RESUMO
Background: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) combined immunotherapy has a synergistic effect on patients with stage IV tumors. However, the efficacy and prognostic factors analysis of SBRT combined immunotherapy for patients with pulmonary oligometastases have rarely been reported in the studies. The purpose of this study is to explore the efficacy and prognostic factors analysis of SBRT combined immunotherapy for patients with oligometastatic lung tumors. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 43 patients with advanced tumors who received SBRT combined with immunotherapy for pulmonary oligometastases from October 2018 to October 2021. Local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses of OS were performed using the Cox regression model, and the P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) after SBRT was generated. Spearman correlation analysis was used to determine the relationship of planning target volume (PTV) with absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) before and after SBRT and with neutrophil count (NE) after SBRT. Additionally, linear regression was used to examine the relationship between ALC after SBRT and clinical factors. Results: A total of 43 patients with pulmonary oligometastases receiving SBRT combined with immunotherapy were included in the study. The change in NLR after SBRT was statistically significant (P<0.001). At 1 and 2 years, respectively, the LC rates were 90.3% and 87.5%, the OS rates were 83.46% and 60.99%, and the PFS rates were 69.92% and 54.25%, with a median PFS of 27.00 (17.84-36.13) months. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that a shorter interval between radiotherapy and immunization [≤21 days; hazard ratio (HR) =1.10, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.06-0.89; P=0.02] and a low NLR after SBRT (HR =0.24, 95% CI: 1.01-1.9; P=0.03) were associated with improved OS. The ROC curve identified 4.12 as the cutoff value for predicting OS based on NLR after SBRT. NLR after SBRT ≤4.12 significantly extended OS compared to NLR after SBRT >4.12 (log-rank P=0.001). Spearman correlation analysis and linear regression analysis showed that PTV was negatively correlated with ALC after SBRT. Conclusions: Our preliminary research shows that SBRT combined with immunotherapy has a good effect, and NLR after SBRT is a poor prognostic factor for OS. Larger PTV volume is associated with decreased ALC after SBRT.
RESUMO
N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is one of the most common internal modifications in eukaryotic RNA. The presence of m6A on transcripts can affect a series of fundamental cellular processes, including mRNA splicing, nuclear transportation, stability, and translation. The m6A modification is introduced by m6A methyltransferases (writers), removed by demethylases (erasers), and recognized by m6A-binding proteins (readers). Current research has demonstrated that m6A methylation is involved in the regulation of malignant phenotypes in tumors by controlling the expression of cancer-related genes. Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) are a diverse group of RNA molecules that do not encode proteins and are widely present in the human genome. This group includes microRNAs (miRNAs), long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), circular RNAs (circRNAs), and PIWI interaction RNAs (piRNAs). They function as oncogenes or tumor suppressors through various mechanisms, regulating the initiation and progression of cancer. Previous studies on m6A primarily focused on coding RNAs, but recent discoveries have revealed the significant regulatory role of m6A in ncRNAs. Simultaneously, ncRNAs also exert their influence by modulating the stability, splicing, translation, and other biological processes of m6A-related enzymes. The interplay between m6A and ncRNAs collectively contributes to the occurrence and progression of malignant tumors in humans. This review provides an overview of the interactions between m6A regulatory factors and ncRNAs and their impact on tumors.
RESUMO
Background: Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC) is a rare disease which is highly malignant with a poor prognosis. PSC is highly resistant to chemotherapy and radiotherapy and is prone to recurrence even after surgery. Most of what is known about PSC comes from limited single-center, retrospective studies. There is still no standard international clinical guideline for PSC. Limited case reports have shown that PSC patients with driver gene mutations and high programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression have good responses to molecular targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) immunotherapy, respectively. Therefore, current first-line chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy play a leading role in the diagnosis and treatment of advanced PSC patients. Case Description: We report a 42-year-old male who was diagnosed with PSC [stage IVB (T4N2M1)] and treated at our department (Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University). The initial computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest showed a large mass (159 mm × 112 mm) which on needle biopsy showed sarcomatoid carcinoma histology. The patient received 8 cycles of abraxane plus cisplatin chemotherapy combined with anlotinib and immunotherapy, followed by immunotherapy and anlotinib for >1 year. Finally, the local tumor was well controlled, and no obvious drug-related adverse reactions were observed. The large lesions in the lung remained in complete response for >24 months. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of an advanced PSC patient showing a good response to the treatment consisting of anlotinib combined with sintilimab and platinum-doublet chemotherapy. This case suggests that chemotherapy combined with antiangiogenic therapy and immunotherapy may benefit patients with advanced PSC. Long-term immunotherapy and anlotinib maintenance therapy has been safe and effective in our case. However, randomized controlled clinical studies are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of these treatment options.