Monitoring antimicrobial resistance (AMR) using CUSUM control charts.

We evaluated the use of the Cumulative Summation (CUSUM) control chart methodology for detection of an excessive increase in antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) bacteria acquisition. We used administrative, clinical and bacteriological data from all 157,570 patients hospitalized for at least 48 h from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2015 in a 654-bed university teaching hospital in Paris, France. Monthly computed CUSUM were evaluated for the detection of out-of-control situations, defined as incidence rates of acquired AMR bacterial colonization exceeding acceptable thresholds at the hospital and ward levels (based on six selected wards) for AMR bacteria overall and Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) and Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), specifically. During the study period, 1,403 samples of acquired AMR bacteria were identified including 1,129 ESBL-E and 151 MRSA. The incidence rate of acquired AMR bacteria was stable at the hospital and the wards level. When based on AMR bacteria overall, CUSUM alarms were triggered at the hospital level and at the ward level in four units. For ESBL-E, CUSUM tests generated alarms at the hospital level and for the same four wards, and for MRSA, CUSUM tests detected out-of-control situations in all the wards. The CUSUM approach appears complementary with hospital infection control strategies currently in practice and appears of interest in common practice as a simple tool for AMR surveillance.

[Seasonal influenza vaccination coverage of general practitioners and their patients. Practice survey of French general practitioners after vaccination campaign 2011-2012]. / Couverture par le vaccin de la grippe saisonnière des médecins généralistes et de leurs patients. Enquête de pratique auprès de médecins généralistes français après la campagne de vaccination 2011-2012.

BACKGROUND: In France, vaccination coverage against seasonal influenza for risk groups was inadequate: 55.2% of people aged 65 and older, and 33% of the 16-64 year group with chronic targeted disorders were vaccinated in March 2012. Three quarters of general practitioners were vaccinated. Our objective was to estimate the influence of the vaccination status of general practitioners on vaccine coverage of their patients at risk. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent in March 2012 to a sample of 500 general practitioners. Their professional characteristics, vaccination status against seasonal influenza and the determinants of these vaccinations were collected and compared to the vaccine coverage of their patients obtained from the French healthcare fund. RESULTS: Self-reported vaccination coverage of the 225 general practitioners respondents was 81.3%. There was a positive correlation with age greater than 50 years, high activity level, rural practice and the absence of particular mode of exercise. The doctors wanted to be vaccinated to protect themselves and protect their patients or their family. Of the 42 doctors unvaccinated, 42.5% feared the side effects of the vaccine, 40% considered influenza to be a benign illness and 32.5% considered low risk of catching or spreading it. The vaccination rate for patients aged 65 and older was 62.3% among 147 doctors vaccinated versus 58.3% in unvaccinated 31 physicians (P<0.0001). These rates were 39% versus 36.7% (P=0.29) for patients with chronic targeted disorders. CONCLUSION: This study shows a positive association between the reported vaccination of general practitioners and effective influenza vaccination of their patients aged 65 years and older. This result is less clear for patients with chronic targeted disorders. All this findings argue in favor of promoting seasonal influenza vaccination among general practitioners.

[Statistical and epidemiological methods used in biomedical research: implications for initial medical education]. / Méthodes biostatistiques et épidémiologiques employées pour la recherche biomédicale : implications pour la formation médicale initiale.

BACKGROUND: The main source of key medical information consists in original articles published in peer-reviewed biomedical journals. Reported studies use increasingly sophisticated statistical and epidemiological approaches that first require a solid understanding of core methods. However, such understanding is not widely shared among physicians. Our aim was to assess whether the basic statistical and epidemiological methods used in original articles published in general biomedical journals are taught during the first years of the medical curriculum in France. METHODS: We selected original articles published in The New England Journal of Medicine, The Lancet, and The Journal of the American Medical Association, over a period of six months in 2007 and in 2008. A standardized statistical content checklist was used to extract the necessary information in the "Abstract", "Methods", "Results", footnotes of tables, and legends of figures. The methods used in the selected articles were compared to the national program and the public health program of biostatistics and epidemiology taught during the first six years of medical school. RESULTS: The 237 analyzed original articles all used at least one statistical or epidemiological method. Descriptive statistics, confidence interval and Chi(2) or Fisher tests, methods used in more than 50% of articles, were repeatedly taught throughout the medicine curriculum. Measures of association, sample size, fit and Kaplan-Meier method, used in 40 to 50% of articles, were specifically taught during training sessions on critical reading methods. Cox model (41% of articles) and logistic regression (24% of articles) were never taught. The most widely used illustrations, contingency tables (92%) and flowcharts (48%), were not included in the national program. CONCLUSION: More teaching of the core methods underlying the understanding of sophisticated methods and illustrations should be included in the early medical curriculum so that physicians can read the scientific literature critically for their medical education.

