New Graduate Respiratory Therapists' Perceptions of Their Transition to Practice.

BACKGROUND: The emerging challenges in the healthcare system require a vision for the future of respiratory care to ensure a successful transition to practice for new graduate respiratory therapists (RT). The nursing profession has recognized the need to acknowledge the successes and failures of graduates' transition to practice so that these programs can be continuously improved. The challenge is in identifying aspects of the transition to practice that may improve job satisfaction, retention, professional development, and patient care for RTs. This research aimed to explore the perceptions of new graduate RTs' experiences during their first year of practice and identify barriers and facilitators to a successful transition to practice. METHODS: This qualitative descriptive study surveyed new graduate RTs who transitioned to practice from May 2019 to December 2021 at a New England academic medical center respiratory care department. RESULTS: Twenty-eight new graduate RTs responses were included in the study. The majority of the respondents experienced a successful transition to practice; however, they faced many barriers. New graduate RTs reported that their orientation did not provide enough experience and exposure to gain confidence in critical skills and procedures. They also experienced stress due to COVID-19 and interpersonal relationships, felt overwhelmed by their workload, and were subject to negative workplace behavior. CONCLUSIONS: New graduate RTs experienced many barriers to their transition to practice. Respiratory care leadership should identify barriers faced by new graduate RTs during their transition to practice. A nurse residency model may provide a framework for RT transition-to-practice programs. Improving transition-to-practice programs for new graduate RTs and surveying their experiences may lead to an increase in job satisfaction, retention, and improved patient care.

Albuterol delivery via tracheostomy tube.

HYPOTHESIS: Albuterol delivery through a tracheostomy tube is affected by device (nebulizer vs metered-dose inhaler), interface (mask vs T-piece), bias flow, and humidification. METHODS: A lift bar was placed between the chambers of a dual-chambered lung model such that a ventilator triggered simulated spontaneous breathing at a rate of 20 breaths/min, tidal volume of 0.4 L, and inspiratory-expiratory ratio of 1:2. An 8-mm inner diameter cuffed tracheostomy tube was placed through a semi-circular model that simulated a patient's neck. Four conditions of gas flow and humidification were used for the nebulizer experiments: heated aerosol (approximately 30 L/min, approximately 30 degrees C), heated humidity (approximately 30 L/min, approximately 30 degrees C), high flow without added humidity (approximately 30 L/min), or a nebulizer attached to the tracheostomy tube without additional flow. The nebulizer was filled with 4 mL that contained 2.5 mg of albuterol, and operated at 8 L/min. The nebulizer was tested with a T-piece or tracheostomy mask. For the metered-dose inhaler experiments, a spacer was used and actuation of the inhaler (100 microg per actuation) was synchronized with inhalation (4 actuations separated by > or = 15 s). When the spacer was used without additional flow, a valved T-piece was used with a 1-way valve placed either proximal or distal to the spacer. A filter was attached between the lung model and the distal end of the tracheostomy tube. Albuterol washed from the filter was measured by ultraviolet spectrophotometry. RESULTS: For the nebulizer, the most efficient delivery was with no flow other than that to power the nebulizer and with a T-piece (p < 0.001). The most efficient method for aerosol delivery was metered-dose inhaler with a valved T-piece and placement of the 1-way valve in the proximal position (p < 0.001). The effect of humidity was unclear from the results of this study. CONCLUSIONS: Albuterol delivery via tracheostomy was affected by the delivery device (nebulizer vs inhaler), bias gas flow, and the patient interface.