are emerging, little is known about the impact of sex and age on these profiles. MethodsWe performed multidimensional analysis of millions of records of laboratory parameters and diagnostic tests for 178,887 individuals, of which 33,266 tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. These included complete blood cell count, electrolytes, metabolites, arterial blood gases, enzymes, hormones, cancer biomarkers, and others. ResultsCOVID-19 induced similar alterations in the laboratory parameters in males compared to females. Biomarkers of inflammation, such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and ferritin, were increased especially in older men with COVID-19, whereas other markers such as abnormal liver function tests were common across several age groups, except for young women. Low peripheral blood basophils and eosinophils were also more common in the elderly with COVID-19. Both male and female COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) displayed alterations in the coagulation system, and higher levels of neutrophils, CRP, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), among others. DiscussionOur study uncovers the laboratory profile of a large cohort of COVID-19 patients that underly discrepancies influenced by aging and biological sex. These profiles directly link COVID-19 disease presentation to an intricate interplay between sex, age and the immune response. One Sentence SummaryBig Data analysis of laboratory results from a large number of COVID-19 patients and controls reveals distinct disease profiles influenced by age and sex which may underly occurrence of severe disease. Key messagesO_ST_ABS- What is the key question?C_ST_ABSLittle is known about the impact of sex and age on the routine laboratory parameters measured in COVID-19 patients. - What is the bottom line?Our in-depth analysis unraveled distinct disease profiles influenced by age and sex which may underly occurrence of severe disease. - Why read on?This work will help physicians to interpret the disease presentation in COIVD-19 patients according to their age and sex.