[The role of a hospital-based registry of a regional cancer center for a population-based cancer registry]. / Intérêt des données du registre hospitalier (Enquête permanente cancer) d'un centre régional de lutte contre le cancer pour un registre de cancer en population.

BACKGROUND: Hospital-based cancer registries (HBR) of Comprehensive cancer centers (CCC) named "Enquête permanente cancer (EPC)" could represent an important information source of data for a population-based cancer registry (PBR). The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the concordance between data from HBR of the CCC for regions of Bordeaux and South-Western France and data from PBR of the General cancer registry of Gironde and the completeness for the year 2005, in order to explore the possibility for immediate integration of data collected by the HBR in the database of the PBR and to reduce the systematic consultation of medical records for cancer cases notified by the HBR. METHODS: We estimated the proportion of concordant cases between the HBR and the PBR and the unweighted and weighted Cohen's Kappa coefficient for certain variables. RESULTS: Among 1151 cases notified by the HBR, 1095 (positive predictive value of HBR: 95%) were included in the PBR database. For these admissible cases, sex, birth date and place for residence postal code at diagnosis were concordant in more than 94%. Concordance of cancer incidence date was 50% but difference between two dates was lower than 1 month in 91% of cases. Concordance of cancer topography and morphology was respectively 72% and 78%. Cancer progression, estimated by TNM classification was concordant in 96% of cases. The Kappa coefficient was 0.95 for pT, and respectively 0.92 for pN and M. CONCLUSION: Automatic data integration from the HBR database to the PBR database without consulting medical record will be possible in Gironde. But, topography and morphology will be systematically recoded using pathologist records. And, if cancer progression (coded by TNM classification) is missing in the HBR database, medical records will be consulted in order to complete this data in the PBR database.

Pressure-controlled ventilation and intrabronchial pressure during one-lung ventilation.

BACKGROUND: Pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) has been suggested to reduce peak airway pressure (P(peak)) and intrapulmonary shunt during one-lung ventilation (OLV) when compared with volume-controlled ventilation (VCV). At the same tidal volume (V(T)), the apparent difference in P(peak) is mainly related to the presence of a double-lumen tracheal tube. We tested the hypothesis that the decrease in P(peak) observed in the breathing circuit is not necessarily associated with a decrease in the bronchus of the dependent lung. METHODS: This observational study included 15 consecutive subjects who were ventilated with VCV followed by PCV at constant V(T). Airway pressure was measured simultaneously in the breathing circuit and main bronchus of the dependent lung after 20 min of ventilation. RESULTS: PCV induced a significant decrease in P(peak) [mean (sd)] measured in the breathing circuit [36 (4) to 26 (3) cm H(2)0, P<0.0001] and in the bronchus [23 (4) to 22 (3) cm H(2)O, P=0.01]. However, the interaction (ventilatory mode x site of measurement) revealed that the decrease in P(peak) was significantly higher in the circuit (P<0.0001). Although the mean percentage decrease in P(peak) was significant at both sites, the decrease was significantly lower in the bronchus [5 (6)% vs 29 (3)%, P<0.0001]. CONCLUSIONS: During PCV for OLV, the decrease in P(peak) is observed mainly in the respiratory circuit and is probably not clinically relevant in the bronchus of the dependent lung. This challenges the common clinical perception that PCV offers an advantage over VCV during OLV by reducing bronchial P(peak).